Package Details: linux-lqx 4.8.11-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lqx.git (read-only)
Package Base: linux-lqx
Description: A desktop oriented kernel and modules with Liquorix patches
Upstream URL: http://liquorix.net/
Licenses: GPL2
Submitter: akurei
Maintainer: sir_lucjan
Last Packager: sir_lucjan
Votes: 100
Popularity: 3.129113
First Submitted: 2011-08-08 16:08
Last Updated: 2016-11-29 16:14

Latest Comments

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-12-02 15:37

I'll update with 4.8.12 :)

Freso commented on 2016-12-02 08:14

Both kernel.org and liquorix.net work fine with https:// AFAICT. Perhaps update $sources array to use HTTPS?

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-12-01 15:45

Não há problema

the_wolf commented on 2016-12-01 15:42

rsrsrs ... Sorry. It is very clear the same. I have to pay more attention. Hug ...

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-12-01 15:27

"_config="pkg" # "local": compile only probed modules(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/modprobed-db/)"

It's pretty clear.

BUG: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1671598#p1671598

the_wolf commented on 2016-12-01 04:00

When I went to install the kernel-headers of this error.

[root@XXXY:linux-lqx]# pacman -U linux-lqx-headers-4.8.11-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
carregando pacotes...
resolvendo dependências...
procurando por pacotes conflitantes...

Pacotes (1) linux-lqx-headers-4.8.11-1

Tamanho total instalado: 50,11 MiB

:: Continuar a instalação? [S/n]
(1/1) verificando chaves no chaveiro [#################################################################] 100%
(1/1) verificando integridade do pacote [#################################################################] 100%
(1/1) carregando arquivos do pacote [#################################################################] 100%
(1/1) verificando conflitos de arquivo [#################################################################] 100%
(1/1) verificando espaço em disco disponível [#################################################################] 100%
:: Processando alterações do pacote...
(1/1) instalando linux-lqx-headers [#################################################################] 100%
>>> Updating module dependencies. Please wait ...
depmod: ERROR: Bad version passed %KERNVER%
erro: comando não executado corretamente
:: Executando hooks pós-transação...
(1/1) Install DKMS modules

the_wolf commented on 2016-12-01 02:34

Sorry, it does not have the local parameter in the description.
hug

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-11-30 18:24

the_wolf

Please read pkgbuild carefully :)

the_wolf commented on 2016-11-30 18:11

To implement, is it possible ??
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Modprobed-db

hug

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-11-22 21:36

I'll try fix it. Be patient.

kazuo commented on 2016-11-22 16:52

I'm getting a error on install of linux-lqx-headers

depmod: ERROR: Bad version passed %KERNVER%

Looks like to sed magic is not working? Looking at the .INSTALL it still have the placeholder tags (the main kernel is ok, but both the headers and the docs have the placeholders)

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-11-18 16:42

Add pacman-hook

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-11-13 19:01

Yes.

hydranix commented on 2016-11-13 18:54

Liquorix.net appears to be down. Is this temporary?

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-10-31 12:32

Hi @xxxtonixxx, thx for the info. Fixed.

xxxtonixxx commented on 2016-10-31 11:59

Hi @sir_lucjan ! modprobed-db doesn't work because it's modprobed-db no modprobed_db

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-10-30 10:35

I'll bump to 4.8.5-2 tomorrow.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-10-26 15:27

@damentz

Done. Could you check?

Anthony25 commented on 2016-10-26 15:11

@damentz: already done since 4.8.3-2, thanks

Edit: my bad, misread your question

damentz commented on 2016-10-26 15:10

Just a heads up on the latest package, MuQSS is now the default in Liquorix, so the PKGBUILD should probably be updated to handle both CFS or MuQSS being enabled, and swap the config lines as needed.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-10-22 18:32

You're welcome. Please let me know if you'll got an error.

Anthony25 commented on 2016-10-22 18:29

@sir_lucjan: All good, many thanks! Plus, this version seems to fix the freezes I got with BFS.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-10-22 18:05

@Anthony25

Could you try and report?

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-10-22 17:59

@Anthony25

Please don't flag package without reason

Anthony25 commented on 2016-10-22 17:41

Hello,
You might want to update your PKGBUILD for options related to BFS, as Muqss has been merged in linux-zen, replacing BFS: https://github.com/zen-kernel/zen-kernel/issues/85

Thanks!

Edit: flagged the pkg out-of-date for this reason, because enabling BFS in the PKGBUILD will do nothing on 4.8.3. I'm sorry about that.

Sixsupersonic commented on 2016-10-20 19:18

I'm also getting freezing with BFS. On my i5 3570k desktop it freezes when running x264, or simply "sudo poweroff". On my Pentium P6200 laptop it will freeze when opening chrome, or wiggling the terminal around. I could not find any useful info in journalctl though.

Edit: After rebuilding with CFS the freezing still happens on my Desktop, not sure on the laptop yet, this time it "unfreezes" after a hour of being frozen.

Anthony25 commented on 2016-10-17 21:52

Hello,
I get some freezes at boot when enabling BFS, when I did not have any issue on 4.7.7. Going back to CFS fixes the issue. I don't know how to get some logs, but on 10 boots, 8 or 9 are failing/freezing.

I saw that CK released some recent patches for BFS (like 10 days ago) that fixed some freezes. Are they merged in liquorix yet?

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-10-17 15:52

Bump to 4.8.2

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-10-17 09:27

No problem. I'll push a new tarball in a couple hours.

metak commented on 2016-10-16 02:16

Sorry about that sir_lucjan. Flagged it before I saw your comment.

Edit: updated pkgbuild file to 4.8.1 and it builds fine on my end.

damentz commented on 2016-10-16 00:30

@neognomic, net/ipv4/tcp_input.c is not changed by by Zen or by Liquorix. All I can suspect is that your environment may be contributing to the build error and connectivity issues.

Try the 4.8 series when sir_lucjan bumps it next week, if this kernel specifically is still causing issues for you, I'll take a look.

neognomic commented on 2016-10-04 00:28

This is apparently more than just a warning:
[code]
CC net/ipv4/tcp_input.o
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c: In function ‘tcp_data_queue’:
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:4283:49: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
tp->selective_acks[i-1] = tp->selective_acks[i];
[/code]

as the network is broken.
~messages~
"WIRED CONNECTION DEACTIVATED"
"IP Configuration UNAVAILABLE"
...unable to obtain ipaddress.

I suppose linux44, linux47, linux-mainline and linux-ck working as expected would be ample to indicate that it is this kernel. { Only mod to PKGBUILD was for localmodconfig(same as used for linux-ck and linux-mainline(linux48)] }.
Thanks anyway; LQX looks almost ideal for desktop usage.

ImAli commented on 2016-09-11 08:24

@MrEvilBreakfast
apply this patch
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/plain/trunk/change-default-console-loglevel.patch?h=packages/linux

MrEvilBreakfast commented on 2016-09-10 17:50

Hi,

I just compiled the kernel on my netbook and it runs beautifully, but I have a question. How can I stop the absolute flood of console messages with this kernel? I use the console a lot and I find it a little irritating that this kernel is so verbose.

Thanks, and keep up the good work!

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-09-07 08:23

Did you change default config? Did you try with older version?

UnixMan commented on 2016-09-07 05:35

I'm getting this error:
http://www.hophost.net/images/680LAIMAGEN_phixr.png

nano /etc/default/grub
added: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="zswap.enabled=1 quiet splash"
grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg

OS: Arch Linux x86_64
CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 847 @ 1.10GHz

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-08-15 15:13

Bump to 4.7.0

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-08-12 10:36

Bump to 4.6.6

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-07-26 14:13

updpkgsums && makepkg -si

ltorvalds024 commented on 2016-07-26 11:47

I am getting this error:

$ git clone https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lqx.git
$ cd linux-lqx
$ makepkg -si
...
==> Validating source files with sha512sums...
linux-4.6.tar.xz ... Passed
linux-4.6.tar.sign ... Skipped
4.6.4-2.patch.gz ... Passed
config.i386 ... FAILED
config.i386-pae ... FAILED
config.amd64 ... FAILED
linux-lqx.preset ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

...

eeleater commented on 2016-07-13 21:30

I built it on my server now, no idea what was wrong with my laptop, I was using makepkg on both btw.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-07-13 16:32

eelater: I've compiled without errors. Did you use makepkg or yaourt?

eeleater commented on 2016-07-12 21:50

/bin/sh: scripts/basic/fixdep: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:291: drivers/acpi/acpica/nsxfeval.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'sound/firewire/bebob/bebob_maudio.c', needed by 'sound/firewire/bebob/bebob_maudio.o'. Stop.
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC [M] sound/firewire/bebob/bebob_focusrite.o
gcc: error: sound/firewire/bebob/bebob_focusrite.c: No such file or directory
gcc: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:292: sound/firewire/bebob/bebob_focusrite.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'sound/firewire/digi00x/digi00x-pcm.c', needed by 'sound/firewire/digi00x/digi00x-pcm.o'. Stop.
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC [M] sound/firewire/digi00x/digi00x-proc.o
CC [M] drivers/atm/solos-pci.o
gcc: error: sound/firewire/digi00x/digi00x-proc.c: No such file or directory
gcc: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
In file included from sound/firewire/bebob/bebob_yamaha.c:9:0:
sound/firewire/bebob/./bebob.h:30:20: fatal error: ../lib.h: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:291: sound/firewire/digi00x/digi00x-proc.o] Error 1
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:440: sound/firewire/digi00x] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:292: sound/firewire/bebob/bebob_yamaha.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:440: sound/firewire/bebob] Error 2
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:440: sound/firewire] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:965: sound] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC [M] drivers/atm/idt77105.o
In file included from <command-line>:0:0:
././include/linux/kconfig.h:4:32: fatal error: generated/autoconf.h: No such file or directory
#include <generated/autoconf.h>
^
compilation terminated.
/bin/sh: scripts/basic/fixdep: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:297: drivers/ata/sata_via.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:440: drivers/ata] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:297: drivers/atm/solos-pci.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
In file included from <command-line>:0:0:
././include/linux/kconfig.h:4:32: fatal error: generated/autoconf.h: No such file or directory
#include <generated/autoconf.h>
^
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:297: drivers/atm/idt77105.o] Error 1
CC [M] drivers/atm/adummy.o
CC [M] fs/btrfs/volumes.o
CC drivers/acpi/hed.o
CC [M] fs/btrfs/async-thread.o
In file included from <command-line>:0:0:
././include/linux/kconfig.h:4:32: fatal error: generated/autoconf.h: No such file or directory
#include <generated/autoconf.h>
^
compilation terminated.
In file included from <command-line>:0:0:
././include/linux/kconfig.h:4:32: fatal error: generated/autoconf.h: No such file or directory
#include <generated/autoconf.h>
^
compilation terminated.
In file included from <command-line>:0:0:
././include/linux/kconfig.h:4:32: fatal error: generated/autoconf.h: No such file or directory
#include <generated/autoconf.h>
^
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:297: drivers/atm/adummy.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:291: drivers/acpi/hed.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
/bin/sh: scripts/basic/fixdep: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:291: drivers/acpi/acpica/nsxfname.o] Error 1
make[2]: scripts/Makefile.build: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'scripts/Makefile.build'. Stop.
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:440: fs/cachefiles] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:440: drivers/acpi/acpica] Error 2
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:440: drivers/acpi] Error 2
CC [M] fs/btrfs/ioctl.o
cc1: fatal error: ./include/linux/kconfig.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:292: fs/btrfs/async-thread.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC [M] fs/btrfs/locking.o
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:292: fs/btrfs/volumes.o] Error 1
cc1: fatal error: ./include/linux/kconfig.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
CC [M] fs/btrfs/orphan.o
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:292: fs/btrfs/ioctl.o] Error 1
cc1: fatal error: fs/btrfs/orphan.c: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
cc1: fatal error: ./include/linux/kconfig.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
Assembler messages:
Fatal error: can't create fs/btrfs/.tmp_orphan.o: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:292: fs/btrfs/orphan.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:292: fs/btrfs/locking.o] Error 1
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:5789:1: fatal error: opening dependency file fs/btrfs/.extent_io.o.d: No such file or directory
}
^
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:292: fs/btrfs/extent_io.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:440: fs/btrfs] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:965: fs] Error 2
drivers/atm/eni.c:2340:1: fatal error: opening dependency file drivers/atm/.eni.o.d: No such file or directory
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:297: drivers/atm/eni.o] Error 1
drivers/atm/idt77252.c:3804:1: fatal error: opening dependency file drivers/atm/.idt77252.o.d: No such file or directory
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("IDT77252 ABR SAR Driver");
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:297: drivers/atm/idt77252.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:440: drivers/atm] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:965: drivers] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-lqx.


What to do?

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-07-12 15:35

Not a bug.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Makepkg#Signature_checking

Pival81 commented on 2016-07-12 15:32

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
linux-4.6.tar ... FAILED (unknown public key 79BE3E4300411886)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-lqx.
==> Restart building linux-lqx ? [y/N]
==> ----------------------------------
==>

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-07-12 14:33

Bump to 4.6.4

damentz commented on 2016-07-01 00:40

@sir_lucjan

I don't specifically remember changing the configuration since the last release, but I do recommend updating the package to use github tags here: https://github.com/damentz/liquorix-package/releases

Each tag on github has an associated zip and tar.gz file, like so: https://github.com/damentz/liquorix-package/archive/4.6-3.tar.gz

In each of these is the config folder, linux-liquorix/debian/config/kernelarch-x86. I do understand though that this will take time to implement. If I get some free time I'll try my stab at updating the kernel package to use this method.

EDIT: Forgot to mention, the patch is also available in the folder, linux-liquorix/debian/patches/zen.

damentz commented on 2016-07-01 00:35

@Junio_Calu

Nice catch, I wasn't aware that the graysky2 patches added their own native architecture configuration. I committed a change to the zen source to remove the ZEN specific option since it duplicates the option in graysky2's (which is preferred since it adds more specific architectures).

Change commit ID: https://github.com/zen-kernel/zen-kernel/commit/78d08393dc4d868f348a885d66c64cd92942199b

Next version of the liquorix package will have this change merged.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-06-30 08:46

@saburouta

Probably damentz has changed config files.

saburouta commented on 2016-06-30 04:32

Is there a reason the config files do not match the checksum array? Does that happen often?

Junio_Calu commented on 2016-06-29 02:26

damentz, I chose CONFIG_MNATIVE option, so it is also necessary to mark CONFIG_X86_MARCH_NATIVE ?

damentz commented on 2016-06-29 01:22

This patch is already merged per this commit:

https://github.com/zen-kernel/zen-kernel/commit/dce22c423602594e2cfc27c19588b9010ff12065

Customize with menuconfig or xconfig and you'll see new options in the processor architecture section.

Junio_Calu commented on 2016-06-29 01:20

sir_lucjan, could add support to "kernel_gcc_patch" created by graysky2 as an option?
https://github.com/graysky2/kernel_gcc_patch

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-06-19 20:32

Bump to 4.6.2-2

damentz commented on 2016-06-19 20:19

Released a new patch that removes CKO from the kernel source, this should fix the build error that eeleater and metak confirmed.

Also, I've been pushing my changes to github here: https://github.com/damentz/liquorix-package

Each release is tagged and downloadable as a zip or tar.gz file. For instance, the latest release as of this post can be downloaded from this link: https://github.com/damentz/liquorix-package/releases/tag/4.6-3

Inside are the patches and configuration. Just an FYI in case handling github releases through the AUR is easier than tracking the files from http://liquorix.net/sources

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-06-19 18:54

Vanilla linux, linux-bfq, linux-ck - build withouts errors.

I've reported bug.

metak commented on 2016-06-19 18:40

Same error as @eeleater.

eeleater commented on 2016-06-19 17:44

drivers/hwtracing/stm/console.c: In function ‘stm_console_link’:
drivers/hwtracing/stm/console.c:51:20: error: assignment from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
sc->console.write = stm_console_write;
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:292: drivers/hwtracing/stm/console.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

make: *** [Makefile:965: drivers] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-lqx.
==> Restart building linux-lqx ? [y/N]
==> ----------------------------------

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-06-19 16:16

Bump to 4.6.2

mariojuniorjp

Show me your modprobed.db files.

mariojuniorjp commented on 2016-06-11 16:49

Yes!

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-06-11 10:28

Did you use modprobed-db?

mariojuniorjp commented on 2016-06-10 23:01

Here: http://pastebin.com/NABPrGDE

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-06-10 22:04

lsmod | grep ath9k

mariojuniorjp commented on 2016-06-10 21:54

The wireless stopped working after compilation with localmodconfig. Both the driver and the chipset of the module are loaded. The wpa_supplicant.service remains inactive but loaded.

I enabled and I disabled the networmanager, but nothing decided.

06:00.0 Network controller: Qualcomm Atheros AR93xx Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01)
Subsystem: Qualcomm Atheros Device 3112
Kernel driver in use: ath9k
Kernel modules: ath9k

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-06-03 10:44

Bump to 4.5.6

kasei commented on 2016-05-24 04:13

I put this package to archlinuxcn. So I just want make sure there is no download error. Thanks for help.

frol commented on 2016-05-22 07:15

@kasei 4.5.5-1 works fine for me. Make sure you cleaned makepkg cache (/etc/makepkg.conf:SRCDEST)

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-05-22 07:12

Use "updpkgsums". I'll fix this tomorrow.

kasei commented on 2016-05-21 14:00

Validity check failed again.
Validating source files with sha512sums...
linux-4.5.tar.xz ... Passed
linux-4.5.tar.sign ... Skipped
4.5.5-1.patch.gz ... Passed
config.i386 ... FAILED
config.i386-pae ... FAILED
config.amd64 ... FAILED
linux-lqx.preset ... Passed

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-05-20 12:05

Bump to 4.5.5

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-05-11 14:50

Bump to 4.5.3-2

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-05-11 08:31

Fixed.

kasei commented on 2016-05-11 04:57

Validity check failed.
Validating source files with sha512sums...
linux-4.5.tar.xz ... Passed
linux-4.5.tar.sign ... Skipped
4.5.3-1.patch.gz ... Passed
config.i386 ... FAILED
config.i386-pae ... FAILED
config.amd64 ... FAILED
linux-lqx.preset ... Passed

spangry commented on 2016-05-10 20:20

@damentz

Some googling around reveals very little about this driver (only get 4 pages back). It's for a Atmel Wlan card of some kind. Probably safe to remove until it compiles properly.

By the looks of it, the non-compilation issue has been encountered before: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/148693

damentz commented on 2016-05-10 15:01

@spangry, I noticed this too recently, I think it's GCC 6.x that's causing the build failure. On Debian, this module builds successfully with the official Liquorix packages using pbuilder.

If the hardware this module supports is rare and no one actually has it, I'm ok disabling it in the official configuration. It _is_ a staging device driver, after all.

spangry commented on 2016-05-10 14:41

Hey is anyone else getting errors when compiling? Build was failing for me on one of the staging drivers (wilc_spi). After removing this via menuconfig it compiled fine.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-05-08 07:13

Bump to 4.5.3

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-05-03 09:21

@damentz: Done. :)

damentz commented on 2016-05-03 03:04

@sir_lucjan, can you revert the change? Per the wiki, we shouldn't be override user configured MAKEFLAGS.

disastro commented on 2016-05-03 02:25

makepkg.conf :/ https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/makepkg#MAKEFLAGS

And like the wiki says, the only reason to override that should be -j1 for race conditions. num_cores is just wrong and overriding user preference and ${MAKEFLAGS} is unnecessary.

damentz commented on 2016-05-03 01:53

I'm not too familiar with makepkg, I just started using Arch seriously on a laptop of mine and wanted the build to use all the cores. If you know a better way of doing it, feel free to submit a patch to @sir_lucjan. The ${MAKEFLAGS} would be ideal since we don't need to modify the make command.

disastro commented on 2016-05-03 01:31

Why is -j being set? That's what MAKEFLAGS is for...

EDIT: And I hadn't even noticed before that ${MAKEFLAGS} was being passed too, even though makepkg already does that. :/

damentz commented on 2016-05-03 00:14

@sir_lucjan, I believe the build bug is fixed. It was due to a stable patch that changes quite a bit about how the SCHEDSTATS config option works and requires some serious porting. For now, when selecting BFS, CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS turns off. I'll remove this workaround in v4.6 when Con ports it officially.

@eeleater, awesome! We merged a change to the PKGBUILD that tries to get the total number of cores on your system and use that as the job parameter during the various make commands. The more cores you have the faster you will build.

eeleater commented on 2016-05-02 21:03

That compiled real fast now :D

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-05-02 09:19

@damentz

Could you check ;)?

damentz commented on 2016-04-29 03:53

Uploaded a new patch that reverts the 'wastedcores' patch set, marked this package as out-of-date. Basically, this patch set improved efficiency on large systems, but didn't provide any measurable benefit to regular and small systems, and had the side effect of breaking BFS builds.

BrianAllred commented on 2016-04-29 02:49

So, any word on a fix out there for those of us that build with BFS?

ronoverdrive commented on 2016-04-27 23:37

sir_lucjan: yeah it compiles with BFS disabled.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-04-27 10:45

@ronoverdrive: Could you try without BFS?

ronoverdrive commented on 2016-04-27 03:36

sir_lucjan: Yes I enable BFS.

kbrownlees commented on 2016-04-26 20:25

The section mismatch issue seems to be related to BFS on my laptop, hit the issue when building with BFS but worked fine without.

frol commented on 2016-04-26 17:01

+1 everything is fine on my custom old-config. (no BFS, no KSM)

shivik commented on 2016-04-26 16:58

No problems here also. BFS enabled.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-04-26 14:39

Sorry, I can't reproduce this error - I build linux-lqx succesfull. Did you change config file / PKGBUILD, for example with BFS?

ronoverdrive commented on 2016-04-26 14:36

Still getting the same error as last time.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-04-26 10:53

Bump to 4.5.2-3

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-04-26 09:48

DEPMOD 4.5.2-3-lqx
==> Tidying install...
-> Removing libtool files...
-> Purging unwanted files...
-> Removing static library files...
-> Compressing man and info pages...
==> Checking for packaging issue...
==> Creating package "linux-lqx"...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Generating .BUILDINFO file...
-> Adding install file...
-> Generating .MTREE file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Starting package_linux-lqx-headers()...
==> Tidying install...
-> Removing libtool files...
-> Purging unwanted files...
-> Removing static library files...
-> Compressing man and info pages...
==> Checking for packaging issue...
==> Creating package "linux-lqx-headers"...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Generating .BUILDINFO file...
-> Adding install file...
-> Generating .MTREE file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Starting package_linux-lqx-docs()...
==> Tidying install...
-> Removing libtool files...
-> Purging unwanted files...
-> Removing static library files...
-> Compressing man and info pages...
==> Checking for packaging issue...
==> Creating package "linux-lqx-docs"...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Generating .BUILDINFO file...
-> Adding install file...
-> Generating .MTREE file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Leaving fakeroot environment.
==> Finished making: linux-lqx 4.5.2-3 (Tue Apr 26 11:47:38 CEST 2016)
==> Cleaning up...

I'll bump later.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-04-26 09:11

4.5.2-3 is out and I'll try. Be patient.

BrianAllred commented on 2016-04-25 23:48

Build breaks at modpost with the following error:
LINK vmlinux
LD vmlinux.o
MODPOST vmlinux.o
WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es).
To see full details build your kernel with:
'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y'
GEN .version
CHK include/generated/compile.h
UPD include/generated/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `set_cpu_sibling_map':
(.text+0x46942): undefined reference to `sched_max_numa_distance'
Makefile:938: recipe for target 'vmlinux' failed
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1

If I make with CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y, then I get the following output:

LINK vmlinux
LD vmlinux.o
MODPOST vmlinux.o
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.data+0x6f0a0): Section mismatch in reference from the variable logo_clut224 to the variable .init.rodata:logo_arch_clut224
The variable logo_clut224 references
the variable __initconst logo_arch_clut224
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
*_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console

GEN .version
CHK include/generated/compile.h
UPD include/generated/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `set_cpu_sibling_map':
(.text+0x46942): undefined reference to `sched_max_numa_distance'
Makefile:938: recipe for target 'vmlinux' failed
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1

I have my kernel .config file if needed. I tried building with pkgconfig set to both 'old' and 'x' and then reselecting my boot logo (that's all I change).

ronoverdrive commented on 2016-04-25 23:48

Fails to build:

arch/x86/build-in.o: In function 'set_cpu_sibling_map':
(.text+0x4a841): undefined reference to 'sched_max_numa_distance'
Makefile:938: recipe for target 'vmlinux' failed
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-04-25 11:33

Bump to 4.5.2-2

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-04-23 09:54

Fixed. Thx for an info.

