Is GTK2 still required as a dependency? I tried building the package w/o it and it builds and runs flawlessly (or so it seems).
Search Criteria
Package Details: minecraft-launcher 1:1.0.1221-3
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/minecraft-launcher.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | minecraft-launcher |
| Description: | Official Minecraft Launcher |
| Upstream URL: | https://mojang.com/ |
| Keywords: | game minecraft |
| Licenses: | custom |
| Conflicts: | minecraft-launcher-beta |
| Provides: | minecraft-launcher-beta |
| Submitter: | shoghicp |
| Maintainer: | pschichtel |
| Last Packager: | pschichtel |
| Votes: | 1097 |
| Popularity: | 2.93 |
| First Submitted: | 2017-01-18 14:17 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-06-17 22:10 (UTC) |
Dependencies (6)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR)
- libgpg-error (libgpg-error-gitAUR)
- zlib (zlib-ng-compat-gitAUR, zlib-gitAUR, zlib-ng-compat)
- flite (flite1AUR) (optional) – narrator support
- org.freedesktop.secrets (keepassxc-gitAUR, gnome-keyring-gitAUR, pass-secrets-gitAUR, keepassxc-allow-aur-extension-originAUR, keepassxc-allow-aur-extension-origin-binAUR, pass-secret-service-binAUR, dssdAUR, pass-secret-service-gitAUR, bitw-gitAUR, gnome-keyring, keepassxc, kwallet, kwallet5) (optional) – persistent login support
Sources (3)
RunAndTumble commented on 2021-01-22 13:13 (UTC)
iruoy commented on 2021-01-14 11:44 (UTC)
Oh and the PKGBUILD.template file can be removed from the git since it isn't used.
iruoy commented on 2021-01-14 11:41 (UTC)
The .gitignore can be updated to ignore packaged files so that users that don't use an AUR manager don't get conflicts when updating.
The change is just one line: https://git.sr.ht/~iruoy/minecraft-launcher/commit/9d378b6232299f083304518719256f266f12ad33
ali.molaei commented on 2020-12-18 08:08 (UTC)
2.2.909 is out https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/Launcher_version_history
JoeSchr commented on 2020-12-15 19:45 (UTC)
only thing currently working for me is using AppImage from here: https://github.com/ChristopherHX/linux-packaging-scripts/releases
xdotax commented on 2020-12-12 05:16 (UTC)
@WBryie
that did it, thank you very much!
WBryie commented on 2020-12-12 05:08 (UTC) (edited on 2020-12-12 05:08 (UTC) by WBryie)
Please update minecraft-launcher to the current launcher version, I have a github repo with everything, however pkgbuild is in my name and the .git folder isnt there.
WBryie commented on 2020-12-12 04:43 (UTC)
@xdotax please use minecraft-launcher and not minecraft, the sha256 sums for minecraft are broken and should not be used.
xdotax commented on 2020-12-12 03:16 (UTC) (edited on 2020-12-12 03:17 (UTC) by xdotax)
I get the same error for this package as minecraft-launcher:
==> Validating source files with sha256sums... minecraft-2.2.741.deb ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! Failed to build minecraft
Any help please? Referencing the pinned comment, I get this output from updpkgsums:
==> ERROR: PKGBUILD not found or is not a file
Pinned Comments
petr commented on 2021-10-08 09:04 (UTC)
The package version is the version of the launcher bootstrap - the part that actually downloads and updates the launcher.
That means the version number of the actual launcher (2.x.xxx) is different from the version here (9xx+) on a fundamental level, and should not be compared.
The package is outdated only when the bootstrap version you get here is different from the bootstrap version you would get from minecraft.net when using the raw tarball.