But how can you take over when this RcrdBrt guy is nowhere to be found?
Maybe we should signal the archlinux staff?
Search Criteria
Package Details: linux-lqx-docs 6.12.1.lqx1-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lqx.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | linux-lqx |
| Description: | Documentation for the Linux Liquorix kernel |
| Upstream URL: | https://liquorix.net/ |
| Keywords: | bbr2 bfq futex pds proton zen |
| Licenses: | GPL-2.0-only |
| Submitter: | akurei |
| Maintainer: | sir_lucjan (damentz) |
| Last Packager: | damentz |
| Votes: | 161 |
| Popularity: | 1.51 |
| First Submitted: | 2011-08-08 16:08 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-12-01 17:30 (UTC) |
Dependencies (12)
- linux-lqxAUR
- bc (bc-ghAUR) (make)
- cpio (cpio-gitAUR) (make)
- gettext (gettext-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- libelf (elfutils-gitAUR) (make)
- pahole (pahole-gitAUR) (make)
- perl (perl-gitAUR) (make)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR) (make)
- tar (tar-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR) (make)
- xz (xz-gitAUR) (make)
- zstd (zstd-gitAUR, zstd-staticAUR) (make)
Required by (0)
Sources (3)
<deleted-account> commented on 2011-12-04 06:03 (UTC)
<deleted-account> commented on 2011-12-04 01:09 (UTC)
I've got everything updated and tested and ready to upload.
<deleted-account> commented on 2011-12-04 00:38 (UTC)
I'm in the process of creating the updated PKG Build and I will be taking over the maintenance of the package for the time being.
akurei commented on 2011-12-03 20:34 (UTC)
3.1.4-1 has been released by LQX now =)
<deleted-account> commented on 2011-12-02 22:48 (UTC)
A 3.1.4-1 patch of lqx has not been released yet, once it is I will work on getting an updated version.
<deleted-account> commented on 2011-12-02 18:25 (UTC)
Yeah, linux-lqx is a good kernel and doesn't deserve this.
Maybe this guy clicked on "Adopt packages" by accident?
silvik commented on 2011-12-02 13:13 (UTC)
hey Mavirick / td123 / someone with sufficient skills and time, why don't you take ownership of this package or create linux-liquorix or something like this and maintain it properly? it's already 2 versions behind official arch kernel. the maintainer doesn't care anyway.
<deleted-account> commented on 2011-11-30 07:07 (UTC)
Thanks,Mavirick!
Too bad the _new_ maintainer doesn't seem to care.
It's been 3 days since lqx 3.1.3 is out and still no update.
<deleted-account> commented on 2011-11-30 06:47 (UTC)
I've created and tested a new pkgbuild for linux-lqx-3.1.3-1 it requires the new mkinitcpio 0.8 which moves mkinitcpio from /sbin/ to /usr/bin
Here is the PKGBUILD: http://pastebin.com/TeySHHRs
Here is the Modified linux-lqx.install: http://pastebin.com/bdiyFB51
shivik commented on 2011-11-23 07:13 (UTC)
td123, what I meant was that you can use a different name for your kernel
for ex. linux-td123, linux-td, linux-lqxtd (and still base it on the -lqx)- you get my point.
I believe in diversity so I welcome your unique approach, but still I don't think linux-lqx should be changed.
That's why I suggested a new AUR package.
Pinned Comments
damentz commented on 2020-08-31 15:22 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-21 18:25 (UTC) by damentz)
Official binaries of linux-lqx, linux-lqx-headers, and linux-lqx-docs are now available: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#liquorix
Signing key import instructions:
sudo pacman-key --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 9AE4078033F8024D && sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 9AE4078033F8024D