Package Details: lib32-essentia-acousticbrainz 2.1_beta2-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/essentia-acousticbrainz.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: essentia-acousticbrainz
Description: audio analysis and audio-based music information retrieval (binary for acousticbrainz)
Upstream URL: https://acousticbrainz.org/download
Licenses: AGPL
Conflicts: essentia-acousticbrainz
Provides: essentia-acousticbrainz
Submitter: JonnyJD
Maintainer: JonnyJD (Freso)
Last Packager: Freso
Votes: 7
Popularity: 0.003226
First Submitted: 2014-10-21 00:55 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2019-03-17 02:57 (UTC)

Latest Comments

doppelhelix commented on 2022-07-18 07:29 (UTC)

Metabrainz dicontinued the project. Downloads are disabled. See https://acousticbrainz.org/download and https://community.metabrainz.org/t/acousticbrainz-making-a-hard-decision-to-end-the-project/572828

PaNaVTEC commented on 2019-03-16 22:08 (UTC)

Does not work, the links seems to be down

JonnyJD commented on 2016-03-13 10:19 (UTC)

A split package usually works like this normally: You compile once and then install the results in different packages. So usually a lib32 package conflicts in the building step (which can't be split) There is a workaround to build in the package step, but that is obviously a hack. Additionally: The point of having a split package is to build once for all packages instead of duplicating the build. A "doublel build" kind of defeats the purpose. So that is probably what went wrong for other lib32 splits. However, we don't build anything. We just download and install a static build. So I just use a split in this case. I hope nobody has a problem with downloading two 5 MiB files even when not using lib32.

Freso commented on 2016-03-12 08:29 (UTC)

I've just found out that the 32-bit binary works on my (64-bit) desktop system, but the 64-bit binary does not, so I'm thinking to fork this out to have a sister lib32- package, however, would it make sense to make this a split package instead? (I don't think lib32-foo works well in split package setups, but maybe I got something wrong last time I messed with something similar. :))

JonnyJD commented on 2014-11-27 15:07 (UTC)

This is now using the static build provided by acousticbrainz. The reason is stated in the AB-FAQ: http://acousticbrainz.org/faq (short: they want few different builds for "statical analysis") I don't really like shipping a binary for open source projects, but this also has good news: The installed size is now 12, rather than 150 MiB. (that probably means only very few functions of the dependencies are actually needed; and it is stripped)

JonnyJD commented on 2014-10-21 01:04 (UTC)

This does not conflict with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/essentia/ This package (only) installs an example needed for acousticbrainz. The built version is fixed for now. This is the same commit that is used for the Acousticbrainz-provided essentia binaries.