Package Details: kde-cdemu-manager 0.5-3

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: kde-cdemu-manager
Description: KDE CDEmu Manager is a simple frontend for CDEmu.
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: ReNoM
Maintainer: ReNoM
Last Packager: ReNoM
Votes: 55
Popularity: 0.046612
First Submitted: 2009-03-29 11:19
Last Updated: 2015-06-08 17:14

Latest Comments

valentin.brasov commented on 2016-03-28 18:55


Fixed during installing by choosing to edit the PKGBUILD and added () to the license line as follows:


valentin.brasov commented on 2016-03-28 18:51

It does not install:

kde-cdemu-manager 0.5-3 (2015-06-08 17:14)
( Unsupported package: Potentially dangerous ! )
==> Edit PKGBUILD ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort)
==> ------------------------------------
==> n

==> kde-cdemu-manager dependencies:
- kdelibs (already installed)
- cdemu-daemon>=2.0 (already installed)
- cmake (already installed) [makedepend]
- automoc4 (already installed) [makedepend]

==> Continue building kde-cdemu-manager ? [Y/n]
==> -------------------------------------------
==> y

==> Building and installing package
==> ERROR: license should be an array
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build kde-cdemu-manager.
==> Restart building kde-cdemu-manager ? [y/N]
==> ------------------------------------------

sl1pkn07 commented on 2013-10-18 17:40

kbuildsycoca4(30905) KConfigGroup::readXdgListEntry: List entry Actions in "ServiceMenus/kde_cdemu_mount.desktop" is not compliant with XDG standard (missing trailing semicolon).


ReNoM commented on 2013-09-03 07:00

Vindex17, fixed.

Vindex17 commented on 2013-09-02 07:34

Can you please change
"cd $startdir/src/kde_cdemu"
"cd $srcdir/kde_cdemu" ?
The use of the startdir variable is deprecated and it doesn't even compile for me because of that

shaumux commented on 2013-01-19 21:43

wasn't working for me so i updated it.
Now its working, tested with pacaur.
Here's the updated PKGBUILD:

ReNoM commented on 2013-01-17 06:24

updated to 0.5.

alieno commented on 2013-01-13 17:04

KDE CDEmu 0.5 is out

Blissfull commented on 2012-12-31 01:11

You probably shouldn't update the PKGBUILD to work ONLY with something from testing. Providing an alternate in the comments for the testers is sufficient IMO.

Blissfull commented on 2012-12-31 01:07

You probably shouldn't update the PKGBUILD to pull a dependency from testing, for those of use who are using testing.

All comments