Package Details: make-3.81 3.81-3

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: make-3.81
Description: GNU make utility to maintain groups of programs (3.81 version)
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: ilikenwf
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: ItachiSan
Votes: 14
Popularity: 0.000087
First Submitted: 2012-04-07 01:50
Last Updated: 2020-02-23 20:20

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

rjn commented on 2020-08-19 18:26

In case anyone stumbles upon the issue with PGP signature check: I saved this key to a file:

and then imported it with:

$ gpg --import <filename>

Gallu commented on 2019-12-19 12:42

Hello, i cant install the package because perl-use_safe_inclusion.patch fails the source validation with sha256checksum

ItachiSan commented on 2018-10-02 17:31

@rjn you need to import the GPG key, else the sources check will fail.

I am pretty sure it is explained in the ArchWiki.

rjn commented on 2018-09-22 15:23

I'm getting the following:

==> Validating source files with sha256sums... make-3.81.tar.gz ... Passed make-3.81.tar.gz.sig ... Skipped make-glibc_alloc_fix.patch ... Passed perl-use_safe_inclusion.patch ... Passed ==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... make-3.81.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key 96B047156338B6D4) ==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified! ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build make-3.81.

ItachiSan commented on 2018-06-21 14:41

@BangL: I fixed the PKGBUILD quite a bit, now it should work without issues.

BangL commented on 2018-05-29 19:44

Currently, this package does not build on Manjaro, and throws the error msg "undefined reference to `__alloca'", in the file "glob.c". I don't know about Arch, but i guess it's the same.

This seems to be an incompatibility with a newer version of glibc.

To fix this, i copied this patch file: to "/tmp/make-glibc_alloc_fix.patch". Then i edited the PKGBUILD of this package, by adding "patch -p1 -i /tmp/make-glibc_alloc_fix.patch" after the line "cd ${srcdir}/${pkgname}" in the "build()" function.

ItachiSan commented on 2014-02-16 21:35

@aitjcize, I find no reason to update this...
You can easily do a 3.82 version of this package just editing a few lines ;)

aitjcize commented on 2014-02-16 14:44

can you change the package name to make3 and update the version to 3.82?

ItachiSan commented on 2013-11-24 13:32

@xavery, it won't clash as the binary file is 'make-3.81' and not 'make'.
I mean that if you want to use it, you should use from CLI
$ make-3.81
instead of
$ make

xavery commented on 2013-09-03 20:28

The PKGBUILD should also have provides=('make') and conflicts=('make') in order to avoid clashes with the main make package.