Package Details: libcxx-svn 176640-1

Package Base: libcxx-svn
Description: a new implementation of the C++ standard library targeting C++0X
Upstream URL: http://libcxx.llvm.org/
Category: lib
Licenses: MIT custom:UIUC
Submitter: None
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: None
Votes: 10
First Submitted: 2010-12-20 03:01
Last Updated: 2013-03-08 17:36

Dependencies (1)

Required by (1)

Sources

Latest Comments

Comment by thestinger

2013-07-20 23:42

This should be renamed to `libc++-svn` to follow the upstream naming (`+` is an allowed character in a pkgname) and should likely use `libc++abi` from [community] like the `libc++` package there.

There are many unimplemented features without `libc++abi`, like `std::exception_ptr` and all of <future> and <async>. It will currently just abort() at *runtime*. With `libc++abi`, it's an 100% complete C++11 implementation.

Anonymous comment

2013-03-08 17:37

Package updated. Should hopefully work on x86 now.

Comment by alucryd

2013-03-08 17:20

rabbidrabbit: Good, thx.

Anonymous comment

2013-03-08 17:12

I'll add MIT to the licence array, and fix on x86. It's x86_64 only at the moment, as the build system changed, and the way I build it was x86_64 due to me not running x86. There is a better way of building which I will update the package to do.

Comment by alucryd

2013-03-08 15:12

This is dual licensed, please add 'MIT' in the license array. Also, this might be a dumb question, but why is it x86_64 only?

Comment by alucryd

2013-03-08 15:06

Merging into libcxx-svn, no need to duplicate just to have another vcs. Plus, the svn is mentioned on the webpage, not the git.

Anonymous comment

2013-03-08 01:39

@StefanHusmann
Just cloned by git but not svn... and I'm not the maintainer of libcxx-svn...so...

Comment by haawda

2013-02-17 19:50

What is the difference to libcxx-svn?

Anonymous comment

2013-02-12 14:15

Sorry. I don't use x86, and am unsure about the location of libsupc++ on it.

Anonymous comment

2012-09-17 23:16

I no longer actively run Arch, so it is best that someone else maintain this package.

Anonymous comment

2012-09-15 21:17

Updated http://pastebin.com/tu7ZZLBi

Comment by peoro

2011-02-07 10:24

Latest revisions of libc++ fail compiling with LLVM and Clang in Community: 2.8-4.
I had to manually force revision 122057 to make libc++ build.