FadeMind commented on 2016-04-23 07:18

Typo is :

find "${pkgdir}" -type f -exec chmod 4.5 {} \;

VALID is

find "${pkgdir}" -type f -exec chmod 444 {} \;

not 644 or other.

Anthony25 commented on 2016-04-23 00:15

Hello,
In your PKGBUILD, line 393, I think there is a typo with the chmod parameter, and you might mean 644 instead of 4.5.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-04-20 22:04

Bump to 4.5.2

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-04-15 10:36

Bump to 4.5.1

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-04-13 11:11

Bump to 4.4.7

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-04-12 17:42

Thx.

Fixed

disastro commented on 2016-04-12 17:36

You forgot to push a .SRCINFO for 4.4.6-3

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-04-12 16:58

Bump to 4.4.6-3

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-04-11 11:24

Bump to 4.4.6-2

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-03-21 09:54

Bump to 4.4.6

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-03-13 22:17

Bump to 4.4.5-3

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-03-12 20:38

Bump to 4.4.5-2

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-03-08 14:30

I don't know.

frol commented on 2016-03-08 14:18

Does anyone know when liquorix.org site will be up and running again? Liquorix Home page is completely unreachable and `/sources/4.4.4-3.patch.gz` path returns 'Service unavailable'.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-03-08 12:19

Bump to 4.4.4-3

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-03-07 14:53

Bump to 4.4.4-2

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-03-02 11:04

Bump to 4.4.3-3

FadeMind commented on 2016-02-27 13:56

Yes

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-02-27 10:22

@FadeMind

Do you mean nvidia, virtualbox and other?

FadeMind commented on 2016-02-27 10:16

@sir_lucjan FYI: http://archlinux.2023198.n4.nabble.com/out-of-tree-modules-and-alpm-hooks-td4709750.html

tl;dr Standalone packages for external modules are not needed any more. Users should using dkms for build it - ALPM hooks manage this stuff.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-02-27 10:03

Bump to 4.4.3-2

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-02-21 06:22

Super :D

eeleater commented on 2016-02-21 00:57

yeah, was a temporary glitch, went through compilation without problems just now

eeleater commented on 2016-02-21 00:28

I use yaourt, should I try it with makepkg directly?

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-02-21 00:08

Do you use yaourt or makepkg?

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-02-21 00:02

I'll check it soon (I mean monday). Be patient.

eeleater commented on 2016-02-20 23:59

Nope nothing of the sort, just straight up tried upgrading linux-lqx.

I am now trying to have it compile again, might have been only a temporary glitch.

eeleater commented on 2016-02-20 23:35

Do you know what to do here?

I get this when compiling the newest linux-lqx:

objdump: 'sound/pci/oxygen/.tmp_oxygen_io.o': No such file
mv: cannot stat 'sound/pci/oxygen/.tmp_oxygen_io.o': No such file or directory
scripts/Makefile.build:258: recipe for target 'sound/pci/oxygen/oxygen_io.o' failed
make[3]: *** [sound/pci/oxygen/oxygen_io.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:403: recipe for target 'sound/pci/oxygen' failed
make[2]: *** [sound/pci/oxygen] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.build:403: recipe for target 'sound/pci' failed
make[1]: *** [sound/pci] Error 2
Makefile:945: recipe for target 'sound' failed
make: *** [sound] Error 2

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-02-20 22:02

Bump to 4.4.2

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-02-17 10:50

Bump to 4.4.1-3 (lqx 4.4.1-2)

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-02-05 08:29

Fixed,

ronoverdrive commented on 2016-02-05 00:06

I'm getting the following error:

error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
linux-lqx-headers: /usr/lib/modules/4.4.1-1-lqx/build/Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-01 exists in filesystem
linux-lqx-headers: /usr/lib/modules/4.4.1-1-lqx/build/Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02 exists in filesystem
linux-lqx-headers: /usr/lib/modules/4.4.1-1-lqx/build/Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.select-break exists in filesystem
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-02-04 17:50

No problem, mate ;)

funkmuscle commented on 2016-02-04 17:45

and there we go, back to normal.. building as we speak.. thank you for the superb job sir_lucjan!

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-02-04 17:28

Bump to 4.4.1

funkmuscle commented on 2016-02-04 16:29

this is by far the best. bfq doesn't do it. this one is close to vanilla as possible with some tweaks..
I'll just wait till 4.4.1 as I never had to compile the earlier versions. If this is how he's doing them, then I'll compile.. thanx

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-02-04 13:24

@funmuscle

Try linux-bfq :D

funkmuscle commented on 2016-02-04 12:52

haha, thanx sir_lucjan :-)
I haven't compiled a kernel in about 10+ years. I love the kernel, I hope it won't be like this from here on..

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-02-04 09:54

Ask damentz ;)

funkmuscle commented on 2016-02-04 01:46

why is this build asking so much?

*
* Restart config...
*
*
* General setup
*
Tune kernel for interactivity (ZEN_INTERACTIVE) [Y/n/?] y
Cross-compiler tool prefix (CROSS_COMPILE) []
Compile also drivers which will not load (COMPILE_TEST) [N/y/?] n
Local version - append to kernel release (LOCALVERSION) [-lqx] -lqx
Automatically append version information to the version string (LOCALVERSION_AUTO) [N/y/?] n
Kernel compression mode
1. Gzip (KERNEL_GZIP)
2. Bzip2 (KERNEL_BZIP2)
3. LZMA (KERNEL_LZMA)
> 4. XZ (KERNEL_XZ)
5. LZO (KERNEL_LZO)
6. LZ4 (KERNEL_LZ4)
choice[1-6?]: 4
Default hostname (DEFAULT_HOSTNAME) [(none)] (none)
Support for paging of anonymous memory (swap) (SWAP) [Y/n/?] y
System V IPC (SYSVIPC) [Y/n/?] y
POSIX Message Queues (POSIX_MQUEUE) [Y/n/?] y
kdbus interprocess communication (KDBUS) [N/m/y/?] n
Enable process_vm_readv/writev syscalls (CROSS_MEMORY_ATTACH) [Y/n/?] y
open by fhandle syscalls (FHANDLE) [Y/n/?] y
uselib syscall (USELIB) [N/y/?] n
Auditing support (AUDIT) [Y/?] y

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-02-02 19:20

Bump to 4.4.0

frol commented on 2016-01-27 03:45

BTW, the prepackaged config has `CONFIG_FB_NVIDIA=m`, which seem to cause a freeze on resume from suspend. I haven't tested it thoroughly, but resume feature got fixed when I did `rmmod nvidiafb`. Stock Arch Linux has this module disabled.

frol commented on 2016-01-26 12:28

FYI, I have succeeded in getting a stable Liquorix kernel (4.4.0-2) using `_config="local"` mode (thus, using prepackaged config.amd64 as a base) for my Lenovo Y50-70 laptop (Intel HD 4600 + Nvidia GTX 860M). There were only two issues on my way this time:

1. WiFi couldn't initialize due to the missing CONFIG_PACKET (I was getting "l2_packet_init: socket(PF_PACKET): Address family not supported by protocol" error in journalctl). This was caused by `local` mode since prepackaged config.amd64 has CONFIG_PACKET enabled as a module, but I since I was moving from Arch stock where this option was enabled straight to a kernel instead of a module, modprobed-db couldn't know that this option is needed.

2. The combination of the default encoding for FAT FS (CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET) being utf-8 in Liquorix prepackaged config.amd64, and modprobed-db stripping almost all `CONFIG_NLS_*` (including UTF8) resulted in that I couldn't mount an MMC card (and wouldn't probably able to mount USB flash drive either). I have changed CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET to `iso8859-1` (just to be safe, as this is makes more sense to me, and stock Arch Linux kernel uses it), and also re-enabled `CONFIG_NLS_*` options.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-01-23 17:19

Bump to 4.3.3-8

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-01-23 17:01

I will bump to 4.4 when linux 4.4 hits to [core]

frol commented on 2016-01-23 16:42

I just want to leave quick notes here:

1. xconfig in Kernel 4.4 has been ported to Qt5, so the build requirement might be changed from `qt4` to `qt5-base`.

2. Current Liquorix patch for 4.4 Kernel (4.4.0-2) does not include BFS scheduler.

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-01-20 09:01

Fix CVE-2016-0728

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-01-13 14:08

Bump to 4.3.3-5

frol commented on 2016-01-01 06:23

@Dea993 You have to import Linus Torvalds' public key: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=192575

Dea993 commented on 2015-12-28 13:00

==> Validazione dei sorgenti con sha512sums in corso...
linux-4.3.tar.xz ... Verificato
linux-4.3.tar.sign ... Ignorato
4.3.3-2.patch.gz ... Verificato
config.i386 ... Verificato
config.i386-pae ... Verificato
config.amd64 ... Verificato
linux-lqx.preset ... Verificato
==> Validazione delle firme dei sorgenti con gpg in corso...
linux-4.3.tar ... NON RIUSCITO (chiave pubblica sconosciuta 79BE3E4300411886)
==> ERRORE: Una o più firme PGP non possono essere verificate!
==> ERRORE: Makepkg non è riuscito a compilare linux-lqx.

lembang commented on 2015-12-28 06:20

@frol sorry havent check the page for awhile. I tried your idea, but no luck, with liquorix's default config; even worse the new config causing me have a kernel panic, no idea if its because I use LVM on LUKS on that laptop, so for now I give up using liquorix on my t420;am still using it on my g73sw.

Once I have enough time to play around with it, I will post it here.

afader commented on 2015-12-27 06:39

For some reason, with this kernel I can't get an IPv4 address from my router. I use the linux-ck kernel 4.3.3.2 with no problem with my router and it gets a 192.168.1.x address from dhcpcd. When I switch to the -lqx kernel I only get an ipv6 address. I can't use only IPv6 because my ISP only provides IPv4 and the tunnel is slow. I am compiling with localmodconfig but I went in and checked a bunch of IP-related modules in the config, but it didn't help.

frol commented on 2015-12-22 12:14

@damentz, I haven't succeeded in moving from liquorix default config to a working one (I just couldn't make my wifi (Intel Corporation Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260) work well, it somehow gets initialized correctly only 20+ minutes after a boot). Thus, I cannot even tell how stable the kernel is as it is not acceptable to me waiting 20 minutes before I can start using my laptop...

My config (posted in the previous comment) is originated from Arch upstream kernel config, which I have manually stripped.

damentz commented on 2015-12-21 05:46

@frol, just to clear up any possible FUD, CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON was disabled the same day you posted your message, ironically, for a different bug I encountered on a different system of mine. Here was the update from the official debian changelog:

linux-liquorix (4.3-7) unstable; urgency=medium

* disable CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON
- DMA remapping is unstable on most intel systems where IOMMU is enabled
in the BIOS. Causes crashes and freezes on modern Haswell+ systems.
- Known bug that was solved on Ubuntu kernels:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/911236
* update version to 3.dmz.2

-- Steven Barrett <steven@liquorix.net> Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:48:02 -0600

What else did you change that is making your system more stable?

frol commented on 2015-12-16 09:53

@lembang You know what, I have tried to compile the kernel with the packaged configs and they seem to be broken for me also. At least dmesg has scary messages about IOMMU-related stuff (`DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set`), and at the very least WiFi won't work for no reason (modules are loaded and everything seems to be fine, but no WiFi device can be found). Also, 4.3.2-2, in contrast to 4.3.2-1, doesn't work with my old config either. Here is my working kernel config - https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18807070/tmp/kernel-lqx-4.3.3-1.config

BTW, It seems that CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON causes some issues by itself, so you may start by trying switching it off by passing via grub options `intel_iommu=off` (other available options are `=pt`, `=igfx_off`, and, obviously, `=on`). Stock Arch kernel has CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON disabled, but liquorix's prepackaged config has it enabled.

frol commented on 2015-12-15 15:18

@lembang I'm sorry for my delayed responses. I have disabled a number of unnecessary for my Lenovo y50-70 laptop options, and I use BFS process scheduler, but starting with the built-in ('pkg') kernel config didn't work for me (WiFi was misbehaving for no reason at all), so I started with 'old' config running stock Arch kernel and later I was slimming it gradually.

lembang commented on 2015-12-10 07:56

@frol that is interesting.
I tested this kernel on my thinkpad t420(Intel HD 3000) ,asus g751JM (HD 4600 + GTX 860m), asus x200ma (baytrail) all will have a random freeze. It only working fine on my Asus G73SW (GTX 560M).
Did you do any kernel parameter?

frol commented on 2015-12-10 07:51

@lembang I have Intel HD 4600 + Nvidia GTX 860M (though, I rarely use Nvidia and it is almost always turned off by bumblebee+bbswitch). They have been working absolutely fine on this kernel since I installed the kernel this September.

lembang commented on 2015-12-08 23:11

Anyone in here actually having a problem with lqx kernel + intel HD graphics card.
I found that all the device that is running intel HD GPU will have a random freeze.
I have followed all the kernel flag instruction it doenst help me with anything. I found it works perfect on my other devices which run NVIDIA GPU

Junio_Calu commented on 2015-12-08 18:53

Thanks for the clarification @sir_lucjan, I will use the patch without fear now :D

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-11-22 17:52

@Junio_Calu: If you want - no ;) You can add this patch to PKGBUILD.

Junio_Calu commented on 2015-11-22 03:39

@sir_lucjan, is there any restriction on the use of graysky2 patch (enable_additional_cpu_optimizations_for_gcc_v4.9+_kernel_v3.15+.patch
)?

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-11-16 18:14

Try nvidia-lqx or nvidia-dkms from [testing].

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-11-16 18:13

Paste:

pacman -Qs lqx

afader commented on 2015-11-16 17:25

/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/355.11/build/nvidia/nv-procfs.c: In function ‘nv_procfs_read_registry’:
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/355.11/build/nvidia/nv-procfs.c:363:12: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
return seq_printf(s, "Binary: \"%s\"\n", registry_keys);
^
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/355.11/build/nvidia/nv-procfs.c: In function ‘nv_procfs_read_text_file’:
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/355.11/build/nvidia/nv-procfs.c:563:12: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
return seq_puts(s, s->private);
^
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/355.11/build/nvidia/nv-procfs.c:564:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
}
^
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/355.11/build/nvidia/nv-procfs.c: In function ‘nv_procfs_read_registry’:
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/355.11/build/nvidia/nv-procfs.c:364:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
}
^
scripts/Makefile.build:258: recipe for target '/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/355.11/build/nvidia/nv-procfs.o' failed
make[2]: *** [/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/355.11/build/nvidia/nv-procfs.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Makefile:1379: recipe for target '_module_/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/355.11/build' failed
make[1]: *** [_module_/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/355.11/build] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/lib/modules/4.3.0-1-lqx/build'
Makefile:81: recipe for target 'modules' failed
make: *** [modules] Error 2

afader commented on 2015-11-16 17:24

I'm having trouble building nvidia-dkms on 4.3

-> Running build hook: [nvidia]
Building nvidia modules for 4.3.0-1-lqx kernel...

Kernel preparation unnecessary for this kernel. Skipping...

Building module:
cleaning build area...
'make' -j8 NV_EXCLUDE_BUILD_MODULES='__EXCLUDE_MODULES' KERNEL_UNAME=4.3.0-1-lqx modules....(bad exit status: 2)
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 4.3.0-1-lqx (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/355.11/build/make.log for more information.

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-11-13 15:52

Bump to 4.3

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-11-10 16:51

Bump to 4.2.6

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-10-29 15:48

Fixed

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-10-29 10:15

I will fix that later.

frol commented on 2015-10-29 03:06

Weird, 4.2.5-1.patch.gz doesn't match sha512sum. For me, it is 4503310f5ad1725b7093d9fec35c87af4ccd7c3397f3b8edc232066fc4b525f6bf384841e308a8ae969fb650dbfd1b094f63bc049f471b6474316d14395a9a

damentz commented on 2015-10-29 00:15

@vania, the old versions were removed as part of my sync scripts a long time ago when I found out that one of the previous maintainers to the AUR was not properly maintaining this package. I got tired of constantly logging in and marking this package as obsolete, so as a compromise, I just delete non-current patches from the sources folder on liquorix.net.

Since this isn't an issue anymore I can turn that off and just sync all patches instead. If you want to stay up-to-date, you can subscribe to the atom feed here: http://liquorix.net/atom.

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-10-28 17:03

Link to "old" version (4.1.12):

https://github.com/sirlucjan/aur/tree/master/linux-lqx-old

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-10-28 15:58

Bump to 4.2.5

vania commented on 2015-10-28 14:32

I not speek good english, tx..

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-10-28 13:32

You can ask him if you want :)

vania commented on 2015-10-28 12:42

It will not be the case to ask the author to leave the "old patches" a little longer? The patch 4.2.4 has already been deleted ..

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-10-24 15:35

Bump to 4.2.4

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-10-05 15:47

Link to "old" version (4.1.10):

https://github.com/sirlucjan/aur/tree/master/linux-lqx-old

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-10-04 17:15

Bump to 4.2.3

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-30 15:43

Link to "old" version (4.1.9):

https://github.com/sirlucjan/aur/tree/master/linux-lqx-old

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-30 15:38

Bump to 4.2.2

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-24 05:44

Link to "old" version (4.1.8):

https://github.com/sirlucjan/aur/tree/master/linux-lqx-old

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-24 05:42

Hi.

It's probably an upstream bug:

http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-bugs/2015-09/msg00539.html

http://askubuntu.com/questions/677585/upgrading-iwlwifi-7260-firmware-on-lenovo-t540p

It look like linux-firmware from [core] doesn't include iwlwifi-7260-14.ucode.

pejas commented on 2015-09-23 19:11

Hi,
After an upgrade to 4.2.1-1 my wifi stopped working.
dmesg shows:
[ 61.640993] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: Direct firmware load for iwlwifi-7260-14.ucode failed with error -2

it looks like missing firmware (no 14):
$ sudo updatedb
$ locate iwlwifi-7260
/usr/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-7260-10.ucode
/usr/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-7260-12.ucode
/usr/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-7260-13.ucode
/usr/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-7260-7.ucode
/usr/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-7260-8.ucode
/usr/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-7260-9.ucode

no packages to upgrade after: yaourt -Syua

I don't know if it's arch/aur problem or linux/lqx in general.
I think Intel Wireless 7260 is quiet popular... please let me know if I should fill it upstream or can help etc.

Best Regards
pp

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-22 15:40

Version 4.1.8: https://github.com/sirlucjan/aur/tree/master/linux-lqx-old

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-22 15:23

Bump to 4.2.1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-22 05:30

4.2.1 is out. I'll bump later.

petejones commented on 2015-09-22 03:39

I'm getting a 404 error when I try to build package.

ilikenwf commented on 2015-09-21 14:02

I know what LQX is, I've been following zen for probably 8? years, when it was known as the kamikaze patchset over on gentoo forums.

Thanks for the clarification :)

It makes me happy to see so much mainstream use of this kernel.

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-21 13:50

Steven Barrett (damentz) wrote:

"To put it plainly, Liquorix is a distribution of Zen.

Zen is just the primary source code that contains many changes under the zen tune branch, plus many out of tree patches that have not made it to mainline. Liquorix takes the latest zen patches, adds a configuration on top, and packages that for Debian Unstable / Testing."

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-21 11:05

1. http://techpatterns.com/forums/about1534.html

I know --> 2010 :)

2. https://www.diffchecker.com/ivvby9pj

Diiff between -zen and -lqx config (for example 64 bit).

3. linux-lqx includes 'config 32-pae'.

ilikenwf commented on 2015-09-21 07:25

The real question, is what are the differences between this and the zen-kernel in the [extra] repo? Zen and lqx use the same git repo, and I'm assuming that zen-kernel in [extra] is the same, since the maintainer is one of the Zen/lqx devs (@heftig).

ilikenwf commented on 2015-09-21 07:24

The real question, is what are the differences between this and the zen-kernel in the [extra] repo? Zen and lqx use the same git repo, and I'm assuming that zen-kernel in [extra] is the same, since the maintainer is one of the Zen/lqx devs.

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-20 19:43

Bump to 4.2.0

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-14 18:51

Bump to 4.1.7

Freso commented on 2015-09-14 14:49

http://liquorix.net/sources/4.1.6-2.patch.gz 404's.

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-13 19:29

Bump to 4.1.6-2

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-11 06:02

[ 0.317183] io scheduler bfq registered (default)

Check:

# cat /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler

DungSherlock commented on 2015-09-11 01:53

[ 0.316623] io scheduler noop registered
[ 0.316768] io scheduler deadline registered
[ 0.316984] io scheduler cfq registered
[ 0.317183] io scheduler bfq registered (default)
[ 0.327078] BFQ I/O-scheduler: v7r8
[ 0.652154] CFS CPU scheduler.


BFQ not working? How to fix this?!

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-09-07 05:29

@MrEvilBreakfast

Why out-of-date?

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-08-11 17:54

Bump to 4.1.5

MrEvilBreakfast commented on 2015-08-11 08:40

I spotted 4.1.5. I grabbed the patch myself, modified the 4.1.4 pkgbuild and got 4.1.5 running nicely.

MrEvilBreakfast commented on 2015-08-11 07:54

I spotted 4.1.5

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-08-04 17:03

Bump to 4.1.4

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-07-22 18:09

Bump to 4.1.3

lembang commented on 2015-07-22 03:26

4.1.3 is on the upstream

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-07-17 20:45

Version 4.0.8: https://github.com/sirlucjan/aur/tree/master/linux-lqx-old

damentz commented on 2015-07-12 21:22

Woops, accidentally flagged as out of date, you can ignore that.

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-07-12 19:18

Bump to 4.1.2

keren_sky commented on 2015-07-12 12:16

Anyone getting a 404 on the 4.1.1-2.patch.gz link since y'day?

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-07-06 14:52

@afader: No.

@ Freso: Fixed

Freso commented on 2015-07-06 03:43

4.1.1-1.patch.gz, config.i386-pae, and config.amd64 doesn't pass checksum tests.

afader commented on 2015-07-06 00:49

Is there still aufs in this package?

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-07-05 12:02

Bump to 4.1.1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-07-03 18:27

@Det

linux-lqx is up-to-date

http://liquorix.net/sources/

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-06-23 17:38

Bump to 4.0.6-1

MrEvilBreakfast commented on 2015-05-24 19:00

It's fine now.

MrEvilBreakfast commented on 2015-05-24 17:21

Oh how I wish it were that simple! I'm sure your PKGBUILD is fine. If you're at all curious as to what's going on my end,
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=197787

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-05-24 10:47

You should use a makepkg without root privileges.

MrEvilBreakfast commented on 2015-05-24 08:08

Well it may not be the PKGBUILD's fault. No AUR kernel will compile for me. Disregard me.

MrEvilBreakfast commented on 2015-05-24 05:08

I'm getting patching errors...

...
patching file tools/perf/util/cloexec.h
patching file tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
patching file tools/power/x86/turbostat/Makefile
patching file virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
patching file virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare().
Aborting...

Naturally, running makepkg --noprepare results in a healthy stream of errors.

MrEvilBreakfast commented on 2015-05-24 03:26

I'm getting patching errors...

...
patching file tools/perf/util/cloexec.h
patching file tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
patching file tools/power/x86/turbostat/Makefile
patching file virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
patching file virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare().
Aborting...

