This one is up to date:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22147
Search Criteria
Package Details: libreoffice-uglyfix-freetype2-infinality 2.4.6-1
Package Actions
- View PKGBUILD
- Download tarball
- Search wiki
- Flagged out-of-date (2012-04-17)
| Package Base: | libreoffice-uglyfix-freetype2-infinality |
|---|---|
| Description: | Compiles freetype2 .so files and puts them in the libreoffice directory to fix font ugliness |
| Upstream URL: | http://freetype.sourceforge.net |
| Category: | office |
| Licenses: | |
| Submitter: | fettouhi |
| Maintainer: | None |
| Last Packager: | None |
| Votes: | 25 |
| First Submitted: | 2011-01-28 14:44 |
| Last Updated: | 2011-09-17 19:03 |
Dependencies (2)
Required by (0)
Sources
- freetype-2.2.1-enable-valid.patch
- http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/freetype/freetype-2.4.6.tar.bz2
- http://www.infinality.net/files/freetype-add-subpixel-hinting-infinality-20110604-1.patch
- http://www.infinality.net/files/freetype-enable-subpixel-hinting-infinality-20100909-1.patch
- http://www.infinality.net/files/freetype-entire-infinality-patchset-20110604-1.patch
- openoffice.patch
Latest Comments
Comment by ilikenwf
Comment by fettouhi
Thanks for the notivce and clarification. Updated the installdir.
Comment by Szunti
Feeling too weird it's only a problem for me, I investigated it a bit.
libreoffice 3.4 use cairo for font-rendering, I guess this means this package
can't do anything with this libreoffice version.
So my comment is not relevant.
Sorry about disturbing.
Comment by Szunti
Sry I am new to arch, i forgot to click on Notify, and about the flagging.
I flagged out of date because it doesn't work with latest libreoffice.
it can't depend on libreoffice, as it is a group now
INSTDIR should be libreoffice/basis3.4
Comment by fettouhi
Why was this flagged out of date? freetype 2.4.6 is the latest and the infinality patches are also the latest.
Comment by ilikenwf
My build works again now...and doesn't include the infinality patches...I don't see the point in doing that...
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22147
Comment by Berseker
"base-devel" is a group package, not a meta-package, sorry
Comment by Berseker
"patch" is included into the meta-package "base-devel". If you start using AUR, you are supposed to have "base-devel" installed on your system.
Comment by gymka
it depends on it...
Comment by fettouhi
@gymka: Why?
Comment by gymka
add to dependencies "patch", by default in archlinux there is no such package installed.
Comment by ilikenwf
Really, why do these exist? My pkgbuild - the original - always puts the .so files in the correct directory, no matter which version or fork of openoffice you run.
Comment by fettouhi
Runs fine for me, no crashes. Only thing I changed in the PKGBUILD was the install directory. In order to match the latest package in extra.
Comment by L42y
this package make my libreoffice crash at start