Package Details: linux-pf-headers 6.11.pf4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-pf.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-pf
Description: Headers and scripts for building modules for the pf-kernel
Upstream URL: https://pfkernel.natalenko.name
Keywords: bbr bbr3 kernel ksm linux linux-pf pf-kernel uksm uksmd v4l2loopback zstd
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: linux-pf-headers
Submitter: nous
Maintainer: post-factum
Last Packager: post-factum
Votes: 210
Popularity: 0.30
First Submitted: 2011-07-24 12:01 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-06 15:49 (UTC)

Dependencies (10)

Required by (0)

Sources (2)

Pinned Comments

post-factum commented on 2023-09-25 20:30 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-08 14:21 (UTC) by post-factum)

Official binary builds for various x86_64 ISA levels are available here.

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 106 Next › Last »

post-factum commented on 2024-10-31 15:54 (UTC)

Would you be able to elaborate in more details what would be expected from the PKGBUIL in this case? Do you want me to pass LLVM=1 conditionally?

EndlessEden commented on 2024-10-31 08:48 (UTC)

(PLEASE IGNORE THIS) -- edited this as discovered this was already happening in prepare.

@post-factum -- can you add clang support to the config? 'config' be converted to generate when makepkg is run or atleast add variables to the PKGBUILD for separate configs related to cc/as/ld to support LLVM/CLANG/Mold.

I prefer to use clang over gcc system-wide, but without the config variables "CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG=y" & "CONFIG_LD_IS_LLD=y", DKMS breaks (see: https://github.com/dell/dkms/pull/169).

EndlessEden commented on 2024-10-31 08:28 (UTC)

@post-factum -- can you add clang support to the config? 'config' be converted to generate when makepkg is run or atleast add variables to the PKGBUILD for separate configs related to cc/as/ld to support LLVM/CLANG/Mold.

I prefer to use clang over gcc system-wide, but without the config variables "CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG=y" & "CONFIG_LD_IS_LLD=y", DKMS breaks (see: https://github.com/dell/dkms/pull/169).

yurikoles commented on 2024-03-02 23:38 (UTC)

@tee

Installation of linux-pf enlarged my general desktop performance, and my cat fur became soft and silky.

post-factum commented on 2024-03-02 23:19 (UTC)

Define "general desktop performance" please.

tee commented on 2024-03-02 23:11 (UTC)

In terms of general desktop performance.

post-factum commented on 2024-03-02 16:12 (UTC)

Does this kernel include patches from linux-clear?

No. In case you need specific patches, let me know.

Is this kernel better than linux-zen?

Better for what?

tee commented on 2024-03-02 15:11 (UTC)

Does this kernel include patches from linux-clear? Is this kernel better than linux-zen?

post-factum commented on 2023-11-17 11:46 (UTC)

I do not see any clear advantage of, say, -mzen3 build over the x86_64-v3 build that would outweight maintenance burden. If you can prove it with a benchmark, please do so, until then four distinct levels is enough.

jaro3 commented on 2023-11-17 09:28 (UTC)

Why have you disabled the optimizations like skylake, haswell, k10, adlerlake etc. in the sources?