Package Details: linux-ice 4.6.4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ice.git (read-only)
Package Base: linux-ice
Description: The Linux-ice kernel and modules
Upstream URL: http://www.kernel.org/
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: kernel26-ice
Provides: kernel26-ice=4.6.4, linux=4.6.4
Replaces: kernel26-ice
Submitter: ngoonee
Maintainer: ForeverYoung
Last Packager: ForeverYoung
Votes: 100
Popularity: 0.002162
First Submitted: 2011-07-28 06:30
Last Updated: 2016-07-12 19:49

Required by (146)

Sources (12)

Latest Comments

ForeverYoung commented on 2016-04-28 06:31

Those flags are configured during 'make oldconfig'.
This way I just take configs from stock kernel without any editing.

FadeMind commented on 2016-04-27 17:17

You missing TOI configuration in config files (PART OF DIFF)

#
# Power management and ACPI options
@@ -591,6 +580,33 @@
CONFIG_HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS=y
CONFIG_HIBERNATION=y
CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION=""
+CONFIG_TOI_CORE=y
+
+#
+# Image Storage (you need at least one allocator)
+#
+CONFIG_TOI_FILE=y
+CONFIG_TOI_SWAP=y
+
+#
+# General Options
+#
+CONFIG_TOI_CRYPTO=y
+CONFIG_TOI_USERUI=y
+CONFIG_TOI_USERUI_DEFAULT_PATH="/usr/sbin/tuxoniceui"
+CONFIG_TOI_DEFAULT_IMAGE_SIZE_LIMIT=-2
+# CONFIG_TOI_KEEP_IMAGE is not set
+
+#
+# No incremental image support available without Keep Image support.
+#
+CONFIG_TOI_REPLACE_SWSUSP=y
+CONFIG_TOI_IGNORE_LATE_INITCALL=y
+CONFIG_TOI_DEFAULT_WAIT=25
+CONFIG_TOI_DEFAULT_EXTRA_PAGES_ALLOWANCE=7000
+# CONFIG_TOI_CHECKSUM is not set
+CONFIG_TOI=y
+CONFIG_TOI_ZRAM_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=y

Regards

mayurkr commented on 2016-04-18 07:51

change www.kernel.org to cdn.kernel.org, cdn.kernel.org is using fastly cdn to speed up downloads.

ForeverYoung commented on 2015-04-13 19:44

4.0 is out!

Det commented on 2015-02-27 19:42

The diff for 'tuxonice-for-linux-head-3.19.0-2015-02-10.patch' vs. 'tuxonice-for-linux-head-3.19.0-2015-02-14.patch' seems worthwhile: https://www.diffchecker.com/s1wz4yjq

jseb commented on 2015-02-16 19:24

Perfect ! Thank you ForeverYoung !

valr commented on 2015-02-16 16:48

@ForeverYoung: super, thank you very much!

ForeverYoung commented on 2015-02-16 16:44

Fixed package

ForeverYoung commented on 2015-02-16 16:25

About signatures - https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Makepkg#Signature_checking

valr commented on 2015-02-16 16:16

Hi, linux.install is missing in the tarball.
Can you fix it?
Thanks

jseb commented on 2015-02-16 16:11

I've downloaded the tarball on this page, but didn't get "linux.ice" file in it.

/tmp$ wget https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/li/linux-ice/linux-ice.tar.gz
(...)
/tmp$ tar xf linux-ice.tar.gz
/tmp$ cd linux-ice/
/tmp/linux-ice$ ls
change-default-console-loglevel.patch config config.x86_64 linux.preset PKGBUILD

Thank you.

ForeverYoung commented on 2015-02-16 15:49

linux.install should be with PKGBUILD. Try "download tarball" from this page

ForeverYoung commented on 2015-02-16 15:46

I just got this signature thing from stock kernel. Probably I'll just remove this from PKGBUILD.
You can remove three lines about signatures, or add them to your gpg key ring:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys <keyid>

jseb commented on 2015-02-16 15:36

A more serious problem:

(at the end of the makepkg)
DEPMOD 3.19.0-1-ice
cp: cannot stat ‘/home/jseb/aur/linux-ice/linux.install’: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package_linux-ice().

I've looked the PKGBUILD and there is no install() function… i think it now needs one (since an upgrade of Arch package system, one month ago). I'm not sure about this, though.

jseb commented on 2015-02-16 14:36

Hi, got this error when «makepkg» :

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
linux-3.19.tar ... FAILED (unknown public key 79BE3E4300411886)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!

As linux sources come from kernel.org, i guess you cannot do much about this, but that's annoying anyway.
Is it something related with the SigLevel set to «TrustAll» ? I just do «yaourt -G linux-ice» for getting PKGBUILD and patches, and then i do «makepkg».

Thank you for maintening the package, i use it for years :)

jseb commented on 2015-02-16 14:35



Hi, got this error when «makepkg» :

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
linux-3.19.tar ... FAILED (unknown public key 79BE3E4300411886)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!

As linux sources come from kernel.org, i guess you cannot do much about this, but that's annoying anyway.
Does it something related with the SigLevel set to «TrustAll» ? I just do «yaourt -G linux-ice» for getting PKGBUILD and patches, and then i do «makepkg».

Thank you for maintening the package, i use it for years :)

jseb commented on 2015-02-16 14:34

Hi, got this error when «makepkg» :

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
linux-3.19.tar ... FAILED (unknown public key 79BE3E4300411886)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!

As linux sources come from kernel.org, i guess you cannot do much about this, but that's annoying anyway.

Thank you for maintening the package, i use it for years :)

ForeverYoung commented on 2015-02-15 20:22

Updated to 3.19

[icekernel]
Server = http://files.f-y.name/icekernel
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.17
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.18
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.19

ForeverYoung commented on 2015-02-15 20:20

Updated to 3.19

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-12-09 20:29

Updated to 3.16.7

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-10-27 16:58

There is no compatible tuxonice patch for 3.17 yet.

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-07-10 18:41

3.15.5

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-07-07 19:35

3.15.4

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-07-01 16:52

3.15.3

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-06-27 11:22

3.15.2

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-06-20 10:07

3.15.1 in repo:
[icekernel]
Server = http://files.f-y.name/icekernel
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

New features of 3.15 release: http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.15
3.15.1: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.15.1

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-06-08 18:27

3.14.6

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-05-13 18:31

3.14.4

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-05-13 13:13

3.14.3-3, fix for CVE-2014-0196

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-05-06 16:42

Version 3.14.3 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.14.3:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.14.3

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-05-06 04:08

I think so.

ilkyest commented on 2014-05-05 23:14

recompile dkms with this option?

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-05-05 04:33

set IGNORE_CC_MISMATCH environment variable to 1
(taken from comments https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-dkms/ )

ilkyest commented on 2014-05-03 22:33

gcc-version-check failed:

The compiler used to compile the kernel (gcc
4.8) does not exactly match the current compiler
(gcc 4.9). The Linux 2.6 kernel module loader
rejects kernel modules built with a version of gcc
that does not exactly match that of the compiler
used to build the running kernel.


make[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/lib/modules/3.14.2-1-ice/build'
NVIDIA: left KBUILD.
nvidia.ko failed to build!
Makefile:175: recipe for target 'nvidia.ko' failed
make[1]: *** [nvidia.ko] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/337.12/build'
Makefile:222: recipe for target '../Module.symvers' failed
make: *** [../Module.symvers] Error 2
make: Leaving directory '/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/337.12/build/uvm'

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-05-02 05:56

Why multilib?

I enabled 'testing' in /etc/pacman.conf
then 'pacman -S gcc libtool'
then disabled 'testing' again.

ilkyest commented on 2014-05-02 01:10

A question..

If I try install gcc 9 (pacman -S gcc-libs-multilib) it says about remove gcc-libs 4.8

and a lot of things asks it

any workaround? how install gcc 4.9 to compile linux-ice

error:
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-fstack-protector-strong’
/home/ilkyest/300hz-NUMAOFF/linux-ice/src/linux-3.14/./Kbuild:35: recipe for target 'kernel/bounds.s' failed
make[1]: *** [kernel/bounds.s] Error 1
Makefile:884: recipe for target 'prepare0' failed
make: *** [prepare0] Error 2

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-04-28 09:32

3.14.2
Patches from stock Archlinux kernel: added fixes for i810 hang, uefi xsdt issue, saa7134, rtl8192se, tun speed
Upstream changelog: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.14.2

NB: gcc 4.9 from testing is needed for compiling
or use my repo:

[icekernel]
Server = http://files.f-y.name/icekernel
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-04-14 21:40

Version 3.14.1 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.14.1:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.14.1

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-04-12 06:47

3.14-2, patches from stock archlinux kernel

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-04-10 20:02

Version 3.14 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.14:
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.14

Repo URL:
[icekernel]
Server = http://files.f-y.name/icekernel
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-04-06 04:14

Version 3.13.9 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.13.9:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.13.9

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-04-02 10:54

Version 3.13.8 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.13.8:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.13.8

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-03-25 11:46

Version 3.13.7 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.13.7:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.13.7

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-03-23 16:24

New release 3.16.6-3
Patches from vanilla arch kernel: Fix xhci mass storage problems
(https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/linux&id=297450e858cc2a2463857b2cefa3dd0a5a9419f6)

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-03-11 13:13

Package and repo updated
Patch from tuxonice-git:
http://lists.tuxonice.net/pipermail/tuxonice-devel/2014-March/007484.html
https://github.com/NigelCunningham/tuxonice-kernel/commit/d6abb8786b3c614bf0d3667c14ac178f250b3df0

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-03-09 19:06

Version 3.13.6 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.13.6:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.13.6

Repo URL:
[icekernel]
Server = http://files.f-y.name/icekernel
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-02-28 04:14

Fixed file mode.
It's strange, that that prevented build.
Either I would extract source archive and run makepkg (all under my user), or
use something like yaourt (under my user too), also works ok. Unless you extracted archive under one user and makepkg under another (not root)

mid-kid commented on 2014-02-27 14:14

For some reason, "change-default-console-loglevel.patch" has mode 640. Had to change that to 644 for it to compile.

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-02-24 09:25

Version 3.13.5 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.13.5:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.13.5

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-02-23 16:56

Version 3.13.4 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.13.4:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.13.4

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-02-21 09:56

Because of http://lists.tuxonice.net/pipermail/tuxonice-devel/2014-February/007466.html, I'll wait one day.

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-02-18 12:27

Uh-uh, the same for me, about 1 hang-up for 7-10 normal hibernations.

kris7t commented on 2014-02-18 12:25

Package version 3.13.3 is hanging up for me yet again...

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-02-14 11:10

Version 3.13.3 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.13.3:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.13.3

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-02-14 09:45

3.13.2-3 is in repo.
Final 3.13.2 tuxonice patch (with build fix for it).

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-02-07 07:15

3.13.2-2
--------
Changes to config, as at http://lists.tuxonice.net/pipermail/tuxonice-devel/2014-February/007451.html (no more hang-ups while trying to free memory during hibernation)

Upstream changelog:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.13.2

Uploaded to repository

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-01-30 14:04

Repository updated (3.13.1):

[icekernel]
Server = http://files.f-y.name/icekernel
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-01-30 13:14

3.13.1
Upstream changelog:
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.13
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.13.1

Removed i915 patch, problem is solved upstream

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-01-27 10:30

Version 3.12.9 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.12.9:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.12.9

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-01-21 06:19

Version 3.12.8 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.12.8:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.12.8

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-01-13 05:52

Version 3.12.7 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.12.7:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.12.7

ForeverYoung commented on 2014-01-09 05:18

ilkyest, did you try nvidia-dkms? It should work (if you installed linux-ice-headers).

