Package Details: linux-cachyos 6.18.7-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-cachyos.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-cachyos
Description: The Linux EEVDF + LTO + AutoFDO + Propeller Cachy Sauce Kernel by CachyOS with other patches and improvements. kernel and modules
Upstream URL: https://github.com/CachyOS/linux-cachyos
Keywords: cachyos kernel linux
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: ADIOS-MODULE, KSMBD-MODULE, linux-cachyos-lto, NTSYNC-MODULE, V4L2LOOPBACK-MODULE, VHBA-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: linux-cachyos-lto
Submitter: ptr1337
Maintainer: ptr1337 (sir_lucjan)
Last Packager: sir_lucjan
Votes: 42
Popularity: 1.48
First Submitted: 2021-10-12 18:31 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-01-23 23:25 (UTC)

Required by (16)

Sources (4)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 12 Next › Last »

grappas commented on 2026-01-18 20:12 (UTC) (edited on 2026-01-18 20:12 (UTC) by grappas) 

 0001-cachyos-base-all.patch ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

Fails to build due to this error.

Bitals commented on 2026-01-15 08:46 (UTC)

Just remove the patches, and the config for good measure, from cache directory of whatever your AUR package manager is every time there's an update. Maybe it's possible to write a hook for paru/yay/whatever to do that, but as I personally don't use those to build I didn't look into that. Versioning the patches upstream will fix the checksum failure, but will result in all those patches accumulating on your machine over time.

ptr1337 commented on 2026-01-13 16:47 (UTC)

Yeah, it is what it is. Its the best and easiest way maintaining it for us

patlefort commented on 2026-01-13 16:42 (UTC)

makepkg also will cache the patch. The issue is that the patch file isn't properly versioned upstream. Every changes should generate a new file with a new name.

ptr1337 commented on 2026-01-13 16:37 (UTC)

The issue is that many of you are using paru or yay, which caches the patch. So the new updated patches does not get fetched from yay and it says then that the checksums are wrong.

Use makepkg to build this kernel

nyunyun commented on 2026-01-13 15:41 (UTC)

It seems to be a regular occurrence that 0001-cachyos-base-all.patch fails and it was the reason I got rid of it some months ago. Now, after installing it again just a few days ago, the same issue occurs.

Can anyone explain why this happens and how to fix it, without recompiling the whole kernel again?

OzzyHelix commented on 2026-01-12 22:52 (UTC)

the answer is probably no but could you guys build with the tux logo enabled at boot?

x140x1n commented on 2026-01-11 10:36 (UTC)

6.18.4-1

==> Validating source files with b2sums...
    linux-6.18.4.tar.xz ... Passed
    config ... Passed
    0001-cachyos-base-all.patch ... FAILED
    dkms-clang.patch ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

lamarpavel commented on 2025-12-29 13:19 (UTC)

For version 6.18.2-1

...
patching file include/linux/hid.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 625 (offset 29 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 788 (offset 29 lines).
patching file include/linux/soc/apple/dockchannel.h
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare().
    Aborting...

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 12 Next › Last »