Package Details: linux-lts510 5.10.118-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lts510.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-lts510
Description: The LTS 5.10 Linux kernel and modules
Upstream URL: https://www.kernel.org/
Keywords: kernel linux
Licenses: GPL2
Provides: VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Submitter: jonathon
Maintainer: jonathon
Last Packager: jonathon
Votes: 6
Popularity: 1.64
First Submitted: 2022-01-11 00:20 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-05-25 10:16 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

jonathon commented on 2022-01-11 19:25 (UTC) (edited on 2022-05-18 10:09 (UTC) by jonathon)

Please make sure you read the "How to use the AUR" wiki page before reporting issues: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Installing_and_upgrading_packages

A binary package is also available in my kernel-lts unofficial user repository.

Latest Comments

ozz commented on 2022-05-18 12:32 (UTC) (edited on 2022-05-18 13:23 (UTC) by ozz)

@jonathon Towards the end of the build the latex command is used for something (documentation?) but the build skips it if it's not available.

I thought texlive-bin might be pulled in by texinfo but it is not. Anyway, sorry for the noise.

jonathon commented on 2022-05-18 10:09 (UTC)

As per the page linked in the pinned comment, those build dependencies are in base-devel.

I don't know why texlive-bin would be an optional dependency of a kernel - could you expand on that?

ozz commented on 2022-05-18 06:32 (UTC) (edited on 2022-05-18 06:58 (UTC) by ozz)

This package is missing dependencies: patch, make, gcc, flex, bison

Missing optional dependencies: texlive-bin

Bitals commented on 2022-05-13 12:39 (UTC)

Right, my bad, was sure that I also built it with gcc12, but checked again and turns out I didn't. Sorry about that.

jonathon commented on 2022-05-13 10:44 (UTC)

You need to build both the kernel and the modules with the same GCC version.

If you need help then please open a thread on the forum.

Bitals commented on 2022-05-13 10:37 (UTC)

Post-install job Install DKMS modules failed for every module:

...
==> dkms install --no-depmod ashmem/1 -k 5.10.115-1-lts510
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 5.10.115-1-lts510 (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/ashmem/1/build/make.log for more information.
==> WARNING: `dkms install --no-depmod ashmem/1 -k 5.10.115-1-lts510' exited 10
...

/var/lib/dkms/ashmem/1/build/make.log:

DKMS make.log for ashmem-1 for kernel 5.10.115-1-lts510 (x86_64)
Fri 13 May 12:48:56 MSK 2022
make -C /lib/modules/5.10.115-1-lts510/build V=0 M=$PWD
make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/lib/modules/5.10.115-1-lts510/build'
  CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/ashmem/1/build/deps.o
  CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/ashmem/1/build/ashmem.o
cc1: error: incompatible gcc/plugin versions
cc1: error: failed to initialize plugin ./scripts/gcc-plugins/structleak_plugin.so
cc1: error: incompatible gcc/plugin versions
cc1: error: failed to initialize plugin ./scripts/gcc-plugins/structleak_plugin.so
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:280: /var/lib/dkms/ashmem/1/build/ashmem.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:280: /var/lib/dkms/ashmem/1/build/deps.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1822: /var/lib/dkms/ashmem/1/build] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/lib/modules/5.10.115-1-lts510/build'
make: *** [Makefile:12: all] Error 2

Using gcc 12 from the repos.

andrius4669 commented on 2022-04-09 03:14 (UTC)

correct checksum is dbef6a06325433481551cb8cfca9254d908d0ae950bc809f3da8ade00c485693 now..?

ajgringo619 commented on 2022-02-07 19:03 (UTC)

Just finished building the 5.10.98 release and noticed that the docs package is being built, even though I don't have them installed (only this one and headers).

Is this normal? If so, is there a way to prevent the docs from being built?

lacsaP commented on 2022-01-20 15:09 (UTC)

thanks jonathon, I'll also ask at the maintainer because both your links are relatively old and because this change is not on the official LTS kernel (kernel.org). regards, lacsaP.

jonathon commented on 2022-01-19 16:05 (UTC)

That would be a question for the original maintainer, but I suspect it's a combination of issues like https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6191527.html and https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833238 , so

  CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET="ascii"
  FAT_DEFAULT_UTF8=y

is simply the most robust combination.

lacsaP commented on 2022-01-19 15:50 (UTC)

hi jonathon, not an issue but a question : CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET was changed from iso8859-1 to ascii on Feb 14 2021 between these two commits : https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/blob/eab5c4dff977fec9310f060e562eaa3361aa6ac6/trunk/config#L9597 https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/blob/283332609549a479357d2d58adf80d12e89e345f/trunk/config#L9208 but I can't find the reason for this change: can you help me or direct me to the answer ? regards, lacsaP.

jonathon commented on 2022-01-11 19:25 (UTC) (edited on 2022-05-18 10:09 (UTC) by jonathon)

Please make sure you read the "How to use the AUR" wiki page before reporting issues: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Installing_and_upgrading_packages

A binary package is also available in my kernel-lts unofficial user repository.