Arch Linux User Repository

Search Criteria

Enter search criteria

Search by

Keywords

Out of Date

Sort by

Sort order

Per page

Package Details: mingw-w64-openssl-1.0 1.0.2.u-1

Package Actions

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/mingw-w64-openssl-1.0.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	mingw-w64-openssl-1.0
Description:	The Open Source toolkit for Secure Sockets Layer and Transport Layer Security (mingw-w64)
Upstream URL:	https://www.openssl.org
Licenses:	custom:BSD
Submitter:	Martchus
Maintainer:	Martchus
Last Packager:	Martchus
Votes:	2
Popularity:	0.000000
First Submitted:	2017-06-05 01:00 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2024-08-01 18:31 (UTC)

Dependencies (4)

mingw-w64-zlib^AUR
mingw-w64-environment^AUR (llvm-mingw-w64-environment^AUR) (make)
mingw-w64-gcc (mingw-w64-gcc132^AUR, llvm-mingw-w64-toolchain-ucrt-bin^AUR, llvm-mingw-w64-toolchain-msvcrt-bin^AUR) (make)
perl (perl-git^AUR) (make)

Required by (0)

Sources (7)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2

chenxiaolong commented on 2017-06-11 04:31 (UTC) (edited on 2017-06-11 04:32 (UTC) by chenxiaolong)

@Martchus Any chance you could revert this commit? https://github.com/Martchus/PKGBUILDs/commit/d8173496cce65929c387abd575fb647bb10a87c9 It's causing CMake to find openssl-1.0 instead of openssl for me. I realize this is probably a cmake bug, but for example, before I installed this package, I would get: -- Found OpenSSL: /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/lib/libssl.dll.a (found version "1.1.0f") and now it is: -- Found OpenSSL: /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/bin/libeay32.dll (found version "1.1.0f")

xantares commented on 2017-06-09 19:24 (UTC) (edited on 2017-06-09 19:24 (UTC) by xantares)

hi, are you getting these? ==> Validating source files with sha256sums... openssl-1.0.2l.tar.gz ... FAILED openssl-1.0.2l.tar.gz.asc ... Skipped openssl-1.0.2a-x509.patch ... FAILED openssl-1.0.0a-ldflags.patch ... FAILED openssl-1.0.1-x32.patch ... FAILED openssl-1.0.2a-parallel-build.patch ... FAILED openssl-1.0-versioned-symbols.patch ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

« First ‹ Previous 1 2