Search Criteria
Package Details: linux-lts414-headers 4.14.316-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lts414.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | linux-lts414 |
Description: | Header files and scripts for building modules for Linux-lts414 kernel |
Upstream URL: | https://www.kernel.org/ |
Licenses: | GPL2 |
Submitter: | severach |
Maintainer: | severach |
Last Packager: | severach |
Votes: | 8 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2019-01-01 20:55 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-05-31 13:28 (UTC) |
Dependencies (5)
- bc (bc-gh) (make)
- inetutils (gettext-hostname, inetutils-git) (make)
- kmod (kmod-git, kmod-minimal-git) (make)
- libelf (libelf-minimal-git, elfutils-git) (make)
- xmlto (xmlto-git) (make)
Required by (1)
- openss7-modules-lts414-git (make)
Sources (7)
- 0001-add-sysctl-to-disallow-unprivileged-CLONE_NEWUSER-by.patch
- 0003-Revert-drm-i915-edp-Allow-alternate-fixed-mode-for-e.patch
- 0004-export_kernel_fpu_functions.patch
- 0005-898490c010b.patch
- config
- https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/linux-4.14.tar.xz
- https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/patch-4.14.316.xz
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »
City-busz commented on 2023-01-19 03:04 (UTC)
I would suggest the following changes: https://pkgbuild.com/~bgyorgy/files/linux-lts414.patch
Apply this patch to avoid this error during installation with kmod>=30: ==> ERROR: file not found: `/lib/modules/4.14.303-1-lts414/modules.builtin.modinfo'
Install the kernel image into /usr/lib/modules/4.14.303-1-lts414/vmlinuz instead of /boot and add the file /usr/lib/modules/4.14.303-1-lts414/pkgbase in order to make the package compatible with the libalpm hooks shipped with recent mkinitcpio versions. After that the custom mkinitcpio preset and libalpm hooks can be removed from this package, and the 'mkinitcpio' dependency can be replaced with 'initramfs' as the package will be compatible with other initramfs generators as well.
ReDemoNBR commented on 2022-04-19 21:22 (UTC)
Forgot to update the checksums for the
patch-4.14.275.xz
source. Here they are for your convenience:jonathon commented on 2022-01-21 20:54 (UTC)
I've packaged up linux-firmware-uncompressed for kernels affected by module compression in
linux-firmware
20220119.0c6a7b3-2.severach commented on 2021-02-09 22:54 (UTC)
Downgrade to binutils 2.35.1-1 to build.
eschwartz commented on 2021-01-03 01:11 (UTC)
Unless you provide the same
uname -r
and /lib/modules/${_kernver}/ directory (protip: you don't, this is based on_kernelname=${pkgbase#linux}
) you do not provide the right interface to support modules compiled for core/linux... NOT EVEN modules compiled for core/linux 4.14.x from way back in 2018.Now, you were warned by both me and Scimmia, which is twice the warnings you had a right to receive, but I am a gracious person... the next step is I'm going to delete this package if you do anything other than remove the provides. I am speaking with my TU hat on -- I will not listen to further arguments, and you will not get another warning.
severach commented on 2021-01-02 07:03 (UTC) (edited on 2021-01-02 09:49 (UTC) by severach)
It's not broken so it won't be fixed. Arch is a source distro so you are wrong, provides is right. Nvidia needs a depends=(linux-headers=version). All other modules work correctly with provides. Please submit a bug report to add provides to linux-lts. What really need is two provides, provides=4.14 and provides=4.14.x for kernel version particular modules. We could also make up fake package names so modules could depend on them or the original names as desired. Same as Java.
Scimmia commented on 2021-01-02 05:12 (UTC)
2 updates and the provides still isn't fixed
Scimmia commented on 2020-12-11 00:39 (UTC)
nvidia? broadcom-wl? Every single module in the repos?
severach commented on 2020-12-11 00:22 (UTC)
What package has such a module? Don't reference any DKMS packages because my settings are there to support those packages, not packages with kernel modules inexplicably compiled for the latest kernel but with no source available.
Scimmia commented on 2020-12-09 13:15 (UTC)
Really? So if you have a module built against the 'linux' package it will work with this kernel with no changes? Because that's what you're claiming.
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »