Package Details: mindustry-bin 1:5.0_99-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/mindustry-bin.git (read-only)
Package Base: mindustry-bin
Description: A sandbox tower defense game written in Java
Upstream URL: https://github.com/Anuken/Mindustry
Licenses: GPL3
Conflicts: mindustry
Provides: mindustry
Submitter: dmitmel
Maintainer: dmitmel
Last Packager: dmitmel
Votes: 6
Popularity: 3.02
First Submitted: 2019-10-08 13:45
Last Updated: 2019-10-28 09:29

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

Firstbober commented on 2019-10-25 11:21

dmitmel: Sure, it should work well.

dmitmel commented on 2019-10-25 10:55

Firstbober: Thanks, didn't consider that, I'll change that later (I don't have a access to my machine right now). Although I think that the version should instead look like major.minor_build to show that the build number isn't reset on each new minor/major version.

Firstbober commented on 2019-10-25 09:15

I think the version number should look like major.minor.patch.0.build or something similar to mark the version of the game. For example 5.0.0.0.97.

dmitmel commented on 2019-10-08 17:32

eschwartz: Thanks for your help very much!

eschwartz commented on 2019-10-08 17:30

Yes, you'll need to have the existing additional pkgname deleted (or merged, but there are no comments or votes to merge anyway) before you can push an update containing an additional pkgname in this .SRCINFO.

dmitmel commented on 2019-10-08 17:17

eschwartz: Yeah, I'm probably going to do that way. Also: if I make a split package with pkgbase=mindustry and which contains two packages mindustry and mindustry-server, should I ask for deletion of mindustry-server?

eschwartz commented on 2019-10-08 17:14

That would be my recommendation. :) Change this one to build from source, and add a pinned comment telling people where to find a precompiled binary package if they prefer.

dmitmel commented on 2019-10-08 17:11

eschwartz: So should I make a pinned comment about the split of this package into mindustry and mindustry-bin?

eschwartz commented on 2019-10-08 17:09

No, you're wrong. People who have installed this package already are expecting to install "the software", and are ambivalent about how it is created. People who go to download a package ending in -bin are explicitly saying "I consider using precompiled assets to be important".

Also there is already a notification system, it is called "the comments section". :)

dmitmel commented on 2019-10-08 16:54

eschwartz: because most people who have already installed this package are expecting a pre-compiled binary, I can't think of a way to add compilation here and notify users about migration to mindustry-bin.