If you need custom configuration - edit PKGBUILD, uncomment some of the

# Configure the kernel. Replace the line below with one of your choice.
#make menuconfig # CLI menu for configuration
#make nconfig # new CLI menu for configuration
#make xconfig # X-based configuration
#make oldconfig # using old config from previous kernel version

Or, uncomment that:

####################
# stop here
# this is useful to configure the kernel
#msg "Stopping build"; return 1
####################

Then apply patches, configure, whatever, then:

make ${MAKEFLAGS} LOCALVERSION= bzImage modules

(substitute MAKEFLAGS from /etc/makepkg.conf manually)

Then - run "makepkg --repackage" to get packages.

(I didn't try that, just guessing)

ilkyest commented on 2014-01-09 00:25

Forever...

To make nvidia driver work (repo's nvidia one) I need install what? nvidia-dkms? or do you have a "nvidia-ice" on your repo?

I need compile myself the kernel. I'm doing comparisons with and without NUMA

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-12-28 16:19

Or install from my repo, see http://files.f-y.name/icekernel/

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-12-28 16:18

Makepkg in normal way. There will be kernel, docs and headers packages.

ilkyest commented on 2013-12-28 13:05

How do I compile this kernel with "headers'?

I need it to virtualbox and nvidia driver

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-12-26 21:02

Version 3.12.6 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.12.6:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.12.6

ilkyest commented on 2013-12-22 22:25

Does this package don't have a "nvidia-ice" to make nvidia driver working? or using nvidia-dkms/nvidia-hook is enough?

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-12-17 05:19

Version 3.12.5 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.12.5:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.12.4
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.12.5

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-12-11 04:25

Sorry for incomplete repo, fixed

[icekernel]
Server = http://files.f-y.name/icekernel
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-12-07 13:02

Version 3.12.3 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.12.3:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.12.3

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-12-02 10:24

Version 3.12.2 is in repo.

Upstream changelog for 3.12.2:
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.12
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.12.1
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.12.2

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-11-24 14:30

Please somebody try this: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B-A9F0S_B-wIakctRFRzV01vWXM&usp=sharing
On my notebook this version freezes in the beginning of hibernation process. Is it only me?

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-11-16 16:17

Version 3.11.8 is in repo.
Upstream changelog for 3.11.8:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.11.7
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.11.8

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-10-22 08:34

Version 3.11.6 is in repo.
Upstream changelog for 3.11.6 - https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.11.6

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-10-15 05:25

Version 3.11.5 is in repo. Tuxonice patch is for 3.11.4
Upstream changelog for 3.11.5 - https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.11.5

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-10-08 10:54

Version 3.11.4 is in repo.
Upstream changelog for 3.11.4 - https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.11.4

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-10-02 10:58

Version 3.11.3 is in repo. Tuxonice patch is for 3.11.2.

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-10-02 05:01

[icekernel]
Server = http://files.f-y.name/icekernel
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

mytbk commented on 2013-10-02 04:15

My repo server is no longer available, and I'm not going to maintain this.
So someone can adopt it.

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-09-27 19:22

More properly patched version: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B-A9F0S_B-wIbjI0U19oTWY4eUE&usp=sharing (compiled version, patch)

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-09-27 13:03

Ooh. How fast they make new versions :)

mytbk commented on 2013-09-27 13:00

Binaries(x86_64) on Google Drive:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxD6BcPa8uc2LWJkeUExQ3R3MEE&usp=sharing

@ForeverYoung, this patch will fail in 3.11.2, you can first test if the new kernel is ok.

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-09-27 12:48

@mytbk, actually, I fixed that patch, see http://pastebin.com/qN2X8Sek or https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B-A9F0S_B-wIRWVzR3AxTVlTdlk&usp=sharing

mytbk commented on 2013-09-27 12:46

Updated to 3.11.2
@ForeverYoung: the fix_i915 patch cannot be applied in linux-ice-3.11.2

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-09-27 11:44

3.11.1 (with patch)
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B-A9F0S_B-wIRWVzR3AxTVlTdlk&usp=sharing

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-09-27 10:33

@mytbk: yes. not revert this time, http://pastebin.com/qN2X8Sek

mytbk commented on 2013-09-11 15:48

updated to 3.10.11, and it's now available in [icekernel].

mytbk commented on 2013-09-11 04:45

@ForeverYoung: still need fix_1915.patch?

mytbk commented on 2013-09-03 11:54

3.10.10
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxD6BcPa8uc2ZWIxRXZlQTEzbW8&usp=sharing

mytbk commented on 2013-08-22 04:10

Updated to 3.10.9

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxD6BcPa8uc2ZTM5N0FDVVBQOTA&usp=sharing

[icekernel]
Server = http://icekernel.oss.aliyuncs.com/x86_64
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

mytbk commented on 2013-08-20 12:40

Binary packages on Google Drive:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxD6BcPa8uc2M3lxV3dLRVhtMnM&usp=sharing

mytbk commented on 2013-08-20 12:30

Added the i915 patch, and the binary packages are in repo now.
[icekernel]
Server = http://icekernel.oss.aliyuncs.com/x86_64
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

ForeverYoung commented on 2013-08-19 12:28

Freezes on startup on Asus Zenbook UX21A. (The same with stock kernel)
Gets fixed by reverting this patch - http://pastebin.com/tGsyAu52
(patch -NRp1 -i "${srcdir}/fix_i915.patch")

mytbk commented on 2013-08-16 08:58

Bump to 3.10.7, binary packages will be built after linux-3.10.7 goes into [core].

mytbk commented on 2013-08-14 11:21

Updated to 3.10.6, uploaded to the repo:
[icekernel]
Server = http://icekernel.oss.aliyuncs.com/x86_64
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

Binaries on Google Drive:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxD6BcPa8uc2bTRtRGRiZ1h6bE0&usp=sharing

mytbk commented on 2013-08-14 10:46

Uploaded to the repo:
[icekernel]
Server = http://icekernel.oss.aliyuncs.com/x86_64
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

Now I'm having some trouble visiting Google Drive, so the binaries on Google
Drive will be postponed.

mytbk commented on 2013-08-04 17:00

And the Google Drive binaries:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxD6BcPa8uc2TmFIemVxMFFBLW8&usp=sharing

mytbk commented on 2013-08-04 16:55

Updated to 3.10.5, a repo is on

[icekernel]
Server = http://icekernel.oss.aliyuncs.com/x86_64
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

mytbk commented on 2013-07-30 00:54

A new TOI patch is released, but no difference in the code,
only some git revision changes, so no need to rebuild.

mytbk commented on 2013-07-29 12:01

Now I have a server for the [icekernel] repo:
[icekernel]
Server = http://icekernel.oss.aliyuncs.com/x86_64
SigLevel = Optional TrustAll

mytbk commented on 2013-07-29 10:02

updated to 3.10.4
binaries(x86_64) on Google drive:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxD6BcPa8uc2eGJ0WFZqSGhXWkE&usp=sharing

This time I use the original 3-file splitting, all I need is a file hosting
service with file limit at least 50MB.

mytbk commented on 2013-07-27 02:45

updated to 3.10.3
binaries(x86_64) still on Google drive:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxD6BcPa8uc2OUdjenJCY1Y2anc&usp=sharing

mytbk commented on 2013-07-18 04:57

set INTEL_MEI and INTEL_MEI_ME to m.
binaries on google drive(x86_64):
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxD6BcPa8uc2OUdjenJCY1Y2anc&usp=sharing

mytbk commented on 2013-07-17 18:05

binaries (now for x86_64 only) in
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxD6BcPa8uc2OUdjenJCY1Y2anc&usp=sharing

cannot find a file hosting site for a repository yet.

mytbk commented on 2013-07-14 10:36

@Burroughs: I think you should install virtualbox and virtual-host-dkms package from [community], and run 'dkms autoinstall', then you'll have vboxdrv.

Burroughs commented on 2013-07-14 10:34

Virtualbox, file "VirtualBox-4.2.16-86992-Linux_amd64.run", still complains about not finding the vboxdrv module.
Is there a way to fix this problem?

Burroughs.

mytbk commented on 2013-05-26 14:57

I'll update this to 3.9.4 tomorrow, and add a patch for FS#35237.

mytbk commented on 2013-05-26 14:56

I'll update this to 3.9.4 tomorrow, and add a patch for #FS35237.

mytbk commented on 2013-05-11 13:00

Well, the package is big, so I'm still thinking about pushing it on the net...

mytbk commented on 2013-05-09 14:30

PKGBUILD not tested, I'm trying to build a linux-ice package to upload now.

mytbk commented on 2013-05-07 22:50

Maybe I can put the packages in my github pages...

Anonymous comment on 2013-05-07 08:41

Can you update the default configs to use /usr/sbin/tuxoniceui as the default userui path? Also, would you consider hosting a repo with binary packages somewhere, like the previous maintainer did? Dropbox would work if you don't have a dedicated server.

mytbk commented on 2013-05-07 02:16

Before I maintain the package, the TOI patch is uploaded together with the PKGBUILD. But I think I should give out the source of the TOI patch.

@Det: I think you're right, so next time I'll not rename the patch.

Det commented on 2013-05-07 00:11

Why does the TOI patch have to be renamed according to the major kernel version?

You get an md5sum error, if you preserve the sources.

mytbk commented on 2013-05-06 04:16

This is the latest linux-3.9-ice kernel. And it's a mainline kernel.

mytbk commented on 2013-05-02 14:27

@xxxxme: but linux-3.9 is not a stable release, so I'm not going to use it now. However, we can have a try.

xxxxme commented on 2013-05-02 14:16

Linux 3.9 and the tuxonice for 3.9 patch are out.

mytbk commented on 2013-04-27 04:51

@Det: Now I'm installing the kernel and headers in one package called 'linux-ice', so in _package() script I call _package-headers after the kernel is installed in ${DESTDIR}.

Det commented on 2013-04-27 03:02

Mm, what's the "_package-headers" call doing inside _package()?

mytbk commented on 2013-04-25 15:16

The PKGBUILD of linux-ice-3.8.8-1 is modified from core/linux. I've merged linux-headers into the linux-ice package, so now is linux-ice and linux-ice-docs. This PKGBUILD works fine on my machine.

mytbk commented on 2013-04-25 05:07

To be updated tonight. Please wait.

mytbk commented on 2013-04-23 02:20

OK. So I'm going to use the stable kernel with tuxonice. And I'm planning to split the package into linux-ice(kernel+headers) and linux-ice-docs.

mytbk commented on 2013-04-23 02:17

OK. Some I'm going to use the stable kernel with tuxonice, and split the package with linux-ice(with headers) and linux-ice-docs. Is that ok?

Det commented on 2013-04-23 00:45

If you're going to use mainline, it should be named linux-mainline(-ice).

mytbk commented on 2013-04-19 01:20

I'm going to split the package into linux-ice, linux-ice-headers and linux-ice-docs in the next version.
PS: I'm planning to use linux-mainline(i.e. the rc- kernel) in this package. What do you guys think?

mytbk commented on 2013-04-19 01:09

I'm going to add linux-headers and linux-docs into PKGBUILD in the next version.
PS: I'm planning to use linux-mainline(i.e. the rc- kernel) in this package. What do you think?

cian1500ww commented on 2013-03-29 20:03

Updated for 3.8.5, binaries available here: http://www.cianmcgovern.com/arch-linux-repositories/

cian1500ww commented on 2013-03-23 14:13

Updated for 3.8.4, binaries available here: http://www.cianmcgovern.com/arch-linux-repositories/

ngoonee commented on 2013-03-10 23:53

Apologies, haven't been able to find the time to take care of this. Disowned.

cian1500ww commented on 2013-03-09 13:44

If you aren't going to update this, please orphan the package so some of us can.

ngoonee commented on 2013-01-25 01:02

Apologies, my laptop has died and I'm without an Arch system right now.

Det commented on 2013-01-23 10:58

You need the actual 3.7 ones for that.

ngoonee commented on 2012-12-31 01:05

I'm trying to build 3.7 versions but the TOI patch doesn't apply cleanly. Patches welcome.

ngoonee commented on 2012-12-13 07:04

Ah, the beauty of sarcasm and humour on the internet =)

Det commented on 2012-12-09 12:12

Yeah, it was a joke lol.

