Package Details: libqglviewer 2.9.1-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/libqglviewer.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: libqglviewer
Description: C++ library based on Qt that eases the creation of OpenGL 3D viewers
Upstream URL: https://github.com/GillesDebunne/libQGLViewer
Keywords: OpenGL
Licenses: GPL2, custom, GPL3
Conflicts: libqglviewer-qt4
Submitter: ilpianista
Maintainer: sukanka
Last Packager: sukanka
Votes: 14
Popularity: 0.23
First Submitted: 2009-10-17 21:36 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-11-05 14:37 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

gian commented on 2011-03-14 09:07 (UTC)

Since it seems that PyQGLViewer depend on python2 and python-opengl, I opted for a separate package since I don't see the point to force the installation of all the python2 packages if someone don't need them. As long as the package will be ported to python3, I will merge the two packages.

foxcub commented on 2011-03-10 23:37 (UTC)

Wait, I'm confused. This seems to defeat the purpose. I thought you'd include the Python bindings into this package. Now it's just a separate parallel package for libqglviewer. Is this what you intended?

gian commented on 2011-03-10 23:30 (UTC)

Uploaded the pyQGLViewer package

foxcub commented on 2011-03-03 07:42 (UTC)

Here's a PKGBUILD that works for me. You probably want to split it using build() and package() functions, as done now. http://aur.pastebin.com/WE6w0NgQ

gian commented on 2011-03-02 21:44 (UTC)

foxhub, yes, I am interested. Just give me some days to look into it.

foxcub commented on 2011-03-02 19:44 (UTC)

gian, would you be interested in adding Python bindings [1] to this PKGBUILD? It requires patching the source, so if I were to create a separate PKGBUILD for the bindings, it would have to have an entire parallel version of libQGLViewer. (I would personally prefer the bindings to be included in this PKGBUILD.) [1] http://pyqglviewer.gforge.inria.fr/wiki/doku.php

gian commented on 2011-02-06 11:20 (UTC)

foxhub, I am interested, adopted.

foxcub commented on 2011-02-06 01:09 (UTC)

gian, are you interested in claiming it, or should I?

larryhaja commented on 2011-02-06 01:07 (UTC)

Updated to version 2.3.9. Removed gcc-4.4 patch. I also orphan this package as I never use it anymore.

gian commented on 2011-01-31 21:01 (UTC)

Just removing the patch command from the PKGBUILD seems to solve the problem since the package is build correctly.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »