Package Details: libowfat 0.34-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/libowfat.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: libowfat
Description: GPL reimplementation of libdjb
Upstream URL: http://www.fefe.de/libowfat/
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Submitter: None
Maintainer: aperez
Last Packager: aperez
Votes: 28
Popularity: 0.096126
First Submitted: 2006-10-16 18:54 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-23 16:13 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

dreieck commented on 2025-01-22 19:20 (UTC)

You need to make the license SPDX compliant: 

libowfat E: GPL is not a valid SPDX license identifier. See https://spdx.org/licenses/ for valid identifiers, or prefix the identifier with 'LicenseRef-', if it is custom.

Regards and thanks for the package!

dreieck commented on 2025-01-22 19:08 (UTC)

I cannot see why it conflicts with tinycdb. I can install both in parallel (if I remove the conflicts entry from libowfat).

phects commented on 2014-01-04 10:59 (UTC)

Oh, I missed that, sorry. Thanks!

arcanis commented on 2014-01-04 10:45 (UTC)

but it will not be removed if you have old makepkg.conf. In the new makepkg.conf there is following line: OPTIONS=(... !staticlibs ...)

arcanis commented on 2014-01-02 23:27 (UTC)

hm libowfat.a is a static library. If you have not enable this option it will be removed from package. Anyway, if I install the package without the flag, I will have empty /usr/lib/ directory (libowfat.a will be removed in package() function)

phects commented on 2014-01-02 13:31 (UTC)

The staticlibs option seems to be unnecessary, because only libowfat.a lands in the package with or without it.

arcanis commented on 2014-01-01 23:58 (UTC)

According to [1] please add to PKGBUILD following line: options=(staticlibs) [1] https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2013-October/025542.html

sl1pkn07 commented on 2012-11-08 18:14 (UTC)

libowfat 0.28 conflicts with tinycdb and new release http://dl.fefe.de/libowfat-0.29.tar.bz2

1 2 3 Next › Last »