Search Criteria
Package Details: motionbox-bin 2.0.0.6-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/motionbox-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | motionbox-bin |
Description: | MotionBox is a Video Browser for Motion Freedom |
Upstream URL: | http://omega.gg/MotionBox/ |
Licenses: | GPL3 |
Conflicts: | motionbox |
Provides: | motionbox |
Submitter: | AnoGP |
Maintainer: | AnoGP |
Last Packager: | AnoGP |
Votes: | 3 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2021-02-11 19:10 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-09-16 13:19 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- libidn11
- qt5-base (qt5-base-gitAUR, qt5-base-headlessAUR)
- vlc (vlc-gitAUR, vlc-luajitAUR)
Latest Comments
AnoGP commented on 2021-07-12 19:57 (UTC)
I will looking forward to do this, but in the meantime I changed the validity check to SKIP for the tar.gz as a temporary solution.
Lneux commented on 2021-07-07 22:47 (UTC)
Same issue as the others, validity check invalid, try speaking to the maintainer about your AUR contrib and if he can give you a hand or heads up before each new repackage.
AnoGP commented on 2021-06-11 15:01 (UTC)
Thank you for reporting it, checksum updated.
Dante_Igashu commented on 2021-06-11 12:40 (UTC)
Seems the checksum problem is present again in "MotionBox-1.7.0-0-linux64.tar.gz". THANKS in advance!
"==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!"
Jerror commented on 2021-04-16 17:32 (UTC)
Thanks, all good now.
AnoGP commented on 2021-04-06 08:02 (UTC)
Hi! Checksum updated. Unfortunately the maintainer of this app are repackaging the source quite often without a version number bump and I many times do not notice the change.
Jerror commented on 2021-04-05 23:06 (UTC)
MotionBox-1.6.0-12-linux64.tar.gz fails the sha256sum validity check. Please verify the source file and update PKGBUILD accordingly!