AUR (en) - mingw-w64-fontconfig

Search Criteria

Package Details: mingw-w64-fontconfig 2.15.0-1

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/mingw-w64-fontconfig.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	mingw-w64-fontconfig
Description:	A library for configuring and customizing font access (mingw-w64)
Upstream URL:	https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/fontconfig/
Keywords:	fontconfig mingw mingw-w64
Licenses:	custom
Submitter:	Schala
Maintainer:	pingplug
Last Packager:	pingplug
Votes:	17
Popularity:	0.000000
First Submitted:	2012-09-05 17:59 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2023-12-23 02:32 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aur.archlinux.org/mingw-w64-fontconfig.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

mingw-w64-fontconfig

Description:

A library for configuring and customizing font access (mingw-w64)

Upstream URL:

https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/fontconfig/

Keywords:

fontconfig mingw mingw-w64

Licenses:

custom

Submitter:

Schala

Maintainer:

pingplug

Last Packager:

pingplug

Votes:

Popularity:

0.000000

First Submitted:

2012-09-05 17:59 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2023-12-23 02:32 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3

xantares commented on 2013-11-06 19:03 (UTC)

Ok, so I'll link my packages to win-iconv too.

ant32 commented on 2013-11-06 17:01 (UTC)

Fedora uses win-iconv http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/?q=mingw-&ofs=150. I think we should only use one or the other as a default for all packages. Also win-iconv does not provide libiconv. Applicactions built with win-iconv link to iconv.dll and applications built with libiconv link to libiconv-2.dll. Renaming the dlls does not work either.

xantares commented on 2013-11-06 16:19 (UTC)

Hi, Is there any reason to depend on win-iconv rather than libiconv ? There's the same question for mingw-w64-qt4, should we change also all the packages that depend on libiconv ? xan.