You can see from my messy output that it was only a fraction of a second.

ngoonee commented on 2012-11-28 02:37

Strange, both work for me here with no problem (aria2c). Made the change anyway.

Det commented on 2012-11-27 15:15

Btw. http://www.tuxonice.net/ has moved to http://tuxonice.net/.

Curl spends hours and hours trying to redirect there: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=YPam1geu

ngoonee commented on 2012-10-24 04:32

Change made, thanks. Also (finally) updated to 3.6, TOI now autogenerates tarballs =)

Anonymous comment on 2012-10-17 10:18

I got the "no such file" error when I tried to make the package.

The file is the pkg/lib/modules/3.4.5-1-ice directory.

Here's my solution:

# move module tree /lib -> /usr/lib
mv "${pkgdir}/lib" "${pkgdir}/usr"

# Now we call depmod...
depmod -b "${pkgdir}" -F System.map "${_kernver}"

These codes are in the PKGBUILD from line 239 to 243 line.
And the solution is to put them upside down, i.e.

# Now we call depmod...
depmod -b "${pkgdir}" -F System.map "${_kernver}"

# move module tree /lib -> /usr/lib
mv "${pkgdir}/lib" "${pkgdir}/usr"

Then everything runs smoothly.

ps. I looked into the linux-ck's PKGBUILD for the sinilar codes and I found out that the codes are exactly the same except that they are in a different order.

I hope this can help someone.

ngoonee commented on 2012-09-26 01:36

Thanks Det, updated.

Det commented on 2012-09-25 16:34

I guess he just didn't wanna duplicate the bfs patches: http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/3.0/3.4/3.4-ck3/patches/

ngoonee commented on 2012-08-22 08:41

Somehow his patches seem to have been wiped from the server... you could remove that line from sources.

Anonymous comment on 2012-08-22 08:00

I cannot build it because following link is dead:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/bfs/3.4.0/3.4-sched-bfs-424.patch

ngoonee commented on 2012-07-31 08:24

No patch present for higher than 3.4.5 yet (current patch does not cleanly apply on 3.4.6, I checked). Please do not flag out-of-date unless this changes.

ngoonee commented on 2012-07-27 02:15

I'm using a swap file with no problems.

archman commented on 2012-07-26 18:16

Is anyone using a swap file successfully?

archman commented on 2012-07-18 11:56

I am getting "Kernel BUG at kernel/power/tuxonice_io.c:827" when trying to hibernate.
I use the swap file. Anyone else getting that?
Nothing in hibernate.log (LogVerbosity 4 in common.conf)

archman commented on 2012-07-18 11:54

I am getting "Kernel BUG at kernel/power/tuxonice_io.c:827" when trying to hibernate.
I use the swap file. Anyone else getting that?
Nothing in hibernate.log (LogVerbosity 4 in common.conf)

archman commented on 2012-07-18 07:42

Says "Kernel BUG at kernel/power/tuxonice_io.c:827" when trying to hibernate. Anyone else seen the same thing?

ngoonee commented on 2012-07-12 04:03

Yes, I am using [testing], which I think I've emphasized before (4th July comment). Unfortunately that means this kernel can't be built if you're not running [testing] until the kmod update makes it to [core]. If anyone is interested I can post a pastebin for the PKGBUILD which works on the old kmod, but it may be easier for you just to wait a bit till it hits [core] since you'd have to rebuild then anyway.

Anonymous comment on 2012-07-11 18:39

jep, i think you are using the testing kmod for this ;D
Thx for your time

Anonymous comment on 2012-07-11 18:30

what did i:
line 244: depmod -b "${pkgdir}/usr" -F System.map "${_kernver}"
and added manually to my filesystem, which should be also work in the pkgbuild
cd lib/modules; ln -s /usr/lib/modules/3.4.4-1-ice
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-July/023200.html
i think in future not more needed

ngoonee commented on 2012-07-11 02:13

Full log? I cannot reproduce, I just rebuilt linux-ice here (without my normal personal changes to it) and it ran just fine... If you could pinpoint which line fails it would be even better. Try seriously reducing your modules built list (basically remove all drivers). The kernel won't be bootable, but at least you wouldn't have to wait a long time to get the log.

Anonymous comment on 2012-07-10 16:59

Same problem as donniezazen builded manually with makepkg
a lib directory wasn't even created

ngoonee commented on 2012-07-10 08:36

In any case, I've uploaded an updated PKGBUILD. Don't think I have changed anything that would affect what you're having, but try it anyway.

ngoonee commented on 2012-07-10 08:21

Unfortunately the second time you ran makepkg you did not remove ./src, hence the build did not even start due to errors reapplying patches.

donniezazen commented on 2012-07-09 20:17

Linux-ice unmodified log https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2014304/linux-ice
linux-ice PKGBUILD added echo in line 241 https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2014304/linux-ice-241-echo-hi
PKGBUILD https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2014304/PKGBUILD

Thanks for your help.

donniezazen commented on 2012-07-09 20:17

Linux-ice unmodified log https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2014304/linux-ice
linux-ice PKGBUILD added echo in line 241 https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2014304/linux-ice-241-echo-hi
PKGBUILD file:///home/donnie/Dropbox/Public/PKGBUILD

Thanks for your help.

ngoonee commented on 2012-07-06 08:51

Your error appears to be occuring somewhere after (or during) the depmod call of line 240. Could you put an 'echo "hi"' or something in line 241 so I can figure out which? I've already built this kernel myself and am using it, so I'm surprised you're having problems. Next time though, for ease you can just do "makepkg -i > log".

donniezazen commented on 2012-07-06 08:38

http://pastebin.com/1zt2Shms This is as much as terminal would let me grab. Let me know if their is a better way to grab complete output.

This time I didn't use yaourt but makepkg -i but it returned with same error.

ERROR: could not open directory /home/donnie/Downloads/linux-ice/pkg/linux-ice/lib/modules/3.2.13-2-ice: No such file or directory
FATAL: could not search modules: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package_linux-ice().
Aborting...

ngoonee commented on 2012-07-06 01:30

I would need to see a longer log (and for you to stop using yaourt).

donniezazen commented on 2012-07-04 21:39

I got following error when I tried to upgrade.

ERROR: could not open directory /tmp/yaourt-tmp-donnie/aur-linux-ice/pkg/linux-ice/lib/modules/3.2.13-2-ice: No such file or directory
FATAL: could not search modules: No such file or directory

ngoonee commented on 2012-07-04 01:45

I will be updating this package to 3.2.13-2 which will comply with the latest changes in kmod (which is currently being put into [testing]). ALL USERS SHOULD REBUILD THE KERNEL AFTER UPGRADING kmod). This kernel will become unbootable otherwise. If you're not using [testing], please still take note, as when the kmod update comes to [core] you'd have to do the same thing.

Again, REBUILD KERNEL AFTER UPGRADING kmod. In addition, please do not build versions 3.2.13-1 or prior of this kernel anymore if you're on the old kmod (9-1) since that wouldn't work.

ngoonee commented on 2012-06-25 04:55

Go ahead and try it out. I'm of course not a kernel dev, nor do I follow linux kernel development (like most other AUR contributors, I'd think). Probably best place for you to search would be the kernel's ML.

donniezazen commented on 2012-06-25 01:50

I wanted to try this kernel. My system suffered from power regression which was fixed though force_aspm=true. I thought I would quickly ask it here instead of opening a thread. Sorry about it.

ngoonee commented on 2012-06-25 00:52

No idea why you're asking that here, honestly.

donniezazen commented on 2012-06-24 19:47

Pardon my ignorance. Was PCIe ASPM patch applied in 3.2.13-1 or was it applied in later kernels? Thanks.

ngoonee commented on 2012-04-23 02:19

RcrdBrt don't flag out of date without commenting why. I've already said why this is still on 3.2.13. If you have information I don't have, tell me.

ngoonee commented on 2012-04-10 06:33

TOI patch does not cleanly apply, so this stays on 3.2.13 for now. Minor change made (rename patch), no need to bump pkgrel.

Det commented on 2012-04-09 20:02

3.2.14

ngoonee commented on 2012-03-21 01:25

You know, if you delete your previous comment without adding the content to your next comment, it doesn't make a whole lot of sense?

wichura commented on 2012-03-20 17:32

I think I've found the problem: pm-hibernate stopped resuming during step called like 'resuming filesystems'

wichura commented on 2012-03-20 11:34

Works perfectly indeed, but on fluxbox. On Xfce I've to switch to text terminal before issuing pm-hibernate command, otherwise graphical terminal hangs up. I've got error message from laptop-mode: 'udev not active?'. I've run out of ideas where to look for errors :/.

ngoonee commented on 2012-03-18 10:31

Hibernation works with xorg here, it stopped working for you with latest update? Any error messages/logs?

wichura commented on 2012-03-17 12:41

From text terminal (#1, KMS) hibernation works, but Xorg freezes.

wichura commented on 2012-03-14 22:36

Hibernation works, but I have a non-critical error at boot time (from udevd), seems to be a new kernel version issue.

ngoonee commented on 2012-03-14 03:14

Updated, a volunteer generated a patch from git as the maintainer for TOI is still very tied up. Boots fine, but haven't testing hibernating yet.

ngoonee commented on 2012-03-11 09:00

You're welcome. Most likely its not anything special about my package though, maybe the config names etc. have changed a bit.

wichura commented on 2012-03-10 09:46

Thanks for piece of good work Mr Maintaner. I've checked linux-pf and couldn't get hibernation to work (same config worked here, in linux-ice), yaourt is compiling this package right now.

ngoonee commented on 2012-03-05 01:47

@Limoto - maybe you should, instead. They don't use the TOI patchset but the pf patchset (whose authors merge the TOI git in themselves, I believe).

Limoto commented on 2012-03-03 21:18

@ngonee: linux-pf has all of these and is at 3.2.5. Maybe you should look at it ;-)

Det commented on 2012-03-01 17:48

Well, you could at least update it to 3.0.23. It would be up-to-date then.

ngoonee commented on 2012-02-14 05:41

@helios - show me working TOI patches and bfs patches for a higher version and I will. I've been keeping my other kernel package updated all this while, its only this one that can't be updated. Check the TOI list, I've asked for a patch there, but the maintainer is swamped and doesn't have time to get around to it.

mortzu commented on 2012-02-13 14:03

update or orphan.

Det commented on 2012-01-21 21:24

No definite idea but if you're using a static kernel then you need to use an initrd to recognize the UUID.

Also why you still using grub? Grub2 is much better.

archman commented on 2012-01-15 11:49

Anyone ever managed to get the Filewriter support working? If I use "kernel /boot/vmlinuz-linux-ice root=/dev/sda1 resume=UUID=349e04943158472caa9b78ec658d545a:0x1444028 ro" in /boot/grub/menu.lst, hibernate-disk succeeds to write the image, but after the reboot, all I get is "Waiting 10 seconds for the device ..." at the initramfs stage. Anyone has any ideas about this?

Det commented on 2011-11-22 09:04

Why won't you update to the 3.0.7 ARCH patch?

ngoonee commented on 2011-11-09 02:51

The TOI patch is not. The maintainer is busy.

Samsagax commented on 2011-11-08 23:12

linux 3.1-4 is out now :)

ngoonee commented on 2011-11-03 01:26

Unofficial patch, quite hesitant to do that honestly. Will wait for an official patch.

Synthead commented on 2011-11-02 14:51

There's a 3.0.7 linux-ck package in the AUR now; can you update this one? :)

ngoonee commented on 2011-10-27 00:49

Mostly because I use the bfs patch with this kernel and don't see much point in updating (it would be different for 3.1, which I'll be getting around to sometime soon, I'd update that even without some optional patches).

echoblack commented on 2011-10-26 02:16

Why are you holding back the ICE kernel because an optional BFS patch is not out? Just remove the optional patch for now and update when it is out.

echoblack commented on 2011-10-26 02:16

Why are you holding back the ICE kernel only, because an optional BFS patch is not out? Just remove the optional patch for now and update when it is out.

ngoonee commented on 2011-10-21 07:35

3.0.7 is out but BFS patch does not work on this, so I'm holding the update for now.

