Package Details: lib32-ldb 2.7.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/lib32-ldb.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: lib32-ldb
Description: A schema-less, ldap like, API and database
Upstream URL: https://ldb.samba.org/
Licenses: GPL3
Submitter: rafaelff
Maintainer: DarkShadow44
Last Packager: DarkShadow44
Votes: 20
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2016-01-22 06:42 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-05-22 18:34 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

DarkShadow44 commented on 2020-08-03 17:06 (UTC)

Updated and removed the now obsolete lib32-tdb-temp. Manual intervention might be necessary.

DarkShadow44 commented on 2019-11-17 14:49 (UTC)

@rodrigo21 Yeah, I was to quick and just noticed. Thanks for the heads-up though, I downgraded again.

rodrigo21 commented on 2019-11-17 14:45 (UTC)

I think you should use the same version as the repos because there may be some incompatibilities with headears. It's what I do in my packages.

DarkShadow44 commented on 2019-11-17 14:40 (UTC)

Updated to 2.0.7, for newest samba.

DarkShadow44 commented on 2019-11-17 14:25 (UTC)

Updated to 1.5.6. Side note: Is there a reason we don't use the 1.6.x versions? Are they somehow older?

DarkShadow44 commented on 2019-05-07 18:13 (UTC)

@J5lx Fixed. Thanks for the notice, always have python installed so I didn't notice.

J5lx commented on 2019-05-07 11:43 (UTC)

This is missing a dependency on python:

/usr/bin/env: ‘python3’: No such file or directory

m3thodic commented on 2019-04-12 11:13 (UTC)

FYI: grabbing lib32-tdb from the AUR and changing pkgver=1.3.18 as well as commenting out the sed command in build() allows lib32-tdb to be installed. Once lib32-tdb has been upgraded to 1.3.18, lib32-ldb installs without any modifications to PKGBUILD. HTH!

DarkShadow44 commented on 2019-04-10 17:24 (UTC)

Disabled python support for the time being, if you need it please let me know.

@llde Okay I've decided to drop python support for now. If we need it, after all I can always bring it back (once the issues there are fixed).

DarkShadow44 commented on 2019-04-10 14:36 (UTC)

@llde We don't necessarily need python bindings, but that would mean the dependencies (smbclient) would need certain functionality to be disabled - not sure how suitable that is. I'd prefer to keep as-is, i.e. with python bindings.