Package Details: mergerfs 2.25.1-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: mergerfs
Description: FUSE based union filesystem
Upstream URL:
Keywords: filesystem fuse
Licenses: custom:ISC
Submitter: pheerai
Maintainer: willemw
Last Packager: willemw
Votes: 15
Popularity: 1.232963
First Submitted: 2015-10-23 12:47
Last Updated: 2018-12-07 09:03

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

rspenc29 commented on 2018-12-08 14:38

I also had a broken mergerfs after the latest update. Installing fuse3 fixed it.

Sparticuz commented on 2018-12-04 14:55

I got the same error and it was fixed by installing fuse3

danch commented on 2018-12-03 18:42

@willemw: Sorry it took me so long to respond. I didnt see your response until now. It looks like the issue might actually be with the fuse-common package. I am on fuse-common 3.3.0-1 as of a full system upgrade and it looks like this has come up before, as you can see here: I am thinking that fuse-common is wanting something out of fuse3. I could only get it to run after I installed that package. The error message was basically that it could not locate the library.

willemw commented on 2018-12-02 10:51


Cannot reproduce. Building mergerfs and mounting with mergerfs works without fuse3 being installed. Fuse3 should not be dependency.

What errors are you getting?

danch commented on 2018-12-01 22:04

I just did a full system update and mergerfs wouldnt start after that with version 2.25.1. Once I installed fuse3 everything worked again but without that I was getting errors where it says it couldn't find fuse3 packages. I am wondering if fuse3 is a dependency now and if that should be changed int he PKGBUILD.

willemw commented on 2018-11-06 21:13

@pheerai: I run a very basic sanity check with file images representing disks. For better testing, test scripts should be made available, see for example SnapRAID ("make check").

2.25.0 is out. It's a pre-release. See release notes. 2.24.2 is still marked as being the latest release.

pheerai commented on 2018-11-06 20:19

@willemw: Both. I would not detect any runtime issues, as well as any build time configuration problems that show up at runtime. I'm trying to at least test basic usability with my packages before updating. This is rather hard without any actual real-world use Case, IMHO.

So, no actual problems with the tool itself, but I'd rather not break anyone's disk setup as long as I can avoid it ;-)

willemw commented on 2018-11-06 20:13

@pheerai: what kind of FUSE issues? Only build issues or also run-time issues?

pheerai commented on 2018-11-06 19:22

As I have no use for this package, I disown it (I suspect that there might be quite some issues with FUSE-Stuff, and not using boils down to someone without any suitable setup basically poking around in cases of build mistakes).

Feel free to adopt, actually the PKGBUILD is quite straight forward.

rpodgorny commented on 2018-09-19 15:46

cosmetic side note: the pkgbuild in the repo seems to be executable ;-)