Package Details: latex-template-springer 20180122-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: latex-template-springer
Description: Springer templates for LNCS proceedings (llncs), monographs (svmono), multiauthor volumes (svmult), journals (svjour3), and other lecture notes (svmultln)
Upstream URL:
Conflicts: latex-template-lncs
Provides: latex-template-lncs
Replaces: latex-template-lncs
Submitter: shtrom
Maintainer: shtrom
Last Packager: shtrom
Votes: 15
Popularity: 0.000002
First Submitted: 2009-05-08 04:08
Last Updated: 2018-11-13 09:41

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

sebstar commented on 2016-04-28 16:59

Please use md5sums or even better sha1sums! All download links point to insecure plain-text ftp or http resources. This is REALLY dangerous! Also, checksum generation now happens automatically:

XavierCLL commented on 2014-05-11 17:01

please links to download:

==> ERROR: Failure while downloading

shtrom commented on 2013-09-19 08:51

Yeah, I sometimes think that Springer does not really want these classes to be usable...

gbc921 commented on 2013-09-19 03:16

In fact, I did not notice this. I remember to have searched for splncs, but I probably was too tired to take a careful looking at the find output.

You are right, the default ones are completely fine. I'm just curious about the naming convention of "splncs" file. Why it has the 03 at the end? (Then one needs to use it on "\bibliographystyle{splncs03}" as well, making things kinda difficult to guess).


shtrom commented on 2013-09-19 01:12

Aren't the bibliography styles by default in LaTeX?

I now use BibLaTeX


and I have the feeling I was using default BibTeX styles before.

Or not. I also notice that this package already includes some BSTs:

latex-template-springer/pkg/latex-template-springer/usr/share/texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/springer$ ls
spbasic.bst splncs03.bst spmpsci.bst spphys.bst

Isn't this sufficient? Or should they be located somewhere else?

gbc921 commented on 2013-09-14 20:56

I think the bibliography styles should also be installed with this package, as the default publication style, in most cases, are the ones that cames with the default template used, right?


shtrom commented on 2013-09-12 03:23

Now using SKIP everywhere as suggested by aksr.

gbc921 commented on 2013-09-12 02:04

MD5SUM from changed again. Should be:



shtrom commented on 2013-05-13 03:17

Oh, I wasn't aware of that!

I'll propagate this as the next MD5sum fail (please keep reporting them in the meantime).


Anonymous comment on 2012-05-29 10:09

Unfortunately for one of the provided zips the md5sums are not valid:

"==> Validating source files with md5sums... ... Passed ... FAILED

and from time to time also for
" ... FAILED"

checking with md5sum I am getting:
> md5sum

and as far as I understand the PKGBUILD has for these files: