Package Details: masterpdfeditor 5.9.86-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/masterpdfeditor.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: masterpdfeditor
Description: A complete solution for viewing, creating and editing PDF files
Upstream URL: https://code-industry.net/free-pdf-editor/
Keywords: master-pdf-editor
Licenses: custom
Submitter: farseerfc
Maintainer: pgoetz
Last Packager: pgoetz
Votes: 190
Popularity: 0.045824
First Submitted: 2016-12-05 01:50 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-04 16:49 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

Alad commented on 2021-03-03 16:25 (UTC)

The next person who discusses keygens will have their account suspended indefinitely.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 30 Next › Last »

pgoetz commented on 2021-03-17 14:51 (UTC) (edited on 2021-03-17 14:52 (UTC) by pgoetz)

@nTia89 @Icecube63 @thibaultmol Not sure what is going on, at the moment. I thought I had the correct sha1sum, updated it with what is on Code Industry page, and downloaded the .tar.gz file to compute the sha1sum myself (they were the same). It all checks out but now when I try to install the package on my workstation, I get a failed validity check as well. When I test installed the package yesterday, I didn't.

nTia89 commented on 2021-03-17 13:28 (UTC)

https://code-industry.net/checksum-information/

Icecube63 commented on 2021-03-17 09:04 (UTC)

You have to change the first sha1sums to '9055c1edfd28442acd97b3228ee753335d381a09'

thibaultmol commented on 2021-03-17 07:11 (UTC)

==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha1sums... master-pdf-editor-5.7.40-qt5.x86_64.tar.gz ... FAILED net.code-industry.masterpdfeditor5.desktop ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

pgoetz commented on 2021-03-17 01:35 (UTC)

There's a bug in the net.code-industry.masterpdfeditor5.desktop file for version 5.7.40 which prevents the application from appearing in the menu:

Exec=/opt/master-pdf-editor-5/masterpdfeditor5.sh %f

There is no such shell script in /opt/master-pdf-editor-5

For the time being I'll have to build a new version of the package which includes an edited version of this file.

Alad commented on 2021-03-03 16:42 (UTC)

I already removed the offending comments.

pgoetz commented on 2021-03-03 16:40 (UTC)

@Alad Not at all following what this is in reference to or what "discussing keygens" even means. Is this some comment pinned to every AUR comment section, or in reference to some specific transgression?

Alad commented on 2021-03-03 16:25 (UTC)

The next person who discusses keygens will have their account suspended indefinitely.