Package Details: lua51-iup 3.25-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/iup.git (read-only)
Package Base: iup
Description: Lua 5.1 bindings for IUP GUI toolkit
Upstream URL: http://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/iup/
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: None
Maintainer: daurnimator (blueowl)
Last Packager: daurnimator
Votes: 10
Popularity: 0.000122
First Submitted: 2009-09-13 15:00
Last Updated: 2018-08-28 05:18

Dependencies (16)

Required by (0)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

daurnimator commented on 2018-08-28 05:18

@ktamp

Please add 'lua' 'lua51' and 'lua52' to makedepends list.

done.

Maybe remove 'libcd', 'ftgl', 'webkitgtk', 'openmotif', 'libxpm' from Makedepends list? They are already in Depends list.

From man PKGBUILD:

Note that makepkg does not consider split package depends when checking if dependencies are installed before package building and with --syncdeps. All packages required to make the package are required to be specified in the global depends and makedepends arrays.

ktamp commented on 2018-08-27 23:26

Please add 'lua' 'lua51' and 'lua52' to makedepends list. They should be there.

Current behavior is to rely on: 1) Automatic installation of 'libcd' at the same time as 'iup'. 2) Not using an AUR helper which aggresively cleans up makedepends (e.g. pikaur). 3) Maybe having all these packages already installed in the system before building 'iup' (which would solve case 2).

ktamp commented on 2018-03-05 21:32

Maybe remove 'libcd', 'ftgl', 'webkitgtk', 'openmotif', 'libxpm' from Makedepends list? They are already in Depends list.

Maybe make 'lua-iup' (as well as 'lua-im' and 'lua-cd') optional? Keeping around three different versions of Lua may just be too much for someone interested in IUP but not in Lua. If necessary, Lua-less versions of the PKGBUILD's could be provided in addition to the existing ones.

daurnimator commented on 2017-11-08 02:02

@caelia because iup comes with a motif driver (see http://webserver2.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/iup/en/drv/motif.html ).

Is it causing you issues?

I guess we could create a split package (e.g. iup-motif) so that it becomes optional.

caelia commented on 2017-11-08 01:43

Why on earth does this package depend on openmotif? Motif has been obsolete for decades; this seems really perverse.

ktamp commented on 2017-05-14 13:39

Please move iupgl above iup_plot.

lgg2 commented on 2016-04-12 16:39

Can be used downloading the files from their SourceForge place and then install first the "runtimes" (/.install) and later "development" (/.install_dev) both with root permissions.

In my case works OK.

SneakySnake commented on 2015-11-23 07:43

Okay, I'm disowning this, because it's not very maintainable, and I have lost interest in it.

miotatsu commented on 2015-07-10 00:36

This package fails to build due to compilation errors.
../tecmake.mak:1583: recipe for target '../obj/Linux319_64/iupgtk_dialog.o' failed
make[2]: *** [../obj/Linux319_64/iupgtk_dialog.o] Error 1
Makefile:11: recipe for target 'iup' failed
make[1]: *** [iup] Error 2
Makefile:9: recipe for target 'iup' failed
make: *** [iup] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...

mihaim commented on 2014-09-13 08:44

TrialnError, the other package uses the GTK+ frontent UI toolkit like this one. Basically they are duplicate packages. I found iup-gtk to be the proper name since there exists (at least it used to) another official FE for IUP, namely Motif.

Have a look at Webkit, the QT FE is named "qtwebkit", while the GTK+ FE is named "webkitgtk". There is no generic "webkit" package, because it requires one GUI tollkit to be built against in order to be useful. :P