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-05-19 08:33

Did you try for example xconfig?

thoffmeyer commented on 2015-05-19 02:17

I don't know if this is a menuconfig/nconfig glitch or to do with nVidia drivers, but I cannot for the life of me get menuconfig/nconfig working in fb or terminal without just massivly glitching out.. Not sure if anyone else has this problem just massive flickers..

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-05-18 08:18

Bump to 4.0.4

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-05-12 15:43

Bump to 4.0.2-2

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-05-08 13:08

Bump to 4.0.2-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-05-06 14:44

BFS for 4.0 sometimes doesn't work properly.

Please don't use "BFS=yes".

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-05-06 13:27

BFS for 4.0 is corrupted.

Freso commented on 2015-05-06 09:00

I get http://sprunge.us/HTiG if I set $_use_BFS to "yes" but leave all other options as default in the PKGBUILD ("no", "pkg", "", "yes" (BFS), "no", "no"). It compiled fine with $_use_BFS set to "no".

thoffmeyer commented on 2015-05-05 19:12

The localmod config doesn't work in the pkgbuild, it fails every time :/

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-05-05 15:35

Bump to 4.0.1-3

New version of liquorix patchset

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-04-30 09:47

Bump to 4.0.1-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-04-29 15:43

Probably yes.

hpstg commented on 2015-04-29 15:35

Is CFS the default scheduler again?

└──> ~ $ >> sudo dmesg | grep scheduler
[ 0.312382] io scheduler noop registered
[ 0.312383] io scheduler deadline registered
[ 0.312403] io scheduler cfq registered
[ 0.312420] io scheduler bfq registered (default)
[ 0.312421] BFQ I/O-scheduler version: v7r7
[ 0.326239] CFS CPU scheduler.

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-04-27 12:34

Bump to 4.0.0-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-04-21 08:47

Bump to 3.19.5-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-04-14 16:12

Bump to 3.19.4-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-04-14 16:12

Bump to 3.19.4-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-04-11 16:24

Fixed

topgun commented on 2015-04-11 16:19

I imported the key, but I keep getting these errors

==> Validating source files with sha512sums...
linux-3.19.tar.xz ... Passed
linux-3.19.tar.sign ... Skipped
3.19.3-1.patch.gz ... FAILED
config.i386 ... Passed
config.i386-pae ... Passed
config.amd64 ... Passed
linux-lqx.preset ... Passed
0001-fix-btrfs-mount-deadlock.patch ... Passed
0001-fixup-drm.patch ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-lqx.

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-04-02 08:32

Bump to 3.19.3-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-28 17:44

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 79BE3E4300411886

AACO commented on 2015-03-28 17:40

I just tried to install this package and got an error saying that one or more pgp signatures couldnt be verified.

==> Building and installing package
==> Making package: linux-lqx 3.19.2-1 (Sat Mar 28 17:36:49 WET 2015)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Downloading linux-3.19.tar.xz...
......
-> Downloading linux-3.19.tar.sign...
......
-> Downloading 3.19.2-1.patch.gz...
......
-> Downloading config.i386...
......
-> Downloading config.i386-pae...
......
-> Downloading config.amd64...
......
-> Found linux-lqx.preset
==> Validating source files with sha512sums...
linux-3.19.tar.xz ... Passed
linux-3.19.tar.sign ... Skipped
3.19.2-1.patch.gz ... Passed
config.i386 ... Passed
config.i386-pae ... Passed
config.amd64 ... Passed
linux-lqx.preset ... Passed
==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
linux-3.19.tar ... FAILED (unknown public key 79BE3E4300411886)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-lqx.
==> Restart building linux-lqx ? [y/N]
==> ----------------------------------
==>

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-25 07:53

Try now.

Freso commented on 2015-03-25 07:24

I keep getting FAILED sources for the config.* and 3.19.2-1.patch.gz files when makepkg --verifysources'ing. Am I continuously pulling down bad files, or did they get ninja-modified upstream?

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-23 07:54

Bump to 3.19.2-1

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-17 16:04

@damentz and @sir_lucjan
Turkish my system.So there is an error in the compilation.
modversions.h file compilation looks as follows:

src/linux-3.18/include/config/modversIon.h

so src/linux-3.18/include/config/modversion.h file could not be found:

drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.c:18:32: ölümcül hata: config/modversions.h: Böyle bir dosya ya da dizin yok
#include <config/modversions.h>
^
derleme sonlandırıldı.

I fix compilation was successfully terminated as modversion.h hands:
DEPMOD 3.18.9-2-lqx
==> Kurulum düzenleniyor...
-> İstenmeyen dosyalar kaldırılıyor...
-> libtool dosyaları kaldırılıyor...
-> static library dosyaları kaldırılıyor...
-> Kılavuz ve bilgi sayfaları sıkıştırılıyor...
==> "linux-lqx" paketi oluşturuluyor...
-> .PKGINFO dosyası üretiliyor...
-> install dosyası ekleniyor...
-> .MTREE dosyası oluşturuluyor...
-> Paket sıkıştırılıyor...
==> package_linux-lqx-headers() işlemine başlanıyor...
==> Kurulum düzenleniyor...
-> İstenmeyen dosyalar kaldırılıyor...
-> libtool dosyaları kaldırılıyor...
-> static library dosyaları kaldırılıyor...
-> Kılavuz ve bilgi sayfaları sıkıştırılıyor...
==> "linux-lqx-headers" paketi oluşturuluyor...
-> .PKGINFO dosyası üretiliyor...
-> install dosyası ekleniyor...
-> .MTREE dosyası oluşturuluyor...
-> Paket sıkıştırılıyor...
==> package_linux-lqx-docs() işlemine başlanıyor...
==> Kurulum düzenleniyor...
-> İstenmeyen dosyalar kaldırılıyor...
-> libtool dosyaları kaldırılıyor...
-> static library dosyaları kaldırılıyor...
-> Kılavuz ve bilgi sayfaları sıkıştırılıyor...
==> "linux-lqx-docs" paketi oluşturuluyor...
-> .PKGINFO dosyası üretiliyor...
-> install dosyası ekleniyor...
-> .MTREE dosyası oluşturuluyor...
-> Paket sıkıştırılıyor...
==> fakeroot ortamından çıkılıyor.
==> linux-lqx 3.18.9-2 (Sal Mar 17 19:44:20 EET 2015) paketinin derlenmesi tamamlandı

I think this is a concern for the compilation of Turkish users.

Thank you all.

pavbaranov commented on 2015-03-17 08:09

It builds without any problems for me.

damentz commented on 2015-03-16 18:36

sir_lucjan, ok thanks.

cokomoko, what happens when you try building with LANG=C? Your output is in Turkish and there's a chance that your language settings could be interfering with the build.

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-16 17:59

@damentz

Yes

http://pastebin.com/TGDWLiie

Package has built successfully (~tenfold).

damentz commented on 2015-03-16 17:51

sir_lucjan, can you reproduce from a vanilla Arch Linux installation? I wonder if there's a dependency missing from this build that's only obvious on brand new installations with minimal package sets installed.

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-16 17:41

Do not have users who experience any problems?

Am I the only who have problems?

napcok commented on 2015-03-16 17:23

Builds fine here

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-16 16:04

Once again (and probably last time):

DEPMOD 3.18.9-2-lqx
==> Tidying install...
-> Purging unwanted files...
-> Removing libtool files...
-> Removing static library files...
-> Compressing man and info pages...
==> Creating package "linux-lqx"...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Adding install file...
-> Generating .MTREE file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Starting package_linux-lqx-headers()...
==> Tidying install...
-> Purging unwanted files...
-> Removing libtool files...
-> Removing static library files...
-> Compressing man and info pages...
==> Creating package "linux-lqx-headers"...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Adding install file...
-> Generating .MTREE file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Starting package_linux-lqx-docs()...
==> Tidying install...
-> Purging unwanted files...
-> Removing libtool files...
-> Removing static library files...
-> Compressing man and info pages...
==> Creating package "linux-lqx-docs"...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Adding install file...
-> Generating .MTREE file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Leaving fakeroot environment.
==> Finished making: linux-lqx 3.18.9-2 (Mon Mar 16 17:04:01 CET 2015)
==> Cleaning up...

Regards.

marcin82 commented on 2015-03-16 15:56

Package has built successfully

============
DEPMOD 3.18.9-2-lqx
==> Sprzątam instalację...
-> Usuwam niechciane pliki...
-> Usuwam libtool plików...
-> Usuwanie statycznych plików bibliotek
-> Kompresuję strony man oraz info...
==> Tworzenie pakietu "linux-lqx"...
-> Generuję plik .PKGINFO...
-> Dodawanie pliku install...
-> Generowanie pliku .MTREE...
-> Kompresuję pakiet...
==> Zaczynam package_linux-lqx-headers()...
==> Sprzątam instalację...
-> Usuwam niechciane pliki...
-> Usuwam libtool plików...
-> Usuwanie statycznych plików bibliotek
-> Kompresuję strony man oraz info...
==> Tworzenie pakietu "linux-lqx-headers"...
-> Generuję plik .PKGINFO...
-> Dodawanie pliku install...
-> Generowanie pliku .MTREE...
-> Kompresuję pakiet...
==> Zaczynam package_linux-lqx-docs()...
==> Sprzątam instalację...
-> Usuwam niechciane pliki...
-> Usuwam libtool plików...
-> Usuwanie statycznych plików bibliotek
-> Kompresuję strony man oraz info...
==> Tworzenie pakietu "linux-lqx-docs"...
-> Generuję plik .PKGINFO...
-> Dodawanie pliku install...
-> Generowanie pliku .MTREE...
-> Kompresuję pakiet...
==> Opuszczam środowisko fakeroot.
==> Skończyłem tworzenie: linux-lqx 3.18.9-2 (pon, 16 mar 2015, 16:52:53 CET)
===============

marcin82 commented on 2015-03-16 15:55

Package has build without any crash ...
[quote] DEPMOD 3.18.9-2-lqx
==> Sprzątam instalację...
-> Usuwam niechciane pliki...
-> Usuwam libtool plików...
-> Usuwanie statycznych plików bibliotek
-> Kompresuję strony man oraz info...
==> Tworzenie pakietu "linux-lqx"...
-> Generuję plik .PKGINFO...
-> Dodawanie pliku install...
-> Generowanie pliku .MTREE...
-> Kompresuję pakiet...
==> Zaczynam package_linux-lqx-headers()...
==> Sprzątam instalację...
-> Usuwam niechciane pliki...
-> Usuwam libtool plików...
-> Usuwanie statycznych plików bibliotek
-> Kompresuję strony man oraz info...
==> Tworzenie pakietu "linux-lqx-headers"...
-> Generuję plik .PKGINFO...
-> Dodawanie pliku install...
-> Generowanie pliku .MTREE...
-> Kompresuję pakiet...
==> Zaczynam package_linux-lqx-docs()...
==> Sprzątam instalację...
-> Usuwam niechciane pliki...
-> Usuwam libtool plików...
-> Usuwanie statycznych plików bibliotek
-> Kompresuję strony man oraz info...
==> Tworzenie pakietu "linux-lqx-docs"...
-> Generuję plik .PKGINFO...
-> Dodawanie pliku install...
-> Generowanie pliku .MTREE...
-> Kompresuję pakiet...
==> Opuszczam środowisko fakeroot.
==> Skończyłem tworzenie: linux-lqx 3.18.9-2 (pon, 16 mar 2015, 16:52:53 CET)
[/quote]

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-16 14:41

You're right - that is very interesting.

I tried many times - you saw logs...

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-16 14:35

I tried to build both desktop PCs and notebooks linux-lqx 3.18.9-2, but gives the same error in the same place.

whereas linux-ck and linux-bfs was built smoothly:
aur/linux-ck 3.19.1-1 [installed] (266)
aur/linux-ck-headers 3.19.1-1 [installed] (266)
aur/nvidia-340xx-ck 340.76-4 [installed] (4)
aur/vhba-module-ck 20140928-2 [installed] (17)

aur/linux-bfs 3.19.1-1 [installed] (17)
aur/linux-bfs-docs 3.19.1-1 [installed] (17)
aur/linux-bfs-headers 3.19.1-1 [installed] (17)
aur/nvidia-bfs-340xx 340.76-4 [installed] (1)


very interesting...

linux-lqx not be built, so sorry

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-16 04:47

I'll try 3.18.9-2

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-16 04:12

@cokomoko

shivik wrote

"Builds fine for me"

Bulids fine for me too - I tried many times.

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-16 02:31

@sir_lucjan
I have successfully installed the linux-bfs package:

DEPMOD 3.19.1-1-bfs
==> Kurulum düzenleniyor...
-> İstenmeyen dosyalar kaldırılıyor...
-> libtool dosyaları kaldırılıyor...
-> Statik kütüphane dosyaları kaldırılıyor...
-> Kılavuz ve bilgi sayfaları sıkıştırılıyor...
==> "linux-bfs" paketi oluşturuluyor...
-> .PKGINFO dosyası üretiliyor...
-> install dosyası ekleniyor...
-> .MTREE dosyası oluşturuluyor...
-> Paket sıkıştırılıyor...
==> package_linux-bfs-headers() işlemine başlanıyor...
==> Kurulum düzenleniyor...
-> İstenmeyen dosyalar kaldırılıyor...
-> libtool dosyaları kaldırılıyor...
-> Statik kütüphane dosyaları kaldırılıyor...
-> Kılavuz ve bilgi sayfaları sıkıştırılıyor...
==> "linux-bfs-headers" paketi oluşturuluyor...
-> .PKGINFO dosyası üretiliyor...
-> .MTREE dosyası oluşturuluyor...
-> Paket sıkıştırılıyor...
==> package_linux-bfs-docs() işlemine başlanıyor...
==> Kurulum düzenleniyor...
-> İstenmeyen dosyalar kaldırılıyor...
-> libtool dosyaları kaldırılıyor...
-> Statik kütüphane dosyaları kaldırılıyor...
-> Kılavuz ve bilgi sayfaları sıkıştırılıyor...
==> "linux-bfs-docs" paketi oluşturuluyor...
-> .PKGINFO dosyası üretiliyor...
-> .MTREE dosyası oluşturuluyor...
-> Paket sıkıştırılıyor...
==> fakeroot ortamından çıkılıyor.
==> linux-bfs 3.19.1-1 (Pzt Mar 16 04:27:18 UTC 2015) paketinin derlenmesi tamamlandı


cokomoko commented on 2015-03-15 21:02

I tried giving the same error in the same place on both arch and manjaro.

3 times over the arch, one time I tried to build on linux-lqx manjaro but it does not build.

I'll try to build linux-bfs
results you writer

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-15 20:23

Try with another kernel (for example linux-bfs) and let me know.

Can someone else confirm this bug?

P.S: AUR doesn't support Manjaro :P

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-15 20:20

Try with another kernel (for example linux-bfs).

P.S: AUR doesn't support Manjaro :P

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-15 20:17

I installed manjaro, I try to build linux-lqx 3.18.9-1 but still gives the same error:

LD drivers/staging/unisys/channels/built-in.o
CC [M] drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.o
drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.c:18:32: ölümcül hata: config/modversions.h: Böyle bir dosya ya da dizin yok
#include <config/modversions.h>
^
derleme sonlandırıldı.
scripts/Makefile.build:257: recipe for target 'drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.o' failed
make[4]: *** [drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:402: recipe for target 'drivers/staging/unisys/channels' failed
make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/unisys/channels] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.build:402: recipe for target 'drivers/staging/unisys' failed
make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/unisys] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.build:402: recipe for target 'drivers/staging' failed
make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
Makefile:937: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
==> HATA: build() içinde bir hata oluştu.
Çıkılıyor...
[cokomoko@linux aur-linux-lqx]$ uname -a
Linux linux 3.16.7.2-1-MANJARO #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Dec 1 19:15:43 UTC 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux

where is the problem?

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-15 19:32

Bump to 3.18.9-2

Add:

From https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/li/linux-ck/PKGBUILD
### DO NOT MERGE OUT THIS IF STATEMENT
### IT AFFECTS USERS WHO STRIP OUT THE DVB STUFF SO THE OFFICIAL ARCH CODE HAS A CP
### LINE THAT CAUSES MAKEPKG TO END IN AN ERROR
###
if [ -d include/config/dvb/ ]; then
mkdir -p "${pkgdir}/usr/lib/modules/${_kernver}/build/include/config/dvb/"
cp include/config/dvb/*.h "${pkgdir}/usr/lib/modules/${_kernver}/build/include/config/dvb/"
fi

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-15 18:49

@shivik

I sent a mail to Freso with (this) solution.

I will bump shortly.

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-15 18:48

@shivik

I sent mail to Freso with this solution.

I will bump shortly.

shivik commented on 2015-03-15 18:43

Builds fine for me, but check this out:
From https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/li/linux-ck/PKGBUILD
### DO NOT MERGE OUT THIS IF STATEMENT
### IT AFFECTS USERS WHO STRIP OUT THE DVB STUFF SO THE OFFICIAL ARCH CODE HAS A CP
### LINE THAT CAUSES MAKEPKG TO END IN AN ERROR
###
if [ -d include/config/dvb/ ]; then
mkdir -p "${pkgdir}/usr/lib/modules/${_kernver}/build/include/config/dvb/"
cp include/config/dvb/*.h "${pkgdir}/usr/lib/modules/${_kernver}/build/include/config/dvb/"
fi

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-15 18:15

@ Freso

Check your mailbox ;)

Freso commented on 2015-03-15 18:04

Disabling DVB related things in .config is a perfectly valid thing to do, so the PKGBUILD shouldn't fail if DVB things aren't available. The 3.18.9-1 PKGBUILD still has this issue.

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-15 05:15

Probably your system is misconfigured.

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-14 21:21

package was not built

LD drivers/staging/unisys/built-in.o
LD drivers/staging/unisys/channels/built-in.o
CC [M] drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.o
drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.c:18:32: ölümcül hata: config/modversions.h: Böyle bir dosya ya da dizin yok
#include <config/modversions.h>
^
derleme sonlandırıldı.
scripts/Makefile.build:257: recipe for target 'drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.o' failed
make[4]: *** [drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:402: recipe for target 'drivers/staging/unisys/channels' failed
make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/unisys/channels] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.build:402: recipe for target 'drivers/staging/unisys' failed
make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/unisys] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.build:402: recipe for target 'drivers/staging' failed
make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
Makefile:937: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
==> HATA: build() içinde bir hata oluştu.
Çıkılıyor...
==> HATA:makepkg linux-lqx'i inşa edemedi.
==> linux-lqx yeniden inşa edilsin mi ? [e/H]
==> -----------------------------------------


I'll wait for the next linux-lqx package...

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-14 18:42

@ sir_lucjan
I did not modify the file

@ damentz
my machine a little old:Toshiba Satellite A500-19W
linux-lqx package installation will find 5-6 hours

The results of the installation finishes, I'll write

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-14 18:34

@ sir_lucjan
I did not modify the file

@ damentz
my machine a little old:Toshiba Satellite A500-19W laptop
installation package linux-lqx find 5-6 hours

The results of the installation finishes, I'll write

damentz commented on 2015-03-14 18:01

cokomoko, at this point we suspect you have a tainted build environment or your system is misconfigured. The errors you're showing us is that files are missing after they were built. Perhaps you have some serious filesystem corruption?

If you keep having trouble, I would try building this package in a virtual machine or on another linux host, just to be sure it's not your current system that's breaking the build.

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-14 17:26

Did you modify a config file?

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-14 17:25

Did you change a config file?

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-14 17:17

@ sir_lucjan
I'll try to re-establish the pack
I will write the results here

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-14 16:50

@cokomoko

DEPMOD 3.18.9-1-lqx
==> Tidying install...
-> Purging unwanted files...
-> Removing libtool files...
-> Removing static library files...
-> Compressing man and info pages...
==> Creating package "linux-lqx"...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Adding install file...
-> Generating .MTREE file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Starting package_linux-lqx-headers()...
==> Tidying install...
-> Purging unwanted files...
-> Removing libtool files...
-> Removing static library files...
-> Compressing man and info pages...
==> Creating package "linux-lqx-headers"...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Adding install file...
-> Generating .MTREE file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Starting package_linux-lqx-docs()...
==> Tidying install...
-> Purging unwanted files...
-> Removing libtool files...
-> Removing static library files...
-> Compressing man and info pages...
==> Creating package "linux-lqx-docs"...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Adding install file...
-> Generating .MTREE file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Leaving fakeroot environment.
==> Finished making: linux-lqx 3.18.9-1 (Sat Mar 14 17:49:48 CET 2015)
==> Cleaning up...

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-14 15:54

1.export LANG=C and then give me logs. I don't understand.

2. Did you change a config?

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-14 15:54

1.export LANG=C and tthen give me logs. I don't understand.

2. Did you change a config?

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-14 15:46

LD drivers/staging/unisys/channels/built-in.o
CC [M] drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.o
drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.c:18:32: ölümcül hata: config/modversions.h: Böyle bir dosya ya da dizin yok
#include <config/modversions.h>
^
derleme sonlandırıldı.
scripts/Makefile.build:257: recipe for target 'drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.o' failed
make[4]: *** [drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:402: recipe for target 'drivers/staging/unisys/channels' failed
make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/unisys/channels] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.build:402: recipe for target 'drivers/staging/unisys' failed
make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/unisys] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.build:402: recipe for target 'drivers/staging' failed
make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
Makefile:937: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
==> HATA: build() içinde bir hata oluştu.
Çıkılıyor...
┌─[cokomoko]──[cokomoko]:~/aur-linux-lqx$
└──>>

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-14 05:29

Please DON'T build in tmp directory.

You should use "makepkg -sric"

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-13 22:32

Package install failed:
http://pastebin.com/XUtiPnUz

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-13 22:32

Package install failed:
http://pastebin.com/XUtiPnUz

Please update!

cokomoko commented on 2015-03-13 22:30

Package install failed:
http://pastebin.com/XUtiPnUz

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-13 18:17

Bump to v3.18.9-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-11 17:10

Yes, you're right ;)

==> Tidying install...
-> Purging unwanted files...
-> Removing libtool files...
-> Removing static library files...
-> Compressing man and info pages...
==> Creating package "linux-lqx"...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Adding install file...
-> Generating .MTREE file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Starting package_linux-lqx-headers()...
==> Tidying install...
-> Purging unwanted files...
-> Removing libtool files...
-> Removing static library files...
-> Compressing man and info pages...
==> Creating package "linux-lqx-headers"...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Adding install file...
-> Generating .MTREE file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Starting package_linux-lqx-docs()...
==> Tidying install...
-> Purging unwanted files...
-> Removing libtool files...
-> Removing static library files...
-> Compressing man and info pages...
==> Creating package "linux-lqx-docs"...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Adding install file...
-> Generating .MTREE file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Leaving fakeroot environment.
==> Finished making: linux-lqx 3.18.8-1 (Wed Mar 11 18:10:01 CET 2015)
==> Cleaning up...



Freso commented on 2015-03-11 15:10

While running package_linux-lqx-headers() it errored out due to not being able to stat() 'include/config/dvb/*.h'. I disabled all DVB things in the .config, so I'm guessing this might be related?

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-03 18:47

Bump to v3.18.8-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-02-28 09:22

Bump to v3.18.7-2

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-02-13 09:01

Bump to v3.18.7-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-02-11 10:19

@Det

linux-lqx is up to date.

http://liquorix.net/sources/

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-02-08 17:51

http://pastebin.com/1LK2Yicz

JohnRobson commented on 2015-02-08 17:48

Thank you. I manually added the PGP Key:
$ gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 79BE3E4300411886

Please, remember:
http://allanmcrae.com/2015/01/two-pgp-keyrings-for-package-management-in-arch-linux/

source=(http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libc/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.xz{,.sig})
validpgpkeys=('F37CDAB708E65EA183FD1AF625EF0A436C2A4AFF') # Carlos O'Donell

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-02-07 19:23

Bump to v3.18.6-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-01-31 20:53

Bump to v3.18.5-1

pavbaranov commented on 2015-01-30 22:03

Today, we have 3.18.4 patch for this kernel including 3.18.4 upstream's patch. There's no patch for 3.18.5 yet.
Unfortunetly, sir_lucjan will not be able to upgrade this kernel for next few days. Then you can find PKGBUILD for 3.18.4 on:
http://www.archlike.darmowefora.pl/index.php/topic,218.msg1036.html#msg1036
If anybody want to upgrade this kernel to 3.18.4 version, should:
$ yaourt -G linux-lqx
$ cd linux-lqx
Replace PKGBUILD in those directory by PKGBUILD from link above.
$ makepkg -sirc

I hope, that everything will be ok with this version.

fhdrin commented on 2015-01-27 04:07

Despite reading everything over and over and still not getting it; I figured it out: enter this -->

gpg --keyserver http://http-keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys 79BE3E4300411886



sir_lucjan commented on 2015-01-19 10:43

Bump to v3.18.3-1

Note: This PKGBUILD now conforms to the pacman-4.2 standards of being able to verify pgp signatures of upstream files. See the following for info on how to add the needed keys or how to disable this feature entirely,[1]

1. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Makepkg#Signature_checking

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-01-11 15:28

Bump to v3.18.2-1

Note: This PKGBUILD now conforms to the pacman-4.2 standards of being able to verify pgp signatures of upstream files. See the following for info on how to add the needed keys or how to disable this feature entirely,[1]

1. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Makepkg#Signature_checking

bigc commented on 2015-01-11 10:31

Patch at http://liquorix.net/sources/ updated to 3.18.2-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-01-09 13:54

http://allanmcrae.com/2015/01/two-pgp-keyrings-for-package-management-in-arch-linux/

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-01-08 22:39

Note: This PKGBUILD now conforms to the pacman-4.2 standards of being able to verify pgp signatures of upstream files. See the following for info on how to add the needed keys or how to disable this feature entirely,[1]

1. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Makepkg#Signature_checking

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-12-26 11:48

Done :)

Update to 3.18.1

clfarron4 commented on 2014-12-25 23:01

Oop, looks like 3.18.1-1 has been released, just in time for Christmas :)

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-12-24 23:25

Update to 3.17.7-2

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-12-19 10:52

Update to 3.17.7-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-12-08 10:45

Update to 3.17.6-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-12-01 11:22

liquorix.net is down.

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-25 19:07

No. Try with makepkg. It works.

mystique commented on 2014-11-25 19:01

packer -S linux-lqx
..
patching file sound/usb/quirks-table.h
patching file virt/kvm/iommu.c
patching file virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare().
Aborting...
The build failed.

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-24 10:59

Update to 3.17.4-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-18 10:02

Fixed.

cargoan commented on 2014-11-18 09:55

wrong KERNEL_VERSION variable in linux-lqx.install (3.17.2-2-lqx) must be 3.17.3-2-lqx

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-17 16:12

Bump to v3.17.3-2

Changelog: Added fix FS#42689

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-15 19:13

Update to 3.17.3-1

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-15 18:56

Sorry guys, I push update on Monday.

I'm sorry for delay.

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-14 21:05

@FadeMind
@any.one.who.cares.

I really wish the 'flag out-of-date' button required a reason to be entered like the one on the official packages to help maintainers understand why. For example, this package could be dated for ONLY ONE reason: liquorix patch is out of the date, Thank you for attention. Best regards.

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-14 21:04

@FadeMind
@any.one.who.cares.

I really wish the 'flag out-of-date' button required a reason to be entered like the one on the official packages to help maintainers understand why. For example, this package could be dated for ONLY ONE reasons: liquorix patch is out of the date, Thank you for attention. Best regards.

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-14 20:49

@FadeMind

Damn...

3.17.2 is the NEWEST version.... 3.17.3 comming soon.

Now, don't pretend you don't understand me.

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-14 20:38

@FadeMind

No comment.

http://liquorix.net/sources/

3.17.2 is the NEWEST version of lqx patch at the moment.

Prywatne słówko: zapoznaj się z tematem, nim wyskoczysz przed szereg.

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-07 15:35

Bump to 3.17.2-3

Add package linux-lqx-docs

pkgbase=linux-lqx
pkgname=('linux-lqx' 'linux-lqx-headers' 'linux-lqx-docs')

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-07 11:41

Attention!

There is no BFS released for 3.17!

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-07 11:14

Bump to 3.17.2-2

Little changes in PKGBUILD

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-06 18:45

Only one change:

Separate packages for kernel and headers.

pkgbase=linux-lqx
pkgname=('linux-lqx' 'linux-lqx-headers')

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-11-06 18:10

shivik - thank you very much :)

It is a great honour for me.

shivik commented on 2014-11-06 18:06

For sometime now it's been buggin' me that I can't do much for *lqx packages.
So naturally I decided to pass the torch.

Congratulations to the new maintainer - sir_lucjan!
Wish you all the best!

Thank you guys for sticking around and special thanks to damentz for keeping this alive!

lembang commented on 2014-11-06 06:06

Anyone in here have a problem with libdrm with intel graphics card?
I'm staying with kernel 3.16.6 because libdram seems always failed to load for me.

shivik commented on 2014-10-23 11:24

Well, 3.17 is here.
Old stuff can be found here: http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/

shivik commented on 2014-10-10 09:39

Thanks, damentz!
Included in the PKGBUILD.
Its use is controlled with _use_32bit_pae variable.

damentz commented on 2014-10-10 01:11

Configurations have updated for 32-bit. There is also a new 32-bit config file named config.i386-pae for convenience - this comes directly from the debian kernel package.

shivik commented on 2014-09-22 16:26

Open PKGBUILD file with a text editor and you'll see
custom="no" option.On the right of that you'll see all available options.
Just replace "no" with "m" or "x", or whatever you like.

RayManzarek1984 commented on 2014-09-22 10:00

Is it possible to enter menuconfig before compilation process to edit a custom configuration for my own kernel?

Anonymo commented on 2014-08-25 03:50

http://liquorix.net/sources/3.16.1-1.patch.gz

Anonymo commented on 2014-08-25 03:50

http://liquorix.net/sources/3.16.1-1.patch.gz

silvik commented on 2014-08-16 19:27

http://liquorix.net/sources/3.15.10-1.patch.gz is out

clfarron4 commented on 2014-08-10 18:29

http://liquorix.net/sources/3.15.9-1.patch.gz

shivik commented on 2014-08-04 05:11

I naver gave it much thought really.
It takes about 10 minutes for me to build the package,so I never bothered.

But, you can take a look at this https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ccache

joko commented on 2014-08-03 11:14

Hello, could you make an example on how to use optimally this PKGBUILD? I would like to minimize downloading and compilation time.

So far, I am using the same directory for PKGBUILDs of different version and I have enabled modprobed-db. Although I don't have to re-download the source files of the current minor version (e.g. 3.15), I cannot use the same source directory, since files there are already patched, so I download pkg and src directories. I guess I could save some time by using previously compiled files that haven't changed. Any ideas?

clfarron4 commented on 2014-07-22 14:09

I make it http://liquorix.net/sources/3.15.6-2.patch.gz now. That was quick.

shivik commented on 2014-07-22 04:12

(3.15.6-1.patch.gz 2014-07-21 18:23 163K)
3.15.6-1 is out, but it's 163K big so I assume something went wrong.
Also no BFS,BFQ(which were present in 3.15.5-1)...

Cape commented on 2014-06-22 02:17

Can't download 3.14.7-1.patch.gz (server return 404).
I see 3.14.8-1.patch.gz at http://liquorix.net/sources/ . Out of date already?

yachi commented on 2014-06-17 08:42

==> Validating source files with sha512sums...
linux-3.14.tar.xz ... Passed
3.14.7-1.patch.gz ... FAILED
config.i386 ... Passed
config.amd64 ... Passed
linux-lqx.preset ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

liubenyuan commented on 2014-05-13 02:32

I can boot linux-lqx with 3.14.3 !!

liubenyuan commented on 2014-05-13 00:36

@clfarron4 what do you mean by [core] ? I will give 3.14.3 a try

clfarron4 commented on 2014-05-11 17:28

@liubenyuan: Can you boot the kernel from [core] on that machine?

shivik commented on 2014-05-11 05:38

.

alaviss commented on 2014-05-11 01:49

Liquorix 3.14.3 released

liubenyuan commented on 2014-05-10 01:18

Well, something must have changed from 3.13 -> 3.14, my x230 box failed to boot, only with a blank screen. I made bfs and ksm enabled by default, and below are my boot loader script:
title Arch Linux (LQX)
linux /vmlinuz-linux-lqx
initrd /initramfs-linux-lqx.img
options root=/dev/sda2 ro quiet ipv6.disable=1 elevator=noop init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd acpi_osi=Linux acpi_backlight=vendor logo.nologo

clfarron4 commented on 2014-05-09 18:33

@liubenyuan: Download 3.14.2-1.patch.gz again. I believe damentz re-sync'ed all the files, hence new checksums.

shivik commented on 2014-05-09 11:02

Although it's still 3.14.2-1 checksum changed with the upload of the new config files.
Fixed.Should be good now.

liubenyuan commented on 2014-05-09 08:51

==> Validating source files with sha512sums...
linux-3.14.tar.xz ... Passed
3.14.2-1.patch.gz ... FAILED
config.i386 ... Passed
config.amd64 ... Passed
linux-lqx.preset ... Passed

strange, the 3.14.2-1.patch.gz failed, any suggestion ?

damentz commented on 2014-05-08 12:46

Sorry, there was a typo on my sync script. Configurations should be correct now.

clfarron4 commented on 2014-05-08 10:16

@damentz: If I can reproduce the kernel panic with linux-lqx (because the panics seem to be random, and I've only had the one with LQX), I'll certainly post over there.

This post should give you an idea of what I got (but I only managed to reproduce it with linux-ck and linux-lts-ck so far): https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1413252#p1413252

shivik commented on 2014-05-07 05:39

damentz, yes of course I checked the 3.14 folder
the timestamps are different,but the checksums are the same.
from 3.13.11-1 - config.amd64 2014-04-23 23:41 154K
from 3.13.11-1 - config.i386 2014-04-23 23:41 157K

from 3.14.2-1 - config.amd64 2014-05-01 22:33 154K
from 3.14.2-1 - config.i386 2014-05-01 22:33 157K

Plus the PKGBUILD looks in the right place
...
__basekernel=3.14
...
http://liquorix.net/sources/${__basekernel}/config.i386
http://liquorix.net/sources/${__basekernel}/config.amd64
...

I get a lot of these (the first 3) http://pastebin.com/9an18Q3u
I assumed that everyone else will get those.

Maybe there is something wrong on my part,but I just deleted everything
and ran a makepkg -S.PKGBUILD redownloaded everything and no checksum failed.
The config files have been the same from 3.13.7-1 to 3.13.11-1.
And if you check the PKGBUILDS from here http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/pkgsrc/3.13/
Checksums are the same as the current from the sources/3.14 folder.

damentz commented on 2014-05-06 22:14

shivik, the config files are in the sources/3.14 folder.

clfarron4, can you kick start a post on the liquorix forum? http://techpatterns.com/forums/forum-34.html

Preferably, I think running 'inxi -bDPxx' will help the most. Make sure you're running the latest version too, h2 fixed some bugs w/ partition / drive detection recently.

clfarron4 commented on 2014-05-06 12:58

Question: Is anyone having random kernel panics caused by BFQ with "elevator=bfq" set?

shivik commented on 2014-05-02 06:27

The first 3.14 lqx patch is out,
but the config files are the ones from 3.13, so you'll get lots config
related questions during build.Just hit "Enter" to each one.

That is until damentz uploads the new configs for 3.14.
And there is no BFS released for 3.14(if that's a show stopper for you)

3.13 and older stuff can be found here:
http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/

shivik commented on 2014-05-02 06:27

The first 3.14 lqx patch is out,
but the config files are the ones from 3.13, so you'll get lots config
related questions during build.Just hit "Enter" to each one.

That is until damentz uploads the new configs for 3.14.
And there is no BFS released for 3.14(if that a show stopper for you)

3.13 and older stuff can be found here:
http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/

shivik commented on 2014-04-20 20:29

Sorry guys.I was in a hurry for Easter day and forgot to clean up after some experiments.
My fault entirely.
Redownload and test.Should be OK now.

Roshless commented on 2014-04-20 19:47

Not only you. Tried 2 times since morning, same error.

fhdrin commented on 2014-04-20 19:30

compile errors with latest (3.13.10-1) lqx kernel. just me or everyone?

shivik commented on 2014-04-20 06:20

.

alaviss commented on 2014-04-20 02:00

Liquorix 3.13.10-1 is out! Please update the package

clfarron4 commented on 2014-04-08 21:20

Thanks! Builds now!

shivik commented on 2014-04-08 16:16

Yes,there is a problem.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-uksm-ck/?setlang=en&comments=all
The guy reports that this works:
--- linux-3.13.9-uksm_orig/mm/uksm.c 2014-04-04 14:56:29.738462696 -0300
+++ linux-3.13.9-devel/mm/uksm.c 2014-04-04 14:55:36.165528224 -0300
@@ -1604,7 +1604,11 @@
static struct page *page_trans_compound_anon(struct page *page)
{
if (PageTransCompound(page)) {
- struct page *head = compound_trans_head(page);
+ /*benatto: old compound_trans_head
+ * was merged into standard
+ * compound_head function on linux/mm.h
+ */
+ struct page *head = compound_head(page);
/*
* head may actually be splitted and freed from under
* us but it's ok here.

shivik commented on 2014-04-08 15:15

Yes,there is a problem.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-uksm-ck/?setlang=nb&comments=all
The guy reports that this works:
--- linux-3.13.9-uksm_orig/mm/uksm.c 2014-04-04 14:56:29.738462696 -0300
+++ linux-3.13.9-devel/mm/uksm.c 2014-04-04 14:55:36.165528224 -0300
@@ -1604,7 +1604,11 @@
static struct page *page_trans_compound_anon(struct page *page)
{
if (PageTransCompound(page)) {
- struct page *head = compound_trans_head(page);
+ /*benatto: old compound_trans_head
+ * was merged into standard
+ * compound_head function on linux/mm.h
+ */
+ struct page *head = compound_head(page);
/*
* head may actually be splitted and freed from under
* us but it's ok here.

clfarron4 commented on 2014-04-08 13:47

When building 3.13.9 with KSM, I got this error: http://pastie.org/private/5h9z0h5xa4kpvtjpawaiq

Any ideas? It built fine with 3.13.6 (didn't build with KSM for 3.13.7 or 3.13.8).

cl00t commented on 2014-04-06 17:05

Flagged out of date as 3.13.9-1.patch.gz is out

thoffmeyer commented on 2014-03-12 13:10

@clfarron4: Thank you brother. I see it is now updated. I do know that lqx doesn't follow the [core] kernel updates or packages.

clfarron4 commented on 2014-03-11 12:00

@thoffmeyer: The LQX kernel follows its own development cycle which releases kernels at different times to when the individual parts are released.

Put another way, when [core] releases a version, LQX doesn't immediately jump to that version.

shivik commented on 2014-03-09 11:47

From http://liquorix.net/sources/
3.13.5-1.patch.gz 2014-02-25 07:49 663K

shivik commented on 2014-03-09 11:22

Show me where is this 3.13.6.

shivik commented on 2014-03-09 11:20

Show me where

thoffmeyer commented on 2014-03-09 08:28

3.13.6 is out along with a new patch for BFS. I would love to use this a my kernel but until BFS gets forked in and updated.. :/, flagged out of date.

clfarron4 commented on 2014-03-04 09:22

@Det: BFS and what not.

shivik commented on 2014-03-04 09:01

linux-lqx follows http://liquorix.net/sources/
So...not out-of-date yet.

Det commented on 2014-03-03 21:56

CK patches..?

PerfectGentleman commented on 2014-03-03 16:56

ck patches are out. mark package as out-of-date

zoopp commented on 2014-02-27 12:54

Might someone have an idea on why systemd complains about failing to insert 'autofs4' and 'ipv6' module when the kernel is built with '_config="local"'? I have been running modprobed-db for a few months by now and setup a cron script that stores loaded modules every 5 minutes.

Everything works fine if _config is set to pkg.

clfarron4 commented on 2014-02-25 17:36

The 3.13.5 patchset does not contain the BFS CPU scheduler because Con hasn't released it for the 3.13 series yet.

clfarron4 commented on 2014-02-25 14:33

And the patches have now been updated, so 3.13.5.patch.gz is looks like it's an actual LQX patch.

clfarron4 commented on 2014-02-24 12:30

@shivik: You are best waiting, the patch file inside the archive is empty ¬¬

shivik commented on 2014-02-24 06:45

3.13.5-1.patch.gz is 35 bytes.
I'll wait for damentz to reupload.

shivik commented on 2014-02-06 22:11

Not out-of-date!
http://liquorix.net/sources/

kleku commented on 2014-02-04 16:35

That's really important.

shivik commented on 2014-02-04 16:34

in the respective config file(config.amd64 or config.i386) change CONFIG_LOGO=y to CONFIG_LOGO=n.But then checksum will fail and you'll have to change it accordingly in PKGBUILD.
Or build package with menuconfig,nconfig or xconfig enabled in PKGBUILD
and then search and disable "Boot logo".

shivik commented on 2014-02-04 16:33

in the respective config file(config.amd64 or config.i386) CONFIG_LOGO=y to CONFIG_LOGO=n.But then chesum will fail and you'll have to change it accordingly in PKGBUILD.
Or build package with menuconfig,nconfig or xconfig enabled in PKGBUILD
and then search and disable "Boot logo".

shivik commented on 2014-02-04 16:31

in config CONFIG_LOGO=y to CONFIG_LOGO=n
Or build package with menuconfig,nconfig or xconfig enabled in PKGBUILD
and then search and disable "Boot logo".

liubenyuan commented on 2014-02-04 12:01

Hi, how to prevent the bootup logo from building into the kernel ? I have add logo.nologo to the kernel command line, however it still shows a splash screen.

shivik commented on 2014-01-30 07:08

Yeap...
3.12.9-2.patch.gz 2014-01-29 00:13 870K
3.12.9-2.patch.gz 2014-01-29 13:55 870K
Fixed.

masolit commented on 2014-01-29 20:31

5160298ee23bead800b918dec8306af6a14ccb112d3c34f6438019bdfe0dedad6fb4894d3a7058610c153414a3d30f383ce34494ba5d5f6f95cb6ce3b6372489 3.12.9-2.patch.gz

masolit commented on 2014-01-29 20:26

==> Validating source files with sha512sums
3.12.9-2.patch.gz ... FAILED

shivik commented on 2014-01-28 19:26

linux-lqx.install gets overwritten every time the package is built,so not really a problem.
If you build the package you'll get a linux-lqx.install with KERNEL_VERSION 3.12.9-1 (or whatever the current version)

masolit commented on 2014-01-28 10:36

need to FIX - > KERNEL_VERSION=3.12.8-1-lqx in linux-lqx.install

shivik commented on 2014-01-18 07:46

There is an option now in PKGBUILD for those who wish to use BFS.
Just set _use_BFS to "yes" and you're good to go.

shivik commented on 2014-01-18 07:45

There is an option now in PKGBUILD for those who wish to use BFS.
Just set _use_BFS to yes and you're good to go.

damentz commented on 2014-01-18 01:44

joko, CFS has less functional bugs than BFS. After a few years of going back and forth due to new random bugs, I decided to stick to CFS and work with it instead.

One nice feature of CFS that BFS doesn't have is autogrouping, taking advantage of cgroups to share CPU bandwidth more fairly. This is most obvious when building software with multiple threads - the build tool will be grouped and will be treated as a single process, preventing a DoS on your own system. This is important for desktops where increased latency through interactivity is considered a big problem.

Lastly, since BFS has been released, many of the bugs that once infested CFS have been fixed. If you read benchmarks, there's no drastic difference between the two schedulers.

That leaves behavior, which I don't believe is really an issue anymore. I can be building a kernel, watching youtube, and playing an intensive AAA game at the same time and I can't tell the difference. The only difference with BFS is that you have access to sched_batch, which you can use to lower the priority of a build program that uses multiple threads. In CFS, you have auto grouping, which solves that problem nicely without any action of the user.

So there you go, that's the reality of CFS vs BFS. Behavior is mostly identical and throughput is close enough to not matter.

joko commented on 2014-01-18 00:04

Hello, does this kernel use the BFS scheduler? I have compiled this package quickly via yaourt and it seems it doesn't:

$ dmesg | grep scheduler
[ 0.636725] io scheduler noop registered
[ 0.636725] io scheduler deadline registered
[ 0.636743] io scheduler cfq registered
[ 0.636757] io scheduler bfq registered (default)
[ 0.702179] CFS CPU scheduler.

Any reason why it is not used?

KairiTech commented on 2014-01-12 21:27

Appreciate your efforts. I'll keep working at it to find an easier way to keep track of the mobo-specific kernels I create.

Thanks again for your efforts.

shivik commented on 2014-01-12 20:09

I did a pacman -Rns linux-lqx prior to installing the rebuilt linux-lqx(with the custom name).
Maybe this has something to do.I mean if you haven't done that yourself...
This is all I can think of for now.
Making that work for your case turns out to be beyond my knowledge.

Next step is a completely modified PKGBUILD just for your needs.

KairiTech commented on 2014-01-12 18:00

No errors here either but I end up in emergency mode when I re-boot.

I've had it work before without any changes to the kernel version but it doesn't seem to work now.

shivik commented on 2014-01-11 17:48

Yeah, two of my experiments must have mixed up 'cause I made a whole new PKGBUILD just for that and probably installed one on top of the other...

I just recompiled and I have what you have,but I have a working system and
I got no errors during kernel install - initramfs went fine,etc.
I use nvidia driver and it is working.
I don't use LVM, so no way to test that.

The way this is supposed to work is just let you append a string to the kernel version and everything else should be normal - i.e. no need to mess with your bootloader config.

Is your system working with this setup?

KairiTech commented on 2014-01-11 14:01

I don't seem to get

extramodules-3.12-lqx-M5A99X_EVO

or

initramfs-linux-lqx-M5A99X_EVO-fallback.img
vmlinuz-linux-lqx-M5A99X_EVO
initramfs-linux-lqx-M5A99X_EVO.img

ls -l /lib/modules

3.12.6-1-ARCH
3.12.6-1-lqx-M5A99X_EVO
extramodules-3.12-ARCH
extramodules-3.12-lqx

ls /boot

EFI
initramfs-linux-lqx-fallback.img
initramfs-linux-lqx.img
vmlinuz-linux-lqx

shivik commented on 2014-01-09 10:09

OK, I added an option _append_kernel_custom_string to the PKGBUILD.
Change that to your desire.It works on my system,no errors.

Changed, rebuilt the kernel and here's my uname -r now :)
[shivik@archenemy ~]$ uname -r
3.12.6-1-lqx-M5A99X_EVO

My /lib/modules looks like this now:
[shivik@archenemy modules]$ ls
3.12.6-1-ARCH 3.12.6-1-lqx-M5A99X_EVO extramodules-3.12-ARCH extramodules-3.12-lqx-M5A99X_EVO

Keep in mind that this changes your /boot kernel and initramfs filenames,so you have
to edit your bootloader config file accordingly.
[shivik@archenemy boot]$ ls
initramfs-linux-fallback.img
initramfs-linux.img
vmlinuz-linux
initramfs-linux-lqx-M5A99X_EVO-fallback.img
lost+found
vmlinuz-linux-lqx-M5A99X_EVO
initramfs-linux-lqx-M5A99X_EVO.img
syslinux

shivik commented on 2014-01-09 10:03

OK, I added an option _append_kernel_custom_string to the PKGBUILD.
Change that to your desire.It works on my system,no errors.

