Search Criteria
Package Details: linux-lts515-headers 5.15.173-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lts515.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | linux-lts515 |
Description: | Headers and scripts for building modules for the LTS Linux 5.15.x kernel |
Upstream URL: | https://www.kernel.org/ |
Licenses: | GPL2 |
Submitter: | andreas_baumann |
Maintainer: | andreas_baumann (severach) |
Last Packager: | andreas_baumann |
Votes: | 15 |
Popularity: | 0.010703 |
First Submitted: | 2023-02-24 10:54 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-29 09:53 (UTC) |
Dependencies (9)
Required by (1)
- e1000e-dkms-lts515 (optional)
Sources (8)
- 0001-ZEN-Add-sysctl-and-CONFIG-to-disallow-unprivileged-C.patch
- 0002-PCI-Add-more-NVIDIA-controllers-to-the-MSI-masking-q.patch
- 0003-iommu-intel-do-deep-dma-unmapping-to-avoid-kernel-fl.patch
- 0004-Bluetooth-btintel-Fix-bdaddress-comparison-with-garb.patch
- 0005-lg-laptop-Recognize-more-models.patch
- config
- https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/linux-5.15.173.tar.sign
- https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/linux-5.15.173.tar.xz
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »
andreas_baumann commented on 2023-03-14 16:06 (UTC)
@anonfunc: No reason, just a leftover of a copy-paste action from linux-lts. :-) Fixed. Note, that on pentium4/i686/i486 there is no documentation built currently (that's the sed-fu at the end of the PKGBUILD when CARCH is 32-bittish).
anonfunc commented on 2023-03-14 02:07 (UTC)
Is there a specific reason to limit
python-sphinx
to <6.0.0 ? I just build the package successfully with python-sphinx 6.1.3 with no apparent problems.andreas_baumann commented on 2023-03-11 09:28 (UTC)
/lib/modules/5.15.98-1-lts515/build/ exists. I get:
andreas_baumann commented on 2023-03-11 08:29 (UTC)
CONFIG_DRM_SIMPLEDRM=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y are in all config files. The problem with
dkms
seems to be something deeper with the mechanism..ThiasTux commented on 2023-03-06 19:39 (UTC)
I think they are related. And I was wondering if it has anything to do with any flag that must be enabled at compile time. I found this piece of information that talks about kernel parameters to install
nvidia-dkms
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/NVIDIA#Custom_kernelandreas_baumann commented on 2023-03-04 12:19 (UTC)
Yeah, I noticed that too, I tried do build virtualbox-dkms, and it failed. Not sure, if that's related to your Nvidia issue though..
ThiasTux commented on 2023-03-03 23:17 (UTC)
Hi! I can't install nvidia-dkms using this kernel. I am getting the error:
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 5.15.96-2-lts515 (x86_64)
The error is only on this kernal and happens also for nvidia-vulkan-dkms. Any idea?msrd0 commented on 2023-03-02 11:58 (UTC)
I'm having the same problem with the broken dependency being reported by yay. However this is probably not a typo: It looks like the
_get_gcc_version_from_config
function isn't run properly when generating the.SRCINFO
file. It works when invokingmakepkg
directly, since it doesn't read the broken file.ajgringo619 commented on 2023-03-01 20:58 (UTC)
This dependency problem looks like a typo:
Is this accurate?
ajgringo619 commented on 2023-03-01 00:28 (UTC)
Hmmm...now the build is failing (original release built fine):
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »