Package Details: litecoin-qt 0.17.1-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: litecoin-qt
Description: Peer-to-peer network based digital currency (QT)
Upstream URL:
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: litecoin
Submitter: Flink
Maintainer: rpodgorny
Last Packager: rpodgorny
Votes: 82
Popularity: 0.001176
First Submitted: 2013-03-22 17:37
Last Updated: 2019-05-12 12:53

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

rpodgorny commented on 2019-02-20 23:42

thanks for the news. updated.

czk commented on 2019-02-19 01:15

@rpodgorny has been fixed about a week ago.

There's some issue with SHA256 checksums though:

==> Building and installing package
==> Making package: litecoin-qt 0.16.3-1 (Tue 19 Feb 2019 01:49:06 AM CET)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
  -> Found v0.16.3.tar.gz
  -> Found litecoin-qt.desktop
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    v0.16.3.tar.gz ... FAILED
    litecoin-qt.desktop ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build litecoin-qt.
==> Restart building litecoin-qt ? [y/N]

You have 7788800eb4a433696a464563384cbdf83a47eebb8698325c75314171833227c8 in your PKGBUILD, while I'm getting afdcf2fc8f343cef556ff3a930d363d9c714d03d7f13964e67f65194f82b37ad for

I guess it's better to use the sources the authors recommend at, ie. The SHA256 sum 0dccc577d704bd48226d11b749cca3bd7cadd23694ccbb15a87a0806704a69c3 in matches the OK.

rpodgorny commented on 2019-01-25 10:02

litecoin-qt seems to be broken right now. i'll wait a while for the upstream to fix that before i include the patch. thanks for the patience.

rpodgorny commented on 2018-03-16 12:31

thanks for spotting 0.16rc1 is out but i'm going to keep being conservative for this package (as it may involve serious money loss) and stick to stable versions only.

02m commented on 2018-01-31 07:38

Unable to do the upgrade 0.14.2-1 => 0.14.2-2.

Get the following error: /usr/include/boost/multi_index/detail/ord_index_impl.hpp:1181:7: error: no match for call to ‘(const key_compare {aka const CompareModifiedEntry}) (const CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry&, CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry&)’ if(comp_(key(v),key(y->value())))return false;

kwe commented on 2018-01-13 14:16

@rpodgorny The patch mentioned by chappjc works for me.

chappjc commented on 2018-01-08 19:02

Looks like boost 1.66 compat was addressed in It's a small diff. Would be a reasonable Arch patch until 0.15 is out.

EDIT: Confirmed that the patch works.

chappjc commented on 2018-01-08 18:51

Needs a bump for boost runtime update.

Also there is now a compile error, so it probably needs an upstream fix:

usr/include/boost/multi_index/detail/ord_index_impl.hpp:1186:25: error: no match for call to ‘(const key_compare {aka const CompareModifiedEntry}) (CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry&, const CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry&)’ return y==header()||!comp_(key(y->value()),key(v)); In file included from miner.cpp:6:0: miner.h:76:10: note: candidate: bool CompareModifiedEntry::operator()(const CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry&, const CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry&) <near match=""> bool operator()(const CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry &a, const CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry &b) ^~~~~~~~</near>

rpodgorny commented on 2017-12-23 22:01

updated the sum and bumped pkgrel. thanks for you cooperation!

pixelyte commented on 2017-12-23 21:52

The downloaded source files are legit. The sha256 sum is not. Verified by the gpg signed message which has the new sum on