Package Details: lldb-svn 8.0.0svn_r346644-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/llvm-svn.git (read-only)
Package Base: llvm-svn
Description: Next generation, high-performance debugger
Upstream URL: https://lldb.llvm.org/
Keywords: clang lld lldb llvm
Licenses: custom:University of Illinois
Groups: llvm-toolchain-svn
Conflicts: lldb
Provides: lldb
Submitter: None
Maintainer: kerberizer (Lone_Wolf)
Last Packager: kerberizer
Votes: 106
Popularity: 0.506749
First Submitted: 2007-08-02 07:15
Last Updated: 2018-11-12 13:38

Required by (23)

Sources (8)

Pinned Comments

kerberizer commented on 2016-08-11 00:39

[PINNED] IMPORTANT INFORMATION // PLEASE READ CAREFULLY

Please check the following page for information on:

  • possible problems with this package;
  • recommendations on how to build it;
  • availability of binary packages.

https://github.com/arch-llvm/llvm-svn

You may also use it for bug reports and pull requests.

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

Lone_Wolf commented on 2018-12-12 11:44

cause found, Codegen files were moved by upstream , see

https://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=348827

Added Mesa bug report link

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109039

Lone_Wolf commented on 2018-12-11 23:05

confirmed

QuartzDragon commented on 2018-12-11 14:33

Hi everyone,

Is anyone else getting this:

In file included from ../mesa/src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/llvm/codegen/native.cpp:31:
../mesa/src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/llvm/compat.hpp:61:10: fatal error: clang/Frontend/CodeGenOptions.h: No such file or directory
#include <clang/Frontend/CodeGenOptions.h>
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated."

When attempting to compile mesa-git with kerberizer's latest llvm-svn packages?

kerberizer commented on 2018-11-12 13:32

@PedroHLC, @Lone_Wolf: Yes, I've already committed the change to GH, but wait for the rebuild to finish before updating AUR. Thanks for bringing this up. lib32 also turned out to miss libxml2.

Lone_Wolf commented on 2018-11-12 13:26

Looks like llvm-libs-svn is missing libedit and libxml2 as dependencies. (stock llvm-libs has those 2 also)

$ namcap /var/cache/pacman/pkg/llvm-libs-svn-8.0.0svn_r3466
llvm-libs-svn-8.0.0svn_r346606-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz  llvm-libs-svn-8.0.0svn_r346633-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz  llvm-libs-svn-8.0.0svn_r346644-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
[panoramix@obelix mesa-git]$ namcap /var/cache/pacman/pkg/llvm-libs-svn-8.0.0svn_r346644-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz 
llvm-libs-svn W: ELF file ('usr/lib/BugpointPasses.so') is unstripped.
llvm-libs-svn W: ELF file ('usr/lib/LLVMHello.so') is unstripped.
llvm-libs-svn W: ELF file ('usr/lib/LLVMgold.so') is unstripped.
llvm-libs-svn W: ELF file ('usr/lib/libLLVM-8svn.so') is unstripped.
llvm-libs-svn W: ELF file ('usr/lib/libLTO.so.8svn') is unstripped.
llvm-libs-svn E: Dependency libxml2 detected and not included (libraries ['usr/lib/libxml2.so.2'] needed in files ['usr/lib/libLLVM-8svn.so'])
llvm-libs-svn E: Dependency libedit detected and not included (libraries ['usr/lib/libedit.so.0'] needed in files ['usr/lib/libLLVM-8svn.so'])
$

PedroHLC commented on 2018-11-12 11:07

Could libedit be added to depends? I'm building mesa-git from a clean chroot (base-devel) and it fails with llvm-config not finding it...

gloriouseggroll commented on 2018-10-12 22:36

went to compile this on a fresh arch install, was getting a recommonmark error, installing python-recommonmark fixed it, apparently either python2-recommonmark wasn't enough or arch was using python3 to build as python3 is the default version now for the python package. probably also needed on lib32-llvm-svn

kerberizer commented on 2018-09-09 16:04

@Lone_Wolf, thank you, I've added you as a co-maintainer. I've also transferred the GitHub repos to a separate organization for more flexibility. :)

Lone_Wolf commented on 2018-09-09 15:11

I'm ok with becoming co-maintainer, but do think you should stay as maintainer.

You've always treated llvm as a compiler suite while I only see it as "necessary evil* requirement" for mesa. If I maintained this i'd probably ditch everything not needed for mesa.

Also llvm bug tracking system is almost a black box to me, while you have shown you know how to use it or find out if issues are already in it.

I dislike the license llvm had and the one they're switching to. I also dislike several of their development choices (cmake, svn, no clear method to have multiple installs coexist)

kerberizer commented on 2018-09-09 11:21

@Lone_Wolf, thank you very much for taking care of this. Would you feel fine with taking over the maintainership of the package? You are doing great work with mesa-git already.