Package Details: librepfunc 1.10.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/librepfunc.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: librepfunc
Description: a collection of common functions, classes and tools. Mainly used by w_scan_cpp
Upstream URL: https://github.com/wirbel-at-vdr-portal/librepfunc
Licenses: GPL2
Submitter: ohli
Maintainer: ohli (M-Reimer)
Last Packager: M-Reimer
Votes: 2
Popularity: 0.010370
First Submitted: 2021-12-02 17:53 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-03-16 10:25 (UTC)

Latest Comments

ohli commented on 2023-03-12 09:43 (UTC)

Right @Mr.Smith1974,

you seem to miss the gcc dependency, which is also included in base-devel.

I added this to the makedepends, please update & try again

Mr.Smith1974 commented on 2023-03-06 06:30 (UTC)

==> Starting build()...
 CXX /home/admin/.cache/yay/librepfunc/src/librepfunc-1.7.0/BCDtoDecimal.o
make: g++: No such file or directory

ohli commented on 2022-08-16 14:53 (UTC)

Atm, I have build errors for 1.6.0:

src/librepfunc-1.6.0/Base64.cpp:13:52: error: 'bytes' has incomplete type
   13 | std::array<uint8_t,4> get4x6(std::array<uint8_t,3> bytes) {
      |                              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
compilation terminated due to -Wfatal-errors.
make: *** [Makefile:137: *****/aur_packages/librepfunc/src/librepfunc-1.6.0/Base64.o] Error 1

M-Reimer commented on 2021-12-03 07:28 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-03 07:34 (UTC) by M-Reimer)

Can you please correctly map this to the right source file which is valid for the given pkgver? The releases are properly tagged on GitHub.

https://github.com/wirbel-at-vdr-portal/librepfunc/tags

What you did here is basically a "librepfunc-git" PKGBUILD and not a proper "librepfunc" PKGBUILD. You completely drop any source file verification this way (no sha256sum).

Actually, if you like, you could directly push this again as "librepfunc-git" and make the PKGBUILD here use the correct source file including sha256sum.