Search Criteria
Package Details: kpeoplevcard-git 0.1.r164.g6d9178d-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/kpeoplevcard-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | kpeoplevcard-git |
Description: | Expose VCard contacts to KPeople |
Upstream URL: | https://kde.org |
Licenses: | GPL |
Conflicts: | kpeoplevcard |
Provides: | kpeoplevcard |
Submitter: | rhssk |
Maintainer: | N0tACyb0rg |
Last Packager: | N0tACyb0rg |
Votes: | 1 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2020-04-27 23:05 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-06-04 00:03 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- kcontacts5
- kpeople5AUR
- extra-cmake-modules (extra-cmake-modules-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
Required by (1)
- plasma-phonebook (requires kpeoplevcard)
Latest Comments
zwastik commented on 2020-04-30 23:06 (UTC)
:: Installing repository dependencies for kdeconnect-git:
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
Packages (4) docbook-xsl-1.79.2-5 extra-cmake-modules-5.69.0-1 kdoctools-5.69.0-1 kpeoplevcard-0.1-1
Total Installed Size: 29.78 MiB
:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] Y
(4/4) checking keys in keyring [#####################################################] 100% (4/4) checking package integrity [#####################################################] 100% (4/4) loading package files [#####################################################] 100% (4/4) checking for file conflicts [#####################################################] 100% error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
kpeoplevcard: /usr/lib/cmake/KF5PeopleVCard/KF5PeopleVCardConfig.cmake exists in filesystem (owned by kpeople-vcard-git)
kpeoplevcard: /usr/lib/qt/plugins/kpeople/datasource/KPeopleVCard.so exists in filesystem (owned by kpeople-vcard-git)
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
rhssk commented on 2020-04-27 23:08 (UTC)
Sounds reasonable
jclds139 commented on 2020-04-27 21:05 (UTC)
Since the repo version doesn't have the
-
in it (justkpeoplevcard
), shouldn't this match? Or, at least, shouldn't this conflict with the repo version? Right now it doesn't because of that name difference.