Package Details: minecraft-technic-launcher 4.347-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: minecraft-technic-launcher
Description: Choose from thousands of community-made Minecraft modpacks available on the Technic Platform.
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL3
Submitter: kozec
Maintainer: ainola
Last Packager: ainola
Votes: 49
Popularity: 0.748125
First Submitted: 2012-05-10 16:14
Last Updated: 2016-02-02 14:07

Latest Comments

Celti commented on 2016-04-20 20:27

.technic/logs is how I found out it was a 401 error... sadly, nothing else was useful. I guess I'll keep poking around...

ainola commented on 2016-04-20 14:15

@Celti, I'm not having any such problems.

Perhaps you could try looking in your .technic/logs folder to see if anything relevant pops up.

Celti commented on 2016-04-20 03:37

Anyone else having issues with the launcher giving 401 errors when trying to do anything with the API (access news, download modpacks — even vanilla!)? Not sure what I've done wrong.

ainola commented on 2016-03-06 04:47

It looks like technic's window draws properly when using the latest batches of updates. Maybe Mutter, maybe Java (I run OpenJDK 8), but whatever was updated seems to have fixed the grey window bug on my Nvidia (proprietary) and Intel Haswell graphics under Gnome.

ainola commented on 2016-02-19 01:46

I have been unsuccessful with my own experimentation. At this point I think that Mutter should have a bug raised against it (if it doesn't already exist). Please, do the honors!

lipe_cantarelli commented on 2016-02-18 12:37

Any updates on the blank screen problem?
I have nvidia drivers but I don't use awm and the issue is still hapening.

altiris commented on 2015-09-16 01:21


No need to be sorry, you're the maintainer :D Thanks again!

ainola commented on 2015-09-15 14:54

Fixed, sorry about that: wrong checksum line was updated...

altiris commented on 2015-09-15 14:50

Can't update, TechnicLauncher.jar failed the checksum, I noticed in the commit/changes you changed the URL of the .jar, im guessing there is a different checksum that goes along with it?

ainola commented on 2015-05-15 19:00

@delusionallogic: I've attempted a lot of tinkering with wmname with no success on my end. I'm not convinced there's anything that can be done on the PKGBUILD end. I'd love to be proven wrong.

All in all, this is just proof that implementing your own window controls is not only stupid design but certainly bug-inducing. :)

All comments