Package Details: kodi-devel-eventclients 17.4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/kodi-devel.git (read-only)
Package Base: kodi-devel
Description: Kodi Event Clients
Upstream URL: http://kodi.tv
Keywords: kodi kodi-devel
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: kodi-eventclients
Submitter: alucryd
Maintainer: MarcinWieczorek
Last Packager: MarcinWieczorek
Votes: 23
Popularity: 0.003357
First Submitted: 2014-08-11 23:33
Last Updated: 2017-09-05 21:11

Dependencies (49)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

ArnaudNux commented on 2017-09-03 21:10

checking for main in -lgpg-error... yes
checking for gcry_control in -lgcrypt... yes
checking for gnutls... yes
checking for main in -lbz2... yes
checking for main in -lpthread... yes
checking for pthread_setname_np in -lpthread... yes
checking for main in -llzo2... yes
checking for main in -lz... yes
checking for main in -lcrypto... yes
checking for main in -lssl... yes
checking for main in -lmysqlclient... yes
checking for tinyxml >= 2.6.2... yes
checking for uuid... yes
checking "for libcrossguid"... configure: error: crossguid not found
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build kodi-devel.
==> Restart building kodi-devel ? [y/N]

cudencuden commented on 2017-01-01 23:01

do you do release candidates? if yes see https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/archive/17.0rc2-Krypton.tar.gz

cudencuden commented on 2016-12-19 20:26

hello, Krypton beta 7 is out. https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/archive/17.0b7-Krypton.tar.gz

MarcinWieczorek commented on 2016-12-03 18:39

Why did you create kodi-pre-release then?
I'm updating ATM.
Anyone wants to help me with the flags or should I just copy them from the original package?

graysky commented on 2016-12-02 22:39

I bumped https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kodi-pre-release/ to b6. AUR has some redundant packages.

cudencuden commented on 2016-12-02 22:25

hello, Krypton beta 6 is out.

MarcinWieczorek commented on 2016-10-29 21:12

I've checked them out already. Anyone wants to discuss that? I don't think there are reasons for -devel to use different flags, are there?

graysky commented on 2016-10-29 20:57

Not sure what to talk about... I would suggest modeling the configure options off the official package.

MarcinWieczorek commented on 2016-10-29 20:26

Well, that's must have been added by previous maintainers.
Could you please send me an email so we can talk about upgrading the package?

graysky commented on 2016-10-29 20:21

@Marcin - Why are you compiling with --disable-optimization?

All comments