V3n3RiX commented on 2011-08-15 20:41

CK patchset for 3.0 is out : http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/3.0/3.0.0-ck1/patch-3.0.0-ck1.bz2

kjslag commented on 2011-08-12 19:21

I get an install error:

/etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-ice.preset: line 5: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/kernel26-ice.kver: No such file or directory

It looks like the
source /etc/mkinitcpio.d/kernel26-ice.kver
line in
/etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-ice.preset
should have been
source /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-ice.kver

Det commented on 2011-07-28 15:59

What's newer than Arch :p?

ngoonee commented on 2011-07-28 10:21

Not everyone updates their systems very regularly. The 'one month' comment is because my personal belief is that those who don't upgrade their systems at least once a month should really move on to a new distro =).

Det commented on 2011-07-28 09:28

A month? I don't think that's necessary. At least as [linux] hits [core] people will understand that they need to switch the 'kernel26' packages to 'linux' alternatives.

Btw. I really liked this renaming thing in the sense that now that we have so many unmaintained/out-of-date 'kernel26' packages (11 unmaintained/31 out-of-date out of the 68) they finally have a chance to be removed.

ngoonee commented on 2011-07-28 06:32

Package 'linux-ice' has been uploaded which deprecates this package. I will be requesting the deletion of this package in a month's time to give everyone a chance to notice. Please go to http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51077 to update. I am currently running that kernel with no problems.

ngoonee commented on 2011-07-28 06:31

Does not yet have bfs patch, as the author (ck) has not updated it due to real-life commitments. Replaces (and is based on) kernel26-ice which will no longer be updated.

Det commented on 2011-05-29 17:41

It seems this is the place where to get the fbcondecor patch, if the other gentoo patches [1] aren't being used with the kernel: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/fbcondecor/archive/

The upstream is Gentoo as fbcondecor (formerly 'fbsplash', which was formerly 'bootsplash' -> the current 'fbsplash' is the former 'gensplash' (confusing, eh?)) was designed by the Gentoo folks: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/fbcondecor/

[1] = http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/linux-patches/genpatches-2.6/trunk/

wassup commented on 2011-05-29 09:14

@ngoonee: Thank you for the answer. As soon as I end my examination session I'll be on it.

ngoonee commented on 2011-05-29 08:39

@wassup - as I don't use it (and don't really know where upstream is) I've removed it. If you'd like to edit the PKGBUILD and send me the diff I have no objections to adding it in.

@Det - thanks, I'm on it.

Det commented on 2011-05-28 09:29

.38.7 was uploaded to [core].

wassup commented on 2011-05-28 09:28

Hi all.

I've been a little bit off the track for a couple of months and, therefore, I've got a question - what happened to the fbcondecor in the -ice release?

wassup commented on 2011-05-28 09:15

Hi all.

I've been a little bit off the track for a couple of months and, therefore, I've got a question - what happened to the fbcondecor in the -ice release?

ngoonee commented on 2011-05-10 00:03

Indeed it does =). Sorry, TOI ML seems down (or somehow I'm not receiving anything). Will get right to it.

Det commented on 2011-05-09 18:43

Since tuxoince 3.2 has been released, doesn't it make this out-of-date?

Anonymous comment on 2011-05-07 08:49

Thanks. The TOI list is down at the moment - I'm shifting the server to another Linode datacentre. It should be back up within a few hours.

ngoonee commented on 2011-05-07 00:07

Hi Nigel, nice of you to drop by. Please refer to https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=116119 for information about the resume failures (will also email this to the toi list).

Anonymous comment on 2011-05-06 21:12

Hi all.

Sorry for the slow release of the 2.6.38 patch - too much on my plate. Now that I've read this thread and seen that slowness causes grief to others, I'll try and be more on the ball.

I'm not clear from this thread which commit after 2.6.37.4 has been isolated as causing the resume failures. Could someone enlighten me?

Thanks

Nigel - TuxOnIce maintainer

ngoonee commented on 2011-04-23 10:42

Look at the PKGBUILD for the word 'headers'. There isn't a 'kernel26-ice-headers' package, if that's what you're asking.

Anonymous comment on 2011-04-23 10:29

Does this package supply its own headers?

ngoonee commented on 2011-04-19 02:25

Our kernel26-2.6.38.3-1 package has a patch applied to revert the 'break-hibernation' commit, I could just grab that if/when TOI is updated.

Det commented on 2011-04-19 01:53

And if they still got the bug there would not really be any point in using a git patch either just to get this updated :).

ngoonee commented on 2011-04-18 22:52

@MAroco, the toi patch is not updated for 2.6.38, and 2.6.38.2/2.6.37.6 have a bug preventing resume from hibernate. I'm too lazy to create a patch from the TOI git tree so I'll just wait for a release by Nigel or one of them folk.

Anonymous comment on 2011-04-18 20:30

Just found the line
gconfig=${gconfig:-1}
one I kept editing by hand every time...
love you :)

Anonymous comment on 2011-04-18 20:26

Hi all,
I just don't dare flagging it out of date but I wonder why it is still 2.6.37 if arch itself uses 2.6.38.2. What am I missing...?
Great work you're doing with this pkgbuild,thanks a lot!
Maroco

Det commented on 2011-04-18 12:31

Indeed. There's no point in having it in this one.

ngoonee commented on 2011-04-17 08:18

Sorry bout that, updated. I'm thinking of removing the rt-patch altogether since it can't apply in any case. I'll give 2 weeks for objections here if any. kernel26-rt-ice will still be maintained for the foreseeable future.

Anonymous comment on 2011-04-16 19:12

@Det
confirmed.

@anykey
and that's because old rt-patch was moved into "older" directory.
current rt-patch is 2.6.33.9-rt31.

Det commented on 2011-04-16 18:57

Actually just the rt-patch one is.

Anonymous comment on 2011-04-16 17:06

Most Links to the patches are broken by now.

ngoonee commented on 2011-04-12 03:35

Fixed a bfs-compile issue. Previous builds were not actually patching BFS in, even if config option enabled.

ngoonee commented on 2011-03-31 21:03

Cleaned up and posted. Will test 2.6.37.6 when I have the time, this will have to do for now. Or maybe I'll just wait for the ML to give the all-clear.

ngoonee commented on 2011-03-31 12:39

Yes, I tested with (!strip) and found it worked. Will upload a changed PKGBUILD after cleaning up a whole bunch of stuff.

Det commented on 2011-03-31 12:02

At least .38 (indeed) requires the (!strip) option to be set in order to not strip the kernel's symbol table. It's probably the same change to the .37 kernel from .37.5 onwards.

It was very frustrating to me, btw, to find out what was wrong with my own 'local' PKGBUILD.

ngoonee commented on 2011-03-31 10:06

To all: something has changed with latest pacman/makepkg, somehow nvidia-beta does not build against this kernel (even when using the previous PKGBUILD which worked). I think it may have to do with the STRIP changes, I will be looking at the kernel26 PKGBUILD to see what's different (it works there).

Det commented on 2011-03-30 15:17

Sure.

ngoonee commented on 2011-03-30 14:42

Upped to 2.6.37.5, will not do .6 yet due to the errors reported on the ML. In future please leave a note when flagging out of date so I know why (I follow TOI ML, but not kernel ML, so once a new kernel goes into [testing] I stop noticing updates to the old kernel.

p-w commented on 2011-03-30 13:42

2.6.37.6 won't resume for me, on the toi users list people have the same problem with 2.6.38.2 (They are building from the git tree) so there might have been a regrssion with the latest kernel update. 2.6.27.5 is fine though.

Det commented on 2011-03-30 12:46

And again, I didn't flag because of 2.6.38 but 2.6.37.5.

E: no wait, 37.6 is the latest one.

Det commented on 2011-03-30 12:46

And again, I didn't flag because of 2.6.38 but 2.6.37.5.

ngoonee commented on 2011-03-29 22:26

@Det, thanks for helping, but the TOI patch is not released for 2.6.38 hence this cannot (will not) be upgraded.

ngoonee commented on 2011-03-17 05:30

Ah, I thought all along reiser4 was updated. Sorry bout that, uploading corrected now (once I test that the patch applies).

Det commented on 2011-03-16 19:21

You didn't answer my reiser question nor update the link/md5sum =).

Det commented on 2011-03-16 16:29

Actually I flagged because of 2.6.37.4 :). This is not out-of-date just because the kernel is updated, since the patch(es) this package uses are _not_ (well, you knew this anyway, but I said it just in case as you didn't unflag this thing).

But the Reiser patch is another story, why is it still at .36?

ngoonee commented on 2011-03-16 14:58

Thanks Det, but until the TOI patch (at least) is released for 2.6.38 I won't be updating. From the looks of their devel mailing list, there's some pretty big bugs (no filewriter!) so it may be a while yet.

Anonymous comment on 2011-03-11 19:51

Guys... I got much more e-mails notifying me about this "debate" than first few messages from trowdy.
I am not charged for e-mails (yeah, funny joke, really :) )
But could you please stop arguing here? Thanks. Appreciated.

Anonymous comment on 2011-03-11 18:46

Wow. I was going to move on, but I have to say this. It is apparent someone has some sort of complex when they put killing people and forums posts on the same playing field. Do you get charged for each email you recieve?

Det commented on 2011-03-11 13:33

So I killed 5 people instead of 4? Shit happens, what does it matter? Move one, pls.

Anonymous comment on 2011-03-11 06:15

I don't feel i need to apologize for anything. So I refreshed the wrong page and it reposted my post... big deal? I deleted them. And concerning mail notifications... seriously? So you got a few unnecessary notifications, delete them and move on.

ngoonee commented on 2011-03-10 22:17

@trowdy - where I come from pointing out a mistake just elicits an apology, not some petulant grumbling.

Det commented on 2011-03-10 20:20

@trowdy, get over myself? Calm down, I'm just saying that you did this "accident" of yours 4 times.

Anonymous comment on 2011-03-10 18:30

@Det

yeh.... did it just to bug you.

was an accident, get over yourself.

Det commented on 2011-03-10 13:12

@trowdy, you posted both posts 3 times? Did you think of the ones who are subscribed to this comment section? We now got 6 mail notifications just because you first post your messages before reviewing them.

Anonymous comment on 2011-03-10 04:18

yep all is good, thanks ngoonee

the proper checksum:
'4b079b72941bf700a82bc13557043ee6'

ngoonee commented on 2011-03-10 03:27

Yes, that's my mistake. I don't have git access, so hopefully I remmeber to update it tonight. In the meantime, makepkg -g should allow you to compile.

Anonymous comment on 2011-03-10 03:06

@ngoonee

==> Validating source files with md5sums...
linux-2.6.37.tar.bz2 ... Passed
patch-2.6.37.2.bz2 ... Passed
patch-2.6.33.7.2-rt30.bz2 ... Passed
reiser4-for-2.6.36.patch.bz2 ... FAILED
current-tuxonice-for-2.6.37.patch_0.bz2 ... Passed
2.6.37-sched-bfs-363.patch ... Passed
2637-bfs363-nonhotplug_fix.patch ... Passed
config ... Passed
config.x86_64 ... Passed
kernel26-ice.preset ... Passed
mkinitcpio-kernel26-ice.conf ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build kernel26-ice.

ngoonee commented on 2011-02-05 10:20

Applied, thanks. If the file remains at that location I don't mind keeping it in, the problem that occured previously was that it wasn't updated when the TOI and other patches had already been for 2.6.37.

mykey commented on 2011-02-05 09:32

I use this kernel mainly for the reiser4 patch - it would be nice if you could intergrate that again.

It's here: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/edward/reiser4/reiser4-for-2.6/reiser4-for-2.6.37.patch.bz2

and the PKGBUILD should look like this then: http://aur.pastebin.com/UYPDrsJZ

mykey commented on 2011-02-05 09:03

I use this kernel mainly for the reiser4 patch - it would be nice if you could intergrate that again.

ngoonee commented on 2011-02-01 09:12

My mistake, updated the package, please download it again and try it out.

corion commented on 2011-02-01 08:48

This package version creates /lib/modules/2.6.37-ARCH insted /lib/modules/2.6.37-ice (I think so...)

