Search Criteria
Package Details: lacuna-webpki 2.15.0-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/lacuna-webpki.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | lacuna-webpki |
| Description: | The Lacuna WebPKI native application. An easy solution for using digital certificates in Web applications. |
| Upstream URL: | https://lacunasoftware.com |
| Licenses: | unknown |
| Submitter: | gcangussu |
| Maintainer: | gcangussu (ayr-ton, pedrohqb) |
| Last Packager: | ayr-ton |
| Votes: | 4 |
| Popularity: | 0.004287 |
| First Submitted: | 2019-10-21 02:40 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-06-23 15:44 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- icu (icu-gitAUR)
- xdg-utils (busking-gitAUR, xdg-utils-slockAUR, mimiAUR, mimi-gitAUR, openerAUR, mimejs-gitAUR, xdg-utils-mimeoAUR, xdg-utils-gitAUR)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
msteles commented on 2026-06-23 21:37 (UTC)
Thank you. I rebuilt it again from scratch and this time the checksum validation passed successfully:
setup-deb-64 ... Passedlacuna-webpki 2.15.0-1 is now installed correctly on my system. I’m not sure what caused the previous mismatch, since I had already cleaned the cache before, but it seems to be resolved now.
ayr-ton commented on 2026-06-23 21:24 (UTC)
==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha512sums... setup-deb-64 ... Passed
I couldn't reproduce the checksum error locally from the build I pushed yesterday for 2.15.0-1
msteles commented on 2026-06-23 19:17 (UTC)
Thanks for checking. I will wait for the AUR package update.
One thing worth verifying: the checksum I get is the same one previously used for 2.14.2. So it may be worth confirming whether the upstream file for 2.15.0 is actually the new 2.15.0 binary, or whether the server/CDN is still serving the older 2.14.2 file.
pedrohqb commented on 2026-06-23 19:07 (UTC)
@msteles, thank you, I will update it ASAP. You just have to change the checksum for the proper one.
msteles commented on 2026-06-23 18:53 (UTC)
Checksum verification fails for 2.15.0-1.
After removing the Pamac build cache for this package and trying again with a clean build directory, makepkg still fails:
==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha512sums... setup-deb-64 ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
The SHA-512 I get for the downloaded setup-deb-64 is:
9f0eac67622d8bd5bbc87f9f09c7cc488f16f14cfcb91f72636ca55a852e1d74be55326ac1a9bcd7e02b0db95ef3c87450ef68f1ba85c8344326fb8a1730cd00
This appears to be the same checksum previously used for 2.14.2, while the current PKGBUILD for 2.15.0 expects:
e70b1220cb4fec43195ddfddbfc4bdd395c09a51fe913348f90d38592b657bbe9f4259a630f134f8e282542ab692dcb97dd0507175e74dd18d1b906c61b465ae
Could you please verify whether the upstream 2.15.0 file was replaced, is redirecting to the old 2.14.2 file, or whether the checksum/package version needs to be corrected?
Given the recent AUR security issues, I did not use --skipchecksums.
sauloarth commented on 2024-03-09 10:18 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-09 10:18 (UTC) by sauloarth)
got the following
´´´==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!´´´
jolitp commented on 2023-05-03 23:26 (UTC)
got the following error after trying to install, and after updating system too
how do I fix this problem?
pedrohqb commented on 2023-02-22 02:21 (UTC)
Updated and works as expected. Thank you!
pedrohqb commented on 2023-02-20 16:30 (UTC)
The package is outdated and it is no longer "data.tar.xz", but rather "data.zst".
ayr-ton commented on 2022-09-02 14:28 (UTC)
Updated to 2.12.1 and confirmed it's working as expected with Google Chrome 105.0.5195.52. Best!
1 2 Next › Last »