Package Details: ledger-live-bin 1.6.0-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: ledger-live-bin
Description: Ledger Hardware Wallet management software
Upstream URL:
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: DescartesHorse
Maintainer: DescartesHorse
Last Packager: DescartesHorse
Votes: 14
Popularity: 1.016926
First Submitted: 2018-07-10 01:52
Last Updated: 2019-03-21 12:25

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

Cpt_Pi commented on 2019-04-17 07:01

I've updated the PKGBUILD and put it in my github gist.

Please update this PKGBUILD

DescartesHorse commented on 2019-03-14 04:22

Hi sebstar - first up, no worries! Happy to help :) As for your suggestion, I considered this, however as I'm not an "upstream" maintainer, I figured it doesn't make sense (all I'd be doing is certifying that the file that I retrieved from upstream is the same as the file you retrieved from upstream, and this is certified by the hash as well). In regard to confirming that the hash hasn't been tampered with, I am already signing every git commit I do to this repository.

The best would be if Ledger themselves signed their releases, however, in the absence of this, do you see any benefit to signing the files with my key vs. signing the repo? Thanks!

sebstar commented on 2019-03-13 18:30

Thanks for the package! Would be great if you could additionally PGP-sign the source files for heightened security.

DescartesHorse commented on 2018-12-24 13:03

I'll make them optdepends as we have a few folks with different experiences; I also don't need those libs (and also i3), but understand that other DE's may require them. Thanks @trulex

polyzen commented on 2018-12-23 19:14

I'm not using a DE, just i3.

trulex commented on 2018-12-23 19:03

I reproduced this twice on a fresh Plasma installation. Maybe other DEs provide the dependencies in other packages

polyzen commented on 2018-12-23 18:54

FWIW I don't have lib32-gtk2 (or any multilib packages) installed.

trulex commented on 2018-12-23 15:22

Doesn't start without multilib/lib32-gtk2, extra/gconf

DescartesHorse commented on 2018-12-06 02:52

@alaskanarcher - I wasn't aware the ledger-udev package existed :) Makes more sense to go with this option as it appears to be regularly updated by "quest". I'll switch it over but not bump package version for now (no sense in a rebuild when functionality is the same). Cheers for pointing it out.

andykluger commented on 2018-12-06 02:24

I was the one who suggested btchip-udev, and I didn't know ledger-udev existed.