Search Criteria
Package Details: lib32-python 3.12.5-5
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/lib32-python.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | lib32-python |
Description: | Next generation of the python high-level scripting language |
Upstream URL: | http://www.python.org/ |
Licenses: | custom |
Provides: | lib32-python3 |
Submitter: | adsun |
Maintainer: | arzeth |
Last Packager: | arzeth |
Votes: | 4 |
Popularity: | 0.000762 |
First Submitted: | 2018-04-22 19:35 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-09-05 14:48 (UTC) |
Dependencies (19)
- lib32-bzip2
- lib32-expat
- lib32-gdbmAUR
- lib32-libffi
- lib32-libnsl
- lib32-libtirpc
- lib32-openssl
- lib32-readline
- lib32-zlib
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR)
- lib32-bluez-libsAUR (make)
- lib32-llvm (lib32-llvm-gitAUR, lib32-llvm-minimal-gitAUR) (make)
- lib32-sqlite (make)
- lib32-tkAUR (make)
- lib32-xz (make)
- valgrind (valgrind-gitAUR) (make)
- lib32-sqlite (optional)
- lib32-tkAUR (optional) – for tkinter
- lib32-xz (optional) – for lzma
Latest Comments
BillFleming commented on 2024-09-02 20:47 (UTC)
After fixing the valid pgpkeys I still cannot get this to build: /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/14.2.1/../../../libb2.so when searching for -lb2 /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libb2.so when searching for -lb2 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lb2: No such file or directory make: *** [Makefile:3062: Modules/_blake2.cpython-312-i386-linux-gnu.so] Error 1
Do we need to create an arch package for lib32-libb2?
dpogue commented on 2024-05-15 06:24 (UTC) (edited on 2024-05-15 06:24 (UTC) by dpogue)
This needs
7169605F62C751356D054A26A821E680E5FA6305
added to the validpgpkeys for Python 3.12, forThomas Wouters <thomas@python.org>
who is the release manager for 3.12 and 3.13.Ref: https://peps.python.org/pep-0693/#release-manager-and-crew
adam900710 commented on 2019-12-08 08:26 (UTC) (edited on 2019-12-08 09:37 (UTC) by adam900710)
Can we skip the tests for profile based optimization? (By removing the --enable-optimizations and --with-lto lines)
I don't really believe there are that many users using lib32-python as a daily driver, but a dependency for other lib32 packages.
In that case, a little slower is completely acceptable.
adsun commented on 2019-03-22 02:39 (UTC) (edited on 2019-03-22 02:41 (UTC) by adsun)
I modeled this PKGBUILD after the
lib32-python2
PKGBUILD in the AUR. The reason for the strange "m" after "${_pybasever}" was because I wanted to follow the officialpython
PKGBUILD, following its own include directory, "/usr/include/python3.7m". I don't use this package much anyway, so I am disowning this.I tested it out though and "import pyexpat" does work on my system.
DarkShadow44 commented on 2019-03-21 19:03 (UTC) (edited on 2019-03-21 20:09 (UTC) by DarkShadow44)
Also, is it normal that you need to set
PYTHONPATH="/usr/lib32/python3.7/site-packages"
before it finds modules? Or is that something we can configure globally?
Similar for its own modules, it can't "import pyexpat", which should work.
DarkShadow44 commented on 2019-03-20 22:16 (UTC) (edited on 2019-03-20 22:16 (UTC) by DarkShadow44)
There are some strange paths in the PKGBUILD and lib32-distutils-sysconfig.patch:
What's the reason for the stray 'm' in there? Don't know if it's intended, but it's not consistent, breaking my builds. Can you please take a look?
llde commented on 2018-12-28 14:34 (UTC) (edited on 2018-12-28 14:46 (UTC) by llde)
There seems to be some issue in the package: 1)Some files are still putted in /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib32 2)The package contains a python3-config and a python-32-config. IT doesn't exist a python3-32-config file. This cause a conmflict issue when trying to install the package Also python 3.6 is still referenced in some bits of the PKGBUILD and the lib32-distutils-sysconfig.patch file