Changed, rebuilt the kernel and here's my uname -r now :)
[shivik@archenemy ~]$ uname -r
3.12.6-1-lqx-M5A99X_EVO

My /lib/modules looks like this now:
[shivik@archenemy modules]$ ls
3.12.6-1-ARCH 3.12.6-1-lqx-M5A99X_EVO extramodules-3.12-ARCH extramodules-3.12-lqx-M5A99X_EVO

shivik commented on 2014-01-09 10:03

OK, I added an option _append_kernel_custom_string to the PKGBUILD.
Change that to you desire.It works on my system,no errors.

Changed, rebuilt the kernel and here's my uname -r now :)
[shivik@archenemy ~]$ uname -r
3.12.6-1-lqx-M5A99X_EVO

My /lib/modules looks like this now:
[shivik@archenemy modules]$ ls
3.12.6-1-ARCH 3.12.6-1-lqx-M5A99X_EVO extramodules-3.12-ARCH extramodules-3.12-lqx-M5A99X_EVO

KairiTech commented on 2014-01-09 00:42

As suggested I appended -M5A99X_EVO in the PKGBUILD instead of running xconfig but got the error below instead:

==> Finished making: linux-lqx-M5A99X_EVO 3.12.6-1 (Wed Jan 8 19:37:51 EST 2014)
==> Installing package linux-lqx-M5A99X_EVO with pacman -U...
loading packages...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...

Packages (1): linux-lqx-M5A99X_EVO-3.12.6-1

Total Installed Size: 0.00 MiB

:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] Y
(1/1) checking keys in keyring [##############################] 100%
(1/1) checking package integrity [##############################] 100%
(1/1) loading package files [##############################] 100%
(1/1) checking for file conflicts [##############################] 100%
(1/1) checking available disk space [##############################] 100%
(1/1) installing linux-lqx-M5A99X_EVO [##############################] 100%
>>> Updating module dependencies. Please wait ...
>>> Generating initial ramdisk, using mkinitcpio. Please wait...
==> Building image from preset: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-lqx.preset: 'default'
-> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux-lqx -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-lqx.img
==> ERROR: specified kernel image does not exist: `/boot/vmlinuz-linux-lqx'
==> Building image from preset: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-lqx.preset: 'fallback'
-> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux-lqx -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-lqx-fallback.img -S autodetect
==> ERROR: specified kernel image does not exist: `/boot/vmlinuz-linux-lqx'
:: linux-lqx cleaned

shivik commented on 2014-01-08 06:24

What about it?
I just tried it out of curiosity.
Removed nvidia, nvidia-lqx, installed nvidia-dkms, reboot, works.

ilkyest commented on 2014-01-08 01:15

What about the correct way to make nvidia driver working with this kernel?

nvidia-dkms?

shivik commented on 2014-01-07 18:01

Basically you want to change -lqx to -lqx-M5A99X_EVO, right?
So instead of changing -lqx in xconfig try and change _kernelname in PKGBUILD to -lqx-M5A99X_EVO and see what happens.
I haven't tested or given it much thought, but give it a go.
It will either work or it won't :)

shivik commented on 2014-01-07 17:13

Basically you want to change -lqx to -lqx-M5A99X_EVO, right?
So instead of changing -lqx in xconfig try and change _kernelname in PKGBUILD to -lqx-M5A99X_EVO and see what happens.
I haven't tested or given it much taught, but give it a go.
It will either work or it won't :)

KairiTech commented on 2014-01-07 15:20

I use the "local" modprobed_db option to compile only the modules required for my mobo but this generates the error below during the re-creation of the initramfs. Funny thing is I am still able to boot without any issues even though I am using LVM2.

depmod: ERROR: could not open directory /lib/modules/3.12.6-1-lqx: No such file or directory
depmod: FATAL: could not search modules: No such file or directory

Running build hook: [lvm2]
module not found: `dm-snapshot'
module not found: `dm-mirror'

I'm sure it has something to do with the fact that I append '-M5A99X_EVO' to the ‘-lqx’ kernel version when I run xconfigure. I do end up with the modules directory below but mkinitcpio does seem able to find it and I thought that the package file would be renamed too but it isn't.

/lib/modules/3.12.6-1-lqx-M5A99X_EVO/
/lib/modules/extramodules-3.12-lqx/

So my question is should I change the kernel version to include my mobo name in some other way?

KairiTech commented on 2014-01-07 15:05

shivik commented on 2013-12-27 12:56

This happens when damentz updates lqx with the same version.
3.12.6-1 updated to 3.12.6-1,but different checksums.
3.10.22-1.patch.gz 2013-12-24 03:21 1.0M
3.12.6-1.patch.gz 2013-12-24 03:21 794K
config.i386 2013-12-24 03:21 156K
config.amd64 2013-12-24 03:21 152K

3.10.22-1.patch.gz 2013-12-27 01:03 1.0M
3.12.6-1.patch.gz 2013-12-27 01:03 794K
config.i386 2013-12-27 01:03 156K
config.amd64 2013-12-27 01:03 152K

I check a few times a day.

PerfectGentleman commented on 2013-12-27 10:43

==> Validating source files with sha512sums...
linux-3.12.tar.xz ... Passed
3.12.6-1.patch.gz ... FAILED
config.i386 ... Passed
config.amd64 ... Passed
linux-lqx.preset ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

damentz commented on 2013-12-20 21:35

kleku, when this package updates, can you try again? I made a change I was waiting to bundle with 3.12.6 (bundling updates together prevents massive number of updates and work for package maintainers). You'll have to wait though for shivik to update this package.

Basically, I removed the Intel P-State cpufreq driver (final confirmation was Valve citing it as a problem for smooth performance on Steam), set ondemand as default governor, and set the ondemand sampling down factor to 10 (increases throughput during high load). My suspicion was that the Intel P-State cpufreq driver wasn't properly saving power when it could. You should be better off with ondemand.

kleku commented on 2013-12-20 11:08

Powertop on my notebook with standard kernel:
The battery reports a discharge rate of 10.2 W

and with -lqx kernel:
The battery reports a discharge rate of 20.1 W :/

I'm using TLP.

damentz commented on 2013-12-02 07:04

Actually, I'm just on vacation from work and everything else for Thanksgiving. I'll update to 3.12 later this week - I can't responsibly update to 3.12 without having time to both use the kernel for an extended time and respond to feedback.

shivik commented on 2013-12-02 06:52

I think the answer lies below in the comments.
damentz: "The only difference is that I do a bit of quality control and respond to feedback. It's hard to do that where there isn't a "product", or something to install and test immediately without wasting an hour of time compiling or figuring out what configuration to use."

damentz test stuff to some extent prior to release.
I haven't had any problems(even minor) with linux-lqx for more than a year.
I don't even have rcu_preempt wrong time accounting and I enable BFS every time.
So that would explain the delays to me.
Not that it matters so much.It's just an enthusiast thing.
I don't mind waitng :)

PerfectGentleman commented on 2013-12-02 04:38

I just wonder if LQX and Zen share the same codebase, why Zen is 3.12.2 and LQX is still 3.11.9 ?

damentz commented on 2013-12-02 02:24

Well, this package only has a 1 liter engine, so driving up hills is a hit or miss.

PerfectGentleman commented on 2013-12-02 00:05

why so slow?

ilikenwf commented on 2013-11-22 05:24

Just reminding folks that LQX and Zen share the same codebase, LQX just uses a more optimized config than a default kernel config....

shivik commented on 2013-11-21 06:18

No problem.Glad it worked.

saburouta commented on 2013-11-21 02:39

That was it, of course. Sorry I made you quote yourself. I thought it would be enough to nuke the packer* dirs in /tmp. Tarball worked.

shivik commented on 2013-11-20 06:28

Current version is 3.11.8-1.
Your warnigs say 3.11.7-1.
You have some sort of version mix up.
As always delete everything and
"Get the tarball,extract into a new directory and try again.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/li/linux-lqx/linux-lqx.tar.gz
You can copy your linux-3.11.tar.xz to avoid downloading that again."

saburouta commented on 2013-11-19 16:11

[user@host ~]$ sudo depmod -a
depmod: WARNING: could not open /lib/modules/3.11.7-1-lqx/modules.order: No such file or directory
depmod: WARNING: could not open /lib/modules/3.11.7-1-lqx/modules.builtin: No such file or directory

shivik commented on 2013-11-17 12:53

Fixed.
There were two 3.11.8-1 updates:
3.11.8-1.patch.gz 2013-11-17 00:03 791K
3.11.8-1.patch.gz 2013-11-17 02:13 791K

PerfectGentleman commented on 2013-11-17 10:34

==> Validating source files with sha512sums...
linux-3.11.tar.xz ... Passed
3.11.8-1.patch.gz ... FAILED
config.i386 ... Passed
config.amd64 ... Passed
linux-lqx.preset ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-lqx.
==> Restart building linux-lqx ? [y/N]

shivik commented on 2013-11-15 06:29

@AnAkkk - why out of date?

http://liquorix.net/sources/ still says 3.11.7-1

Wintershade commented on 2013-09-22 23:13

Alright, thanks man :) I deleted everything and dl'ed the fresh tarball. It works now.

shivik commented on 2013-09-22 21:04

I updated the package to 3.11.
3.10 stuff can be found here: http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/

shivik commented on 2013-09-22 19:45

I checked and all checksums check out.
(Deleted configs,3.10.12-1 patch,etc and did a makepkg -S)
Actually config.* files have been the same for a while.
So very strange to get checksum error there.
Must be something on your part.
Get the tarball,extract into a new directory and try again.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/li/linux-lqx/linux-lqx.tar.gz
You can copy your linux-3.10.tar.xz to avoid downloading that again.

shivik commented on 2013-09-22 19:42

I checked and all checksums check out.
(Deleted configs,3.10.12-1 patch,etc and did a makepkg -S)
Actually config.* files have been the same for a while.
So very strange to get checksum error there.
Must be something on your part.

Wintershade commented on 2013-09-22 17:33

Hey guys, a quick question. I just pulled all the source files from here (twice, manually and through yaourt), and I'm getting this error...

==> Validating source files with sha512sums...
linux-3.10.tar.xz ... Passed
3.10.12-1.patch.gz ... FAILED
config.i386 ... FAILED
config.amd64 ... FAILED
linux-lqx.preset ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!


so supposedly the 3.10.12-1 patch, as well as the config.* files aren't what they're supposed to be. What gives? Am I missing something, or doing something wrong? TIA

PsychoGame commented on 2013-09-22 08:45

Okay, thanks for clearing that up, and I understand your decision.
Also I have a remark on the latest kernel source. It seems aufs doesn't function on my system. I saw it is included in the kernel configuration.

Greetings PsychoGame

damentz commented on 2013-09-22 00:22

Will BFS make a comeback? Probably not. The bugs in BFS are minor but noticeable. This biggest bug that's yet to be fixed is time keeping. This was documented heavily on the liquorix forums and lead me to choosing CFS over BFS with heavy configuration modifications.

To answer your last question, just choose the zen-tune custom configuration, it will set rr_interval to 3 and change a few more defaults to improve performance.

PsychoGame commented on 2013-09-21 20:57

I have a small question about bfs.
Will BFS make a comeback as standard scheduler in the builds in the future?
Are the bugs which made the switch from BFS to CFS still existing in the latest kernel releases?
Also if I want to compile the Liquorix kernel myself with BFS, what configuration do you recommend for the lowest latency?

Greetings PsychoGame

shivik commented on 2013-08-16 16:05

linux-lqx.install gets overwritten every time you build, so not really a problem.
If you build end then check linux-lqx.install you'll see that it says 3.6.10(or whatever the current version).

Reuploaded anyway.

brenix commented on 2013-08-16 13:28

After update to 3.10.6, the linux-lqx.install file still contains the 3.10.5 version..just a FYI

damentz commented on 2013-08-11 02:04

Sorry, configs have been updated. Thanks for catching that, must have resynced my configs on an incomplete master branch earlier last month.

shivik commented on 2013-08-05 07:14

config* files need to be updated.
I get a lot of config related options during build time, which are not present in the respective config.* file.

shivik commented on 2013-08-05 07:13

config* files need to be updated.
I get a lot of config related, which are not present in the respective config.* file.

shivik commented on 2013-07-28 06:55

Thanks, damentz!
Nvidia works on 3.10 with https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/plain/trunk/nvidia-linux-3.10.patch?h=packages/nvidia

Here's the PKGBUILD for 3.9.11 kernel: http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/pkgsrc/3.9/linux-lqx-3.9.11-1.src.tar.gz

damentz commented on 2013-07-28 02:34

3.10 patch is out, but there's no proper support from nvidia and fglrx yet. Unless you guys have an easy work around, I'll recommend sticking to 3.9 until you can install an nvidia driver with sgfxi.

Kamek commented on 2013-07-25 21:33

On a fresh ArchBang install I get this:
patching file tools/perf/scripts/python/net_dropmonitor.py
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
The build failed.

Any ideas? It doesn't even say what the problem was. Is it a problem patching that file or somthing?

shivik commented on 2013-05-29 05:53

Nice catch.
Added inetutils and bc to makedepends.

silvik commented on 2013-05-28 22:08

also, ths might be of interest:

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/34600

something about kmod and inetutils and bc.

silvik commented on 2013-05-28 22:02

finally found it!

at first i thought that MAKEFLAGS="-j4" option is the problem, so i commented it out. oddly enough, i receided another error message, not about xfs, but about missing bc command. after installing bc everyhting is fine, j4 or not.

so, it looks like bc is needed to build 3.9 kernel... https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=70730bca1331fc50c3caacaea00439de1325bd6e

shivik commented on 2013-05-28 15:07

Hmm...I got nothing.
And I'm using xfs on two of my hard drives.Builds and runs fine.
Try a clean build and all options to default.

silvik commented on 2013-05-28 12:43

build fails, no idea why:

CC [M] fs/xfs/xfs_quotaops.o
CC [M] fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.o
CC [M] fs/xfs/xfs_acl.o
CC [M] fs/xfs/xfs_stats.o
CC [M] fs/xfs/xfs_sysctl.o
CC [M] fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.o
LD [M] fs/xfs/xfs.o
LD fs/built-in.o
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-lqx.

shivik commented on 2013-04-23 19:28

Slip of the mouse.
Mistake of course :)
Fixed.

PerfectGentleman commented on 2013-04-23 14:41

Category: modules - why?

shivik commented on 2013-04-07 15:07

What is "_config" set to in your PKGBUILD?

antihero commented on 2013-04-07 14:50

Something has gone wrong:

==> Running make prepare
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o
SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.lex.c
SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.hash.c
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
scripts/kconfig/conf --silentoldconfig Kconfig
*
* Restart config...
*
*
* Firmware Drivers
*
BIOS Enhanced Disk Drive calls determine boot disk (EDD) [N/m/y/?] n
EFI Variable Support via sysfs (EFI_VARS) [M/y/?] m
Register efivars backend for pstore (EFI_VARS_PSTORE) [Y/n/?] (NEW) aborted!

Console input/output is redirected. Run 'make oldconfig' to update configuration.

make[2]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 1
make[1]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 2
SYSHDR arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h
SYSHDR arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h
make: *** No rule to make target `include/config/auto.conf', needed by `include/config/kernel.release'. Stop.
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
SYSHDR arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_x32.h
SYSTBL arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/asm/syscalls_32.h
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
:: linux-lqx cleaned

poincare commented on 2013-03-26 08:45

Many thanks for putting this together and keeping it alive!!

ilikenwf commented on 2013-03-11 21:55

Damentz, thought so. I like zen because I'm a bit of a ricer :P

Either way, you and heftig are saints for keeping the project alive after all it's been through. Thanks, and keep up the amazing work!

shivik commented on 2013-03-11 06:58

@ilkyest - How up-to-date is your system?
Have you read this https://www.archlinux.org/news/the-lib-directory-becomes-a-symlink/

Most likely this is the problem as kernel builds and installs fine for everyone else including me.

damentz commented on 2013-03-11 03:21

Hi ilikenwf, both heftig and I work on Zen Sources. You're right, Liquorix is zen + configuration. The only difference is that I do a bit of quality control and respond to feedback. It's hard to do that where there isn't a "product", or something to install and test immediately without wasting an hour of time compiling or figuring out what configuration to use.

ilkyest commented on 2013-03-10 21:37

>>> Updating module dependencies. Please wait ...
depmod: ERROR: could not open directory /lib/modules/3.7.10-1-lqx: No such file or directory
depmod: FATAL: could not search modules: No such file or directory
>>> Generating initial ramdisk, using mkinitcpio. Please wait...
/usr/bin/mkinitcpio: line 248: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-lqx.preset: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: Preset not found: `/etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-lqx.preset'


Also... these don't create "linux-headers

ilkyest commented on 2013-03-10 21:35

>>> Updating module dependencies. Please wait ...
depmod: ERROR: could not open directory /lib/modules/3.7.10-1-lqx: No such file or directory
depmod: FATAL: could not search modules: No such file or directory
>>> Generating initial ramdisk, using mkinitcpio. Please wait...
/usr/bin/mkinitcpio: line 248: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-lqx.preset: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: Preset not found: `/etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-lqx.preset'


Also... these don't create "linux-headers

ilikenwf commented on 2013-03-10 20:35

Damentz does most of the work on lqx and zen both, I think... I was in IRC and someone told me it was the same, except for the default configs provided...

shivik commented on 2013-03-10 15:59

Yes, I've overlooked that qt change.
Works fine with with qt4.
Wrong checksum has been fixed when silvernode reported it.

ilkyest commented on 2013-03-10 13:27

sha512 sum mistaken.... here I have
7795d4f3d2aacd1d442017997d211afc9d1ee22a4ae5a069439634ed70e9f7daa33fb879d97e1e5d858934a902c7592ceba228c8162d6211e20e601f897ff72b

and....
arch linux has 3 qt. qt3; qt4, and qt5. None of them solves "dependencies issue"

I worked around it changing pkg build. Put the sha512sum on pkgbuild (no more validity check error) and changing. Since "x" asks for qt, I put "n" and change the comand line, that call xconfig instead nconfig

works fine, even without qt (that I don't know what version the kernel calls)

ilkyest commented on 2013-03-10 13:18

sha512 sum mistaken.... here I have
7795d4f3d2aacd1d442017997d211afc9d1ee22a4ae5a069439634ed70e9f7daa33fb879d97e1e5d858934a902c7592ceba228c8162d6211e20e601f897ff72b

and....
arch linux has 3 qt. qt3; qt4, and qt5. None of them solves "dependencies issue"

I worked around it changing pkg build. Put the sha512sum on pkgbuild (no more validity check error) and changing. Since "x" asks for qt, I put "n" and change the comand line, that call xconfig instead nconfig

works fine, even without qt (that I don't know what version the kernel calls)

shivik commented on 2013-03-10 10:49

Fixed.

silvernode commented on 2013-03-10 10:44

Failed validating sha512sums
3.7.10-1.patch.gz ... FAILED

It should be replaced with:
7795d4f3d2aacd1d442017997d211afc9d1ee22a4ae5a069439634ed70e9f7daa33fb879d97e1e5d858934a902c7592ceba228c8162d6211e20e601f897ff72b

silvernode commented on 2013-03-10 10:28

Failed validating sha512sums
3.7.10-1.patch.gz ... FAILED

silvernode commented on 2013-03-10 10:27

3.7.10-1.patch.gz ... FAILED

shivik commented on 2013-03-09 20:38

You can say it is based on zen.
It uses modified zen sources,other patches,different kernel configuration as far as I know.

ilikenwf commented on 2013-03-09 19:31

Isn't this bascially the same as linux-zen?

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-zen/

shivik commented on 2013-03-04 16:45

It doesn't matter that much, Anonymo.
If you guys like damentz's liquorix and what I'm doing then I'll keep doing it :)

Anonymo commented on 2013-03-04 07:48

@shivik. That Det guy has been a nuisance ever since I was maintaining this kernel too. I think he has his own packages, so I don't understand why he is constantly marking stuff out of date. Wish there was a block user feature on AUR

shivik commented on 2013-03-01 18:48

Thanks, for the heads up.Fixed.

silvik commented on 2013-03-01 17:48

looks like the kernel source link changed:

ftp://ftp.kernel.org/linux/kernel/v3.x/linux-${__basekernel}.tar.xz

shivik commented on 2013-02-26 14:27

I got that and other config questions as well.
We'll probably have new config files for 3.7.9.
Just hit enter and the build process will continue.

silvik commented on 2013-02-26 11:26

I get a dialog at make prepare:
Choose SLAB allocator
1. SLAB (SLAB) (NEW)
> 2. SLUB (Unqueued Allocator) (SLUB)
choice[1-2?]:

shivik commented on 2013-02-26 07:14

config files are the same as 3.7.8 config files at the time I update to 3.7.9.
I'll fix those when I come back from work if damentz updates them in the meanwhile.

damentz commented on 2013-02-21 18:22

Det, I don't know if you're trolling or if you're really that stupid. Package maintenance is a time consuming and inconvenient task. We don't decide when upstream updates their software, but we can decide when to begin working on updating the package. The more random and frequent the updates, the more difficult the maintenance is.

Remember that Shivik is updating this package out of his own good will and self interest. Are you asserting that your personal interests are more important than his?

shivik commented on 2013-02-21 17:30

What's that suppose to mean,Det?
Sometimes you mark it as out of date.So?
Which is of no use to me anyway,because I'll update regardless of the package
marked as out-of-date or not.
For me it is not a question of seeing if there's a new patchset,but if I can use my computer to do it.
Meaning: I update whenever I can.
And since when does that become a problem?

Anyway,Det,if you want to become the maintainer just let me know.
I'm letting go of the bone right away.

Det commented on 2013-02-21 15:50

> I update whenever there's a..
You update whenever I tell you to.

shivik commented on 2013-02-16 06:16

I update whenever there's a new patch here: http://liquorix.net/sources/
linux-lqx follows patches released there.

Keep in mind the time zone difference, meaning I may be sleeping when damentz releases a new patchset revision, so it will be a few hours sometimes.

Also I go to work, you know :)

Anonymous comment on 2013-02-16 00:44

Can you update this to 3.7.8?

shivik commented on 2013-02-14 06:31

Why is this flagged out-of-date?
I don't see 3.7.7 in http://liquorix.net/sources/

Joermungand commented on 2013-02-08 11:20

Thank you, shivik!

Joermungand commented on 2013-02-08 11:20

Patch 3.7.6-1 is no longer available at the remote location.

shivik commented on 2013-02-08 11:11

Yes,because 3.7.6-2 is out.Updated.

Joermungand commented on 2013-02-08 11:04

Patch 3.7.6-1 is no longer available at the remote location.

shivik commented on 2013-02-03 15:48

BFS is back with 3.7.5-2 patch.

damentz commented on 2013-01-02 06:38

Thank you shivik, I was trying to workaround some bugs that presented themselves in the forum after I pushed out the 3.7 kernel. The only thing left that I cannot find a solution for is some very weird time accounting bug in BFS.

For the time being, CFS is the configured scheduler until someone fixes the new bugs in 3.7 for BFS.