And it raises a "warning" during package creation:
/kernel-ice/kernel26-ice/PKGBUILD: line 281: cd: /kernel-ice/kernel26-ice/pkg/kernel26-ice/lib/modules/2.6.37-ice: No such file or directory

Can you help me with that?

ngoonee commented on 2011-01-27 15:11

Yes iceman, I will. Will probably eventually clone it, but not just yet.

iceman81 commented on 2011-01-27 15:09

Feel free to use my github repo for development

ngoonee commented on 2011-01-27 15:07

Adopted. Will see what I can do about this package, first things first to remove rt I think.

iceman81 commented on 2011-01-27 14:25

I disowned all the *-ice packages. Happy pkgbuilding to everyone ;-)

Det commented on 2011-01-25 21:11

@bencahill, wait for an update or change the link to "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.33.7.2-rt30.bz2" and possibly regenerate the md5sums (e.g. "makepkg --geninteg" (or "makepkg -g")) or just ignore the checksums with "makepkg --skipinteg".

This package is also using the .36.2 linux kernel when .36.3 and .37 have already been released.

Anonymous comment on 2011-01-25 20:55

Hi, I'm tring to get tuxonice set up, but can't install this package due to a 404 on this url: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.33.7-rt29.bz2

I'm on 2.6.36, x86_64. What should I do?

Thanks.

ngoonee commented on 2011-01-20 10:33

I wouldn't mind. I would most likely take out gentoo patches though, keeping the rest.

iceman81 commented on 2011-01-20 10:29

everything comes to an end: who want to maintain this package?

mjevans commented on 2011-01-12 04:30

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=snapshot;h=refs/heads/drm-radeon-testing;sf=tgz

I decided to download a snapshot (the h= text ref can be replaced with the checksum of a commit you want to snapshot: I think http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=snapshot;h=2b2fd604bda01bfea9f1657ca468c134448e03a5;sf=tgz )

All the other patches I use applied (if with offsets) work. This might be viable in the short term.

mjevans commented on 2011-01-12 03:40

I really want to test out the new radeon driver support for my 68xx; however it's not even as simple as grabbing the obvious patches from http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=shortlog . The most recent ~50 comprise only the finishing touches; there's still at least an initial delta of some kind from 2.6.37. I'm not sure if it's worth the trouble of trying to extract the full set of what I'm missing.

ngoonee commented on 2011-01-10 07:17

@iceman, I've updated git, you may want to add in the 32-bit config as well. Reiser4 and gentoo patches not yet available.

veprbl commented on 2011-01-07 23:27

http://aur.pastebin.com/Wb4mj5bj
Thanks for your answer.

iceman81 commented on 2011-01-07 17:25

That's how the aur pkgbuild works. We could avoid downloading specific things depending on the configuration, but this means we should override the download and md5 checksumming automatically performed by the makepkg. Since the patches are small and the only big package is the kernel, it's not a problem downloading "useless" patches.

veprbl commented on 2011-01-07 17:23

hi! why your pkgbuild downloads all pathes if he knows that some of them won't be applied? i'm not sure but probably can be fixed since PKGBUILD is kinda /bin/sh executable. Sorry if i'm wrong.

Anonymous comment on 2010-12-13 11:55

@iceman81: No, it is absolutely imperative that all spamming take place here!!!

iceman81 commented on 2010-12-13 10:20

@Det: don't feed the troll
@ariesarch: can you please spam somewhere else? thanks

Anonymous comment on 2010-12-13 06:25

@Det

"just a single post rather"

Sarcasm is a common trait among the weak-minded. I was correcting my own post, where I incorrectly referred to kernel26-ck as kernel-ck.

iceman81 commented on 2010-12-12 17:39

Updated to 2.6.36.2

iceman81 commented on 2010-12-12 15:52

i'll update to 2.6.36.2 soon.

@everyone using bfs and/or ck: feel free to use any kernel you like/prefer.

this pkgbuild if for pure fun only ;-)

Det commented on 2010-12-12 15:10

just a single post rather

Anonymous comment on 2010-12-12 11:10

kernel26-ck rather

Anonymous comment on 2010-12-12 11:08

For those interested mainly in CK's BFS patches, kernel-ck is a much better option than this PKGBUILD

Anonymous comment on 2010-12-06 10:45

Hey, something is screwed with this version.

With BFS I get a build error:
http://pastebin.com/nTjmVNXN

With ck I can build, but cant use my system.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=109659

And also the md5sum for the reiserfs-patch isnt correct in the PKGBUILD .. I simply corrected it since I dont use this patch

I still have to test the clean ice kernel without any patches but the default for this kernel

Edit: after rereading the builderror for bfs: is this patch applied by default now? This could explain why the ck-patch doesnt work because of twice applied bfs? Sorry, I am a noob at these things, only my thoughts ;)

iceman81 commented on 2010-11-26 21:13

Updated config.x86_64
I have no idea about the tuxonice problem. If someone around can help, that would be great.

iceman81 commented on 2010-11-25 13:59

I'll fix the config asap. I've no idea about the suspend thing.

Anonymous comment on 2010-11-25 13:48

what's up with x86_64 config? first it is no complete config (oldconfig bugs me), second, hibernating doesn't work anymore (I get just back to X after sometime with no apparent error)...

artemklevtsov commented on 2010-11-24 06:40

Applying patch-2.6.36.1.bz2
patch: **** Can't open patch file /tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-kernel26-ice/src/patch-2.6.36.1 : No such file or directory

ngoonee commented on 2010-11-24 03:09

Hey iceman, the minor patch is commented out, fixed in git.

Anonymous comment on 2010-11-16 19:30

Sorry for not mentioning the details before. It happens with the BFS patch (and the rest 0), it seems to me the bfs357-worker_fix.patch is the cause. What does this patch do anyway? When I disable applying the patch it continues.

sinister99 commented on 2010-11-14 13:36

I also get that error when trying to build on x86_64. Only change I made to the PKGBUILD is the md5sums for my personal config file.

iceman81 commented on 2010-11-14 11:59

please provide the set of variables you've used to reproduce this issue

Anonymous comment on 2010-11-13 14:42

patching file kernel/sched_bfs.c
patching file kernel/sched.c
patching file kernel/sysctl.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 273 (offset 14 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 290 (offset 14 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 404 (offset 14 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 829 (offset 14 lines).
patching file lib/Kconfig.debug
patching file kernel/sched_bfs.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file kernel/sched_bfs.c.rej
Aborting...

Something seems wrong with the BFS fix?

Anonymous comment on 2010-11-13 06:58

Ah yes, x86_64! My bad :P Should have specified

iceman81 commented on 2010-11-12 21:00

the config for x86 is brand new. i think you're talking about the x86_64 which is not updated (yet), right?

Anonymous comment on 2010-11-12 20:14

You're also using the old config

iceman81 commented on 2010-11-12 15:12

The patch for reiser4 is for 2.6.35 and even if it applies cleanly, it doesn't build.

iceman81 commented on 2010-11-12 12:24

Pushed 2.6.36. I'll check 64bit version when i go home.

iceman81 commented on 2010-11-11 10:20

you can just repush the 2.6.36 PKGBUILD on top of all the commits. let me know when you've done

mjevans commented on 2010-11-11 04:03

It was up, but the sources vanished from kernel.org (check back a few commits and you'll see when I had it, then comments about it not being there.)

Anyway, now I've learned about git revert HEAD (revert the commit in question); now if only I knew how to apply inversions to specific files / patch segments...

commit 5cb88f141e104a9dea42de5d62d6bf5009071abe
With kernel 2.6.36 no longer on kernel.org A slight reversion may be in order.
commit 3b93d9a78700027728c3227aa96192a85f6e08d9
Version bumps, fix <> test to portable != test, disable anti-io-stalling if using ck or bfs

iceman81 commented on 2010-11-09 15:00

@mjevans: can you push PKGBUILD for 2.6.36? thanks

mjevans commented on 2010-10-29 20:30

2.6.36 and corresponding patch version bumps now updated in github ( http://github.com/giuseppecalderaro/kernel26-ice )

iceman81 commented on 2010-10-26 09:20

i'll update it tonight.

mjevans commented on 2010-10-26 03:30

There is a bfs version update, and the full ck patch set option waiting in github. I've not yet tried suspend to disk (s2r was sufficient last night) but so far things seem the same or better relative to before the new patches.

tinhtruong commented on 2010-10-25 14:05

I compiled the kernel last night. And here is the result https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=107251 :).
I don't want to pollute the AUR so I think the forum is more suitable.

mjevans commented on 2010-10-24 22:06

Patch applies successfully (some offsets, but to be expected); compiling my kernel now. Pushed up to github since it looks ready for wider testing.

mjevans commented on 2010-10-24 21:58

Patch seems to applies successfully (some offsets, but to be expected); compiling my kernel now. Pushed up to github since it looks ready for wider testing.

iceman81 commented on 2010-10-24 14:58

@mjevans: agreed. Just make sure if the ck patchset breaks some other patch and put proper if-then in the PKGBUILD

mjevans commented on 2010-10-24 06:26

Unrelated to current thread, but:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.36/2.6.36-ck1/ (and patches subdir which shows the individual patches)

Is anyone else interested in trying out the whole -ck(rev) series of patches? (I was sort of interested before, but wasn't quite proactively lazy enough to ask where the superset of patches that include the BFS scheduler lived; http://ask.slashdot.org/story/10/10/23/1828251/The-State-of-Linux-IO-Scheduling-For-the-Desktop told me.)

Now that I know where to look for them and what path pattern they have I could add them as another option to enable entry to the PKGBUILD that's on http://github.com/giuseppecalderaro/kernel26-ice

Anonymous comment on 2010-10-19 04:56

@iceman81
Argee with you. But what is a solution?.. Perhaps downgrade tuxonice... Like cantabile I'm looking for 3.1.1.1 patch...

iceman81 commented on 2010-10-18 10:48

i think it's a problem related to tuxonice developers more than kernel26-ice maintainers

Anonymous comment on 2010-10-18 06:48

I have trouble with "PM: Not enough free memory \ error -12 hibernating" on tuxonice-3.2-rc2...
Is anybody know how to fix one?

p-w commented on 2010-10-08 15:51

@cantabile - Thanks, I will try the email list when I've turned PM_DEBUG on and got some more log info

jackoneill commented on 2010-10-08 15:08

@p-w:
That's what happens here too. I don't have a solution. #tux-on-ice seems dead, I haven't tried their mailing lists yet.

p-w commented on 2010-10-08 13:58

@cantabile
I get similar messages in my logs with 2.6.35.7 when I try to hibernate it writes the caches and then the screen goes blank for a while and then X restarts. Do you have any ideas how to fix this? I am unable to find old versions on the website as well:-(

jackoneill commented on 2010-10-07 17:27

@ngoonee:
It looks like I need help finding them :/

ngoonee commented on 2010-10-07 16:50

@cantabile, all older versions are stored on the tuxonice website.

jackoneill commented on 2010-10-07 16:21

Does anyone still have version 3.1.1.1 of the tuxonice patch?

jackoneill commented on 2010-10-07 14:10

@shogoki:
Do you see something like this in dmesg:
PM: Creating hibernation image:
PM: Need to copy 522143 pages
PM: Normal pages needed: 522143 + 1024, available pages: 394238
PM: Not enough free memory
Error -12 hibernating
?

iceman81 commented on 2010-10-05 08:21

I am not using tuxonice at the moment and i am not able to give help then.

Is anyone out there experiencing the same issue ?

fheday commented on 2010-10-04 20:07

Hi,
After upgrade, I can't suspend to disk anymore. dmesg informs:

Pid: 4242, comm: hibernate Tainted: G W 2.6.35-ice #1
Call Trace:
[<c107956b>] free_update_stats+0x6b/0x80
[<c10796ba>] toi_free_page+0x4a/0x60
[<c1087316>] forget_signature_page+0x36/0xe0
[<c1084b6a>] toi_bio_cleanup+0x2a/0x60
[<c1079071>] toi_cleanup_modules+0x31/0x60
[<c107b08b>] toi_finish_anything+0xb/0x70
[<c1079b76>] toi_attr_store+0x76/0x2b0
[<c11a0ad2>] ? _copy_from_user+0x32/0x50
[<c115ba19>] sysfs_write_file+0x99/0x100
[<c11091ca>] vfs_write+0x9a/0x190
[<c115b980>] ? sysfs_write_file+0x0/0x100
[<c11094ed>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
[<c100379f>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28
Idx Allocs Frees Tests Fails Max Description
38 0 1 0 0 0 setting swap signature

The computer does not suspend at all (but it seems to write the image to swap partition)
Any ideas?

iceman81 commented on 2010-10-03 14:02

Fixed

Anonymous comment on 2010-10-03 11:21

So, that's it:

patching file virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
A cancelar...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build kernel26-ice.
==> Restart building kernel26-ice ? [y/N]

corion commented on 2010-10-02 07:56

@shogoki: remove the bz2 from line number 74. It should look like this:

patch -Np1 -i ${srcdir}/patch-${pkgver}.${_minor_patch} || return 1

corion commented on 2010-10-02 07:56

@shogoki: remove the bz2 from line number 74. It should be like this

patch -Np1 -i ${srcdir}/patch-${pkgver}.${_minor_patch} || return 1

fheday commented on 2010-10-01 23:30

Hi,
I've been trying to compile but got the following error:
==> Starting build()...
Applying patch-2.6.35.7
patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
patch: **** Only garbage was found in the patch input.
Aborting...

Any sugestions?
Cheers

p-w commented on 2010-09-30 19:07

Am I right in thinking that

file_kernel_patch

is never defined in PKGBUILD so the minor version patch is not applied i.e. Kernel 2.6.35 is built not 2.6.35.5

Hibernation is much better for me with tuxonice than with the mainline kernel code - thanks

Phil

mjevans commented on 2010-09-29 19:33

BFS updated from 330 to 350 in github http://github.com/giuseppecalderaro/kernel26-ice

pankajmore commented on 2010-09-28 19:00

iceman81 , sorry it seemed to be a temporary problem , all the md5sums are ok , but i have one trouble , when i compile it with bfs scheduler , everything works ok , when i use menuconfig to change timer frequency to 1000Hz , the kernel hangs at Loading Modules during boot , i have other kernels which work perfectly ok with 1000Hz frequency , i also use the kernel26-pf which has tuxonice and 1000Hz , but that doesn't hibernate properly. The default pkgbuild and settings in your pkgbuild work great , but on increasing the timer frequency , it hangs .. can you give any suggestions?

jackoneill commented on 2010-09-28 16:07

I'm curious, why doesn't this package have the _minor_patch appended to the pkgver, like the stock kernel?

iceman81 commented on 2010-09-28 08:44

@pankajmore: please add more info when reporting a problem.

md5sum failed... which file ?

pankajmore commented on 2010-09-27 21:41

md5sums check failed , plz update the pkgbuild

iceman81 commented on 2010-09-24 19:41

Updated to 2.6.35.5

iceman81 commented on 2010-09-18 11:07

Updated pkgbuild

thankg ngoone

ngoonee commented on 2010-09-18 02:04

@iceman, updated

iceman81 commented on 2010-09-16 10:33

can anyone update the git repo with the latest fixes? thanks

jackoneill commented on 2010-09-16 08:58

@shogoki:
For no 1, 'linux-firmware' is correct, it replaced kernel26-firmware a long time ago (where have you been? run pacman -Syu every now and then...)

For no 2, ... are you actually running this kernel when you try to hibernate? 'zgrep -i toi /proc/config.gz' should give you about 13 lines if you are running it.

fheday commented on 2010-09-15 09:12

Hi,
I've been trying to install this kernel and found 2 issues:
1- in the dependences, it is set to 'linux-firmware' (maybe it's kernel26-firmware?)
2- when I try to suspend, I get the message: ' Your kernel does not appear to have TuxOnIce support compiled in.'

Any sugestion?

Anonymous comment on 2010-09-14 17:54

md5sum of the toxonice patch isnt correct. or the file isnt correct, your choice :)

jackgu1988 commented on 2010-09-13 20:18

@Pank yep it is working now! thanks. but somebody please update it as well on PKGBUILD :)

Pank commented on 2010-09-13 20:01

Just change line 43 from
http://www.tuxonice.net/downloads/all/${file_toi}
to
http://www.tuxonice.net/files/${file_toi}

jackgu1988 commented on 2010-09-13 19:44

404 when downloading TOI :)

iceman81 commented on 2010-09-12 18:33

Updated config file

mjevans commented on 2010-09-10 21:26

TOI updated to rc2 in GIT.

http://github.com/giuseppecalderaro/kernel26-ice

jackoneill commented on 2010-09-02 18:49

I did say "approximately", but the line number and the error message _are_ accurate :)

jackoneill commented on 2010-09-02 18:48

After the patching part, I get:
src/linux-2.6.35/scripts/setlocalversion: line 46: command not found

That's approximately the message. The package compiles fine and nothing seems broken.

iceman81 commented on 2010-09-02 06:11

Updated to 2.6.35.4

thinking about an automated PKGBUILD to retrieve automatically the actual PKGBUILD from git repo...

mjevans commented on 2010-09-01 22:10

Extremely annoying build error:

INSTALL sound/usb/usx2y/snd-usb-us122l.ko
INSTALL sound/usb/usx2y/snd-usb-usx2y.ko
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `~/src/makepkg/ice26/github/pkg/kernel26-ice/lib/firmware/./', needed by `~/src/makepkg/ice26/github/pkg/kernel26-ice/lib/firmware/bnx2x-e1-5.2.13.0.fw'. Stop.
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
MKDIR ~/src/makepkg/ice26/github/pkg/kernel26-ice/lib/firmware/acenic/
MKDIR ~/src/makepkg/ice26/github/pkg/kernel26-ice/lib/firmware/adaptec/
make: *** [_modinst_post] Error 2

It seems that this is related to the first firmware object to build... I wonder if this is a PKGBUILD, makefile, or patched item caused issue...

I think I found the glitch in the PKGBUILD, it's being tested now. If this works I'll commit it to github.

@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ package_kernel26-ice() {

cd $srcdir/linux-$pkgver
# get kernel version
- mkdir -p $pkgdir/{lib/modules,boot}
+ mkdir -p $pkgdir/{lib/modules,lib/firmware,boot}

mjevans commented on 2010-09-01 21:54

Extremely annoying build error:

INSTALL sound/usb/usx2y/snd-usb-us122l.ko
INSTALL sound/usb/usx2y/snd-usb-usx2y.ko
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/home/aeon/src/makepkg/ice26/github/pkg/kernel26-ice/lib/firmware/./', needed by `/home/aeon/src/makepkg/ice26/github/pkg/kernel26-ice/lib/firmware/bnx2x-e1-5.2.13.0.fw'. Stop.
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
MKDIR /home/aeon/src/makepkg/ice26/github/pkg/kernel26-ice/lib/firmware/acenic/
MKDIR /home/aeon/src/makepkg/ice26/github/pkg/kernel26-ice/lib/firmware/adaptec/
make: *** [_modinst_post] Error 2

It seems that this is related to the first firmware object to build... I wonder if this is a PKGBUILD, makefile, or patched item caused issue...

mjevans commented on 2010-09-01 20:24

Updated BFS as requested and TOI to 3.2-rc1 on http://github.com/giuseppecalderaro/kernel26-ice

Anonymous comment on 2010-08-28 23:51

bfs-patch needs a bump to 330:

http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/bfs/2.6.35-sched-bfs-330.patch

MD5: '58078064227cf7e416c9c7b0f4955256'

Anonymous comment on 2010-08-27 12:08

http://github.com/giuseppecalderaro/kernel26-ice

jackoneill commented on 2010-08-27 08:20

@ngoonee:
" ... the fix has been committed to git ... "
Where is this git you speak of?

ngoonee commented on 2010-08-26 16:46

@funkmuscle, rt-ice and this kernel are identical except for the configuration option (this kernel does not apply the RT patch by default). Also rt-ice is one version behind because the rt patch was not released for 2.6.34 and hasn't yet been released for 2.6.35

funkmuscle commented on 2010-08-26 12:35

does this kernel replace the RT-ICE kernel?

ngoonee commented on 2010-08-25 22:29

@jryarch - Read the comments below

Anonymous comment on 2010-08-25 18:47

Hi, I'm having problems with the current version when installing:

http://www.pastebin.org/767950

The package contains /lib/modules/2.6.35 instead of /lib/modules/2.6.35-ice ?

Nicky726 commented on 2010-08-23 13:57

As I overlooked that the test changed, here is the final of the sed line:

sed -i -e "s/head=\`git rev-parse --verify --short HEAD 2>\/dev\/null\`/0/" \
${srcdir}/linux-${_basekernel}/scripts/setlocalversion

Nicky726 commented on 2010-08-23 09:09

Hello,

instead of:

# hack to prevent output kernel from being marked as dirty or git
sed 's/head=$(git rev-parse --verify --short HEAD 2>\/dev\/null)/0/' \
${srcdir}/linux-${_basekernel}/scripts/setlocalversion > \
${srcdir}/linux-${_basekernel}/scripts/setlocalversion

there should be:
sed -i 's/head=$(git rev-parse --verify --short HEAD 2>\/dev\/null)/0/' \
${srcdir}/linux-${_basekernel}/scripts/setlocalversion

as the former deletes contents of whole file.

Anonymous comment on 2010-08-22 20:05

@ngoonee, Yes, It's work! Thank You! - Dziękuje!

ngoonee commented on 2010-08-22 13:56

I've fixed that, the fix has been committed to git, so try downloading the PKGBUILD from git if you can. Otherwise, just wait for iceman to update.

Anonymous comment on 2010-08-22 11:28

==> Building image "default"
==> Running command: /sbin/mkinitcpio -k 2.6.35-ice -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/kernel26-ice.img
:: Begin build
:: Parsing hook [base]
:: Parsing hook [udev]
:: Parsing hook [autodetect]
FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-ice/modules.dep: No such file or directory
find: `/lib/modules/2.6.35-ice': Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu
FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-ice/modules.dep: No such file or directory
find: `/lib/modules/2.6.35-ice': Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu
:: Parsing hook [pata]
:: Parsing hook [scsi]
:: Parsing hook [sata]
:: Parsing hook [filesystems]
:: Generating image '/boot/kernel26-ice.img'...SUCCESS
==> SUCCESS
==> Building image "fallback"
==> Running command: /sbin/mkinitcpio -k 2.6.35-ice -c /etc/mkinitcpio.d/kernel26-ice-fallback.conf -g /boot/kernel26-ice-fallback.img
:: Begin build
find: `/lib/modules/2.6.35-ice': Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu
ERROR: module 'ata_generic' not found
find: `/lib/modules/2.6.35-ice': Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu
ERROR: module 'ata_piix' not found
find: `/lib/modules/2.6.35-ice': Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu
ERROR: module 'uvesafb' not found
:: Parsing hook [base]
:: Parsing hook [udev]
:: Parsing hook [autodetect]
FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-ice/modules.dep: No such file or directory
find: `/lib/modules/2.6.35-ice': Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu
FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-ice/modules.dep: No such file or directory
find: `/lib/modules/2.6.35-ice': Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu
:: Parsing hook [pata]
:: Parsing hook [scsi]
:: Parsing hook [sata]
:: Parsing hook [usbinput]
:: Parsing hook [filesystems]
:: Generating image '/boot/kernel26-ice-fallback.img'...SUCCESS
==> SUCCESS
Opcjonalne zależności dla kernel26-ice
crda: to set the correct wireless channels of your country

My folder after builds name is /pkg/kernel26-ice/lib/modules/2.6.35... I'm not edit pkgbuilds...

sovok_kpss commented on 2010-08-21 23:43

@str8man
I had the exact problem but with previous(2.6.34) package version. The current version builds fine. Have you modified PKGBUILD before build?

iceman81 commented on 2010-08-21 23:26

I do. I am in oxford right now. I'll let u know as soon as i get back home.

ngoonee commented on 2010-08-21 23:07

Oh iceman, you have x86_64 now? And I've already uploaded the x86_64 config previously, just not the i686 one. Did you pull before building? One of my previous hacks had to be rewritten.

iceman81 commented on 2010-08-21 20:35

Minor patch is 3.
I built it for x86_64 and it worked. The config file needs updating though.
The official language in here is english, i am not gonna use the translator for any language you may use/speak.
@cantabile: wierd, i'll fix it.
@contributors: please provide updated config file when hou update major releases.

Anonymous comment on 2010-08-21 20:18

rmware/cpia2/stv0672_vp4.bin
DEPMOD 2.6.35
/tmp/clyde-exclusive/kernel26-ice/kernel26-ice/PKGBUILD: line 273: cd: /tmp/clyde-exclusive/kernel26-ice/kernel26-ice/pkg/kernel26-ice/lib/modules/2.6.35-ice: Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu

??

Det commented on 2010-08-21 16:49

So why is it 2.6.35 and not 2.6.35.3 that it actually is?

Anonymous comment on 2010-08-21 13:51

What is going on here?

http://aur.pastebin.com/BEBLe29X

ngoonee commented on 2010-08-21 07:33

Uploaded a fix for /lib/module/2.6.35-ice not appearing to git, along with 64-bit config. @mpsnets, any particular reason you need the official Arch patches?

jackoneill commented on 2010-08-21 07:13

In the build function, there is a seemingly orphan closing brace; is it really necessary?

# Applying official patch
if [ -n "${file_kernel_patch%.bz2}" ] ; then
echo "Applying ${file_kernel_patch%.bz2}"
patch -Np1 -i ${srcdir}/patch-${pkgver}.${_minor_patch}.bz2} || return 1
fi

Right before " || return 1"

jackoneill commented on 2010-08-21 07:11

In the build function, there is a seemingly orphan closing brace; is it really necessary?

# Applying official patch
if [ -n "${file_kernel_patch%.bz2}" ] ; then
echo "Applying ${file_kernel_patch%.bz2}"
patch -Np1 -i ${srcdir}/patch-${pkgver}.${_minor_patch}.bz2} || return 1
fi

Right before " || return 1"

Anonymous comment on 2010-08-21 00:06

not have the official patch of archlinux.

iceman81 commented on 2010-08-20 20:44

Updated to 2.6.35.3

ngoonee commented on 2010-08-17 18:18

The rt-patch for 2.6.35 will probably be released, but not very soon (the maintainer is back from holidays soon I think). Will update when that's the case. Would it be beneficial to pull the TOI-patch from git rather than wait for the (seemingly very slow) update on their main website?

iceman81 commented on 2010-08-17 11:21

i'll update asap. was on holidays =)

sovok_kpss commented on 2010-08-16 05:48

That's right, previous was just fine :)

ngoonee commented on 2010-08-15 23:05

Previous 2.6.34-ice modules worked fine, I haven't tested this one yet due to unavailability of the various patchsets.

sovok_kpss commented on 2010-08-15 21:07

Yes, I've noticed that too. It places modules to '/lib/modules/2.6.35' instead of '/lib/modules/2.6.35-ice' causing problems with mkinitcpio, fglrx and other.

sovok_kpss commented on 2010-08-15 21:05

Yes, I've noticed that too. It places modules to '/lib/modules/2.6.35' instead of '/lib/modules/2.6.35-ice'.

mjevans commented on 2010-08-15 17:39

I've committed an option to enable https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12309#c488 ; following the other replies in the thread there are some tuneables that produce promising results.

However I have disturbingly noticed that even with -ice as an auto-appended postfix to the kernel version the modules end up in /lib/modules/kver/ not kver-ice; Are others experiencing the same problem?

Anonymous comment on 2010-08-06 10:36

Have you thought about adding the patch for the bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12309 to this package? A patch for 2.6.35 can be found here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12309#c488

ngoonee commented on 2010-08-06 01:59

Do you know what the ck patch is, and who wrote it, and what the BFS patch is? The main 'benefit' of the ck patchset is the BFS patch.

Anonymous comment on 2010-08-05 21:01

but the kernel26-ice does not have this patch
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.34/2.6.34-ck1/patch-2.6.34-ck1.bz2

is to do this?

Anonymous comment on 2010-08-05 18:53

@mpsnets: if you want tuxonice AND bfs-scheduler (ie ck-patch), tihs ice-kernel-package here is already prepared for that. Find this part in the PKGBUILD:
bfs_scheduler=${bfs_scheduler:-0}
Change 0 to 1 and bfs patch will be applied. Hope that's what you meant :)

Anonymous comment on 2010-08-05 18:40

Would make a kernel with the union of the kernel-ck and kernel-ice

iceman81 commented on 2010-08-05 09:27

I should update the kernel to 2.6.34.2
@ngoone: i am leaving for 10 days, can you update the git so that's easier for me to upload a new pkgbuild? thanks ;-)

jackoneill commented on 2010-08-05 07:12

ngoonee: you mean the tuxonice patch for 2.6.35?

ngoonee commented on 2010-08-03 23:50

Until the TOI patch comes out, this kernel will not be updated.

Anonymous comment on 2010-07-31 20:32

--2010-07-31 21:31:30-- http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.33.5-rt23.bz2
A resolver www.kernel.org...199.6.1.164, 204.152.191.37, 130.239.17.4, ...
A conectar www.kernel.org|199.6.1.164|:80... conectado.
Pedido HTTP enviado, a aguardar resposta...404 Not Found
2010-07-31 21:31:30 ERRO 404: Not Found.

Det commented on 2010-07-25 20:01

@iceman81, actually it's kernel26-rt-ice.. >=)

hnws commented on 2010-07-25 07:58

--2010-07-25 15:58:29-- http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.33.5-rt23.bz2
Resolving www.kernel.org... 199.6.1.164, 204.152.191.37, 130.239.17.4, ...
Connecting to www.kernel.org|199.6.1.164|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
2010-07-25 15:58:30 ERROR 404: Not Found.

ngoonee commented on 2010-07-22 22:53

@mjevans, why do you say it was deleted? Its always there, and will never (AFAIK) be deleted. I just tested it out and downloaded it. Even if you make such a change please don't update pkgver as iceman has asked. It should not be updated for the rt-patch. Reverted.

mjevans commented on 2010-07-22 20:54

Sorry Ngoonee, the file you referenced was deleted from the host. A different release was supplied in the parent directory so I committed a reverted path and more recent file. If we want an older 'stable' file please change things accordingly.

ngoonee commented on 2010-07-14 23:51

iceman81, I've pushed a small modification so that it looks for the older rt-patch. This means even if another 20 rt-patches come out there's no need to change this PKGBUILD just so someone can download the sources.

Anonymous comment on 2010-07-14 11:34

i am sorry for that

iceman81 commented on 2010-07-14 11:01

i understant people are too lazy to read past comments...

once upon a time i wrote: please DON'T mark this package outdated because of the rt patch. There is a kernel26-ice-rt for this purpose. Thanks

Anonymous comment on 2010-07-14 11:00

the file patch-2.6.33.5-rt23.bz2 is out of date
now is patch-2.6.33.6-rt26.bz2

iceman81 commented on 2010-07-06 00:25

Updated to 2.6.34.1

sovok_kpss commented on 2010-07-05 20:47

2.6.34.1 is out!

archman commented on 2010-07-04 08:57

@Ollila: With the same tuxonice.conf hibernation with kernel26-ice works more like a normal kernel with pm-hibernate, in other words, it drops almost all cache from RAM instead of keeping it. Maybe this happens only on my setup.
I've downgraded to a previous -ice release and it's working properly.

Anonymous comment on 2010-07-04 02:16

Come again?

archman commented on 2010-07-03 11:52

Anyone using this release? It drops caches when hibernating on mine. Some problem with a patch I guess. Downgraded. Works correctly.

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-28 12:02

yes i'll do.

Anonymous comment on 2010-06-28 06:32

Why won't you add yourself as maintainer? I mean you're the one who updates this package in the end (despite your use of git and other stuff with ngoone and maybe some other people I'm not aware of at all).

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-27 14:35

PKGBUILD restyling. This should solve a lot of namcap problems.

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-27 10:55

yes i am aware of the problem. I am trying to push the whole pkgbuild to v2.0 and this will solve also this problem.

Anonymous comment on 2010-06-27 09:03

Namcap goes nuts with this PKGBUILD: http://aur.pastebin.com/zca34wX4

jackoneill commented on 2010-06-23 08:29

It works, but I get this in dmesg, both after a reboot and after resuming from hibernation:
Pid: 4484, comm: dash Not tainted 2.6.34-ice #1
Call Trace:
[<c1079361>] free_update_stats+0x71/0x80
[<c10794ba>] toi_free_page+0x4a/0x60
[<c1086d06>] forget_signature_page+0x36/0xe0
[<c10d3286>] ? free_pages+0x26/0x30
[<c10794a0>] ? toi_free_page+0x30/0x60
[<c10845da>] toi_bio_cleanup+0x2a/0x60
[<c1078e51>] toi_cleanup_modules+0x31/0x60
[<c107ae8b>] toi_finish_anything+0xb/0x70
[<c1079996>] toi_attr_store+0x76/0x2b0
[<c1158379>] sysfs_write_file+0x99/0x100
[<c1106c9a>] vfs_write+0x9a/0x190
[<c11582e0>] ? sysfs_write_file+0x0/0x100
[<c1106fbd>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
[<c100379f>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28
Idx Allocs Frees Tests Fails Max Description
38 0 1 0 0 0 setting swap signature

Should I be worried?

archman commented on 2010-06-23 00:15

Running good. Thanks, guys! =)

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-22 12:50

i am compiling the version in aur right now and it's going smoothly

ngoonee commented on 2010-06-22 12:49

@archman - this new one should work, try it out.

archman commented on 2010-06-22 07:16

I commented out the lines for the patch before posting here, too, but then some errors occured. (similar to the previous pastebin). nvm.

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-21 13:43

@ngoone: yes, i just meant "make sure things are all right", but the effort was really appreciated. ;-)

ngoonee commented on 2010-06-21 13:29

@iceman81 - it did work (as in makepkg worked fine), only problem is I forgot that the TOI patch lines were commented. My bad. The current one works (with 3.1.1.1-for-2.6.34), I'm running it now.

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-21 12:42

@archman: yep, pastebin is the right way

archman commented on 2010-06-21 12:25

I'm just trying to test your work, so that made me paste the output. Maybe I should just pastebin it in future.

archman commented on 2010-06-21 12:24

iceman81, you misunderstood. I have just pasted the output from a terminal emulator. :) I would never say such thing to a man providing us the patched kernel! :D
Sorry if I offended you in any way. Again, this is just the output, not my thoughts (or trollings :D)
Cheers. :)

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-21 08:42

@ngoone: please when you say "git updated", make sure it works :-D
@archman: Please follow the HOWTO linked from http://www.tuxonice.net/ for instructions on how to compile TuxOnIce into your kernel. ???

i've been maintaining the kernel for more than 2 years. so please keep stupid comments out of here. thanks.

ngoonee commented on 2010-06-20 23:41

Yes, there were errors with the patch and the PKGBUILD.
@iceman81 - patch-for-head doesn't apply (4 errors), patch-for-2.6.34 applies with 1 error (-F4 eliminates that). Git updated (along with 64-bit config).

archman commented on 2010-06-20 22:08

sudo hibernate -F /etc/hibernate/tuxonice.conf
Your kernel does not appear to have TuxOnIce support compiled in.
Please follow the HOWTO linked from http://www.tuxonice.net/ for instructions
on how to compile TuxOnIce into your kernel.
hibernate: Aborting.

