Search Criteria
Package Details: meli 0.8.10-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/meli.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | meli |
Description: | A MUA for the terminal aiming for configurability and extensibility with sane defaults |
Upstream URL: | https://meli.delivery/ |
Keywords: | mua tui |
Licenses: | GPL-3.0-only |
Submitter: | rumpelsepp |
Maintainer: | alerque |
Last Packager: | alerque |
Votes: | 5 |
Popularity: | 0.000062 |
First Submitted: | 2020-10-27 09:52 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-12-06 20:53 (UTC) |
Dependencies (5)
- dbus-glib
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR, glibc-eac-binAUR, glibc-eac-rocoAUR)
- cargo (rustup-gitAUR, rust-nightly-binAUR, rust-gitAUR, rust-beta-binAUR, rustup-stubAUR, rust, rustup) (make)
- mandoc (mdocml-cvsAUR, mandoc-noconflictAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
afontenot commented on 2024-09-13 21:46 (UTC)
@alerque man-db's man can also generate man pages, and actually the project's building documentation mentions this:
I've tested the resulting build after removing the dependency and everything appears to work fine. I can
man meli
and view the pages withmeli man
as well.I think given that this PKGBUILD would otherwise require a package conflicting with one installed on 99% of Arch systems, it'd be better to change it. Ultimately that's up to you, I can change the dependencies on my local build if necessary.
alerque commented on 2024-08-12 08:55 (UTC)
@Derson5 We use mandoc in this package because that's what the upstream project uses. But I'd guess it has something to do with man-db being tools to read man pages while mandoc has tooling for generating them from other formats.
Derson5 commented on 2024-06-01 23:01 (UTC)
Out of curiosity: @alerque why we use
mandoc
and notman-db
? Ismandoc
better at something thenman-db
?zapata commented on 2023-08-30 17:51 (UTC) (edited on 2023-08-30 17:54 (UTC) by zapata)
Update to version 0.8.0:
https://privatebin.net/?1c3a40094d59e449#HahNkeUVwXfRaEWAEBWZaf99CPyJXKx2B4Lx4rn4hUdu
And please remove dendrite.service!
alerque commented on 2023-05-03 23:06 (UTC)
Ah ha! It actually needs an old version of openssl. Older than Arch has in repos any more...
alerque commented on 2023-05-03 23:03 (UTC)
I tried adding openssl to the deps here but the crate compile still failed. Anybody find a fix that works for a clean chroot build?
3nt3 commented on 2023-04-30 15:37 (UTC)
This doesn't build because of missing openssl headers
alerque commented on 2021-08-02 21:15 (UTC)
There are quite a few issues with this build. One of them is upstream's fault: the source archive is missing some key bits like the Cargo toml file! Additionally the 0.6.2 build does not currently build cleanly even if you supply the missing file because it has issues on current stable Rust.
That being said there are also quite a few things missing here such as dependencies. Would you consider adding me as a co-maintainer so I can get them cleaned up and be available to fix it when there is another tag?
tionis commented on 2021-05-06 10:47 (UTC)
Why is there a dendrite systemd service file included?