Package Details: linux-pf-headers 7.0.pf4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-pf.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-pf
Description: Headers and scripts for building modules for the pf-kernel
Upstream URL: https://pfkernel.natalenko.name
Keywords: bbr bbr3 bbrv3 kernel linux linux-pf pf-kernel v4l2loopback
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: LINUX-HEADERS, linux-pf-headers
Submitter: nous
Maintainer: post-factum
Last Packager: post-factum
Votes: 210
Popularity: 0.095335
First Submitted: 2011-07-24 12:01 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-15 11:23 (UTC)

Required by (322)

Sources (2)

Pinned Comments

post-factum commented on 2023-09-25 20:30 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-08 14:21 (UTC) by post-factum)

Official binary builds for various x86_64 ISA levels are available here.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 .. 107 Next › Last »

Thaodan commented on 2016-12-15 08:17 (UTC)

i pushed the branch now, please report any issues there.

Thaodan commented on 2016-12-15 08:04 (UTC)

thanks I'll updated the pkg to 4.9 in the 4.9 branch please see on gitlab: https://gitlab.com/Thaodan/linux-pf

xianai commented on 2016-12-15 07:59 (UTC)

I've patched v4.9 kernel and tested it on my machine. http://kerneldedup.org/download/uksm/0.1.2.5/uksm-0.1.2.5-for-v4.9.patch However, v4.8..v4.9 contains some non-trivial changes in mmap.c, which means someone of you may want to do additional test on this patch to ensure there is no regression. In case you find anything unusual, please report to me.

Thaodan commented on 2016-12-13 11:20 (UTC)

I updated the pkg to the latest 4.8.x version. UKSM and AUF4 aren't ready for 4.9.1-pf.

mbilker commented on 2016-11-28 16:28 (UTC)

Sorry for flagging the package. I didn't see that the pkgver logic used the pf revision and not the kernel patch level.

xianai commented on 2016-11-07 03:05 (UTC)

@Thaodan Ok, I'll do this next time.

Thaodan commented on 2016-10-31 03:16 (UTC)

I think that was the reason. Please change the version number whatever change you do. Or I get issues when detecting errors and failures or even why I didn't if the patch is valid.

xianai commented on 2016-10-31 02:04 (UTC)

I fixed a kernel warning in uksm-4.8.patch. It's a trivial fix, so I updated the patch on the project site without changing the patch version number. Did that make the checksums change?

Thaodan commented on 2016-10-27 21:14 (UTC)

dont know why the checksums were changed. uksm is out of uksm but inclued by me.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 .. 107 Next › Last »