Package Details: localepurge

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: localepurge
Description: Script to remove disk space wasted for unneeded localizations.
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: None
Maintainer: Hyllios
Last Packager: Hyllios
Votes: 256
Popularity: 0.090413
First Submitted: 2007-07-08 16:29
Last Updated: 2019-08-26 02:11

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous ... 3 4 5 6 7 8

donvla commented on 2010-09-14 13:03

"==> Validating source files with md5sums...
localepurge-arch-0.6.2.tar.gz ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!"

fgr commented on 2010-09-04 16:08

updated README.txt; fixed a typo in the man page.

fgr commented on 2010-09-04 16:07

updated README.txt; fix a typo in the man page.

fgr commented on 2010-08-23 20:00

fixed, thank you.

fgr commented on 2010-08-23 17:34

@Stebalien: I'll fix it. Thanks. For now just type 'y' to the question "Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]".

Stebalien commented on 2010-08-23 17:10

The patches have already been applied (your PKGBUILD is trying to repatch them).

fgr commented on 2010-08-23 17:04

I've add "README.txt" file, that is a small note about the license for diff files.

@shinythings: for now I don't apply your hint because the author of the package don't do it. I think the author follows this software naming practice:

Anonymous comment on 2010-05-28 09:30

Ah ok. Thanks for the info, I'll have a look.

It might be good to reflect the change in the source package (0.6.2.arch1, 0.6.2.arch2 or something) rather than just bumping the package rel. As it stands old PKGBUILDs point at a "localepurge-arch-0.6.2" that doesn't exist anymore because it's changed without it's name changing.

fgr commented on 2010-05-28 09:21

You can see the reason for that by taking a look at "localepurge.config.diff" file.
If I do a new rebuild that means there's some reason. :-)
For example: in the past I've changed the license for my patch scripts (2-clause BSD license -> ISC -> WTFPL ->; now I've written my license).

Anonymous comment on 2010-05-28 07:04

What is the reason for the latest rebuild? The only difference seems to be the md5sum, but the source package has the same number. Has the source changed somehow?