If anyone doesn't already know, the forum is located here: http://techpatterns.com/forums/forum-34.html

shivik commented on 2013-01-02 06:31

damentz, if you are reading this - Thanks for your work!

shivik commented on 2013-01-02 06:31

They keep coming. -5 is out.
damentz is working hard on 3.7

shivik commented on 2013-01-02 06:26

They keep coming. -5 is out.

msx commented on 2013-01-02 02:27

It was impossible to compile -3 for me but I didn't report back because I was trying to make it run.
OTOH -4 compiles and runs smooth!

msx commented on 2013-01-02 02:27

It was impossible to compile -3 but I didn't report back because I was trying to make it run.
OTOH -4 compiles and runs smooth!

shivik commented on 2012-12-30 07:23

3.7.1-3 compiles and runs with no problems.

shivik commented on 2012-12-29 07:25

So far I can tell that there is some problem iwth 3.7.1-2 patch.
3.7.1-1 is OK.Lets hope damentz will run into the same problem fix it soon.
You can grap the pkgsrc for 3.7.1-1 from here http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/pkgsrc/3.7/
And the 3.7.1-1 patch from here http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/patches/3.7/
You can use the current config.i386 and config.amd64
SHA512 sums should be changed to(3rd and 4th are the relevant one for the config files):
sha512sums=('91d65d658e9b6d0c0f03533e631ef1cc46c79ec5c1425a0914e1fe97ac4069230ee2f7d947df5cf76dd8865eb78f149d46140a3ec6509de21094ef70f27f6f61'
'6ccc3d28b212ace866830e0e600e765c97f5179b178b57c164d92fd451247e495a5f90ce9c047f8d355c4cf8df67f820bdadf928a857b720a43946c4048d5587'
'5151ee59093283f02c77c89959432269b16f0bd1b65d0e8da2b41403b182f1a31f239de00ace911aa668455b9b20647804809bcd2b41134be52420a469db5ccb'
'e9c34c725b0c92650e9ef0c8de7bdacf044f2b09aa8a59bd686120093bdab47cfaf25c85f1d93f5d7543c8bdf1f437908b79e056bb6ad72649cca2d22ba45b0f'
'fe4dcd7b5ec06ec3ec4aa631531469f58f6a7111e2d33affa98a1b8a8d230c5fa7e25ffdf770fe5ce61f249b0ec0ecd69df2858c4029acee0efaadff957858fe')

shivik commented on 2012-12-29 07:24

So far I can tell that there is some problem iwth 3.7.1-2 patch.
3.7.1-1 is OK.Lets hope damentz will run into the same problem fix it soon.
You can grap the pkgsrc for 3.7.1-1 from here http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/pkgsrc/3.7/
And the 3.7.1-1 patch from here http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/patches/3.7/
SHA512 sums should be changed to:
sha512sums=('91d65d658e9b6d0c0f03533e631ef1cc46c79ec5c1425a0914e1fe97ac4069230ee2f7d947df5cf76dd8865eb78f149d46140a3ec6509de21094ef70f27f6f61'
'6ccc3d28b212ace866830e0e600e765c97f5179b178b57c164d92fd451247e495a5f90ce9c047f8d355c4cf8df67f820bdadf928a857b720a43946c4048d5587'
'5151ee59093283f02c77c89959432269b16f0bd1b65d0e8da2b41403b182f1a31f239de00ace911aa668455b9b20647804809bcd2b41134be52420a469db5ccb'
'e9c34c725b0c92650e9ef0c8de7bdacf044f2b09aa8a59bd686120093bdab47cfaf25c85f1d93f5d7543c8bdf1f437908b79e056bb6ad72649cca2d22ba45b0f'
'fe4dcd7b5ec06ec3ec4aa631531469f58f6a7111e2d33affa98a1b8a8d230c5fa7e25ffdf770fe5ce61f249b0ec0ecd69df2858c4029acee0efaadff957858fe')

sknd commented on 2012-12-28 14:43

I'm unable to build, it fails:

CC [M] net/wireless/lib80211_crypt_ccmp.o
CC [M] net/wireless/lib80211_crypt_tkip.o
LD net/wireless/built-in.o
LD [M] net/wireless/cfg80211.o
LD net/built-in.o
==> BŁĄD: Wystąpił błąd w build().
Przerywam...
The build failed.

Any ideas? What should i do?

shivik commented on 2012-12-27 17:21

updated

msx commented on 2012-12-27 12:39

New sha512sums:

4bdb4006d268c90661fdc41844b1072add213a6ce69dc3fae7253a159c3efff087214fecc4caee6a337fe68b1e14da048ff80c7cd6db18b8194fd0d9df8b3813 config.i386
2dcebac5cd67489119240da6b732d9c9c50f2b535800e46183594002bbc50b4b6bb9e4633a9bf6cb729ea422a515737413d2cc96f284a3aeb18651405e614e5f config.amd64

msx commented on 2012-12-27 12:31

New sha512sums:
4bdb4006d268c90661fdc41844b1072add213a6ce69dc3fae7253a159c3efff087214fecc4caee6a337fe68b1e14da048ff80c7cd6db18b8194fd0d9df8b3813 config.i386

2dcebac5cd67489119240da6b732d9c9c50f2b535800e46183594002bbc50b4b6bb9e4633a9bf6cb729ea422a515737413d2cc96f284a3aeb18651405e614e5f config.amd64

Anonymous comment on 2012-12-23 02:17

does someone know how to extract xz archive from the git tree..... changing shasum everytime isn't fun

shivik commented on 2012-12-15 07:26

Try one from here 3.5.4-1 should work.Not sure about 3.5.5-1,but try it.
http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/pkgsrc/3.5/

Anonymous comment on 2012-12-15 02:37

Author, please, can you give old 3.5.1 i686 kernel?

MatejLach commented on 2012-11-07 16:39

@shivik - Thanks for keeping the Liquorix kernel so up-to date!

msx commented on 2012-11-03 18:34

Hi all, I can't make ulatencyd daemon work with Liquorix since switching to systemd, anybody else?

shivik commented on 2012-10-21 05:45

Yes.It is built-in.
[shivik@archenemy linux-lqx]$ grep -i acpi_cpufreq config.*
config.amd64:CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=y
config.i386:CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=y

martadinata666 commented on 2012-10-21 01:11

i can't insert acpi_cpufreq module on this kernel? but the cpupower still working, is it built-in on the kernel?

shivik commented on 2012-10-17 05:56

@engelus, in theory - yes.(CONFIG_X86_MARCH_NATIVE is still experimental)

But you can also try CONFIG_MCORE2, which is supposed to optimize for i3,i5,i7
Some reading: http://duopetalflower.blogspot.com/2011/07/custom-kernel-30-amd64-ubuntu-packages.html

engelus commented on 2012-10-17 02:19

@shivik: If I want to enable specific optimizations for my cpu (core i3), in the archive config.i386 (I am building x86 kernel) should I have to coment line CONFIG_X86_GENERIC=y and uncoment line CONFIG_X86_MARCH_NATIVE ? Is that correct? Thank you.

silvik commented on 2012-09-18 14:39

looks like there's a config problem, 2 questions are asked regarding layer7 iptables match.
after responding "m", looks like it's working, so not a big deal.

msx commented on 2012-09-17 14:12

Thanks for the feedback.
Here sensors is working too but I still having the error message when running sensors-detect to config the utility:
/usr/share/webapps # sensors
radeon-pci-0100
Adapter: PCI adapter
temp1: -128.0°C <-- wtf, lol!

coretemp-isa-0000
Adapter: ISA adapter
Core 0: +52.0°C (high = +95.0°C, crit = +105.0°C)
Core 2: +52.0°C (high = +95.0°C, crit = +105.0°C)

acpitz-virtual-0
Adapter: Virtual device
temp1: +54.0°C

Btw, so far community-testing/VirtualBox 4.2.0 with aur/virtualbox-hook with linux-lqx 3.5.3 is working great.

engelus commented on 2012-09-13 02:33

@msx I am using pure systemd system with lqx without any problems since 3.4.9

shivik commented on 2012-09-12 20:18

Config files are supplied by damentz - the author of the lqx patchset.

Actually I just checked both config files for 3.5.3-2 lqx and they both have CONFIG_CGROUPS=y.
[shivik@archenemy linux-lqx]$ grep -i cgroups config.*
config.amd64:CONFIG_CGROUPS=y
config.i386:CONFIG_CGROUPS=y

and this is from my running 3.5.3-2 lqx kernel
[shivik@archenemy linux-lqx]$ zcat /proc/config.gz | grep -i cgroups
CONFIG_CGROUPS=y

Click one of the links below,hit Ctrl+F and type cgroups
You'll see that you have CONFIG_CGROUPS=y.
http://liquorix.net/sources/3.5/config.amd64
http://liquorix.net/sources/3.5/config.i386

msx,you say you haven't made the switch to systemd. Me neither, yet with fully updated system my sensors work.
[shivik@archenemy ~]$ sensors
it8720-isa-0228
Adapter: ISA adapter
in0: +1.28 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in1: +1.52 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in2: +3.38 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
+5V: +2.96 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in4: +3.09 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in5: +2.19 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in6: +4.08 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) ALARM
5VSB: +2.96 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
Vbat: +3.22 V
fan1: 325 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
fan2: 520 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
fan3: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
fan4: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
temp1: +38.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor
temp2: +36.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +60.0°C) sensor = thermal diode
temp3: +39.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor
cpu0_vid: +0.375 V
intrusion0: ALARM

k10temp-pci-00c3
Adapter: PCI adapter
temp1: +25.5°C (high = +70.0°C)
(crit = +67.0°C, hyst = +62.0°C)

shivik commented on 2012-09-12 20:18

Config files are supplied by damentz - the author of the lqx patchset.

Actually I just checked both config files for 3.5.3-2 lqx and they both have CONFIG_CGROUPS=y.
[shivik@archenemy linux-lqx]$ grep -i cgroups config.*
config.amd64:CONFIG_CGROUPS=y
config.i386:CONFIG_CGROUPS=y

and this is from my running 3.5.3-2 lqx kernel
[shivik@archenemy linux-lqx]$ zcat /proc/config.gz | grep -i cgroups
CONFIG_CGROUPS=y

Click one of the links below,hit Ctrl+F and type cgroups
You'll see that you have CONFIG_CGROUPS=y.
http://liquorix.net/sources/3.5/config.amd64
http://liquorix.net/sources/3.5/config.i386

msx,you say you haven't made he switch to systemd. Me neither, yet with fully updated system my sensors work.
[shivik@archenemy ~]$ sensors
it8720-isa-0228
Adapter: ISA adapter
in0: +1.28 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in1: +1.52 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in2: +3.38 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
+5V: +2.96 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in4: +3.09 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in5: +2.19 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in6: +4.08 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) ALARM
5VSB: +2.96 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
Vbat: +3.22 V
fan1: 325 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
fan2: 520 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
fan3: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
fan4: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
temp1: +38.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor
temp2: +36.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +60.0°C) sensor = thermal diode
temp3: +39.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor
cpu0_vid: +0.375 V
intrusion0: ALARM

k10temp-pci-00c3
Adapter: PCI adapter
temp1: +25.5°C (high = +70.0°C)
(crit = +67.0°C, hyst = +62.0°C)

shivik commented on 2012-09-12 19:46

Config files are supplied by damentz - the author of the lqx patchset.

Actually I just checked both config files for 3.5.3-2 lqx and they both have CONFIG_CGROUPS=y.
[shivik@archenemy linux-lqx]$ grep -i cgroups config.*
config.amd64:CONFIG_CGROUPS=y
config.i386:CONFIG_CGROUPS=y

and this is from my running 3.5.3-2 lqx kernel
[shivik@archenemy linux-lqx]$ zcat /proc/config.gz | grep -i cgroups
CONFIG_CGROUPS=y

Click one of the links below,hit Ctrl+F and type cgroups
You'll see that you have CONFIG_CGROUPS=y.
http://liquorix.net/sources/3.5/config.amd64
http://liquorix.net/sources/3.5/config.i386

msx,you say you haven't made he switch to systemd. Me neither, yet with fully updated system my sensors work.
[shivik@archenemy ~]$ sensors
it8720-isa-0228
Adapter: ISA adapter
in0: +1.28 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in1: +1.52 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in2: +3.38 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
+5V: +2.96 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in4: +3.09 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in5: +2.19 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in6: +4.08 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) ALARM
5VSB: +2.96 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
Vbat: +3.22 V
fan1: 325 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
fan2: 520 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
fan3: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
fan4: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
temp1: +38.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor
temp2: +36.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +60.0°C) sensor = thermal diode
temp3: +39.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor
cpu0_vid: +0.375 V
intrusion0: ALARM

k10temp-pci-00c3
Adapter: PCI adapter
temp1: +25.5°C (high = +70.0°C)
(crit = +67.0°C, hyst = +62.0°C)

msx commented on 2012-09-12 17:15

Hi @shivik,
according to this post: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=138457 user @nanix says "If you are running a custom kernel make sure you compile with CONFIG_CGROUPS = y, systemd requires it. The aur lqx no longer has this flagged.".
Now, after a bit research I found these two interesting articles regarding this flag, http://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/CGROUPS.html and http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/cgroups-vs-cgroups.html, where says that:
a. CONFIG_CGROUPS isn't supported in the 3.5 kernel branch (1st link)
b. it is needed with systemd (2nd link)

Will you please consider enabling this flag in the future? While I personally didn't the jump yet to systemd it's certainly a matter of time until it become the de-facto init handler.

Btw, all of this showed up when I tried to run the sensors-detect tool of lm_sensors application and got the error message: "Failed to get D-Bus connection: No connection to service manager", in my case not because systemd but because CONFIG_CGROUPS isn't available in the current kernel branch (found in Linux kernels: 2.6.24–2.6.39, 3.0–3.4, 3.6-rc+HEAD).

msx commented on 2012-09-12 09:11

Hey, I was looking for some light on this error message "Failed to get D-Bus connection: No connection to service manager" (while running sensors-detect from lm_sensors utils) and since I didn't make yet the big leap to systemd it must be the kernel flag thing nanix talks about here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=138457

In a nutshell there say: "If you are running a custom kernel make sure you compile with CONFIG_CGROUPS = y, systemd requires it. The aur lqx no longer has this flagged.".
Based on these two good readings, http://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/CGROUPS.html and http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/cgroups-vs-cgroups.html, there say that:
a. CONFIG_CGROUPS isn't supported in the 3.5 kernel branch
b. it isn't needed at all with systemd

So it seems I need to either upgrade my initscripts to systemd -this is unavoidable anyways- or compile Liquorix myself with this flag on.
In the end I want to thank you very much once again for providing such nice kernel like Liquorix[0], it's a *must* for me.

[0] It's really noticeable the performance difference between Liquorix and the stock kernel, specially regarding desktop responsiveness, system load and heat. I also find this kernel lighter and fastest than -ck and -pf, which are great but don't fit in my system.

engelus commented on 2012-09-04 23:10

@shivik sorry for the delay I was testing stock and linux-ck and having the same problem, also slim brokes on logout. I Will search in the formums to see is anyone is having the same issue. Also i will revert the both kernel stock and lqx to 3.4.9 and see if the problem is present too. Thanks.

engelus commented on 2012-09-04 23:08

@shivik sorry for the delay I was testing stock and linux-ck and having the same problem, also slim brokes on logout. I Will search in the formums to see is anyone is having the same issue. Thanks.

shivik commented on 2012-09-03 05:53

Everything rock solid here.
Engelus,sounds like a power-saving issue of some sort.
Are you sure it's the kernel and not other packages that you upgraded along with the kernel?
Try the stock arch kernel or some other custom kernel(like linux-pf or linux-bfs) and see if you'll get the same problem.

engelus commented on 2012-09-03 01:57

I am having a strange issue with 3.5.3-2. If I leave my laptop on for a while without any kind of activity then the wifi is disabled and the compositing (xcompmgr) disabled and tint2 closed. So I have to relog to things work again. With 3.4.9 I havent any of this problems. Any ideas?

msx commented on 2012-09-01 21:09

@shivik: still having the same issue here:
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxdrv': Exec format error
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxnetadp': Exec format error
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxnetflt': Exec format error
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxpci': Exec format error

I'm wondering if any of you guys have this issue with VirtualBox and Liquorix!?

As a side note, the whole 3.4 branch worked okay and also VirtualBox is working great on linux-pf.

@engelus thanks for the feedback, I will try uninstalling and then reinstalling all VirtualBox packages...

msx commented on 2012-09-01 21:08

@shivik: still having the same issue here:
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxdrv': Exec format error
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxnetadp': Exec format error
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxnetflt': Exec format error
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxpci': Exec format error

I'm wondering if any of you guys have this issue with VirtualBox and Liquorix!?

As a side note, the whole 3.4 branch worked okay and also VirtualBox is working great on linux-pf.

msx commented on 2012-09-01 21:07

@shivik: still having the same issue here:
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxdrv': Exec format error
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxnetadp': Exec format error
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxnetflt': Exec format error
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxpci': Exec format error

I'm wondering if any of you guys have this issue with VirtualBox and Liquorix!?

engelus commented on 2012-09-01 21:06

I am using the latest lqx build:

[engelus@hades ~]$ uname -a
Linux hades 3.5.3-2-lqx #1 ZEN SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 31 20:06:34 ART 2012 i686 GNU/Linux

msx commented on 2012-09-01 20:48

Hey guys, hi!
@engelus: are you running the latest Liquorix or anything from the 3.4 branch?
@shivik: thanks, I'm gonna install the new x86_64 from your repo and post back my results!

Kind regards,
Martin

shivik commented on 2012-09-01 20:11

Doesn't matter the PKGBUILD is the same for 32- and 64-bit(only slightly different config* files).
It only matters when it comes down to precompiled package binaries.
I rebuilt the x86_64 version in the repo.That's why I was asking.
But since you didn't have problems it's not the PKGBUILD.

engelus commented on 2012-09-01 20:00

To clarify I am using i686 kernel

shivik commented on 2012-09-01 19:52

Now I see engelus's post, so its probably not the PKGBUILD then.

shivik commented on 2012-09-01 19:52

Now I see enelus's post, so its probably not the PKGBUILD then.

shivik commented on 2012-09-01 19:48

@msx,is it the same error?
I modified the PKGBUILD a bit just now.Fiddled with the "provides" section.
You can try it if you want(or if you have a fast computer the compile time shouldn't be a problem).
If you're running 64bit,you can try the precompiled package from the "repo".I just re-packaged that.

engelus commented on 2012-09-01 19:44

@msx I upated yesterday the kernel and I havent got any problem rebuilding the modules for virtualbox, I used:

sudo dkms install vboxhost/4.1.20

msx commented on 2012-09-01 16:50

VirtualBox problem again with latest 3.5.3-2, anyone else?

shivik commented on 2012-09-01 05:39

I kinda set a repo :)
It's not the final thing.More of a proof of concept.
Hosting sucks,cuts out randomly while you are downloading,so you have to run pacman -Syu until it downloads the whole thing.
Initial set up was with package signing,but it pacman kept throwing errors,so I have to find info about how to do it the right way.
Anyway here goes.Add the following to your /etc/pacman.conf:

[liquorix]
SigLevel = Never
Server = http://liquorix.herobo.com/$arch

Then run pacman -Syy to sync with new repo.
Precompiled linux-lqx and nvidia-lqx.

shivik commented on 2012-08-31 16:21

Got it!
Deleted my previous comment.
Waiting for the build proccess to complete now.

shivik commented on 2012-08-31 16:04

Package build fails with:
...
DEPMOD 3.5.3-2-lqx
cp: failed to get attributes of „drivers/media/video/et61x251/*.h“: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package_linux-lqx().
Aborting...
Here is the PKGBUILD: http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/pkgsrc/3.5/linux-lqx-3.5.3-2.src.tar.gz
If anyone else wants to try and see if the same error will occur.

shivik commented on 2012-08-31 06:19

I'll update in about 6 hours.
Sorry guys - duty calls.

shivik commented on 2012-08-29 20:20

supercool :)

engelus commented on 2012-08-29 19:57

shivik thanks for your help if do what you said scaling works, also discovered that changing the value of /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor to ondemand also works :D and thanks again for your help

shivik commented on 2012-08-29 19:39

Very strange.I use powernow-k8(which is also built-in).
Working out of the box.

Can you try this(as root or sudo):
1.pacman -S cpupower
2.then edit /etc/conf.d/cpupower and uncomment governor='ondemand'
3.rc.d start cpupower (or /etc/rc.d/cpupower start)
and check if scaling is working

engelus commented on 2012-08-29 11:37

Well the error for the module of vbox was that I havent installed virtualbox-source package, so problem resolved, sorry for that.

---

I know cpu scaling is working because in stock when I log in the cpu are at 0.97 Ghz (I use conky for monitoring) my machine have an i3-350M @ 2,26 GHz, but when I log in in lqx the cpu are always at top GHz.

msx commented on 2012-08-29 11:32

@engelus: did you visit this forum post? https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1143526
May be I'm forgetting something or so, but following that instructions you shouldn't have any problem.

shivik commented on 2012-08-29 07:06

Hmm...everything is fine with your modules dir so vbox is _supposed_ to work...
Does virtualbox work with the stock kernel?
What errors do you get with lqx?

As for cpu frequency scaling it should work out of the box with lqx for acpi-cpufreq.
And you're right the governor is also in the kernel.
So no need to load anything as module.
LQX / srock kernel
CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=y / CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=m
Is scaling working on your machine or you are just concern,because you don't see acpi-cpufreq in lsmod?

shivik commented on 2012-08-29 06:55

Hmm...everything is fine with your modules dir so vbox is _supposed_ to work...
Does virtualbox work with the stock kernel?

As for cpu frequency scaling it should work out of the box with lqx for acpi-cpufreq.
And you're right the governor is also in the kernel.
So no need to load anything as module.
LQX / srock kernel
CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=y / CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=m
Is scaling working on your machine or you are just concern,because you don't see acpi-cpufreq in lsmod?

engelus commented on 2012-08-28 23:53

[engelus@hades ~]$ ls /usr/lib/modules
3.4.9-1-ARCH 3.4.9-3-lqx extramodules-3.4-ARCH extramodules-3.4-lqx

yep my sistem is up to date i suffer from versionist :D

----

I havent installed cpufrequtils because in stock kernel on demand governor is started at boot.
lsmod from stock: http://pastebin.com/9jwvV63R
lsmod from lqx: http://pastebin.com/w863qrkG

shivik commented on 2012-08-28 21:11

Paste the output of "ls /usr/lib/modules"
Also is your system updated pacman -Syu?

acpi-cpufreq is built in the kernel.It's not a module.
This is why you get the error.It's already in the kernel.
Do you have cpufrequtils installed(this is replaced by cpupower by the way).

engelus commented on 2012-08-28 14:30

Hi i am using the kernel 3.4.9-3 it compiled succesfully but having problems with Virtual Box solution provided by msx doesnt work for me.
Another problem the module acpi-cpufreq used by intel chipset for cpu frecuency scaling isnt loading at boot. if i try to load with modprobe doesnt report errors but if i try to unload it it gives me "libkmod: kmod_module_get_holders: could not open '/sys/module/acpi_cpufreq/holders': No such file or directory
Error: Module acpi_cpufreq is in use"

Thanks and sorry for my bad english

engelus commented on 2012-08-28 14:27

Hi i am using the kernel 3.4.9-3 it compiled succesfully but having problems with Virtual Box solution provided by msx doesnt work for me.
Another problem the module acpi-cpufreq used by intel chipset for cpu frecuency scaling isnt loading at boot. if i try to load with modprobe doesnt report errors but if i try to unload it it gives me "libkmod: kmod_module_get_holders: could not open '/sys/module/acpi_cpufreq/holders': No such file or directory
Error: Module acpi_cpufreq is in use"

Thanks and sorry for my bad english

shivik commented on 2012-08-26 16:10

Try it with the default PKGBUILD options to see if it's a confguration problem or some change in the source code.

trizen commented on 2012-08-26 15:58

32-bit and a custom configuration ( http://pastebin.com/mhLVEbHV ). I tried to compile it with _config="old" (with the same configuration that worked just fine with 3.4.7-1).

shivik commented on 2012-08-26 15:54

No ideas for the moment.Compiled fine on my machine.
Are you runing 32 or 64 bit?
Any custom configuration?

trizen commented on 2012-08-26 09:55

I'm trying to upgrade from 3.4.7-1 to 3.4.9-3, but I got this error: http://pastebin.com/hLQwy75h
Any ideas?

