Search Criteria
Package Details: mips-elf-gcc 15.1.0-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/mips-elf-gcc.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | mips-elf-gcc |
| Description: | The GNU Compiler Collection - cross compiler for MIPS ELF (bare-metal) target |
| Upstream URL: | https://gcc.gnu.org/ |
| Licenses: | GPL |
| Conflicts: | cross-mips-elf-gcc |
| Replaces: | cross-mips-elf-gcc |
| Submitter: | angelodalzotto |
| Maintainer: | giumacedo |
| Last Packager: | giumacedo |
| Votes: | 4 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2022-03-14 00:26 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-05-30 16:33 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2
philpirj commented on 2021-06-09 08:43 (UTC) (edited on 2021-06-09 09:31 (UTC) by philpirj)
From Jakub:
Older releases I've signed are with the older key (now expired), the newer with the newer key, both have correct fingerprints on that mirrors.html and both are uploaded to multiple key servers.
There are no separate 6C35 and D3A9 keys, that is a single key with D3A9 3CAD 751C 2AF4 F8C7 AD51 6C35 B993 09B5 FA62 fingerprint. http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C35B99309B5FA62 is the nwer one and http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA328C3A2C3C45C06 is the older one.
It seems to have been a problem with my user keyring. Resolved.
philpirj commented on 2021-06-08 09:56 (UTC)
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgccjit/#comment-808549 suggests importing this key:
but frankly I don't understand why one do that, and why this signature should be trusted?
Checked with Jakub to update their signature on GNU FTP mirrors page.
Anyway, after importing:
philpirj commented on 2021-06-08 09:47 (UTC)
Didn't work.
It still fails the check even if I add this
6C35key tovalidpgpkeys(desperate mode alert).philpirj commented on 2021-06-08 09:37 (UTC)
According to http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/mirrors.html, there are more valid signing keys.
should work.
philpirj commented on 2021-06-08 08:52 (UTC) (edited on 2021-06-08 08:52 (UTC) by philpirj)
ecloud commented on 2019-09-08 07:17 (UTC) (edited on 2019-09-08 07:18 (UTC) by ecloud)
Is this intended as a bare-metal compiler? It seems incomplete for building binaries for openwrt... that's what I was hoping to use it for. Of course there are no headers included, and even if I work around that, I see that it's not able to link a "hello world" executable:
« First ‹ Previous 1 2