Search Criteria
Package Details: meli 0.8.11-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/meli.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | meli |
Description: | A MUA for the terminal aiming for configurability and extensibility with sane defaults |
Upstream URL: | https://meli.delivery/ |
Keywords: | mua tui |
Licenses: | GPL-3.0-only |
Submitter: | rumpelsepp |
Maintainer: | alerque |
Last Packager: | alerque |
Votes: | 6 |
Popularity: | 0.20 |
First Submitted: | 2020-10-27 09:52 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-04-21 18:12 (UTC) |
Dependencies (5)
- dbus-glib
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR)
- cargo (rustup-gitAUR, rust-nightly-binAUR, rust-gitAUR, rust-beta-binAUR, rustup-stubAUR, rust, rustup) (make)
- mandoc (mdocml-cvsAUR, mandoc-noconflictAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
epilys commented on 2025-04-27 14:54 (UTC)
Hi richedge39, meli author here,
Forgejo/gitea/github generate source tarballs automatically, which must be the source of SHA mismatches. Note: I think forgejo lets you replace the source tarball for a "release".
What different mirrors did you try other than upstream?
I don't personally use Arch (btw) so I am not familiar with how AUR works but I see the
PKGBUILD
file only mentions the indeed oldgit.meli.delivery
domain (which, by the way, reluctantly moved away from because DNS e-mail spam filters don't like the.delivery
TLD). So by mirrors you must refer to the git repos I mention in the meliREADME.md
right?PS: As for the HTTP headers, they are just harmless easter eggs inserted by the reverse-proxy: parodies of
X-
vendor headers andContent-
standard headers. I put them so long ago I had forgotten about it!richedge39 commented on 2025-04-18 00:35 (UTC) (edited on 2025-04-18 01:09 (UTC) by richedge39)
Adding on to bda's comment: the shasums for this tarball is different on each of the different "code mirrors."
The main mirror has also moved (from
git.meli.delivery
togit.meli-email.org
):There are some weird HTTP headers there...WTF is
Vintage-Mousepads:
andX-Men
?Looks like the original site was meli.delivery. They've rotated through a few domains including meliemail.org (for a very short period) and finally the current. meli-email.org
update:
Seems that they just separately build the tarballs in the different repos. The files are all the same. Instead of moving the tarballs from one repo to the next, they might've re-built the tarball in the "mirror" repo again. The directory structure is different but the files are the same when I checked via their hashes.
Still not sure why no one in January was complaining about this though. The issue around the shasum for the PKGBUILD seems to have been around for a while.
bda commented on 2025-02-02 15:25 (UTC)
Hi, sha256sum is wrong in PKGBUILD.
Thanks for making this, meli is great :)
grumpy.guy commented on 2025-01-26 21:37 (UTC)
@alerque
I second afontenots command about using man-db. Please consider changing the PKGBUILD.
AndyRTR commented on 2025-01-07 20:08 (UTC)
meli fails to start when missing "m4" macro processor. Please add it to the runtime dependencies.
afontenot commented on 2024-09-13 21:46 (UTC)
@alerque man-db's man can also generate man pages, and actually the project's building documentation mentions this:
I've tested the resulting build after removing the dependency and everything appears to work fine. I can
man meli
and view the pages withmeli man
as well.I think given that this PKGBUILD would otherwise require a package conflicting with one installed on 99% of Arch systems, it'd be better to change it. Ultimately that's up to you, I can change the dependencies on my local build if necessary.
alerque commented on 2024-08-12 08:55 (UTC)
@Derson5 We use mandoc in this package because that's what the upstream project uses. But I'd guess it has something to do with man-db being tools to read man pages while mandoc has tooling for generating them from other formats.
Derson5 commented on 2024-06-01 23:01 (UTC)
Out of curiosity: @alerque why we use
mandoc
and notman-db
? Ismandoc
better at something thenman-db
?zapata commented on 2023-08-30 17:51 (UTC) (edited on 2023-08-30 17:54 (UTC) by zapata)
Update to version 0.8.0:
https://privatebin.net/?1c3a40094d59e449#HahNkeUVwXfRaEWAEBWZaf99CPyJXKx2B4Lx4rn4hUdu
And please remove dendrite.service!
alerque commented on 2023-05-03 23:06 (UTC)
Ah ha! It actually needs an old version of openssl. Older than Arch has in repos any more...
1 2 Next › Last »