Anonymous comment on 2012-08-20 10:47

@shivik

hi apologize for the delay in responding.
i try CONFIG_PACKET=y and work!

thanks a lot for your time again

shivik commented on 2012-08-15 13:53

@msx, nice to see your problem solved :)

msx commented on 2012-08-14 21:33

@shivik: tnx pal, everything's right now =)
In case any user of this kernel keeps having problems with VirtualBox I will simplify here the steps needed to resolve this:
1. got to /usr/lib/modules
2. localize and rename any -lqx directory except the main one, in my case 3.4.8-1-lqx
3. sudo dkms uninstall vboxhost/4.1.18 && sudo dkms install vboxhost/4.1.18

Modules should load as usual now.
And shivik, thanks for your great job packaging Liquorix!

shivik commented on 2012-08-14 05:24

@nmapper, modprobe_db is the reason why modprobe af_packet doesn't work.
So do this then:
Get the stock linux-lqx and don't change _config(leave it as _config="pkg")
Then change CONFIG_PACKET=m to CONFIG_PACKET=y in config.i386 if you're running 32-bit or in config.amd64 if you're running 64-bit.
Recompile the kernel and tell me if it works.

@msx, see this: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1143526
Might be the same problem.

Anonymous comment on 2012-08-14 04:38

@shivit, yes i do it just like you say it. but, modprobe not found a module called af_packet.
i imagine that module not found because i only compile modules listed in /var/log/modprobed.dd, thats why i had to add that module in modprobed_db.

- Ok, i'll try to do this again, and notify you

- thanks for you time

msx commented on 2012-08-13 20:23

@shivit, guys:

VirtualBox modules compilation doesn't work with this linux-lqx release. The modules themselves seems to compile ok with:
# dkms install vboxhost/4.1.18
but then I can't modprobe them:
# modprobe {module}
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxdrv': Exec format error
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxnetadp': Exec format error
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxnetflt': Exec format error
ERROR: could not insert 'vboxpci': Exec format error

This does not happen with stock kernel. Anyone else?

shivik commented on 2012-08-13 18:35

No, just modprobe af_packet as in my previous comment on the fly(don't edit anything,just issue the command modprobe af_packet) and then try to connect to your wifi.
No recompiling,no rebooting.
If it works then you need to modify your kernel config and change CONFIG_PACKET=m to CONFIG_PACKET=y.

You can also try and edit configs that come with linux-lqx and change CONFIG_PACKET=m to CONFIG_PACKET=y.
config.i386 if you're running 32-bit
config.amd64 if you're running 64-bit
Change _config to _config="pkg" and then recompile the kernel and tell me if it works,but try the first one first.

Anonymous comment on 2012-08-13 18:06

- ok, i add "af_packet" as module in my /var/log/modprobed.db, recompile, and doesn't function.

- i recompile linux-lqx "as is" without touch anything in PKGBUILD and function. I assume that is not a problem with the package.

- sure is an problem with my modules. I'll try to found this and i post the solution.

Thanks a lot again!

shivik commented on 2012-08-13 05:29

Troubleshooting starts assuming you are not an idiot :)
I'll need more info,but try this first:
(as root) "modprobe af_packet"
(or sudo) "sudo modprobe af_packet"

Anonymous comment on 2012-08-12 20:04

Hi, im compile this package with "_config="local"" in PKGBUILD.

I have this modules in my /var/log/modprobed.db http://pastebin.com/K1GvG5HD.

I have this wifi card "05:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless LAN Controller (rev 01)".

When i boot into this kernel, my wifi (Network Manager, and Wicd) tells me that password is invalid. and i tried to connect to my wifi with wpa_passphrase and wpa_supplicant and i have this error: "l2_packet_init: socket(PF_PACKET): Address family not supported by protocol".

Any idea?

its a bug?

i'm an idiot?

thanks a lot!

Anonymous comment on 2012-08-02 19:32

Thanks! It turns out that I had made the switch from /lib to /usr/lib. Everything worked once I upgraded.

--rennis250

shivik commented on 2012-07-21 16:35

KARCH has nothing to do with that.I'm running 64bit also.
I don't actually know how yaourt works,but since kmod 9-2 modules are now in /usr/lib not in /lib.
There's a line in the PKGBUILD that moves the entire tree to the new location("mv "$pkgdir/lib" "$pkgdir/usr"").
Have you read this: http://www.archlinux.org/news/the-lib-directory-becomes-a-symlink/ ?
Is your system updated so it reflects the new changes?
Whats your output of " pacman -Q kmod "?

You can try and build linux-lqx with makepkg.
1.Download the tarball: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/li/linux-lqx/linux-lqx.tar.gz
2.Extract the linux-lqx folder to a subfolder of your liking.
3.Open a terminal window,navigate into that folder and type" makepkg "

Anonymous comment on 2012-07-21 02:13

Hello,

I'm receiving a curious error:

MKDIR /tmp/yaourt-tmp-rje/aur-linux-lqx/pkg/linux-lqx/lib/firmware/cpia2/
INSTALL /tmp/yaourt-tmp-rje/aur-linux-lqx/pkg/linux-lqx/lib/firmware/cpia2/stv0672_vp4.bin
DEPMOD 3.4.4-2-lqx
ERROR: could not open directory /tmp/yaourt-tmp-rje/aur-linux-lqx/pkg/linux-lqx/lib/modules/3.4.4-2-lqx: No such file or directory
FATAL: could not search modules: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package_linux-lqx().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-lqx.

I took a look at the package_linux-lqx function and noticed that KARCH is set to x86 by default. I'm running an x64 system, if that has any bearing. Any ideas?

Thanks,
rennis250

shivik commented on 2012-07-14 15:10

Updated.
Now includes changes, which come with the new kmod 9-2.Full story here: http://www.archlinux.org/news/the-lib-directory-becomes-a-symlink/

doug commented on 2012-07-08 09:23

I modified the PKGBUILD so it works with new kmod from testing (at least for x64 systems)
http://pastebin.com/qk2BtEYP

shivik commented on 2012-07-06 17:27

Thanks, Harry!
I didn't know actually.
Doh...great timing...I have so much to do right now...

Anonymous comment on 2012-07-05 22:31

@shivik - Just wondering if you were following the kmod stuff in testing? A discussion has started (with links to relevant arch discussions) over on the linux-ck AUR page. I guess it will effect those using custom kernels. Just thought I would give you a heads up just in case.

Thanks

Anonymous comment on 2012-06-25 07:43

I don't know why, but my kernel didn't become bigger, (still 3,2Mb), and boot-up time haven't improved... Probably, I've done something wrong("nomod" in PKGBUILD and then remove the check mark near "Use modules" in "xconfig")..

I am also thinking about SSD but I am too lazy to buy it, copy system from HDD to SSD...)

shivik commented on 2012-06-22 04:59

How's your kernel size?
What about the boot-up time? Did it improve?
I've struggled in the past to achieve faster boot time and faster loading programs
and found the ultimate tweak - it's called SSD :)
One of my all time best upgrades I've done.

Anonymous comment on 2012-06-21 08:36

Thank you. I have tried it, and i don't know why, kernel config still contains modules...

shivik commented on 2012-06-19 16:24

OK, I'm not sure how this is supposed to work,but it got me 18.5 meg kernel package after compile.
It did ask me some questions prior to compile(don't know if that's normal).
It compiled fine and built the package with no errors,but I didn't try and boot it.
Just change _config="pkg" to _config="nomod" and give it a shot.

shivik commented on 2012-06-19 16:24

OK, I'm not sure how this is supposed to work,but it got me 18.5 meg kernel after compile.
It did ask me some questions prior to compile(don't know if that's normal).
It compiled fine and built the package with no errors,but I didn't try and boot it.
Just change _config="pkg" to _config="nomod" and give it a shot.

Anonymous comment on 2012-06-18 13:00

Thanks a lot.

shivik commented on 2012-06-18 10:48

@Vekt, I'll dig into that as soon as I have more time.

Anonymous comment on 2012-06-18 09:26

Please, add a posibility to compile it with "make localyesconfig". I wouldn't like to have any modules in my system in order to make it boot faster, but when i tried to change "localmodconfig" to "localyesconfig" in the PKGBUILD i got an errror at the end of compilation(The present kernel configuration has modules disabled. Type 'make config' and enable loadable module support. Then build a kernel with module support enabled.)
Thank you.

shivik commented on 2012-06-17 06:25

Guess you're right:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=124250
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27267
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/995163

shivik commented on 2012-06-17 06:19

Guess you're right:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27267
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/995163

Freso commented on 2012-06-16 18:33

@shivik: What you're describing is very much what I was expecting. What happens though, is that "make oldconfig" seems to be run as a fall-back. See http://snipurl.com/23yq8kb

After actually having read the log, it looks like a previously valid statement in the .config, "ZCACHE=m", is now invalid, and thus makes the process bark. I admit though, that this sounds more like an upstream bug, than an issue with the PKGBUILD - but now I've mentioned it here, just in case.

shivik commented on 2012-06-11 13:54

_config="old" uses configuration from your running kernel(which is in /proc/config.gz (try "zcat /proc/config.gz" in a shell)).
_config="x" gives a gui to config.i386(or config.amd64) that comes with lqx.
I tried it and it first copies the configuration from the running kernel and then runs xconfig on top of that.
So in case you set these two options together it just follows the order in the PKGBUILD script,
where zcat /proc/config.gz > ./.config is 1st and xconfig comes second.

Generally, you have to use one thing or the other.
Edit: {line removed}

In fact there is no command `make oldconfig` in the lqx PKGBUILD.

Can you tell me what are you trying to achieve so I can have a better understanding of your idea and maybe help you?

shivik commented on 2012-06-11 05:40

_config="old" uses configuration from your running kernel(which is in /proc/config.gz (try "zcat /proc/config.gz" in a shell)).
_config="x" gives a gui to config.i386(or config.amd64) that comes with lqx.
I tried it and it first copies the configuration from the running kernel and then runs xconfig on top of that.
So in case you set these two options together it just follows the order in the PKGBUILD script,
where zcat /proc/config.gz > ./.config is 1st and xconfig comes second.

Generally, you have to use one thing or the other.
Unless you want to use your running kernel's configuration as a base for further customizations.

In fact there is no command `make oldconfig` in the lqx PKGBUILD.

Can you tell me what are you trying to achieve so I can have a better understanding of your idea and maybe help you?

msx commented on 2012-06-10 21:41

Where do I find the kernel headers? I need them to compile VMWare's kernel modules.

Freso commented on 2012-06-10 21:13

Having set '_custom="x"' and '_config="old"', it seems to run `make oldconfig` - which I'm not really interested in wading through. Any suggestions?

shivik commented on 2012-06-06 06:54

linux-lqx 3.3.8-1 PKGBUILD:
http://netload.in/dateiKj1rU0Os5z/linux-lqx-3.3.8-1.src.tar.gz.htm

MatejLach commented on 2012-05-25 15:18

Ok, thanks.

shivik commented on 2012-05-25 12:35

There were two "provides" statements in the PKGBUILD by mistake.
I left the the one with "linux=".
Try it now and see if it works.

MatejLach commented on 2012-05-24 20:31

I am not sure why virtualbox requires the standard 'linux' package from the repos, when.
Shouldn't 'provides' take care of this?

shivik commented on 2012-05-10 14:46

No problem ;)

Anonymous comment on 2012-05-10 13:32

well that's embarassing ahah, i totally forgot about that, it works just fine now , thanks for the help and sorry if i wasted you're time with something so stupid :P

shivik commented on 2012-05-10 13:16

see this line ->
-=-
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-linux root=UUID=3f92645f-7064-41bb-a033-53c4339f7195 resume=UUID=38df3f39-8626-4976-9365-0f0b7ff22908 pcie_aspm=force i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 i915.i915_enable_fbc=1 i915.lvds_downclock=1 ro
initrd /boot/initramfs-linux-lqx.img
-=-
it says to boot vmlinuz-linux(which is your stock kernel),as opposed to vmlinuz-linux-lqx(which is linux-lqx)


Can you edit your /boot/grub/menu.lst(_only the LQX section_) so it becomes like this(you can copy&paste actually,but remove the old entries if you do):
# (0) Arch Linux
title Arch Linux LQX kernel
root (hd0,5)
kernel /vmlinuz-linux-lqx root=/dev/sda6 fastboot resume=/dev/sda5 pcie_aspm=force i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 i915.i915_enable_fbc=1 i915.lvds_downclock=1 ro
initrd /initramfs-linux-lqx.img

shivik commented on 2012-05-10 13:05

see this line ->
-=-
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-linux root=UUID=3f92645f-7064-41bb-a033-53c4339f7195 resume=UUID=38df3f39-8626-4976-9365-0f0b7ff22908 pcie_aspm=force i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 i915.i915_enable_fbc=1 i915.lvds_downclock=1 ro
initrd /boot/initramfs-linux-lqx.img
-=-
it says to boot vmlinuz-linux(which is your stock kernel),as opposed to vmlinuz-linux-lqx(which is linux-lqx)


Can you edit your /boot/grub/menu.lst so it becomes like this(you can copy&paste actually,but remove the old entries if you do):
# (0) Arch Linux
title Arch Linux LQX kernel
root (hd0,5)
kernel /vmlinuz-linux-lqx root=/dev/sda6 fastboot resume=/dev/sda5 pcie_aspm=force i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 i915.i915_enable_fbc=1 i915.lvds_downclock=1 ro
initrd /initramfs-linux-lqx.img

Anonymous comment on 2012-05-10 12:43

here it is, i left the stock kernel as the fallback https://gist.github.com/2652813

shivik commented on 2012-05-10 12:38

Can post your /boot/grub/menu.lst or at least the LQX section?

Anonymous comment on 2012-05-10 11:07

nope, i tried but it still can't find the devices

shivik commented on 2012-05-09 20:42

Maybe the same problem: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=140676

shivik commented on 2012-05-09 20:24

I'm out of ideas.
I had that same problem back when 3.2 was out and solved it with the fastboot option.
It was not related specifically to linux-lqx,though...(linux-ck for example too was droppin' me to a shell)

Anonymous comment on 2012-05-09 14:36

@shivik
I tried but it still can't find the device :/

shivik commented on 2012-05-09 13:53

@clod89, try:
1.run mkinitcpio -p linux-lqx (as root or sudo)
2.add "fastboot" ot your /boot/grub/menu.lst lqx kernel line like so:
kernel /vmlinuz-linux-lqx root=/dev/sda3 fastboot elevator=deadline ro
Above is just an example do not copy the line just add fastboot to yours

and reboot...

Anonymous comment on 2012-05-09 09:39

I just tried 3.3.5, it compiled fine but it can't find neither the resume nor the root partition at boot and it just drops a recovery shell, booting the stock kernel works fine.

shivik commented on 2012-04-22 05:09

Glad it worked for you :)

msx commented on 2012-04-22 03:26

I compiled the kernel without the CONFIG_I2O_SCSI module and it did compile ok so next thing I did was clean the /tmp directory and then yaourt it again: everything worked smooth this time :)

msx commented on 2012-04-22 03:25

I did compile the kernel without the CONFIG_I2O_SCSI module and it compiled ok so next thing I did was clean the /tmp directory and then yaourt it again: everything working smooth this time :)

msx commented on 2012-04-18 17:50

Excellent, thanks for the help, I will look upon that :)

shivik commented on 2012-04-18 06:43

@msx,I can't tell what might be the problem in your case from this error.
It just says that it fails while building the i2o_scsi module.
I'm running 3.3.2-0 now - compiled and installed with no problems.

Are you running 32 or 64 bit?
Did you "makepkg" in an empty folder or there were leftovers from previous lqx compiles?
Is you system up-to-date (pacman -Syu)?

For the sake of experiment try and disable CONFIG_I2O_SCSI=m(just put a # in front of the line
in your config.i386(if 32bit) or config.amd64(if 64bit)) and run makepkg again.

And maybe try the 3.2.14-lqx here and see if you got the same error:http://netload.in/datei29fehoLd7X/linux-lqx-3.2.14_with_patch_and_configs.zip.htm
No one had problems with that,so give it a shot.

msx commented on 2012-04-18 03:48

@shivik:
Thanks for your aur package, I've been using it for a while until recently when I switched to pf-kernel (btw, I agree Liquorix feels slicker...)
Now, I have this error message when upgrading the package:
compilation terminated.
make[1]: *** [drivers/message/i2o/i2o_scsi.mod.o] Error 1
make: *** [modules] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-lqx.
==> Restart building linux-lqx ? [y/N]
==> ----------------------------------
==>
:(

@shadowed87: Yeah, Liqourix is a fatless marvel that uses ~100mb less than stock/-ck kernels and extends your laptop's battery life. You may want to check the wiki for other means to get most out of your battery specially cpufreq (with acpid), laptop-mode, aur/powertop2 and so on.

msx commented on 2012-04-17 16:50

@shivik:
Thank you very much for your aur, I've been using it for a while until recently when I switched to pf-kernel (btw, I agree Liquorix feels slicker...)
Now, I have this error message when upgrading the package:
compilation terminated.
make[1]: *** [drivers/message/i2o/i2o_scsi.mod.o] Error 1
make: *** [modules] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-lqx.
==> Restart building linux-lqx ? [y/N]
==> ----------------------------------
==>
:(

@shadowed87: Yeah, Liqourix is a fat-less marvel that use ~100mb less than stock/ck kernels and extends your laptop's battery life. I may want to check the wiki to other means to extend battery life and use cpufreq, laptop-mode, aur/powertop2 and so.

shivik commented on 2012-04-17 15:19

Updated to 3.3.2 using latest 3.2.1 configs.
Package version is -0,so I can bump to -1 once damentz updates the config files on the liquorix website.

shivik commented on 2012-04-17 06:21

3.3.2-1 patch is out,but config folder is empty so I can't update the lqx package yet.
You can't compile 3.3.1-1 for the same reason.
Let's hope damentz will fix it soon.
http://liquorix.net/sources/3.3/
Index of /sources/3.3
Name Last modified Size Description
Parent

shivik commented on 2012-04-17 06:18

3.3.2-1 patch is out,but config folder is empty so I can't update the lqx package yet(http://liquorix.net/sources/3.3/).
You can't compile 3.3.1-1 for the same reason.
Let's hope damentz will fix it soon.

shivik commented on 2012-04-11 20:17

3.2.14 PKGBUILD: http://netload.in/dateiqblWHqI78O/linux-lqx-3.2.14-1.src.tar.gz.htm
nvidia module: http://netload.in/dateiYJ7khfgHZe/nvidia-lqx-295.40-1.src.tar.gz.htm

shivik commented on 2012-04-08 06:04

3.2.14 PKGBUILD: http://netload.in/dateiqblWHqI78O/linux-lqx-3.2.14-1.src.tar.gz.htm
nvidia module: http://netload.in/dateifexcLjs2Aw/nvidia-lqx-295.33-1.src.tar.gz.htm

shadowed87 commented on 2012-04-05 10:59

yes it feels really slick, i only modified the config according to this

http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/bfs/bfs-configuration-faq.txt

shivik commented on 2012-03-31 04:51

I think it won't be any different than the stock arch kernel in that aspect.
Try it and see if you like it.

shadowed87 commented on 2012-03-30 15:14

is this kernel suitable for a laptop aswell?? i mean about power management...are there any drawbacks?

shivik commented on 2012-03-15 05:49

No.You don't need to change anything to build for x86_64.
If you're running x86_64 it will build for x86_64 and produce a 64-bit binary
Don't worry about it.

KARCH=x86 means "pc paltform" in this case(does not define 32 or 64 bit).
It just tells the script to use the correct kernel sources.

Anonymous comment on 2012-03-15 00:39

So to build this for x86_64 all I need to do is change KARCH to "x86_64" in the PKGBUILD?

Freso commented on 2012-02-29 14:07

Like graysky's. But it looks like AUR is already in a Git repos, so I guess I can just clone this from there. :)

shivik commented on 2012-02-28 21:04

You mean like graysky's PKG build commits here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50911
Or the liquorix patches that damentz does?

Freso commented on 2012-02-28 19:49

Is the development of this PKGBUILD going on in a Git repository anywhere by chance?

shivik commented on 2012-02-22 06:11

Updated to 3.2.7-1.
config files are the same as 3.2.6-1 at the time I update the PKGBUILD.
I don't know if damentz is going to update those or leave them the same for 3.2.7-1
In case he updates you'll get
config.i386 ... FAILED
config.amd64 ... FAILED
until I update the PKGBUILD again.

shivik commented on 2012-02-15 05:38

config files were updated again

shivik commented on 2012-02-06 22:26

Updated checksums.
I should probably bump package version too,but that will brake the sync with the lqx patch...

doug commented on 2012-02-06 13:18

config files were updated, so they fail validity check

Wintershade commented on 2012-02-01 10:05

@shivik - it does indeed - at the moment. I haven't tested all the modules yet (didn't get the chance to do so), what currently interests me most is the open-source virtualbox module, and the module from the nvidia-all package. I prefer nvidia-all to nvidia-lqx due to the number of kernels I test in my free time - although the -lqx is the "main" kernel I use. So when I find the time to test more, I'll drop you more feedback here. Thanks again :) you're doing a great job.

shivik commented on 2012-01-31 20:57

No problem:) Glad to hear it does the job for you.

Wintershade commented on 2012-01-31 10:11

@shivik, sorry for the late feedback, I was busy as hell for the past few days, didn't even see your updates.
Anyway, it's working fine so far :) thanks for all your effort!

shivik commented on 2012-01-28 21:24

main PKGBUILD now uses extramodules.
---
3.2.2-1:oldstyle PKGBUILD:http://netload.in/datei7dzx5qGIBj/linux-lqx-3.2.2-1.src.tar.gz.htm
oldstyle nvidia drivers: http://netload.in/dateiHvov2rm5GN/nvidia-lqx-290.10-2.src.tar.gz.htm

shivik commented on 2012-01-28 21:11

3.2.2-1:oldstyle PKGBUILD:http://netload.in/datei7dzx5qGIBj/linux-lqx-3.2.2-1.src.tar.gz.htm
nvidia drivers: http://netload.in/dateiHvov2rm5GN/nvidia-lqx-290.10-2.src.tar.gz.htm

Anonymous comment on 2012-01-28 14:14

Thanks, shivik.

shivik commented on 2012-01-25 12:22

I've decided to migrate linux-lqx PKGBUILD to accommodate extramodules.
this is the final PKGBUILD before I replace it in AUR: http://netload.in/dateiDNQ5UosL17/linux-lqx-3.2.1-5_with_extramodules.tar.gz.htm
nvidia modules for it: http://netload.in/dateixrEyHY2Aqg/nvidia-lqx-290.10-2.with_extramodules.tar.gz.htm
It works for me but, can you please test it on your PC's.

It also addresses the 3.2.0-lqx issue.So it now shows the correct version in uname -r.
I can share details if someone's interested.

So...
This one features:
1.the latest patch from damentz(BFS,BFQ,ZEN,etc.root exploit closed too)
2.updated to work with modprobed_db
3.custom configuration via menuconfig, nconfig, xconfig
4.ability to use current kernel config for the new one using /proc/config.gz
5.fixed naming in uname -r

doug commented on 2012-01-25 12:15

I noticed that version number bug with 3.1.0, maybe it started with 3.0, but I'm sure that it was OK on 2.6.x.x versions

shivik commented on 2012-01-25 10:07

@computerquip, it sure is no problem.As for the reason I'm digging into it right now, but it is always been that way for lqx.
Run a pacman -Q linux-lqx and you'll see that the correct version is installed.

@akurei,thanks :)
I'm trying almost my best.
By the way I can give the ownership to someone else if one is so inclined.
I don't consider myself skillful enough.
I was actually updating and disowning the package right away,
but one day I just forgot to disown it and when I came back from work saw I'm still listed as the maintainer and said to myself "what the hell".

computerquip commented on 2012-01-25 06:34

Quick question, "uname -r" says the kernel is of version 3.2.0-lqx. Is that normal?

akurei commented on 2012-01-25 01:52

Been somewhat regretful of orphaning this package, but now I am glad you took over this shivik. My condolesences. This is madness ;) :
http://imgby.com/snapshot2.png

You do a great job there!

akurei commented on 2012-01-25 01:51

Been somewhat regretful of orphaning this package, but now I am glad you took over this shivik. My condolesences. This is madness:
http://imgby.com/snapshot2.png

akurei commented on 2012-01-25 01:51

Been somewhat regretful of orphaning this package, but now I am glad you took over this shivik. My condolesences. This is madness:
http://imgby.com/snapshot2.png

shivik commented on 2012-01-24 17:58

experimental lqx 3.2.1-5 with extramodules - http://netload.in/dateiIQWBUCIw1v/linux-lqx-3.2.1-5_with_extramodules.tar.gz.htm
nvidia module for it - http://netload.in/dateixrEyHY2Aqg/nvidia-lqx-290.10-2.with_extramodules.tar.gz.htm

shivik commented on 2012-01-24 06:43

Done.
Thanks for your work, damentz!

