@greyltc OK if you approve my changes.
Search Criteria
Package Details: matlab-gcc13 1:R2025b+25.2.0.2998904-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/matlab.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | matlab |
Description: | A high-level language for numerical computation and visualization (GCC13 runtime dependency) |
Upstream URL: | https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html |
Keywords: | computation matlab numerical visualization |
Licenses: | custom:MATLAB EULA |
Conflicts: | matlab-gcc, matlab-r2025b-gcc |
Provides: | matlab-gcc, matlab-gcc-release, matlab-gcc-version, matlab-r2025b-gcc |
Submitter: | ido |
Maintainer: | vitaliikuzhdin |
Last Packager: | vitaliikuzhdin |
Votes: | 41 |
Popularity: | 0.096374 |
First Submitted: | 2015-08-15 09:33 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-09-27 20:52 (UTC) |
Dependencies (6)
- gcc13AUR
- matlabAUR (matlab-supportAUR)
- gendesk (make)
- gnutls3.8.9AUR (make)
- inotify-tools (inotify-tools-gitAUR) (make)
- matlab-mpmAUR (make)
Required by (1)
- matlab (requires matlab-gcc) (optional)
Sources (1)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 .. 29 Next › Last »
petronny commented on 2018-06-26 08:30 (UTC)
greyltc commented on 2018-06-20 17:36 (UTC)
@petronny and/or @hottea, would you like me to make you a co-maintainer?
petronny commented on 2018-05-08 21:58 (UTC) (edited on 2018-05-09 11:02 (UTC) by petronny)
@greyltc I wrote a 2018a PKGBUILD here. It behaves almost as same as your current one, except splitting the keys to a new package.
PS. You can just pull my repository to fetch these changes.
hottea commented on 2018-05-02 07:52 (UTC)
Hi all, I create a repo in Github. If interested, one could use this PKGBUILD for building a package. I remove all dependencies, install all products available by default, and no desktop entry is provided. I gonna add a desktop entry to wiki.
greyltc commented on 2018-05-01 14:26 (UTC)
@gunjah post a link here to a pastebin (or similar) of your 2018a PKGBUILD and I'll have a look at getting it in here
sadid commented on 2018-05-01 14:12 (UTC) (edited on 2018-05-01 14:12 (UTC) by sadid)
@gunjah, you can just copy/paste it here or create your own 2018a specific aur package.
jachymb commented on 2018-04-25 11:54 (UTC)
Please update to 2018a
jclsn commented on 2018-04-19 08:31 (UTC)
I updated the PKGBUILD for 2018a. How can I upload it?
hottea commented on 2017-12-20 12:02 (UTC) (edited on 2017-12-20 12:08 (UTC) by hottea)
Hello, I write a PKGBUILD based on this one.
Changes:
- default installation folder:
/opt/matlab
license.dat
is installed in/opt/matlab/licenses
. I'm sure how matlab activing, but just copyinglicense.dat
to/etc/matlab/licenses/
, and create a soft link from/opt/matlab/licenses
to/etc/matlab/licenses/
not work for me.matlab.tar
is created by just copying all file in matlab iso file to foldermatlab
, andtar cvf matlab.tar matlab
However, I just test with _networkinstall=true
, and everything works fine. I'm not sure if other activating method would work.
Pinned Comments
vitaliikuzhdin commented on 2025-07-16 13:12 (UTC) (edited on 2025-08-05 20:05 (UTC) by vitaliikuzhdin)
TODO:
Figure out the users and permissions. Currently,
/opt/MATLAB/${_release}
has777
permissions, which is obviously undesired. It might be better to create a user group and require users to manually add themselves to it for security reasons.Improve the installer. For example, the current inotify watcher spams stdout and does not account for the end of the download/installation or the width of the terminal, which results in flaky output.
Figure out the dependencies. The list of Debian/RHEL dependencies is public, but it includes some seemingly unneeded packages. This might be because they are required by dependent products/add-ons. Additionally, the current logic for removing bundled dependencies should probably be rewritten. Maintaining an exhaustive list for a single release is very difficult, and these components change without notice. Moreover, the current approach may go against the Arch KISS philosophy. Ideally, we should remove only the problematic components like Qt, XCB,
libtiff
,gcc-libs
,fontconfig
, etc.Add auto-discovery for packages written for MATLAB. My plan was to use
/usr/lib/MATLAB/${_release}
for release-specific modules and/usr/lib/MATLAB/common
for shared (mostly architecture-independent) packages. However, load order matters, and "common" modules need to specify which releases they are compatible with. This means we need to implement our own logic for discovering and loading these, likely via hooks, shell scripts, and configuration files (perhaps TOML could work?).Fix the Python components.
python-matlabengine
does install the Python components built against the version of Python shipped by Arch. However, some proprietary CPython components are not included and are built against ancient Python versions. This likely requires version spoofing or some alternative approach.Write and upload packages for previous MATLAB releases. It is entirely possible to have multiple releases installed simultaneously. I have a few of these packages myself, but they are drafts and not suitable for upload to the AUR.
Write and upload packages for MATLAB-dependent add-ons and products. When installing MATLAB required user intervention for source access, it was acceptable to break reproducibility and manually specify required products for installation. Now that we use MPM, it would be better to separate products into individual packages. These packages would install themselves and their dependencies into a specific location, then use
appdata
to install only the component's files. The problem is that MATLAB often includes conflicting files that need to be combined or overwritten. Obviously, we can't allow that, so a hook must be implemented to, for example, combine*.combine@matlab-simulink
and replace*.replace@matlab-documentation
files with backups. Needless to say, this is challenging to implement, so the previous approach (having users specify the product list) might still be preferred.Write and upload the
matlab-runtime
package. I have a draft, but the problem with this package is that it installs the runtime for every available product. Ideally, for source-built packages, we would want tomakedepend
onmatlab-$product
anddepend
onmatlab-$product-runtime
. However, this is not possible without splitting the runtime packages, which poses the challenges described above. I’ll try my best to revisit this sometime later.vitaliikuzhdin commented on 2025-07-16 12:55 (UTC)
@aoneko, @Reexys, please read the post-installation instructions. If you've lost them, you can find the same information here.