Package Details: kata-ksm-throttler 1.11.3-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/kata-containers.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: kata-containers
Description: Lightweight virtual machines for containers
Upstream URL: https://katacontainers.io/
Licenses: Apache
Submitter: kshlm
Maintainer: zer0def
Last Packager: zer0def
Votes: 5
Popularity: 0.34
First Submitted: 2018-07-11 14:57
Last Updated: 2020-09-10 04:02

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

zer0def commented on 2020-08-28 07:50

As a person not associated with the project, at this point I have no idea. I'll chalk it up to the same uncertainty as with the release timing.

Thanks for linking to the documentation, it'll probably need a bit of expanding for Podman, as well, but looks like a good starting point.

Svenstaro commented on 2020-08-28 06:13

Thanks for your take on this. I'm also curious: Do you happen to know whether kata packaging is going to be drastically different for version 2 or whether it'll be mostly the same?

Basically, would it be useful/wise to even officially package kata 1?

About the wiki page: Thanks! That'd be a good first step for making kata on Arch quite a bit more approachable. I suppose it could borrow a lot from https://github.com/kata-containers/documentation/blob/master/install/docker/debian-docker-install.md

zer0def commented on 2020-08-28 06:03

If Kata's tag history is any guidance, the closest one can get to measurable anticipation of a stable release is about 2 weeks to a month after upstream posts an RC and since there is none for 2.0, nobody knows for sure.

The other thing is Kata's (optional from a package maintenance standpoint) support for other hypervisors - as of the time of writing, Firecracker and Cloud-Hypervisor, whose adoption would provide a more complete scope of software's possibilities.

As for the Wiki article - that's largely dependent on the time budget I'll end up having left and the time frame it'd have to fit in, but I'll give it a shot.

Svenstaro commented on 2020-08-28 04:56

I'm potentially interested in maintaining this set of packages in [community] as I think this could be pretty cool for infra stuff. However, I'm curious as to whether we should wait for kata 2? Also, would you be interested in writing a Kata Containers ArchWiki article perhaps?

zer0def commented on 2019-12-11 13:11

Thanks psYchotic.

psYchotic commented on 2019-12-11 12:27

Bump version to 1.9.3-8.1: https://git.sr.ht/~otaconix/aur-kata-containers/commit/ba45411116334eff6b760b0cebb45e91223d258e

zer0def commented on 2019-09-26 19:31

@kshlm yup, just drop in kata = ["/usr/bin/kata-runtime"] under the [runtimes] section in /etc/containers/libpod.conf (example file in /usr/share/containers/libpod.conf), run podman -ti --runtime=kata alpine:edge /bin/sh and it Just Works™.

zer0def commented on 2019-09-24 21:46

From a brief skim, if podman is as drop-in as it claims, it shouldn't be too difficult to point it to another runtime, like Kata.

kshlm commented on 2019-09-23 09:49

Thanks again for the patch zer0def. I've updated to 1.8.2.

I've moved to using podman over docker, and no longer use kata-containers. I'm orphaning this package,

zer0def commented on 2019-09-22 19:16

1.8.0 to 1.8.2 bump: https://github.com/zer0def/PKGBUILDs/commit/7a0cc30e2e5b4773ed3acf72ec27f564623eebf1.patch