P.S. I was actually waiting for -5, but you always release your patches after I go to bed :)

damentz commented on 2012-01-24 02:42

@shivik: please update to 3.2.1-5 soon. This contains a patch to a recently discovered local privilege escalation vulnerability. More information here: http://techpatterns.com/forums/about2004.html

silvik commented on 2012-01-23 16:49

@damentz: thanks for including brcmsmac in the latest release.

shivik commented on 2012-01-23 06:58

experimental lqx 3.2.1-4 with extramodules - http://netload.in/dateiW6Wijh5flg/linux-lqx-3.2.1-4_with_extramodules.tar.gz.htm
nvidia module for it - http://netload.in/dateixrEyHY2Aqg/nvidia-lqx-290.10-2.with_extramodules.tar.gz.htm

Anonymous comment on 2012-01-22 23:50

Out of date. Current patch is for 3.2.1-4, won't build.

shivik commented on 2012-01-21 17:30

@harryNID,
request 1:Done
request 2:Done

Regarding the kernel configuration - it's what damentz sets up for us.Take a look here http://liquorix.net/sources/3.2/

Anonymous comment on 2012-01-21 16:56

@shivik, Could you please take a look at the modprobed_db code. The new version of modprobed_db does not use the reload_database script any longer. For reference check out "modprobed_db" and "linux-ck" packages. It does require that sudo be set up however.

Example: (Updated for this package from "linux-ck" PKGBUILD)

### Optionally load needed modules for the make localmodconfig
# See http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41689
if [ $_config = "local" ]; then
msg "If you have modprobe_db installed, running it in recall mode now"
if [ -e /usr/bin/modprobed_db ]; then
[[ ! -x /usr/bin/sudo ]] && echo "Cannot call modprobe with sudo. Install via pacman -S sudo and configure to work with this user." && exit 1
sudo /usr/bin/modprobed_db recall
fi
msg "Running Steven Rostedt's make localmodconfig now"
make localmodconfig
else
yes "" | make config
fi

Also, would it be possible to add nconfig along with menuconfig and xconfig. It has a nicer interface than plain menuconfig (IMO).

Example: (Since I use nconfig I have "y" set to that but it's up to you)

_menu="y" # menuconfig option [m = make menuconfig; x = make xconfig; nconf or "y" = nconfig n = none]

if [ $_menu = "m" ]; then
msg "Running make menuconfig"
make menuconfig
fi
if [ $_menu = "x" ]; then
msg "Running make xconfig"
make xconfig
fi
if [ $_menu = "nconf" -o $_menu = "y" ]; then
msg "Running make nconfig"
make nconfig
fi

One last question, Is it just me or does the this new kernel config version have more things being built directly into the kernel? Is it the lqx config? It just seems like there is more things I have to manually go through and deselect from being built directly in than in previous versions so I can get a stripped down kernel.

Thanks for your time!!

shivik commented on 2012-01-21 07:02

Oops, I think I got it.You have to use this nvidia PKGBUILD with the extramodules lqx http://netload.in/dateixrEyHY2Aqg/nvidia-lqx-290.10-2.with_extramodules.tar.gz.htm
I used that on both machines,but never included it in the original tar.gz, because I didn't know you use nvidia at that time.

It will be good if others test if extramodules lqx works for them.
If it does I'll replace the main lqx package with one that uses extramodules.

shivik commented on 2012-01-21 06:57

Oops, I think I got it.You have to use this nvidia PKGBUILD with the extramodules lqx http://netload.in/dateixrEyHY2Aqg/nvidia-lqx-290.10-2.with_extramodules.tar.gz.htm
I used that on both machines,but never included it in the original tar.gz, because I didn't know you use nvidia at that time.

shivik commented on 2012-01-21 06:29

@Wintershade,looks like you have some linux-headers problem.At least this is what "Unable to determine the target kernel version." I get when I mess up the location of the linux headers when I'm tinkering around experimenting.

""nvidia: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout" - this I get when I try to load a nvidia module that is compiled for a different version of the kernel.
for example 3.1.5 module on 3.1.8 kernel(pure example there with versions).Or maybe (3.1 module on 3.2 kernel).

What's inside your "ls /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-lqx/".I get a "nvidia.ko.gz" and "version".
I checked the extramodules kernel on another machine at home and it does work there as well(I only have nvidia module),but it boots to gui no problem.
I'm actually still running the extramodule kernel that I did for you on 19th of jan.
That doesn't prove anything 100% of course,but is a starting point where to look.

silvik commented on 2012-01-21 00:14

@damentz: no, everything else works fine on my hardware, just like 3.1 did. thanks.

this broadcom thing is new to 3.2, some new driver design decision made by kernel devs. looks like in 3.3 things will change again: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1036891#p1036891

Wintershade commented on 2012-01-20 23:22

@shivik - oops! I'm sorry, but my previous comment turned out to be a false positive. at least regarding nvidia-all, which is supposed to install into the /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-lqx. The error I'm receiving is "nvidia: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout. Even with intel_iommu=off the error persists. OTOH, now even the nvidia-lqx fails to compile, stating "Unable to determine the target kernel version." (I'm in command line, using links now.) So what gives?

damentz commented on 2012-01-20 23:18

@silvik: well, I can go ahead and change that directly. Is there anything else you noticed missing from the 3.2 kernel? You can also visit the Liquorix forum if you have any other feedback.

silvik commented on 2012-01-20 23:04

looks like lqx config does not enable the new broadcom drivers (brcmsmac) as mainline arch does.

if you have a broadcom wifi (like me) you need to edit the PKGBUILD to enable menuconfig (_menu="m"). in the menuconfig disable BCMA support (in Broadcom specific AMBA section) and enable Broadcom IEEE802.11n PCIe SoftMAC WLAN driver (in Network devices / Wireless LAN)

is it possible to make this small change in the lqx package config? thanks.

silvik commented on 2012-01-20 23:03

looks like lqx config does not enable the new broadcom drivers (brcmsmac) as mainline arch does.

if you have a broadcom wifi (like me) you need to edit the PKGBUILD to enable menuconfig (_menu="n"). in the menuconfig disable BCMA support (in Broadcom specific AMBA section) and enable Broadcom IEEE802.11n PCIe SoftMAC WLAN driver (in Network devices / Wireless LAN)

is it possible to make this small change in the lqx package config? thanks.

Wintershade commented on 2012-01-20 18:45

@shivik, it compiles and works well. virtualbox module doesn't work due to different issues on my system - however a package nvidia-all compiles and works like a charm (I'm using it rather than your nvidia-lqx due to a number of other kernels I'm testing whenever I can).
So anyway, absolutely positive feedback from me. Kudos!

shivik commented on 2012-01-19 15:05

@Wintershade, there you go: http://netload.in/dateiodASThlZAo/linux-lqx-3.2.1-2_with_extramodules.tar.gz.htm
Compiled and installed fine on my system. So it works for me.
Give it a shot and let me know if it works for you.

shivik commented on 2012-01-19 11:01

For anyone having issues booting with with nvidia driver use amd_iommu=off or intel_iommu=off(depending on your motherboard chipset).
Chances are high that you'll be able to boot to graphical environment.

@Wintershade - I'll work on that.

Wintershade commented on 2012-01-18 19:59

Could you please add support for external modules (i.e. /lib/modules/extramodules-XY)?
Without those, external modules (such as virtualbox driver) won't work...

shivik commented on 2012-01-18 06:35

That's because the package was out of date(a 3.2.1-2 patch was released).
It's updated now so you shouldn't have problems.

Anonymous comment on 2012-01-17 20:58

I am trying it install the liquorix kernel and I get the following error.
I think it is trying to download 3.2.1-1.patch.gz which doesn't exist.

==> Making package: linux-lqx 3.2.1-1 (Tue Jan 17 14:53:14 CST 2012)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
warning: config file /etc/pacman.conf, line 33: directive 'ShowSize' in section 'options' not recognized.
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving Sources...
-> Downloading linux-3.2.tar.xz...
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 62.0M 100 62.0M 0 0 305k 0 0:03:28 0:03:28 --:--:-- 300k
-> Downloading 3.2.1-1.patch.gz...
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
==> ERROR: Failure while downloading 3.2.1-1.patch.gz
Aborting...

shivik commented on 2012-01-17 18:04

No problem.Just exit and the build process will continue normally.
It's back to how it was before(no menuconfig).
This nvidia issue is driving me crazy.
Downgraded to 3.1.8 and the problem is gone.
The moment I switch to 3.2.1 and I get a black screen.

silvik commented on 2012-01-17 16:42

i get the make menuconfig configuration dialog. is this ok?

shivik commented on 2012-01-17 07:06

Done.

Anonymous comment on 2012-01-16 19:46

please can this use the linux-3.2.tar.xz archive like https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50911 . Thank you.

shivik commented on 2012-01-16 17:54

Fixed.
Wrong checksums were left from the experimental configs when I was trying to fix the nvidia problem.

silvik commented on 2012-01-16 15:07

==> Validating source files with sha512sums...
linux-3.2.tar.bz2 ... Passed
3.2.1-1.patch.gz ... Passed
config.i386 ... FAILED
config.amd64 ... FAILED
linux-lqx.preset ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-lqx.

shivik commented on 2012-01-15 21:03

I just tried to compile linux-ck and nvidia-ck and got the same result.
So it's either something with my hardware or something in the 3.2 tree.

shivik commented on 2012-01-15 20:27

3.2.1 is out,but I can't get the nvidia driver to work with it.
I get a black screen when it starts loading X.
I adapted the linux-ck PKGBUILD both for kernel and nvidia for the -lqx - no good.

shivik commented on 2012-01-11 15:38

Updated to 3.1.8.

Wintershade commented on 2012-01-10 16:54

nope, it's still (officially) maintained my Mavirick.
@Mavirick, please update the package or disown it so that somebody else can do it if you cannot or don't want to anymore.

Anonymous comment on 2012-01-09 19:23

Has this package been orphaned or something?

damentz commented on 2012-01-09 01:18

3.1.8 is now out.

Wintershade commented on 2012-01-07 10:28

3.1.7 is released. this package is out of date indeed. check out http://liquorix.net/sources/

Anonymous comment on 2012-01-04 01:05

Please stop marking out of date as there is no 3.1.7.1 released from liquorix.net.

Anonymous comment on 2011-12-30 12:21

Updated the Kernel with the 3.1.6.1 patches, tested and verified it working. Sorry for the delay, and an early Happy New Years to you all.

Anonymous comment on 2011-12-30 01:56

Aye, I noticed it was out the other day. I am currently traveling and will try and get something up in the next day or two.

Anonymous comment on 2011-12-29 18:00

3.1.6 is out."3.1.6-1.patch.gz 24-Dec-2011 12:54 685K "

aericson commented on 2011-12-20 17:33

Anyone managed to get truecrypt working with it?

akurei commented on 2011-12-04 23:31

You're welcome =) Have fun!

Anonymous comment on 2011-12-04 22:15

Thanks for pointing out that msg akurei I completely forgot about it when I was modding the PKGBUILD for upload.

silvik commented on 2011-12-04 21:40

thanks for adopting lqx, Mavirick. that's the power of open source, in a few days problems get fixed. updating...

akurei commented on 2011-12-04 21:31

You might want to remove:

msg ""
msg "This package has been orphaned. Feel free to adopt."
msg ""

Anonymous comment on 2011-12-04 18:52

We're cookin' now :)
Thumbs up!

Anonymous comment on 2011-12-04 06:06

I believe I applied to adopt it, so I suppose I am just waiting.

Anonymous comment on 2011-12-04 06:03

But how can you take over when this RcrdBrt guy is nowhere to be found?
Maybe we should signal the archlinux staff?

Anonymous comment on 2011-12-04 01:09

I've got everything updated and tested and ready to upload.

Anonymous comment on 2011-12-04 00:38

I'm in the process of creating the updated PKG Build and I will be taking over the maintenance of the package for the time being.

akurei commented on 2011-12-03 20:34

3.1.4-1 has been released by LQX now =)

Anonymous comment on 2011-12-02 22:48

A 3.1.4-1 patch of lqx has not been released yet, once it is I will work on getting an updated version.

Anonymous comment on 2011-12-02 18:25

Yeah, linux-lqx is a good kernel and doesn't deserve this.
Maybe this guy clicked on "Adopt packages" by accident?

silvik commented on 2011-12-02 13:13

hey Mavirick / td123 / someone with sufficient skills and time, why don't you take ownership of this package or create linux-liquorix or something like this and maintain it properly? it's already 2 versions behind official arch kernel. the maintainer doesn't care anyway.

Anonymous comment on 2011-11-30 07:07

Thanks,Mavirick!
Too bad the _new_ maintainer doesn't seem to care.
It's been 3 days since lqx 3.1.3 is out and still no update.

Anonymous comment on 2011-11-30 06:47

I've created and tested a new pkgbuild for linux-lqx-3.1.3-1 it requires the new mkinitcpio 0.8 which moves mkinitcpio from /sbin/ to /usr/bin

Here is the PKGBUILD: http://pastebin.com/TeySHHRs
Here is the Modified linux-lqx.install: http://pastebin.com/bdiyFB51

shivik commented on 2011-11-23 07:13

td123, what I meant was that you can use a different name for your kernel
for ex. linux-td123, linux-td, linux-lqxtd (and still base it on the -lqx)- you get my point.

I believe in diversity so I welcome your unique approach, but still I don't think linux-lqx should be changed.
That's why I suggested a new AUR package.

td123 commented on 2011-11-23 06:36

Ok, fine, I guess I wont take ownership of this package then..

I did manage to rebase against the [core] linux PKGBUILD.
You can find the package at: http://ompldr.org/vYmV2Ng/linux-lqx-3.1.1-1.src.tar.gz

fyi, this package is *a lot* cleaner and perhaps more bug free than the one provided on this page.
Possibly easier to maintain.

I haven't experienced any problems so far with my package.

akurei commented on 2011-11-22 22:31

I know, I am not maintining this anymore, and thus should not interfere, but please td123, leave the options for make xconfig and make menuconfig etc in. They're useful for everyone and don't harm anyone.

td123 commented on 2011-11-22 21:49

There is a good reason those patches do get applied to the arch kernel (fix freezes on certain hardware).

The arch kernel does the compression also, so I think it's safe to say that this kernel should be using _compress_modules="yes" for all cases.
I can't think of a reason why you wouldn't want this.

The problem with creating another linux-lqx pkg in the aur is that it would be a duplicate.

I guess for now, I will just try reworking the PKGBUILD and see what you guys think before posting it here...

shivik commented on 2011-11-22 19:23

I'm kind of against this.
The main idea is to get the base kernel with the liquorix patchset applied only.
As for the options - almost all of the other AUR kernels have those and they're kind of useful sometimes.
Maybe _compress_modules is useless...
A PKGBUILD cleanup would be nice though

Your ideas are by no means bad,but I think this package should be left the way it is.
Maybe you should create a new kernel based on the -lqx one and realize your ideas.

shivik commented on 2011-11-22 19:15

I'm kind of against this.
The main idea is to get the base kernel with the liquorix patchset applied only.
As for the options - almost all of the other AUR kernels have those and they're kind of useful sometimes.
Maybe _compress_modules is useless...
A PKGBUILD cleanup would be nice though

Your ideas are by no means bad,but I think this package should be left the way it is.
Maybe you should create a new kernel based on the -lqx one and realize your ideas.

td123 commented on 2011-11-22 18:14

I'll try to rebase this kernel against the latest linux in [core].
My current thoughts are what to do about patches that get applied?
Also, I'm planning on removing some if not all of the options provided at the top: _menu, _config, _compress_modules
And general cleanup of the PKGBUILD so that future maintenance would be a lot easier.

Does anyone have any opinions for or against this?
If I can't update the PKGBUILD in about a week, I will just give up since that will probably mean I don't have enough time to figure all of this out.

shivik commented on 2011-10-31 06:29

I tried it - 18 hours running already with no problems.
I can update the PKGBUILD here if there's no one else to do it.

shivik commented on 2011-10-31 06:29

I tried it - 18 hours running already with no problems.
I can update the PKGBUILD here if there's no one else to do it.

Anonymous comment on 2011-10-30 23:13

anyone tried substituting the 8 patch for the 6 this PKGBUILD calls for? I'd try but exams taking up soo much time...
Anyhow thanks.

damentz commented on 2011-10-29 21:05

You might want to look at this post: http://techpatterns.com/forums/about1917.html

LVM requires you to have at least three numbers in your kernel version. For instance, 3.0-6.dmz.1-liquorix-amd64 broke support for LVM and other disk layer user space, but adding in a second 0 for compatibility (3.0.0-6.dmz.1-liquorix-amd64) with the old 2.6.n format works around this bug.

You can check with `uname -r`, make sure you have three numbers in the kernel version (3.0.0 for instance). I suspect that you only need to modify your package scripts to accommodate this change.

akurei commented on 2011-10-29 20:51

When using linux-lqx, I am not able to snapshot a lvm volume. Also while booting, there are error messages like "hey i cannot find your LVM volumes, but i will let you boot anyway". This problem only appears on linux-lqx. All other kernels work fine. I double, triple, quadruple-checked the .config files for dm_*, and still this error persists. I simply cannot run my LVM Backupscript when I am running the lqx kernel.

My lvm backupscript:
URL: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/aImN9jXMM6kXIlZx8Xwy/
RAW: http://paste.pocoo.org/raw/aImN9jXMM6kXIlZx8Xwy/

damentz commented on 2011-10-29 20:45

You're the first to report this bug, can you tell me more about it on the Liquorix forums?

damentz commented on 2011-10-29 20:42

I'm not aware of any dm_snapshot bug, could you post in the liquorix forums about it? You can find them here: http://techpatterns.com/forums/forum-34.html

akurei commented on 2011-10-29 17:47

Orphaned this package, because I got tired of the dm_snapshot bug with this. I am using linux-pf now. Feel free to adopt.

akurei commented on 2011-10-29 17:46

orphaned.

akurei commented on 2011-10-29 11:46

Orphaned. Got tired of dm_snapshot bugs with -lqx. Using -pf now.

akurei commented on 2011-10-28 13:03

Changed that.

Alir3z4 commented on 2011-10-28 00:21

http://kernel.org/ is online now, i changed the source line in the PKGBUILD and it's worked as well.
but the mirror link isn't working. tnx

akurei commented on 2011-09-12 00:24

Pushed to 3.0.4-2. I change the download-server for as long as kernel.org is down.

akurei commented on 2011-09-11 20:10

kernel.org is down, so I am currently looking for a solution. Stay tuned.

Anonymous comment on 2011-09-11 17:42

The build command should be:

make ${MAKEFLAGS} bzImage modules

akurei commented on 2011-09-06 12:33

I probably won't touch the "default" config files from liquorix.net because, well, they're the default ones.

Anonymous comment on 2011-09-05 09:47

@capoeira
you probably need to set the "Packet Socket" option in Networking. I had the same problem and i think setting this fixed it.

BTW, in the configfiles there is 'CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET="utf8"'. I don't think this is good since you can't mount most FAT-Filesystems with that (and the Kernel warns about that in dmesg). It should probably be set to 'iso8859-1' (thats what the stock kernel has)

capoeira commented on 2011-09-04 17:04

Can anybody here help me out? I'm new to this localmod config thing. I have this script running wich records all used modules. When I compile this kernel with localmod my wifi doesn't work (it works installing the whole kernel). When I try to conect manualy (WICD-GUI) to my router I get this st like this "couldn't conect, wrong key-phrase". The key isn't wrong it's the same wich is working now I'm posting this. What could that be? Also on my first attemp to compile with localmod I got a "couldn't load X25, not found" message. So I deleted it from the module-list.
Can anybody give me a clue?

Anonymous comment on 2011-09-02 15:32

It must have been a bug in grub2 itself. After 1.99-4 update everything's back to normal.

akurei commented on 2011-09-01 18:09

@bfo: Sorry, I am not using GRUB2 atm.

akurei commented on 2011-09-01 17:10

Pushed to 3.0.4-1

akurei commented on 2011-09-01 15:41

Pushed to 3.0.4-1

Anonymous comment on 2011-08-30 14:57

Does anyone have problems with GRUB2 not detecting vmlinuz-linux-lqx-fallback and both *-lqx initramfs images? Only vmlinuz-linux-lqx gets on the list while generating GRUB2 config, but without the corresponding ramfs.

akurei commented on 2011-08-26 22:58

Nice =) Almost three days without a notification. Feels like vacation ;)

akurei commented on 2011-08-26 22:58

Nice =) Alomost three days without any notification. Feels like vacation ;)

akurei commented on 2011-08-26 22:57

Nice =) Three days without any notification. Seems like holidays ;)

akurei commented on 2011-08-24 19:26

Sorry, I did not keep the old "config.*"-files.

Anonymous comment on 2011-08-24 19:18

Hmmm, that's interesting. I wonder what Damentz changed?

akurei commented on 2011-08-24 10:02

Pushed to 3.0.3-3.

akurei commented on 2011-08-24 09:58

Well, this time it's not my fault ;) The files were changed on the liquorix.net server:

______Name____________________Last_modified______Size__
______config.i386_____________22-Aug-2011_18:18__135K__
______config.amd64____________22-Aug-2011_18:18__128K__

I'm going to fix that asap.

capoeira commented on 2011-08-24 01:34

the two files still fail the check

akurei commented on 2011-08-19 22:29

Updated to 3.0.3-2, thanks disastrophe! =)

Anonymous comment on 2011-08-19 18:34

:D

akurei commented on 2011-08-19 17:46

Seems like makepkg still had the old config files and did not download the new ones, despite me running makepkg -o in advance. I though by running makepkg -o and makepkg -g afterwards it would download the files and then generate the checksums. But instead it used the files in my local cache ... wtf?
Welle anyway I am going to fix that as soon as I come home.

Anonymous comment on 2011-08-19 14:32

-> Found linux-lqx.preset
==> Validating source files with sha512sums...
linux-3.0.tar.bz2 ... Passed
3.0.3-1.patch.gz ... Passed
config.i386 ... FAILED
config.amd64 ... FAILED
linux-lqx.preset ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-lqx.

akurei commented on 2011-08-19 12:25

Updated to 3.0.3-1

akurei commented on 2011-08-16 23:43

Updated to 3.0.1-1

akurei commented on 2011-08-16 23:16

Already testing. I am out geocaching at the moment. When I come home the test build should be finished and I will upload the package.

Anonymous comment on 2011-08-16 23:11

lqx pathset is out for 3.0~ ;)

akurei commented on 2011-08-09 15:48

Seems like I forgot the sed-lines in the PKGBUILD on lines 142 and 143. Pushed to -6

Anonymous comment on 2011-08-09 15:19

.4-5 also works fine but it still comes out named linux-lqx.img,

akurei commented on 2011-08-09 10:34

Fixed a minor glitch (initramfs in /boot/ was named linux-lqx.img and linux-lqx-fallback.img instead of the canonical initramfs-linux-lqx.img and initramfs-linux-lqx-fallback.img)
Please update your bootloader (GRUB menu.lst) to reflect these changes.

Anonymous comment on 2011-08-09 01:26

Works good and yeah, thanks for all the hard work. You da man!

flan_suse commented on 2011-08-08 21:32

Thanks for the new PKGBUILD. Glad to see AUR packages keeping up with the Arch updates.

I'll wait until LQX 3.0 before compiling this, but just wanted to say thanks!