Package Details: lives 3.0.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/lives.git (read-only)
Package Base: lives
Description: A Video Editing System
Upstream URL: http://lives-video.com
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: encelo
Maintainer: encelo
Last Packager: encelo
Votes: 202
Popularity: 0.000013
First Submitted: 2005-07-31 22:25
Last Updated: 2019-08-18 11:05

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last »

hokum commented on 2010-11-28 09:57

yep, patch works!
Please, update pkgbuild

hokum commented on 2010-11-28 08:57

So, does it means that 1.3.10 can not be build succesfully with current arch version of frei0r-plugins - 1.2.1-1 without that patch?

Anonymous comment on 2010-11-28 06:41

Hey I have an idea, why don't we ask the project developers ?

LOL, no that would be too hard !


http://lives.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/lives/trunk/lives-plugins/weed-plugins/frei0r.c?r1=854&r2=895&view=patch

;-)

Regards,
Salsaman,
main developer, LiVES

frankspace commented on 2010-11-28 01:56

Thanks! I don't think it's that, though. The list of linked libraries in my version of lives 1.3.4 (the last one I got to compile) is the same, other than linking to linux-vdso.so.1 instead of linux-gate.so.1, which I understand to be irrelevant because they're both just virtual DSOs. So I don't think it's a missing dependency, unless maybe it's a build dependency or something. Otherwise, I link to /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, whereas I see you link to /lib/ld-linux.so.2. Is it possible that this is a 64-bit issue?

encelo commented on 2010-11-27 20:46

Of course, here it is: http://aur.pastebin.com/nBYtiFdb

frankspace commented on 2010-11-27 20:09

encelo, can you run "ldd /usr/bin/lives" on your system with the latest version and tell us what you get? If there really is a dependency issue, that might help identify it.

encelo commented on 2010-11-26 22:51

I can compile the program without issues.
Maybe I'm just missing a dependency in the depends array.

drankinatty commented on 2010-11-26 09:38

I guess that make me "me 3". Seems like a missing declaration f0r_inst that I saw scroll by somewhere near the beginning of the compile. Hopefully we can get this worked out.

kama commented on 2010-11-23 15:13

Me too.

frankspace commented on 2010-11-21 18:35

I have the same problem as ganymede.