Package Details: mongodb-bin 4.4.0-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: mongodb-bin
Description: A high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database
Upstream URL:
Keywords: database document-oriented mongo mongod mongodb mongos
Licenses: SSPLv1
Conflicts: mongodb
Provides: mongodb=4.4.0
Submitter: ali.molaei
Maintainer: ali.molaei
Last Packager: ali.molaei
Votes: 45
Popularity: 2.26
First Submitted: 2019-01-28 09:01
Last Updated: 2020-08-01 15:36

Dependencies (2)

Required by (34)

Sources (16)

Pinned Comments

ali.molaei commented on 2019-02-14 15:58

As I said, mongodb general Linux release didn't support SSL, and Also, they will not exist after version 4.2 So, I changed my mind about using them and will use ubuntu xenial binaries from for now, as they have SSL support, maybe there will be an official Arch Linux repo of mongodb one day :)

I also separated -tools package and now there will be a mongodb-tools-bin package

There is only one problem and that is the mongoreplay binary is not exists in -tools packages of mongodb-org repo of any distro!

I filed a bug here about it, and maybe it will be added soon.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

ali.molaei commented on 2020-03-30 06:59

Hey @aj_sopra, I'm aware of the license issue

I think we have to decide what is open-source and what is not, Open Source means many things, we have an Open-source Model and we have also Open Source Initiative Corp that there are some of open-source community members in it

MongoDB is developing in Open-source Model, and the only change in license from AGPL is that it is restricting companies to use the software and not contributing back, and OSI's problem with it is that you cannot restrict how to use the software, etc.

Now, we have to decide, can't we call MongoDB open-source, if they are developing in open-source way? And also, are we deciding or a corporation in California?

Next, I think the license is clearly SSPLv1 and the description cannot mislead anyone, but if there is more push to do it, I'll do it, I don't think it is a big deal

aj_sopra commented on 2020-03-29 23:01

It appears mongodb is no longer considered "open source", can that modifier be removed from the package description?

ali.molaei commented on 2020-02-01 09:14

@gj545rndmu it is needed only in aarch64 build, as I test the package being built on my x86_64 machine, I always comment that dependancy to test the PKGBUILD for both architectures, on 4.2.2 It was remained commented by mistake

gj545rndmu commented on 2020-02-01 09:10

For 4.2.2 you removed depends_aarch64=("libcurl-openssl-1.0") and now you added it again? Why?

ali.molaei commented on 2019-10-27 17:12

@goodpicture I have redownloaded the package using yay AUR-Helper, it successfully reinstalled, are you using an AUR-Helper? If yes, is it keeping any cache? can you clear it's downloaded caches and try again? Is your internet connection fine? The only explanation for me is that the files are not completely downloaded or there is an issue downloading it anyway. Also, can you give me the sha256sum of the downloaded files of yours?

Is there anyone else having the same problem?

goodpicture commented on 2019-10-27 16:39

why cant I install this ? I keep getting "invalid or corrupted package:"

ali.molaei commented on 2019-10-19 07:37

I think the checksums are now correct @monson, thanks

monson commented on 2019-09-04 06:14

@ali.molaei ${CARCH} should not be used in source_x86_64/source_aarch64 because it's based on package system instead of build system when packaging. Please replace it with x86_64/aarch64 respectively, otherwise it will generate wrong checksum by makepkg -g and wrong filename in .SRCINFO .

axedre commented on 2019-08-29 14:28

I need to revert back to mongodb-bin v3.4.x, cause the lack of the --ssl flag is a blocker for me, since I use studio3t v2018.2.0 (and cannot upgrade it, sadly) which expects it in order to use IntelliShell. How would I go about doing it? There is no arch linux archive equivalent for AUR packages, is there? :(

ali.molaei commented on 2019-06-24 14:17

@C0rn3j Ok, in next version I will do it :D Thanks