Package Details: linux-rt-docs 5.0.3_rt1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-rt.git (read-only)
Package Base: linux-rt
Description: Kernel hackers manual - HTML documentation that comes with the Linux-rt kernel
Upstream URL: https://git.archlinux.org/linux.git/log/?h=v
Licenses: GPL2
Submitter: schivmeister
Maintainer: jhernberg
Last Packager: jhernberg
Votes: 155
Popularity: 1.328547
First Submitted: 2011-08-09 20:03
Last Updated: 2019-03-23 14:10

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

dvzrv commented on 2019-03-23 00:07

@patrickelectric: Did you try to build using makepkg -A?

patrickelectric commented on 2019-03-21 14:09

Is it possible to add arch armv7h ?

jhernberg commented on 2019-03-03 09:44

I've just removed the patch for nvidia that has been used for years. Apparently it's no longer needed, have tested on 2 systems one with the current nvidia driver, and another with nvidia-340xx. The symptom was that without the patch X would hang making the GUI unresponsive, while the rest of the system kept on working. Hopefully it doesn't break anything :)

jhernberg commented on 2019-01-11 10:18

A heads up. As there is no 4.19.13 in the arch kernel git repo, I've made this script download tarballs instead. This will also mean that it will require less diskspace to build, but a larger download for each patch.

yoant commented on 2019-01-10 00:06

@jhernberg: that was that (running out of diskspace), thank you and sorry for the noise. (By the way, thanks for this package!)

jhernberg commented on 2019-01-09 10:59

@yoant: IIRC I updated the git repo from the older version and I just tried to build it from scratch, no errors. Are you possibly running out of diskspace/ram? It needs a lot since the devs moved the archlinux kernel script to use a git repo mirroring the entire kernel tree.

yoant commented on 2019-01-09 03:43

Hello, I'm encountering an issue while building (while extracting sources):

==> Extracting sources...
  -> Creating working copy of archlinux-linux git repo...
fatal: 'v4.19.10-arch1' is not a commit and a branch 'makepkg' cannot be created from it
==> ERROR: Failure while creating working copy of archlinux-linux git repo

Does the build miss a git fetch to get the tag?

PS. I'm using git version 2.20.1

Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2018-12-14 11:17

Actually I'm building

$ makepkg -s 
==> Making package: linux-rt-securityink 4.19.8_rt6-0 (Fri 14 Dec 2018 11:07:31 AM CET)
[snip]

right now, so I didn't notice an issue related to the revoked subkey.

$ wget -q https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.18/older/patch-4.18.7-rt5.patch.{xz,sign}
$ xz -cd patch-4.18.7-rt5.patch.xz | gpg --verify patch-4.18.7-rt5.patch.sign -
[snip]
gpg: WARNING: This subkey has been revoked by its owner!
gpg: reason for revocation: Key is superseded
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 6425 4695 FFF0 AA44 66CC  19E6 7B96 E816 2A8C F5D1
     Subkey fingerprint: AC7B D081 0599 51BD 51AD  E800 4FE5 E326 2872 E4CC

Ok, if this makes 'makepkg -s" fail, then consider to remove "https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.18/older/patch-${_pkgver}-${_rtpatchver}.patch.sign" and the second 'SKIP' from the PKGBUILD.

goddisignz commented on 2018-12-14 10:16

Hi Ralf_Mardorf, I know the difference between "unknown public key" and "key has been REVOKED". Please read my comment more carefully.

I imported the key twice, first without the keyserver and then again from pgp.uni-mainz.de. The second time it was not modified. I also removed and reimported it. Still revoked and still doesnt work...

Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2018-12-14 09:46

On 2018-12-14 08:44 goddisignz wrote:

Hi, building the package currently fails because a signature has been revoked.

patch-4.18.7-rt5.patch ... FAILED (public key 4FE5E3262872E4CC has been revoked)

Folks, if you don't have the skills to use Arch Linux, then read the fine manual.

gpg --keyserver hkp://pgp.uni-mainz.de --recv-keys 4FE5E3262872E4CC

jhernberg could you please pin one of the countless replies related to signatures?