Package Details: linux-pax 4.1.6-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-pax.git (read-only)
Package Base: linux-pax
Description: The Linux Kernel and modules with PaX patches
Upstream URL: http://grsecurity.net/~paxguy1/
Keywords: linux pax security
Licenses: GPL2
Groups: base
Conflicts: kernel26-pax
Provides: kernel26-pax
Replaces: kernel26-pax
Submitter: phects
Maintainer: phects
Last Packager: phects
Votes: 8
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2012-01-02 14:23
Last Updated: 2015-08-19 06:34

Latest Comments

gim commented on 2014-11-24 14:00

By the way, you may want to add signatures to the 'source' so makepkg could check them automatically before build.

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/linux-3.17.tar.xz.sign
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/patch-3.17.4.xz.sign

phects commented on 2014-08-29 06:36

Yes, it builds; I forgot to upload the AURball.

clfarron4 commented on 2014-08-28 21:34

https://grsecurity.net/~paxguy1/pax-linux-3.16.1-test2.patch

This should hopefully fix the compilation problems.

clfarron4 commented on 2014-08-17 18:46

Hi, is anyone able to build this? Whenever I try, it stops at:

CC arch/x86/kernel/probe_roms.o
CC arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.o
CC arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.o
AS arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.o
arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.S:27: Error: no such instruction: `pax_force_retaddr'
arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.S:70: Error: no such instruction: `pax_force_retaddr'
arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.S:203: Error: no such instruction: `pax_force_retaddr'
arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.S:221: Error: no such instruction: `pax_force_fptr %rdi'
scripts/Makefile.build:293: recipe for target 'arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.o' failed
make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:404: recipe for target 'arch/x86/kernel' failed
make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
Makefile:961: recipe for target 'arch/x86' failed
make: *** [arch/x86] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...

I also have this with my linux-ck-pax package at the same point.

clfarron4 commented on 2014-08-17 18:46

Hi, is anyone able to build this? Whenever I try, it stops at:

CC arch/x86/kernel/probe_roms.o
CC arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.o
CC arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.o
AS arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.o
arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.S:27: Error: no such instruction: `pax_force_retaddr'
arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.S:70: Error: no such instruction: `pax_force_retaddr'
arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.S:203: Error: no such instruction: `pax_force_retaddr'
arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.S:221: Error: no such instruction: `pax_force_fptr %rdi'
scripts/Makefile.build:293: recipe for target 'arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.o' failed
make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/mcount_64.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:404: recipe for target 'arch/x86/kernel' failed
make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
Makefile:961: recipe for target 'arch/x86' failed
make: *** [arch/x86] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...

phects commented on 2013-11-17 21:12

Nice tip, thanks very much.

Det commented on 2013-11-17 21:04

For when that happens it'd be better to preserve the latest working patch and just put that in the $srcdir instead of simply breaking the whole thing - even if not by your fault.

E: Actually it seems at least some of these are stockpiled in http://grsecurity.net/~paxguy1/. Might also be a better place to get the patch from because I don't know where are you getting the current link from in the new site.

Det commented on 2013-11-17 20:56

For when that happens it'd be better to preserve the latest working patch and just put that in the $srcdir instead of simply breaking the whole thing - even if not by your fault.

phects commented on 2013-09-17 15:09

3.11-test7 is still not booting, do not upgrade, yet.

phects commented on 2013-09-06 10:58

3.11-test2 did not boot at all, 3.11-test3 did but both on x86_64 and i686 hardware and vms, very much errors showed up at boot. I uploaded the current PKGBUILD, but be warned.

All comments