Search Criteria
Package Details: linux-keep-modules 1.0.1-4
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-keep-modules.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | linux-keep-modules |
| Description: | Preserve the Linux kernel modules during and after an upgrade |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/jamescherti/archlinux-linux-keep-modules |
| Licenses: | MIT |
| Conflicts: | kernel-modules-hook |
| Submitter: | james.cherti |
| Maintainer: | james.cherti |
| Last Packager: | james.cherti |
| Votes: | 4 |
| Popularity: | 0.146861 |
| First Submitted: | 2023-04-06 17:13 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-05-26 22:01 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- bash (bash-devel-gitAUR, bash-gitAUR)
- coreutils (coreutils-gitAUR, coreutils-selinuxAUR, coreutils-uutilsAUR, coreutils-uutils-symlinkAUR, coreutils-uutils-selinuxAUR)
- rsync (rsync-gitAUR, rsync-reflink-gitAUR, rsync-reflinkAUR)
Latest Comments
james.cherti commented on 2025-05-26 21:27 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-26 21:38 (UTC) by james.cherti)
@nicovell3: It is up to users to choose the package they prefer. In my view, this package (linux-keep-modules) is easier to read and maintain due to its use of a shell script that is straightforward to understand and modify.
In contrast, kernel-modules-hook package consists mainly of one-liners, making it less readable and harder to maintain. I consider one-liners risky, especially in scripts that perform file deletions.
Both packages serve the same purpose, and having an alternative causes no harm. Feel free to use the package that best suits your needs.
nicovell3 commented on 2025-03-28 17:56 (UTC) (edited on 2025-03-28 17:57 (UTC) by nicovell3)
As this has already commented in Reddit, an alternative to this package which is already in the official repositories is the package kernel-modules-hook, present in the extra repo: https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/kernel-modules-hook/ . Maybe this package could be removed to avoid confusion