Package Details: mathematica 14.1.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/mathematica.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: mathematica
Description: A computational software program used in scientific, engineering, and mathematical fields and other areas of technical computing with offline documentation.
Upstream URL: http://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/
Licenses: LicenseRef-WolframMathematicaLicenseAgreement
Submitter: Feanor12
Maintainer: JP-Ellis (marmis)
Last Packager: marmis
Votes: 80
Popularity: 0.90
First Submitted: 2011-03-03 21:27 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-24 03:20 (UTC)

Dependencies (53)

Required by (1)

Sources (2)

Pinned Comments

marmis commented on 2024-12-24 03:37 (UTC)

mathematica and mathematica-light have been updated to 14.1. Matematica is being rebranded to WolframApp or just Wolfram. Because of that, you might have to update your current configuration according to Upgrading from Mathematica to Wolfram:

  • The default $UserBaseDirectory is now ~/.Wolfram (you may need to mv ~/.Mathematica ~/.Wolfram)
  • MATHINIT is now WOLFRAMNB_INIT (for additional arguments to Wolfram)
  • MATHEMATICA_BASE is now WOLFRAM_BASE (for custom $BaseDirectory)
  • MATHEMATICA_USERBASE is now WOLFRAM_USERBASE (for custom $UserBaseDirectory)

JP-Ellis commented on 2022-10-08 00:22 (UTC) (edited on 2023-08-19 12:56 (UTC) by JP-Ellis)

Wolfram offers two bundles for Mathematica: one with offline docs included, and one which relies on online docs. I have created corresponding version of the Mathematica package in the AUR:

  • mathematica: As this package has historically always included offline docs, it will continue to do so now. As of 13.1.0, the package takes up around 14.1GiB with all documentation.
  • mathematica-light: For those people who want a small package and/or want to use online docs, I have created this package which uses Wolfram's online-docs bundling of Mathematica. As of 13.3, the light version takes up around 7.2GiB.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 .. 37 Next › Last »

archlenovo commented on 2015-04-06 09:18 (UTC)

No problems installing here.

vanillacoffee commented on 2015-04-05 22:01 (UTC)

Yes, the empty files are the same in the makepkg pkgdir, the package tarball, and in the final installed files. Plenty of disk space. Tried rebuilding / reinstalling several times. Anyway, I can work around this by commenting the installer line in the PKGBUILD, running it manually, then running makepkg. So it's no big deal. Maybe someone else will have the same issue and see these comments. Thanks!

kjslag commented on 2015-04-05 21:33 (UTC)

Ok, then I don't think there's anything wrong with the PKGBUILD. If you untar your package file (the one you would install using pacman -U) into a new directory, are there still empty files? You probably already checked these, but just in case: Are you low on hard disk space? If you haven't already, you could try rebooting, rebuilding, and reinstalling the package.

vanillacoffee commented on 2015-04-05 21:17 (UTC)

No, those script files are normal. Maybe the installer is unable to detect the architecture in the makepkg environment?

kjslag commented on 2015-04-05 21:12 (UTC)

That's strange. Are the files in your build directory pkg/mathematica/opt/Mathematica/Executables/ also empty?

vanillacoffee commented on 2015-04-05 21:00 (UTC)

The Mathematica 10.1 installer does not work quite right under the control of makepkg on my system. Most files are installed correctly, but several are installed as empty files, most importantly the actual executables in /opt/Mathematica/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/Binaries. This does not happen if I run the installer outside of makepkg (using the same arguments). The PKGBUILD worked fine for previous releases. Any ideas?

archlenovo commented on 2014-12-15 18:42 (UTC)

A word of caution: after upgrading to 10.0.2 the fonts looked terrible. However, I had several font packages installed (freetype2-infinality, fontconfig-infinality, ttf-ms-win8). Eventually, I found that I could solve it in one of two ways: A) either uninstalling fontconfig-infinality, which was somehow doing a bad font substitution, B) or uninstalling ttf-ms-win8, which was providing a font that fontconfig-infinality could not substitute. The result of A) and B) is different, but in any case the font improves a lot. For the moment I'm sticking with A).

kjslag commented on 2014-12-11 17:02 (UTC)

Updated to 10.0.2. This release fixed the font issues that I was having :)

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 .. 37 Next › Last »