Arch Linux User Repository

To better keep track of problems, I would be grateful if you could report errors on the GitHub repository of this AUR package: https://github.com/neferin12/muse-sounds-manager-aur

If you do not have an account or for any other reason do not want to use GitHub, feel free to post here of course

To better keep track of problems, I would be grateful if you could report errors on the GitHub repository of this AUR package: https://github.com/neferin12/muse-sounds-manager-aur

If you do not have an account or for any other reason do not want to use GitHub, feel free to post here of course

@vvitez I am not able to reproduce that problem on my machine, I will try to do it in a fresh arch install this weekend

If you download and extract the deb file yourself, and then replace /opt/muse-sounds-manager/Muse.Client.Linux with the version in the deb file, it should work fine.

When I try to run it, i get: muse-sounds-manager Failure processing application bundle; possible file corruption. Arithmetic overflow while reading bundle. A fatal error occured while processing application bundle

(I chown 777'd the /srv/muse-hub just in case, but that didn't have anything to do with it i feel)

@jtagcat I do not think that that problem can be solved by me. Muse sounds manager says in its settings that the default location is in the users home directory. I think the /srv/muse-hub path is a relict from the migration from muse-hub to muse-sounds manager. Muse hub used that folder and had the privileges to change the owner, as it was running as root. But muse sounds manager does not, and i do not think that it would be a good idea to add an /srv/muse-hub folder with permissions 666 to the package. I would recommend to temporarily create the folder with the adequate permissions and change the setting when the app opens again (or let it continue to use the folder).

If /srv/muse-hub does not exists, the app crashes to permission errors.

namcap

@aliu Sorry for the late reply, those all sound like valid suggestions, I will have a look at them and integrate them over the next 2-3 days. Regarding the suggested dependencies: they are not listed as dependencies in the .deb file, at least as far as I can see, why should they be added?

Also, minerscale and I agree that the musehub.com TOS seems like the best fit for a license

Since tar is in base, maybe that should be removed as a dependency? Also, should fontconfig, zlib and hicolor-icon-theme be dependencies? And should we use (by moving) the stuff pacman automatically extracts with tar instead of extracting it again?