Package Details: lib32-openssl098 0.9.8.zh-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: lib32-openssl098
Description: The Open Source toolkit for Secure Sockets Layer and Transport Layer Security (32-bit, 0.9.8 branch)
Upstream URL:
Licenses: custom:BSD
Conflicts: lib32-openssl-compatibility
Provides: lib32-openssl-compatibility
Submitter: yejun
Maintainer: eworm
Last Packager: eworm
Votes: 193
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2010-09-06 08:33
Last Updated: 2017-06-20 08:38

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

frizums commented on 2016-08-25 09:18

Replacing validpgpkeys with the version from openssl098 (the 64bit version of this package) and importing one of the keys mentioned in the comments there (gpg --keyserver --recv-keys D5E9E43F7DF9EE8C) worked for me.
Both packages use the same source file. No idea what the cause for the problem is though..

validpgpkeys=('7953AC1FBC3DC8B3B292393ED5E9E43F7DF9EE8C' # Richard Levitte <>
'8657ABB260F056B1E5190839D9C4D26D0E604491' # Matt Caswell <>)

nakano commented on 2016-07-18 13:38

After I import the D9C4D26D0E604491 public key, I get a second error, for the fingerprint of the same key.

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
openssl-0.9.8zh.tar.gz ... FAILED (invalid public key 7953AC1FBC3DC8B3B292393ED5E9E43F7DF9EE8C)

Problem is that I cannot skip signature check. Even if I remove the 'validpgpkeys' from the PKGCONFIG, it still Fails for the same reason.

Any ideas what could I be doing wrong?

yhager commented on 2016-03-13 20:24

Seems to be signed with a different key now.

Bazon commented on 2015-03-06 14:05

Indeed, on a different network, it worked. Must have been some kind of strange filter.
Sorry and thank you!

eworm commented on 2015-03-06 13:22

Hmm, works for me... You could try another keyserver, though:

gpg --keyserver --recv-keys D9C4D26D0E604491

Bazon commented on 2015-03-06 13:07

Please help, I'm stuck:

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
openssl-0.9.8ze.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key D9C4D26D0E604491)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!

then I tried:
# gpg --keyserver --recv-keys D9C4D26D0E604491
gpg: keyserver receive failed: Network is unreachable

although I have a working network! I can access via browser...

trya commented on 2014-06-05 18:47

Orphaned. eworm should take over maintenance.

cesarramsan commented on 2013-01-16 16:04

Source in PKGBUILD is incorrect. It points to "" which does not exist.

cesarramsan commented on 2013-01-16 16:02

Source does not exist anymore.

LookTJ commented on 2012-03-04 22:22

I could ask to delete this and merge with since they are the same number version, the other one looks like a better choice.