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-20 19:18

TOI patch is now working. pkg rel is still 1.

ngoonee commented on 2010-06-20 09:17

Git updated.

Anonymous comment on 2010-06-20 02:36

http://www.tuxonice.net/downloads/all/tuxonice-3.1.1.1-for-2.6.34.patch.bz2

sovok_kpss commented on 2010-06-19 17:49

oh, sorry for that :)

archman commented on 2010-06-19 11:13

Not yet uploaded on the main site.

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-19 10:41

Can you provide a link to the TOI patch?

sovok_kpss commented on 2010-06-19 03:53

tuxonice 2.6.34 patch released

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-14 16:50

@archman: of course i will! The patch is not ready yet, so i can't right now. I'll do as soon as developers release a working patch for 2.6.34

archman commented on 2010-06-14 16:48

Ok, I have edited those files and replaced "-rt-ice" with something like "-ice-test":
kernel26-ice-test.install
kernel26-ice-test.preset
mkinitcpio-kernel26-ice-test.conf
PKGBUILD
Also placed -0 to realtime_patch in PKGBUILD.

Dunno if I did it good, but it's working nicely so far. Hibernation works. All good. Thanks ngoonee and iceman81.

@iceman81: you won't patch the kernel with TuxOnIce anymore?

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-14 10:43

For those who need tuxonice patch: please use kernel26-rt-ice, change the name to kernel26-ice and disable rt patch.

archman commented on 2010-06-13 14:03

@iceman81: :D For dummies, hehe. Well, I considered that the name is kernel26-ice, so I thought I was missing something. For me, this link above is a build for a normal 2.6.34 kernel. Wouldn't it be better to put back an old version of your release? What's the point in having the above tarball if there's no TuxOnIce with it? Excuse my noobishness, I'm still learning. :)
Went back to .33, works good. Thanks! :)

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-13 11:26

@ngoonee: i tried the xduugu patch. it doesn't apply cleanly. I haven't double checked, so i could be wrong, but that's it.
@archman: is "NO TOI PATCH" really so complicated?

ngoonee commented on 2010-06-13 10:49

Yeah, you should go back to a 2.6.33 version. Alternatively you could use the TOI patch xduugu posted here.

archman commented on 2010-06-13 08:03

I get http://aur.pastebin.com/kr6aqHLU with this release. (Now I realize "NO TOI PATCH" sentence. I'll just downgrade, I guess...)

archman commented on 2010-06-13 08:00

That's probably what you meant by "NO TOI PATCH!" (TuxOnIce patched kernel without TuxOnIce?)

archman commented on 2010-06-13 08:00

Using the latest from here I get: http://aur.archlinux.org/pkgedit.php?del_Comment=1&comment_id=159249&ID=
(32 bit)

archman commented on 2010-06-13 07:59

Using the latest from here I get:

http://aur.pastebin.com/kr6aqHLU

ngoonee commented on 2010-06-12 16:13

64-bit done and pushed to git.

archman commented on 2010-06-12 14:14

Erm, I'm stupid, and I can't find any info on it, but, "NO TOI PATCH!" means? Tuxonice without tuxonice? :D

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-12 11:30

@everybody: anyone out there with a 64bit machine to update the config.x86_64 ?

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-12 10:46

Ok. I got bored with the toi patch. It's disabled now. NO TOI PATCH!

ngoonee commented on 2010-06-11 23:48

No, the tuxonice patch doesn't work, as your pastebin shows (and as the previous pastebin didn't show).

archman commented on 2010-06-11 17:29

@ngoonee, you managed to build it successfully?

archman commented on 2010-06-11 17:11

http://aur.pastebin.com/GX1bdG3Z

archman commented on 2010-06-11 16:52

http://aur.pastebin.com/GX1bdG3Z

ngoonee commented on 2010-06-11 12:45

When you run makepkg again, please delete the src/ folder first. Re-post your errors.

archman commented on 2010-06-11 06:32

@ngoone @iceman81: yes, I've downloaded the tarball from above, extracted it and did a "makepkg" in that folder where PKGBUILD is. In pastebin is what I got. Don't let the "which already exists!" parts confuse you. I just tried doing makepkg all over again after I got the failing message the first time. Just in case.

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-10 13:40

@ngoone: messages in pastebin make me think about a fbcondecor patch issue

ngoonee commented on 2010-06-10 13:38

That's probably what he meant by 'failed to makepkg' =)

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-10 09:27

that's weird, i tried to compile the kernel yesterday and i had a problem only with tuxonice patch. I'll give a look at this this weekend.

archman commented on 2010-06-10 07:46

Failed to makepkg today (with 09.06. release): http://aur.pastebin.com/wjuB758i

iceman81 commented on 2010-06-01 09:53

@ngoone: i'll do

ngoonee commented on 2010-05-31 22:57

Yes as can be seen from the comments prior =). Suggest downgrading this package for now, as it is its un-installable. I don't think you'd want to do the git route. You could also source xduugu's patch.

Anonymous comment on 2010-05-31 22:46

md5 check failed: 4200_fbcondecor-0.9.6.patch ... FAILED

md5sum 4200_fbcondecor-0.9.6.patch
fea61fba2885bc4dff578e26ad7657f5 4200_fbcondecor-0.9.6.patch

iceman81 commented on 2010-05-31 18:08

I think tuxonice patch is not ready yet. It doesn't apply cleanly.

iceman81 commented on 2010-05-31 15:26

Updated to 2.6.34

xduugu commented on 2010-05-29 19:16

If someone is interested, this[1] is the TOI patch I use for my kernel since a while. It was extracted from the git repository (git diff against the 2.6.34 tag).

[1] http://www.2shared.com/file/pLIUxG-f/tuxonice-31-for-2634patch.html

$ sha1sum tuxonice-3.1-for-2.6.34.patch.bz2
bd8f20988dd35eef1c83d991a917003ef2f24711 tuxonice-3.1-for-2.6.34.patch.bz2

xduugu commented on 2010-05-29 19:16

If someone is interested, this[1] is the TOI patch I use for my kernel since a while. It was extracted from the git repository (git diff against the 2.6.34 tag).

[1] http://www.2shared.com/file/pLIUxG-f/tuxonice-31-for-2634patch.html

ngoonee commented on 2010-05-22 15:30

Well, obviously the TOI patch will have to be done, but things like reiser4 will take ages, no point waiting for it. RT patch won't ever come out for .34 even.

Det commented on 2010-05-22 06:53

Oh right.. So you don't wait for all those patches to get done for .34?

ngoonee commented on 2010-05-22 02:24

There's already $pkgver, which can be used. The problem being that everytime there's a major update, since the patches lag behind the update (sometimes by quite a bit of time) we'd still have to manually patch back the old patch names, thus not saving much (any) time at all.

iceman81 commented on 2010-05-21 14:51

sounds a good idea.
Since it's your idea then:

1. do the change to the pkgbuild
2. test it
3. either create a patch or tell me your account name on github and push the changes

don't forget to add your name among the contributors

Det commented on 2010-05-21 14:49

Why don't you add a 'majorver' variable so that all the .33 stuff will change to .34 at once (by just modifying the one variable)?

fnord0 commented on 2010-05-18 04:19

new rt-patch, to use this you gotta change the line ::
file_rt="patch-2.6.33.3-rt19.bz2"

TO =>
file_rt="patch-2.6.33.4-rt20.bz2"

also, need to update the md5sum (hint, it's the 3rd one in the 'md5sums=' list) ::

> md5sum patch-2.6.33.4-rt20.bz2
3083075c4d3a3c74aba40dcfe7226c98 patch-2.6.33.4-rt20.bz2

everything works with this change implemented for me.

ngoonee commented on 2010-05-17 15:50

I made a small update to git repo for latest rt-patch. Will not touch 2.6.34 yet, waiting to see how my nvidia-beta-all deals with it.

iceman81 commented on 2010-05-17 12:03

Can anyone update the git repository to 2.6.34 ?

I think tuxonice and reiser4 won't be available but it's better to start updating the kernel version.

I still don't have internet connection at home and will be on a training course this week so please be patient

ngoonee commented on 2010-05-16 22:05

He's just not having an internet connection since moving, I believe.

mjevans commented on 2010-05-16 16:56

The .4 patch has been in git for a few days, I just forgot to post an update message here. I wonder if it's possible for iceman to be auto-notified on updates to the git repository?

iceman81 commented on 2010-05-12 08:41

PKGBUILD updated

ngoonee commented on 2010-05-09 10:03

Yes, that's becuase the patch has been moved. Change it to rt19 instead of rt16, and run 'makepkg -g' to get the new md5sums.

Anonymous comment on 2010-05-08 18:00

Not sure if this is happening to anyone else but;

Resolving www.kernel.org... 149.20.20.133, 204.152.191.37
Connecting to www.kernel.org|149.20.20.133|:80... connected
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found

Then it errors out because it can't grab the rt16.bz2 patch

ngoonee commented on 2010-05-02 23:54

Git updated again, RT patchset updated again (rt19)

ngoonee commented on 2010-05-01 03:18

Git updated with latest rt-patch.

iceman81 commented on 2010-04-26 21:32

Updated to 2.6.33.3

I am on my way to move to cambridge, so please be patient if i disappear for a while, thanks

mjevans commented on 2010-04-26 07:35

GIT updated, then I remembered pkgrel and wound up making and merging a mini-branch where it was and wasn't updated.

http://github.com/giuseppecalderaro/kernel26-ice/commit/a2fa3c40a84dbede67e793f74a1fd7b694a8d014

cap_sensitive commented on 2010-04-25 10:04

It seems that gentoo had removed patch 4400;
and, bfs 316 is out,
So, please update this PKGBUILD:)

cap_sensitive commented on 2010-04-25 10:03

It seems that gentoo had removed patch 4400;
and, bfs 316 has out,
So, please update this PKGBUILD:)

cap_sensitive commented on 2010-04-25 09:06

what's wrong with gentoo? patch 4400 cannot download now?

iceman81 commented on 2010-04-15 18:58

I don't have idea. Since this would be the first time we try something like that, i have no previous info.

Let's try and see what happens.

Anonymous comment on 2010-04-15 17:55

what are the hosting requirements for the binaries? I might be able to help...

iceman81 commented on 2010-04-15 17:48

http://pledgie.com/campaigns/8108

0 donors, 0 dollars to buy some web space for binary packages. Sorry!

iceman81 commented on 2010-04-13 21:48

updated rt patch

Anonymous comment on 2010-04-12 15:16

The rt11 patch moved to the "older" folder (http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/older/). No "out-of-date" ranting here, just modify the PKGBUILD so that the source is correctly retrieved. Many thanks.

ngoonee commented on 2010-04-04 22:58

No it does not

Det commented on 2010-04-04 20:37

The rt patch works with 2.6.33.2?

iceman81 commented on 2010-04-04 10:42

Updated to 2.6.33.2

cap_sensitive commented on 2010-04-04 05:21

no update?
2.6.33.2 is out.
or this package only updated when those patches are updated?

Det commented on 2010-03-28 09:32

Well, if that's the way you want it to be done, then no problem.

Det commented on 2010-03-28 09:32

Well if that's the way you want it to be done, then no problem.

Det commented on 2010-03-28 09:31

Well if that's the way you want it to be done then no problem.

iceman81 commented on 2010-03-27 13:44

@Det: please DON'T mark this package outdated because of the rt patch. There is a kernel26-ice-rt for this purpose. Thanks

Det commented on 2010-03-26 19:18

rt11 patch for the 2.6.33.1 kernel was released before you updated the last time.

ngoonee commented on 2010-03-25 13:36

For automation. If you want to use menuconfig, then set that option at the top of the PKGBUILD, and you'll be fine.

Anonymous comment on 2010-03-25 09:49

why do you have the 'yes ""| make config' in the PKGBUILD? it seems to ruin any previous menuconfig...