Package Details: libquotient 1:0.6.2-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: libquotient
Description: A Qt5 library to write cross-platform clients for Matrix
Upstream URL:
Keywords: library matrix qt5 quotient
Licenses: LGPL2
Conflicts: libquotient
Provides: libquotient
Submitter: Scrumplex
Maintainer: aa13q
Last Packager: aa13q
Votes: 3
Popularity: 0.026232
First Submitted: 2019-07-15 16:52
Last Updated: 2020-11-20 17:58

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

aa13q commented on 2020-11-20 18:33

remspoor, thank you for the notice, missed that! It should be fixed on the project side without changes on the pkgbuild side with -- (since 0.6 version)

aa13q commented on 2020-11-20 17:59

Thanks, ognarb. Updated the package

ognarb commented on 2020-11-20 17:17

this is outdated. The latest version is 0.6.2

remspoor commented on 2020-06-14 14:27

While trying to install aur/vte3-notification i got an error (see aur package for that).

It looks like the header files are installed in a sub-optimal location.

Please consider a small change suggested by packager @mydongistiny to move the header files by adding:

--- PKGBUILD.orig   2020-06-14 15:54:32.692531104 +0200
+++ PKGBUILD-libquotient    2020-06-14 16:12:09.550706330 +0200
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
     cmake .. \
         -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr \
+        -DCMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR=include/qt \
         -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \

Building quaternion still works ;)

aa13q commented on 2020-04-30 19:31

@blx32, thank you! Added arm arch

blx32 commented on 2020-04-30 18:35

Please add aarch64, it is compatible.

aa13q commented on 2020-04-26 11:22

my bad! Fixed and re-checked, should be fixed now

Fanch commented on 2020-04-26 10:39 does not exist Last version is

Maybe you should set:

... and remove other ref to ${pkgrel}

And it look like it may not be a good practice to use ${pkgrel} as a version for downloading archive, as it not related to software version, but more related to PKGBUILD version

aa13q commented on 2020-04-24 19:15

got it! stupid me who have messed up the epoch so easily :)

RubenKelevra commented on 2020-04-24 19:01

Yep, that's correct.

Remember that the epoch needs to be kept forever, when you remove it, it would default to 0, meaning the next version is considered older.