Search Criteria
Package Details: linux-aarch64-orangepi5-headers 5.10.110-6
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-aarch64-orangepi5.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | linux-aarch64-orangepi5 |
Description: | Header files and scripts for building modules for linux kernel - AArch64 vendor kernel for Orange Pi 5 |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/orangepi-xunlong/linux-orangepi |
Licenses: | GPL2 |
Submitter: | 7Ji |
Maintainer: | 7Ji |
Last Packager: | 7Ji |
Votes: | 4 |
Popularity: | 0.82 |
First Submitted: | 2023-02-16 17:34 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-09-06 07:33 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
7Ji commented on 2023-07-23 12:59 (UTC)
@n0rad
I just created a binary repo to host my pre-built AUR packages, you can just install from it (instructions included): https://github.com/7Ji/archrepo
It's basically a mirror repo of another repo I created within my LAN (
localrepo
) but with packages signed instead.I'm not personally using it, though, as connection to Github is constantly breaking now and then in China, using it would mean
pacman -Syu
breaks every time for me. So updates might be late, open issues on that repo if you're having problems using it.n0rad commented on 2023-07-22 18:18 (UTC)
@7Ji
Could it be possible to provide a -bin version from your github action artifacts? :thinking
I'm using your package in a multi-arch cross compile docker setup and I'm currently at 5min to prepare the amd64 filesystem version VS >4h for the aarch64 one :/
7Ji commented on 2023-07-22 17:55 (UTC)
@kyak
You can also use the following PKGBUILD to add a pseudo
linux
package, this will makekodi-rpi
happykyak commented on 2023-07-22 17:50 (UTC)
@7Ji thanks for your comprehensive answer, it makes sense.
7Ji commented on 2023-07-22 17:45 (UTC) (edited on 2023-07-22 17:47 (UTC) by 7Ji)
@kyak
Sorry but I don't think it's a good idea to make this package provide
linux
. If you take a look at Arch Linux (official x86-64, not ARM)'s alternative kernels, they don't providelinux
, e.g. linux-zen (PKGBUILD) only providesKSMBD-MODULE
,UKSMD-BUILTIN
,VHBA-MODULE
,VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES
,WIREGUARD-MODULE
.The biggest reason to not provide
linux
is to ensure this package could co-exist with other kernels, all myaarch64
kernel packages are written like this. The official Arch Linux ARM kernels actually do it the imperfect way: every kernel package provides conflictingImage
,Image.gz
files and dtbs, etc, and providinglinux
thus conflicting with each other. My kernel packages however manage the kernel images and dtbs like the x86-64 does and can co-exist even with the offcial ALARM kernel.Another big reason ArchLinux keeps the kernels unique and do not provide
linux
is thatlinux
is strictly depended on only by kernel modules that build against it. If this package provideslinux
then you can install those module packages and brick your system as they won't ever work.Also, it will be a bad idea to make an AUR kernel package that provides
linux
, which would mean it can be fetched as a dependency by the x86-64 ArchLinux users.As a work around, you can either use the
--assume-installed
argument ofpacman
, or rebuiltkodi-rpi
with a fixedPKGBUILD
.kyak commented on 2023-07-22 13:34 (UTC)
@7Ji first of all, thanks! This package works fine on opi5 plus.
I think this package should
Provide
linux
. This way, I can uninstalllinux-aarch64
for good.The problem with this package not providing
linux
is that packages likekodi-rpi
depend onlinux
and this makes it problematic to removelinux-aarch64
.7Ji commented on 2023-07-22 04:29 (UTC) (edited on 2023-07-22 04:30 (UTC) by 7Ji)
@n0rad
Thank you for notification, package updated and sha256sum fixed. This is not the first time the github patch generation result changed and the sha256sum was changed, it has changed before. I guess the undergoing changes of Github recently has causes this.
n0rad commented on 2023-07-21 18:45 (UTC)
There is a new version
eb1c681e5184e51d8ce1f351559d149d17f48b57
+ I don't understand why but the patch checksum changed6ec4e4767c7df92f9fb33cc6548efd86eb8fca2c53b6c0f76aac4bcee628d5ba
->e9c720fa4dba291f3a87a04eb9245fcf99cd0c4164d2c5deefe7ca35eedf1960
while pointing to old commit on your archived repo. So the package is currently broken7Ji commented on 2023-06-18 05:48 (UTC) (edited on 2023-06-18 06:01 (UTC) by 7Ji)
@Rippanda12
Thank you for notification. I've upgraded the package and verified it on my opi5. But I don't have a opi5 plus to verify if it works. Please report if it works on your opi5plus.
You could download pre-built images and pacakges later from the CI job from my repo after the CI finished if you don't have time/resource to build it by yourself.
Rippanda12 commented on 2023-06-17 19:48 (UTC)
Please use the latest commit (adds support for 5+)
7639c684a04b6f0ad068400da05d6c2ed2b7f18e
1 2 Next › Last »